Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):
    GliadinX



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):
    GliadinX


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

How Is A False Negative Possible? (if It Looks Like A Duck...)


Tim86

Recommended Posts

Tim86 Apprentice

You've heard the expression...if it looks like a duck, swims like a duck, and quacks like a duck, then it's a duck. But what if it looks like a duck, swims like a duck, but clucks like a chicken? It's still probably a duck, but why does it cluck?

I've read many examples on this website of people who were clearly positive for Celiac, based on their experiences with gluten-free diets, and sometimes biopsy results, but their blood test results were negative. Assuming they had been consuming sufficient amounts of gluten at the time of testing, then how is this possible? How could all of their blood results be "normal" even though other evidence proves they have Celiac? I just don't understand. Please be specific and objective. I'm not looking for emotional responses here. I'd like a somewhat scientific explanation, if possible.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Little Northern Bakehouse
Daura Damm



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):
Food for Life


Generic Apprentice

I can't give a scientific explanation, but some people just don't make the antibodies. I am example of this and so is my dad. He has rhuematoid arthritis SP?. A-typical polymyalgia and most likely Celiac, too but doesn't show it on any blood work. Other than the fact that his bloodwork is negative he has all the symptoms/damage.

There a few people on here who can give a more scientific explanation.

Korwyn Explorer
You've heard the expression...if it looks like a duck, swims like a duck, and quacks like a duck, then it's a duck. But what if it looks like a duck, swims like a duck, but clucks like a chicken? It's still probably a duck, but why does it cluck?

I've read many examples on this website of people who were clearly positive for Celiac, based on their experiences with gluten-free diets, and sometimes biopsy results, but their blood test results were negative. Assuming they had been consuming sufficient amounts of gluten at the time of testing, then how is this possible? How could all of their blood results be "normal" even though other evidence proves they have Celiac? I just don't understand. Please be specific and objective. I'm not looking for emotional responses here. I'd like a somewhat scientific explanation, if possible.

It doesn't have anything to do necessarily with being IgA deficient, it is just that the blood tests have a low sensitivity (as compared to specificity). Some of the statistics I've seen are as high as 80%. My doctor told me that she has never seen a positive blood work up come back even with some people confirmed later through biopsy. There are a lot of reasons having to do with individual immune system function, diet, enviornmental chemistry, other physiologic and immunologic issues, and the labs themselves. To be blunt, some labs just seem to do crappy workups.

Tim86 Apprentice

Does anyone else have some ideas on this? I know there are a lot of smart people out there who could chime in! ;)

Jestgar Rising Star

The tests for Celiac are based on production of antibodies to a specific region of gluten. They take your blood, put it on a plate with these specific sequences stuck to it, and then wash off your blood to see what stuck. If your body made antibodies to a slightly different region of the protein, your antibodies won't stick to the plate, and you will test negative.

The tests are designed to pick up MOST people's response, they won't pick up all.

Another Undiagnosed Newbie

I am so confused right now. A little over a year ago my doctor suspected I had Celiac due to a host of digestive issues, so I had the biopsy and the blood test. I recall being told that the biopsy was normal, but the doctor wanted me to get the blood test anyway (which makes me question if the biopsy was TOTALLY normal). Well, the blood test came back negative.

Recently I've been having all sorts of weird neurological stuff going on: tingling, twiching, occasional tremors. I also have all the frequent digestive complaints that I'm sure you all can figure out without me going into detail. I'm going to a neuro soon to rule out Multiple Sclerosis, but I've also heard Celiac can cause similar symptoms. To add to my suspicion, someone in my immediate family was recently positively diagnosed with Celiac. Is there any chance that, even after a biopsy and a blood test, maybe I do in fact have it? I am sort of hoping it is the case because even though it is a tough thing to live with, in my case it beats the alternative. Thanks everyone.

nasalady Contributor
I am so confused right now. A little over a year ago my doctor suspected I had Celiac due to a host of digestive issues, so I had the biopsy and the blood test. I recall being told that the biopsy was normal, but the doctor wanted me to get the blood test anyway (which makes me question if the biopsy was TOTALLY normal). Well, the blood test came back negative.

Recently I've been having all sorts of weird neurological stuff going on: tingling, twiching, occasional tremors. I also have all the frequent digestive complaints that I'm sure you all can figure out without me going into detail. I'm going to a neuro soon to rule out Multiple Sclerosis, but I've also heard Celiac can cause similar symptoms. To add to my suspicion, someone in my immediate family was recently positively diagnosed with Celiac. Is there any chance that, even after a biopsy and a blood test, maybe I do in fact have it? I am sort of hoping it is the case because even though it is a tough thing to live with, in my case it beats the alternative. Thanks everyone.

I had all of the same neuro symptoms you describe along with the gastro symptoms as well. I went to a neurologist and had an MRI of the brain, which was negative. I began to suspect celiac disease was behind the neuro symptoms because I had run across references to celiac ataxia, etc., in my research.

False negatives are common in both bloodwork and biopsy, so it is definitely possible you do have celiac disease.

I tested negative to both blood work and biopsy for celiac, although I had a good reason for that: I was (still am) on very high doses of prednisone and Imuran (which suppress the immune system) because of my autoimmune hepatitis...my immune system is trying to kill my liver, among many other things. Of course, these drugs suppress the body's ability to make antibodies and allow villi to regenerate in those with celiac disease. However, I still managed to register a "3" (0-5 being "normal" range for that lab) for the presence of the celiac antibodies, despite the drugs.

You didn't say whether or not you have tried the gluten free diet; my response to the diet was dramatic! My frequent headaches, vertigo, hand tremors, peripheral neuropathy, gastric problems, etc. all virtually disappeared or at least diminished on the gluten free diet. That was enough for me! The only issues that I have which have not (yet) resolved on the gluten free diet are those associated with my fibromyalgia and rheumatoid arthritis.

Good luck with everything!

JoAnn


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Little Northern Bakehouse
Holidaily Brewing Co.



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):
Food for Life


nasalady Contributor
I can't give a scientific explanation, but some people just don't make the antibodies. I am example of this and so is my dad. He has rhuematoid arthritis SP?. A-typical polymyalgia and most likely Celiac, too but doesn't show it on any blood work. Other than the fact that his bloodwork is negative he has all the symptoms/damage.

There a few people on here who can give a more scientific explanation.

As Jestgar explained in such helpful detail, some people make more exotic antibodies that just won't show up in the standard tests. I too am seronegative for RA, but you can see the damage on xrays and my fingers are starting to develop the classic nodules at the joints. Even though I'm on prednisone and Imuran... :(

Amyleigh0007 Enthusiast

:lol::lol::lol: I used that exact same expression with my doctor on Monday!! I love it!

He admitted to me that he usually only will diagnose someone with Celiac disease if they have smooth villi. Even with a positive blood test. That is very dangerous and I told him so. He went to med school 30 years ago and that is what he was taught. Perhaps these old school doctors are the reason so many of us go undiagnosed or are diagnosed incorrectly.

momxyz Contributor

To add to the confusion, try searching the board for Fructose Malabsorption.

This entity was pointed out to me recently. It will cause many of the same symptoms that celiac or gluten intolerance do, but the mechanism by which it does so is different.

nasalady Contributor
To add to the confusion, try searching the board for Fructose Malabsorption.

This entity was pointed out to me recently. It will cause many of the same symptoms that celiac or gluten intolerance do, but the mechanism by which it does so is different.

Lyme Disease mimics celiac too. But you won't generally find the antibodies or the gene markers for celiac disease if it's Fructose Malabsorption or Lyme. And you won't have problems with other autoimmune diseases developing with the mimics either. :)

elye Community Regular
Is there any chance that, even after a biopsy and a blood test, maybe I do in fact have it? I am sort of hoping it is the case because even though it is a tough thing to live with, in my case it beats the alternative.

My husband had all of the classic symptoms of gluten intolerance/celiac, and a brother who was diagnosed three years ago. DH had a negative blood panel and a negative biopsy. He sprung for the enterolab stool test, and lo and behold, there were the antibodies - - lots of them. As well, there was a great deal of fat in the stool, another strong indicator of malabsorption. He immediately went gluten-free, and all of his symptoms were gone within a couple of weeks. So I would say that yes, it is definitely possible to have a problem with gluten even though the gold standard tests are telling you otherwise.

Generic Apprentice

Ok, I guess my dad and I make "exotic antibodies". Works for me.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
    Little Northern Bakehouse



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      129,960
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    PMcCauley
    Newest Member
    PMcCauley
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
    GliadinX


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.3k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
    GliadinX




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
    Holidaily Brewing Co.



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Wheatwacked
      Hello @CeliacNew, If you are Vegan to help you feel better, reconsider returning to omnivore.  Actually, since you are already on a very restrictive diet, transitioning to gluten free might be easier for you.  Read the ingredient labels, Particularly vitamin D and Choline require supplements for vegan diet because our primary source is sun, eggs and beef.  B12 also.
    • Wheatwacked
      Once you've completed testing and still don't have improvement, start a trial gluten free diet.  Looking for imprvement that may indicate Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity, which is 10 times more prevalent than Celiac Disease. Deficiencies in vitamins B6, B12, D, and C can manifest as skin rashes.  Virtual guaranty you are deficient in vitamin D.
    • cameo674
      So those rs numbers tell researchers where the dbSNP is located in a Genome so that other reasearchers or an AI system can look in that specific spot for that Snip of information.  You can look those rs # s by pasting the numbers after rs into the lookup on this page https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/snp/ right under the Blue header bar at the top of the webpage.  Since you are not a researcher, I do not know how this will help you though.
    • cameo674
      So I posted here once before, and everyone advocated that I get into a GI doc.  I finally got into my functional health appointment on 6/16 to get my blood results evaluated and get the Gastro referral. I was told that I would be fortunate to see a gastro doctor by December, because of the number of people waiting to get in, but they did believe that I needed to see a GI doc among others.  Well, the stars aligned. I got home. I looked at MyChart and it showed an appointment available for later that same day. I never clicked so fast on an appointment time. The gastro doc ran some additional blood work based off the December values that had confirmed my daughter's suspicion that I have undiagnosed stomach issues.  Gastro has also scheduled me to get an upper endoscopy as well as a colonoscopy since it has been 8 years since my last one. She said it would rule out other concerns if I did not show Celiac per the biopsies.  Those biopsies will not occur until August 29th and like everyone here stated, Gastro wants me to keep gluten in my diet exactly as everyone suggested. To be honest, I was barely eating any gluten since I figured I would have plenty of time to do so before testing.  Doc is also looking for the cause of the low level heartburn that I have had for 30 years.  I have mentioned the heartburn to PCPs in the past and they always said take a tums or other OTC drug.  The upper endoscopy is for ruling out eosinphilic esophagitis, h. pylori, and to biopsy the duodenal bulb and second portion to confirm or exclude celiac. The colonoscopy will have random biopsies to rule out microscopic colitis. I didn't really catch her reasoning for the bloodwork.  Doc looked at the December numbers and said they were definitely concerning for Celiac.  She also said, “Hmm that’s odd; usually it’s the reverse”, but I did not catch which result made her say that. She seems very through.  She also asked why I had never bothered to see a GI before.  To be honest, I told her I just assumed that the heartburn and loose stool were a part of aging.  I have been gassy since I was born and thought constantly passing gas was normal?  Everyone I know with Celiac have horrible symptoms that cannot be attributed to other things.  They are in a lot of stomach pain.  I do not go through that.  I attribute my issues to the lactose intolerance that comes with aging, but have slowly been eliminating foods from my diet due to the heartburn or due my assumption that they did not agree with a medication that I was prescribed. I have already eliminated milk products especially high fat ones like ice cream; fats like peanut butter; acids like citrus and tomatoes; chocolate in all forms; and breads more because it is so hard to get in 100 grams of protein if I eat any foods that are not a protein.  I would not have even done the testing if my daughter had not brought up the fact that she thought I might have an undiagnosed condition since she has issues with bloating and another sibling has periodic undiagnosed stomach pain that GI docs throw pills at instead of helping.  Who knew that Bristol scale 5 and 6 were not considered normal especially multiple times a day? I watched my MIL go through basically the same bowel changes starting at 50 so to be honest, I really did think it was normal before this week's appointment.   December 2024's blood tests ran through Quest Labs were:  Deamidated Gliadin (IgA) 53.8 U/mL Above range >15.0 U/mL; Deamidated Gliadin (IgG) >250.0 U/mL Above Range >15.0 U/mL; Tissue Transglutaminase (IgA) 44.0 U/mL Above range >15.0 U/mL; Tissue Transglutaminase (IgG) <1.0 In range <15.0; Immunoglobulin A (IgA) 274 mg/dL In range 47-310 mg/dL 6/16/25 bloodwork:  Until today, I did not really know what all the four tubes of blood were for and since I did not understand the results, I got into the clinical notes to see what was ordered, but it did not exactly explain why for everything. Immunoglobulins IGG, IGA, IGM all came back in range:  IGG 1,010 mg/dL In range 600-1,714; IgA 261 mg/dL In range 66-433 mg/dL; IGM 189 mg/dL In range 45-281.  How do these numbers help with diagnosis? Google says she checked these to see if I have an ongoing infection? I do have Hashimoto's and she did say once you have one autoimmune disease others seem to follow. Celiac Associated HLD-DQ Typing: DQA1* Value: 05; DQA1*DQA11 Value: 05; DQB1* Value: 02; DQB1-DQB11 Value: 02; Celiac Gene Pairs Present Value: Yes; Celiac HLA Interpretation Value: These genes are permissive for celiac disease.  However, these genes can also be present in the normal population. Testing performed by SSOP.  So google failed me.  I think these results basically say I have genes, but everybody has these genes so this test was just to confirm that there is a vague possibility?  Maybe this test result explains why I do not have the horrible symptoms most individuals with celiac have?  I told the GI my assumption is that I am just gluten intolerant since I do not have the pain? So maybe this test explains why I have antibodies? Comprehensive Metabolic Panel: Everything was in the middle of the normal range.  Google says this just says I am metabolically healthy. Tissue Transglutaminase ABS test results – Done by the Mayo Clinic’s Labs –  T-Transglutaminase IGA AB --Value: 3.1 U/mL – Normal Value is <4.0 (negative) U/mL; Tissue Transglutaminase, IgG -- Value: 15.3 U/mL High -- Normal Value is <6.0 (Negative) U/mL – Interpretation Positive (>9.0) – These are the only labs the GI did that have been labeled Abnormal.  I am confused at how/why these came back different than the December labs? Because these numbers seem to be the opposite of what the were in December and I know I have eaten less gluten.  They were definitely measured differently and had different ranges. This must be why she said they are usually opposite? Molecular Stool Parasite Panel said I was Negative for Giardia Lamblia by PCR; Entamoeba Histolytica by PCR and Cryptosporidium Parvum/Hominis by PCR.  So at least I do not need to do a parasite cleanse like everyone on TikTok seems to be doing. So I guess, I am just really asking why the Tissue Transglutaminase numbers are different.  Was it because they were truly different tests? Is it because I have not consumed the crazy amount of gluten one is suppose to eat prior to testing? To be honest, I thought that was only for the biopsy testing. I generally only eat twice a day, and the thought of eating the equivalent of 6 slices of bread is daunting. Even in my youth, I probably only consumed the equivalent of maybe 3 slices a day. Like I said before, now I usually focus on trying to eat 60 gram of protein.  I am suppose to consume 100 grams, but have failed to succeed. I will focus on eating gluten starting in July now that I know my procedure date.
    • Scott Adams
      I agree with @trents and wiping down the spot you eat your lunch, and eating the food your brought from home should be safe for even sensitive celiacs. Gluten can jump on your food, so it would likely better better for you to continue eating where you prefer.
×
×
  • Create New...