Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

What Proportion / Percentage Of Foods Are Gluten?


justinclarke

Recommended Posts

justinclarke Newbie

Hi,

I'm trying to figure out whether I am intollerant to gluten or not and I was looking down the "Unsafe Gluten-Free Food List (Unsafe Ingredients)" article (https://www.celiac.com/articles/182/1/Unsaf...ents/Page1.html) and wondering exactly how much gluten is in the foods / ingredients listed there.

Take for example plain old wheat flour, how much gluten is in that? 95%, 50%, 30% gluten?

How about Pasta, is that 80% gluten? 15% gluten?

How about Couscous, is that 90% gluten? 30% gluten?

Also something like Teriyaki Sauce, is that 40% gluten? 5% gluten? As obviously you only consume a small amount of Teriyaki Sauce compared to Pasta or Couscous so the different amounts of gluten in each would be helpful to know.

For example if Teriyaki Sauce is only 5% gluten then maybe this is still ok to consume for most sufferers compared to if it was 95% gluten.

So does anyone know the percentage of gluten that are in the foods / ingredients on that list, and can add that alongside those foods / ingredients?

Thanks, Justin.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



darlindeb25 Collaborator

I honestly do not think anyone has figured that out. If you are gluten intolerant, any gluten is too much gluten. Anything made with flour..breads, pasta, crackers, cookies, cakes...all has too much gluten. As far as that goes, "gluten free" labeled foods have too much gluten for lots of gluten intolerant people. The US doesn't actually have a standard set, they do say anything with less than 20ppm of gluten is ok...but, that is debatable. Not eveyone can handle 20ppm, or 100ppm, or even 5ppm.

Jestgar Rising Star

Echoing what Deb said, I think most people will tell you that even a tiny bit makes them feel ill, so it doesn't really matter what the percentage is.

ravenwoodglass Mentor

I agree with the others, any amount is too much. With celiac it is not the amount of gluten consumed that makes us sick it is the antibody reaction that it causes. Those antibodies are activated with even a tiny amount of a gluten grain.

justinclarke Newbie

OK thanks for your answers. I was just thinking that there were different levels of sensitivity etc. So if you ate 1 biscuit you may be fine, but then if you ate a whole packet, then that would be too much to handle.

I guess I haven't got a gluten intolerance then as I can eat foods with gluten in and have no reaction. but then sometimes I eat a random meal and I get the same symptoms as celiac disease. I will have to keep searching to the source of my problems!

Thanks.

  • 4 years later...
robertfarquharson Newbie

Hi,

I'm trying to figure out whether I am intollerant to gluten or not and I was looking down the "Unsafe Gluten-Free Food List (Unsafe Ingredients)" article (https://www.celiac.com/articles/182/1/Unsaf...ents/Page1.html) and wondering exactly how much gluten is in the foods / ingredients listed there.

Take for example plain old wheat flour, how much gluten is in that? 95%, 50%, 30% gluten?

How about Pasta, is that 80% gluten? 15% gluten?

How about Couscous, is that 90% gluten? 30% gluten?

Also something like Teriyaki Sauce, is that 40% gluten? 5% gluten? As obviously you only consume a small amount of Teriyaki Sauce compared to Pasta or Couscous so the different amounts of gluten in each would be helpful to know.

For example if Teriyaki Sauce is only 5% gluten then maybe this is still ok to consume for most sufferers compared to if it was 95% gluten.

So does anyone know the percentage of gluten that are in the foods / ingredients on that list, and can add that alongside those foods / ingredients?

Thanks, Justin.

Yes, this is my question too. All answers so far mention cases for those who are completely gluten intolerant. In my case I just want to cut down on gluten intake, so I would like to make an informed desision. With percentages or PPM count of different products this would be possible. So far I have not seen an answer for this. As Darlindeb25 said, maybe there just are no records of this. With all the hype about gluten you'd think some scientist could give gluten ratings on different products. For example, I would like to rate regular oats (yes-contaminated as they are called) agains rye, barley and wheat. If wheat were 30% gluten and contaminated oats were 1% then I would know that I could eat 30 times more oats for the wheat I eliminate from my diet. Can anyone help with this info?

 

Thanks, Rob

psawyer Proficient

Rob, this topic is more that four years old, and those who participated in it back then have mostly moved on.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



GFinDC Veteran

Hi Rob,

 

In the USA, an easy way to get a rough idea of the preponderance of gluten in a product is to look at the ingredient list.  The ingredients are listed in descending order with the largest amount first.  So if wheat flour is the first ingredient you can figure the product is mostly wheat flour (gluten).  Another simple way to look at it is that most baked goods, breads, cookies, pizza etc are very high gluten content.  They are made from flour so that 's easy to figure.

 

If you are just trying to cut down, look for products where wheat, rye, barley or malt are among the last ingredients listed.  Or are not listed at all.  Whole foods are a good way  to go for naturally gluten-free foods.  Versus processed foods which often have gluten as fillers or binding or emulsifying agents.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,034
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    CE1963
    Newest Member
    CE1963
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Jmartes71
      Thankyou so much for your words.Its a hard battle when a supposed well known hospital whose celiac " specialist " has down played me because my colon looks fine and put it in my medical and so pcp doesn't take seriously. In their eyes we all carry that gene.Im having alot of bad days trying to be positive because of it.
    • Scott Adams
      Your experience is both shocking and critically important for the community to hear, underscoring the terrifying reality that cross-contamination can extend into the most unexpected and invasive medical devices. It is absolutely devastating that you had to endure six months of sickness and ultimately sustain permanent vision loss because a doctor dismissed your legitimate, life-altering condition. Your relentless research and advocacy, from discovering the gluten in MMA acrylic to finding a compassionate prosthodontist, is a testament to your strength in a system that often fails celiac patients. While the scientific and medical consensus is that gluten cannot be absorbed through the skin or eyes (as the molecules are too large to pass through these barriers), your story highlights a terrifying gray area: what about a substance *permanently implanted inside the body*, where it could potentially shed microparticles or cause a localized immune reaction? Your powerful warning about acrylic lenses and the drastic difference with the silicone alternative is invaluable information. Thank you for sharing your harrowing journey and the specific, severe neurological symptoms you endure; it is a stark reminder that celiac is a systemic disease, and your advocacy is undoubtedly saving others from similar trauma.
    • Scott Adams
      Those are driving distance from me--I will try to check them out, thanks for sharing!
    • Scott Adams
      I am so sorry you're going through this bad experience--it's difficult when your own lived reality of cause and effect is dismissed by the very professionals meant to help you. You are absolutely right—your violent physical reactions are not "what you think," but undeniable data points, and it's a form of medical gaslighting to be told otherwise, especially when you have a positive HLA-DQ2 gene and a clear clinical picture. Since your current "celiac specialist" is not addressing the core issue or your related conditions like SIBO and chronic fatigue, it may be time for a strategic pivot. Instead of trying to "reprove" your celiac disease to unwilling ears, consider seeking out a new gastroenterologist or functional medicine doctor, and frame the conversation around managing the complications of a confirmed gluten-free diet for celiac disease. Go in and say, "I have celiac disease, am strictly gluten-free, but I am still suffering from these specific complications: SIBO, chronic fatigue, dermatological issues, and high blood pressure linked to pain. I need a partner to help me address these related conditions." This shifts the focus from a debate about your diagnosis to a collaborative plan for your current suffering, which is the help you truly need and deserve to work toward bouncing back.
    • NanCel
      Hello, no I had to have them re done and then used a liner over the top.  Many dentists are not aware of the celiac effects.  Best of luck.   There is other material, yet, very expensive.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.