Jump to content

  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):

    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Is Gluten Challenge Worth It To Get Diagnosis For School?

Chakra2

Recommended Posts

Chakra2 Contributor
Chakra2
Posted

Here's a question for moms of school-aged kids:

Without knowing anything about celiac disease, in January I took my 2 year

old (and myself) off gluten, dairy, soy and a few other things to

try to fix his nightwaking, eczema and diarrhea. Both of us got

great results on the diet, and the more I read about celiac the more

I thought it matched up with the variety of health issues I've had and

my relatives have had.

Now I'm trying to decide whether or not to do a gluten challenge with

my son to work on an official diagnosis. Right now it doesn't seem

worth it -- I control his food choices, eating gluten-free/DF/SF hasn't been that big

a deal, he's growing, happy, and 95% symptom-free.

But I did wonder about the value of an official diagnosis for school, or

even just for helping family and friends take the diet seriously on

down the line.

Could some of you let me know your experiences with having or not

having an official diagnosis for your kids? Does a diagnosis matter more

as kids get older?

And as a 2nd issue -- any thoughts on a good age for a gluten challenge?

Thanks!

Chakra2

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


RoseTapper Newbie
RoseTapper
Posted

To be frank, I personally feel that gluten challenges are very dangerous to one's health. No matter what the reason (school or to prove something to an insurance company), I don't think it's worth the damage that can potentially be done by a challenge. Once you've chosen a gluten-free lifestyle, your body can react quite badly to the sudden introduction of gluten if you have celiac. To give you an example, after I'd been on a gluten-free diet for two years, I inadvertently ingested gluten. The result was that I had to receive iron intravenously for the next two years due to the damage to my intestinal lining. I was very, very careful afterward, but then I inadvertently ingested gluten about four months ago. Two months later, both of my feet suffered multiple stress fractures--just from standing! Apparently, I'm now having trouble absorbing calcium.

I can understand why you would want "proof," but when it comes right down to it, what's more important: your child's (and your) health...or ??

dilettantesteph Collaborator
dilettantesteph
Posted

My son was diagnosed at age 10 by response to diet. His doctor sends notes to the school based on this and they comply. He didn't need a gluten challenge/biopsy.

CeliacMom2008 Enthusiast
CeliacMom2008
Posted

I would not do the challenge if it were my son. And as for "proof," with all of the health care changes and insurance issues, I would avoid it with a ten foot pole. If he's thriving on a gluten-free diet, stay with it. Neither of my son's schools ever asked for any proof of his diagnosis. If you aren't insisting the cafeteria feed him I would see no reason they need anything, and I would never have him eat the cafeteria food so for us it wouldn't matter.

If you do decide to do it, I would do it as soon as possible. From what I've read the longer you're off gluten the harder the symptoms can be if glutened. But again, I would never, could never, absolutely would not gluten my kiddo just to prove to someone he gets sick from it. No way!

Chakra2 Contributor
Chakra2
Posted
  • Author

Thank you for the responses. They are giving me a lot to think about.

His pediatrician has suggested a gluten challenge but the idea does seem

illogical to me. Hope hubby and I can agree on what to do!

polarbearscooby Explorer
polarbearscooby
Posted

I've been wondering the same thing, my Doctor just diagnosed me based on my symptoms and such and never did any blood work, or a biopsy...And the more I've read things on this site about 'official' diagnosis I wonder if later on down the road I might need one? I can't imagine going back on gluten whenever I get glutened now the pain is unbearable.... So for right now I've decided to stick with the Doctor's diagnosis and the diet :)

T.H. Community Regular
T.H.
Posted

You could always save up and pay for a prometheus test for the celiac gene later, too. He doesn't need to go on a gluten challenge for it to work, and with a positive gene plus his response to a gluten free diet, I'm sure you would be able to find a doctor somewhere - might be a different one than now - who would give him a positive diagnosis from that. :)

Thank you for the responses. They are giving me a lot to think about.

His pediatrician has suggested a gluten challenge but the idea does seem

illogical to me. Hope hubby and I can agree on what to do!

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


scarlett77 Apprentice
scarlett77
Posted

It is funny that you ask this as I myself am struggling with a similar situation. I really appreciate the responses since they are completely in line with my logic. My oldest son went through the blood work and endoscopy and got a diagnosis. At the time though we weren't entirely sure what the problem was. Our household went gluten-free which includes my youngest son. I'm getting pressure from my Pediatrician and GI to get my youngest tested after 18 months. I don't think it is necessary if we already eat gluten-free. I don't really want to put another child through a challenge let alone an endoscopy.

kbtoyssni Contributor
kbtoyssni
Posted

You could keep looking around for a doctor who will write you a diagnosis based on dietary response so you don't have to do a challenge. That's probably safer than purposely feeding the kiddo gluten.

ravenwoodglass Mentor
ravenwoodglass
Posted

You could always save up and pay for a prometheus test for the celiac gene later, too. He doesn't need to go on a gluten challenge for it to work, and with a positive gene plus his response to a gluten free diet, I'm sure you would be able to find a doctor somewhere - might be a different one than now - who would give him a positive diagnosis from that. :)

The only problem with doing the gene tests is that if he happens to have one of the celiac related genes other than DQ2 or DQ8 you most likely be told that he is not celiac. We had that happen to my DD after she was positive with both blood and biopsy. As a college student she was overjoyed to go back to gluten and now considers all her symptoms to be stress related.

CeliacMom2008 Enthusiast
CeliacMom2008
Posted

The only problem with doing the gene tests is that if he happens to have one of the celiac related genes other than DQ2 or DQ8 you most likely be told that he is not celiac. We had that happen to my DD after she was positive with both blood and biopsy. As a college student she was overjoyed to go back to gluten and now considers all her symptoms to be stress related.

Ravenwoodglass, so is your daughter now symptom free with negative blood tests?

ravenwoodglass Mentor
ravenwoodglass
Posted

Ravenwoodglass, so is your daughter now symptom free with negative blood tests?

No she is not symptom free. As far as I know she hasn't had any more testing as she has a high stress job now and she considers the gene test to be conclusive and any symptoms she has are attributed to stress. It breaks my heart but there is nothing I can do as she will not discuss any health related issues with me. She does discuss them with her brother though which is how I know she is still symptomatic.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):



    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):



  • Recent Activity

    1. trents
      - trents replied to Roses8721's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      8

      GI DX celiac despite neg serology and no biopsy

      Certainly, it would b wise to have a gene test done if your physician is open to it as it would provide some more data to understand what's going on. But keep in mind that the genetic test for celiac disease cannot be used as to diagnose celiac disease, only to establish the potential to develop active celiac disease. About 40% of the general population possess...
    2. Roses8721
      - Roses8721 posted a topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      0

      gluten-free Oatmeal

      Had Quaker gluten-free oatmeal last night and my stomach is a mess today. NO flu but def stomach stuff. Anyone else?
    3. Roses8721
      - Roses8721 replied to Roses8721's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      8

      GI DX celiac despite neg serology and no biopsy

      So you would be good with the diagnosis and not worry to check genetics etc etc? Appreciate your words!
    4. Scott Adams
      - Scott Adams replied to Ginger38's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      5

      Shingles - Could It Be Related to Gluten/ Celiac

      As recommended by @Flash1970, you may want to get this: https://www.amazon.com/Curist-Lidocaine-Maximum-Strength-Topical/dp/B09DN7GR14/
    5. Scott Adams
      - Scott Adams replied to Xravith's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      3

      Challenges eating gluten before biopsy

      For those who will likely remain gluten-free for life anyway due to well-known symptoms they have when eating gluten, my general advice is to ignore any doctors who push to go through a gluten challenge to get a formal diagnosis--and this is especially true for those who have severe symptoms when they eat gluten. It can take months, or even years to recover...
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):


  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,474
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748
    Silk tha Shocker
    Newest Member
    Silk tha Shocker
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):



  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):

  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      GI DX celiac despite neg serology and no biopsy

      By trents · Posted

      Certainly, it would b wise to have a gene test done if your physician is open to it as it would provide some more data to understand what's going on. But keep in mind that the genetic test for celiac disease cannot be used as to diagnose celiac disease, only to establish the potential to develop active celiac disease. About 40% of the general population possess one or both of the primary genes known to be associated with the development of active celiac disease but only about 1% of the population actually develop active celiac disease. So, the gene test is an effective "rule out" tool but not an effective diagnostic tool.
    • Roses8721
      gluten-free Oatmeal

      By Roses8721 · Posted

      Had Quaker gluten-free oatmeal last night and my stomach is a mess today. NO flu but def stomach stuff. Anyone else?
    • Roses8721
      GI DX celiac despite neg serology and no biopsy

      By Roses8721 · Posted

      So you would be good with the diagnosis and not worry to check genetics etc etc? Appreciate your words!
    • Scott Adams
      Shingles - Could It Be Related to Gluten/ Celiac

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      As recommended by @Flash1970, you may want to get this: https://www.amazon.com/Curist-Lidocaine-Maximum-Strength-Topical/dp/B09DN7GR14/
    • Scott Adams
      Challenges eating gluten before biopsy

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      For those who will likely remain gluten-free for life anyway due to well-known symptoms they have when eating gluten, my general advice is to ignore any doctors who push to go through a gluten challenge to get a formal diagnosis--and this is especially true for those who have severe symptoms when they eat gluten. It can take months, or even years to recover from such a challenge, so why do this if you already know that gluten is the culprit and you won't be eating it anyway?  Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If your symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet it would likely signal NCGS--but those in this group will usually have negative tests, or at best, elevated antibodies that don't reach the level of official positive. Unfortunately test results for celiac disease are not always definitive, and many errors can be made when doing an endoscopy for celiac disease, and they can happen in many ways, for example not collecting the samples in the right areas, not collecting enough samples, or not interpreting the results properly and giving a Marsh score.  Many biopsy results can also be borderline, where there may be certain damage that could be associated with celiac disease, but it just doesn't quite reach the level necessary to make a formal diagnosis. The same is true for blood test results. Over the last 10 years or so a new "Weak Positive" range has been created by many labs for antibody results, which can simply lead to confusion (some doctors apparently believe that this means the patient can decide if they want more testing or to go gluten-free). There is no "Weak Negative" category, for example. Many patients are not told to eat gluten daily, lots of it, for the 6-8 week period leading up to their blood test, nor asked whether or not they've been eating gluten. Some patients even report to their doctors that they've been gluten-free for weeks or months before their blood tests, yet their doctors incorrectly say nothing to them about how this can affect their test, and create false negative results. Many people are not routinely given a total IGA blood test when doing a blood screening, which can lead to false negative interpretations if the patient has low IGA. We've seen on this forum many times that some doctors who are not fully up on how interpret the blood test results can tell patients that the don't need to follow a gluten-free diet or get more testing because only 1 of the 2 or 3 tests done in their panel is positive (wrong!), and the other 1 or 2 tests are negative.  Dermatologists often don't know how to do a proper skin biopsy for dermatitis herpetiformis, and when they do it wrongly their patient will continue to suffer with terrible DH itching, and all the risks associated with celiac disease. For many, the DH rash is the only presentation of celiac disease. These patients may end up on strong prescriptions for life to control their itching which also may have many negative side effects, for example Dapsone. Unfortunately many people will continue to suffer needlessly and eat gluten due to these errors in performing or interpreting celiac disease tests, but luckily some will find out about non-celiac gluten sensitivity on their own and go gluten-free and recover from their symptoms. Consider yourself lucky if you've figured out that gluten is the source of your health issues, and you've gone gluten-free, because many people will never figure this out.    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.