Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):
  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Received Lab Results - Completely Confused


Lawspike

Recommended Posts

Lawspike Rookie

How in the world did my initial lab work come back negative????

I just picked up a copy of my lab results, still waiting on one result, but here is the lab results so far and biopsy results:

IgA: 58 (ref range: 19 units or less - neg

20-30 units: week positive

30 units or greater:: positive

IgG: 44 (ref range: 19 units or less - neg

20-30 units: week positive

30 units or greater:: positive

Biopsy: Moderate to severe villous blunting with intraepithelial lymphocytosis and mononuclear cell expansion of the lamina propria, most consistent with gluten sensitive enteropathy (sprue).

I CLEARLY have Celiac. So, my question is... what is the point of the initial lab work - especially if it is giving a MAJOR false negative!??

My initial la work is as follows:

Tissue Transglutaminase Antibody, IgA : 12 (ref range 0-19)

It goes on to state:

If Tissue Transglutaminase Ab, IgA is negative, the Endomysial Ab, IgA Titer by IFA is not performed.

IgA antibody against human tTG, if detected at a level greater than 19 units, may suggest the possibility of certain gluten sensitive enteropathies such as celiac disease and dermatitis herpetiformis.

I also had high TP, high ALB, high RBC, low MCV and low FER on initial labwork.. all classic *signs*

I CLEARLY HAVE celiac (as per the biopsy and follow up lab work and I HAVE DH (on head, arms and back).... ) How could I get a false negative when my numbers above are soooo high?!?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



ravenwoodglass Mentor

Thats why I always tell folks to try the diet no matter what the test results. I don't know why false negatives occur but they do and they delayed my diagnosis for a very, very long time as the doctors relied on those false negative tests.

On the good side, now you know and can start healing.

ang1e0251 Contributor

I am no expert on blood work but so-o-o many people comment here how there initial tests are negative that I just have to think that there must high numbers of false negatives. I just really think a better diagnostic test would be much more valuable. How many persons continue to eat gluten damaging their bodies because of these tests?

Lynayah Enthusiast

My first test was negative, too. I didn't know I had to eat gluten for 8 weeks before being tested - doc at the time didn't tell me. I have another test coming up in August. As I wait, I am actually afraid the next test will come back neg., too -- possibly because the doc hasn't asked me to eat enough gluten each day in prep. I know I have either gluten-intolorance or celiac disease -- no doubt. I just thank goodness for this forum where I know I am not alone.

I remember reading somewhere that when you have DH - the skin disorder -- they can biopsy the skin to test for celiac disease. Forgive if I missed it in your post (I'm not the best at reading medical "stuff"), but did you have the skin biopsy done?

In the meantime, please know you are not alone. Many of us have been told "negative," only to continue with life thinking we're fine . . . and yet have symptoms, problems, confusion. There is still so much that medical science still needs to learn, perfect or discover. It is up to us to help direct them. Everything happens for a reason, so they say.

Hang in there. Keep using this forum for support.

Sending a big hug,

Lyn

gfb1 Rookie
How in the world did my initial lab work come back negative????

[snip]

I CLEARLY HAVE celiac (as per the biopsy and follow up lab work and I HAVE DH (on head, arms and back).... ) How could I get a false negative when my numbers above are soooo high?!?

as others have said, your case is (sadly) not unusual.

being a diedinthewoolwordparsingacademic, imho, i do disagree that you had a 'false negative'.

blood tests just measure stuff in the blood, and there is a lower limit of detection.

your body, health and wellbeing are much more sensitive to changes in 'state' than any blood test. however, it is exceedingly difficult to trust yourself to know you are, indeed, sick; when you get a printout saying that you are 'negative' or 'normal' (whatever that is...).

in fact, most people feel lousy BEFORE blood tests actually become 'positive'. this is why you feel sick, THEN go to the doctor -- not blood test yourself every month to see if you are BECOMING sick....

:)

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      133,340
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Abbyyoung417
    Newest Member
    Abbyyoung417
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.6k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • SilkieFairy
      I realized it is actually important to get an official diagnosis because then insurance can cover bone density testing and other lab work to see if any further damage has been done because of it. Also, if hospitalized for whatever reason, I have the right to gluten-free food if I am officially celiac. I guess it gives me some legal protections. Plus, I have 4 kids, and I really want to know. If I really do have it then they may have increased risk. 
    • par18
      Been off this forum for years. Is it that important that you get an official diagnosis of something? It appears like you had a trigger (wheat, gluten, whatever) and removing it has resolved your symptom. I can't speak for you, but I had known what my trigger was (gluten) years before my diagnosis I would just stay gluten-free and get on with my symptom free condition. I was diagnosed over 20 years ago and have been symptom free only excluding wheat, rye and barley. I tolerate all naturally gluten free whole foods including things like beans which actually helps to form the stools. 
    • trents
      No coincidence. Recent revisions to gluten challenge guidelines call for the daily consumption of at least 10g of gluten (about the amount in 4-6 slices of wheat bread) for a minimum of 3 weeks. If possible, I would extend that two weeks to ensure valid testing.
    • SilkieFairy
      Thank you both for the replies. I decided to bring back gluten so I can do the blood test. Today is Day #2 of the Challenge. Yesterday I had about 3 slices of whole wheat bread and I woke up with urgent diarrhea this morning. It was orange, sandy and had the distinctive smell that I did not have when I was briefly gluten free. I don't know if it's a coincidence, but the brain fog is back and I feel very tired.   
    • knitty kitty
      @Jane02, I hear you about the kale and collard greens.  I don't do dairy and must eat green leafies, too, to get sufficient calcium.  I must be very careful because some calcium supplements are made from ground up crustacean shells.  When I was deficient in Vitamin D, I took high doses of Vitamin D to correct the deficiency quickly.  This is safe and nontoxic.  Vitamin D level should be above 70 nmol/L.  Lifeguards and indigenous Pacific Islanders typically have levels between 80-100 nmol/L.   Levels lower than this are based on amount needed to prevent disease like rickets and osteomalacia. We need more thiamine when we're physically ill, emotionally and mentally stressed, and if we exercise like an athlete or laborer.  We need more thiamine if we eat a diet high in simple carbohydrates.  For every 500 kcal of carbohydrates, we need 500-1000 mg more of thiamine to process the carbs into energy.  If there's insufficient thiamine the carbs get stored as fat.  Again, recommended levels set for thiamine are based on minimum amounts needed to prevent disease.  This is often not adequate for optimum health, nor sufficient for people with absorption problems such as Celiac disease.  Gluten free processed foods are not enriched with vitamins like their gluten containing counterparts.  Adding a B Complex and additional thiamine improves health for Celiacs.  Thiamine is safe and nontoxic even in high doses.  Thiamine helps the mitochondria in cells to function.  Thiamine interacts with each of the other B vitamins.  They are all water soluble and easily excreted if not needed. Interesting Reading: Clinical trial: B vitamins improve health in patients with coeliac disease living on a gluten-free diet https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19154566/ Safety and effectiveness of vitamin D mega-dose: A systematic review https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34857184/ High dose dietary vitamin D allocates surplus calories to muscle and growth instead of fat via modulation of myostatin and leptin signaling https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38766160/ Safety of High-Dose Vitamin D Supplementation: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31746327/ Vitamins and Celiac Disease: Beyond Vitamin D https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11857425/ Investigating the therapeutic potential of tryptophan and vitamin A in modulating immune responses in celiac disease: an experimental study https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40178602/ Investigating the Impact of Vitamin A and Amino Acids on Immune Responses in Celiac Disease Patients https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10814138/
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.