Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Negative Test, Normal Ct Scan, Anything I Can Do?


torolf

Recommended Posts

torolf Newbie

Hey all, I


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Emilushka Contributor

It sounds like whatever it is that you have, you can't tolerate gluten. I suggest you take that as reality and just go with it. The tests for Celiac are imperfect. It's worth it to talk with a GI doc to make sure you have the documentation in your chart, but if you're miserable with only a partial serving of breaded shrimp, I think you have your answer.

Please listen to your body. Let your guts heal. I hope you continue to feel wonderful on the gluten-free diet!

torolf Newbie

but if you're miserable with only a partial serving of breaded shrimp, I think you have your answer.

Please listen to your body. Let your guts heal. I hope you continue to feel wonderful on the gluten-free diet!

That's what I'm pretty much gonna end up doing. My parents don't even seem to think I have an issue, which sucks that they apparently don't believe me. :/

Skylark Collaborator

A CT scan does not diagnose celiac disease. If your doctor thinks it does, run screaming and get another doctor! There are blood tests, and an intestinal biopsy done by endoscopy. Hopefully you were tested for total IgA, as in that case the IgA versions of the tests are the correct ones. If you want to continue to follow up for a medical diagnosis, you would need to keep eating gluten and get the endoscopy. There are definitely celiacs with villous damage who do not show positive on the blood tests.

You are pretty obviously gluten intolerant if not celiac, and if you're going to eat a celiac diet it really doesn't matter one way or the other whether you are diagnosed. We don't get any help with the cost of gluten-free foods as folks do in Europe. You are an adult, and you need to make your own decisions about what to eat or not eat. Although it's nice to get validation, it really doesn't matter what your parents think. If gluten makes you sick, the sensible thing is to not eat it.

Emilushka Contributor

That's what I'm pretty much gonna end up doing. My parents don't even seem to think I have an issue, which sucks that they apparently don't believe me. :/

Nobody's perfect, including (obviously) your parents. In this case, I think you know what to do. I wish I could tell you that there's some magical thing you could do to change their minds, but really, it sounds like you just need to keep to the gluten-free diet and ignore them.

Sometimes the only thing you can do is take care of yourself and ignore the nay-sayers. It's OK. You're not alone - you have us!

SGWhiskers Collaborator

I just wanted to clarify that while the assistance with the cost of food may be less here in the US, there is a tax deduction available for us. Save your grocery store receipts and then get a comparison of what it would have cost for the same gluten items. Subtract the difference. If that totals more than 7.5% of your income, it can be used as a tax deduction (not tax credit unfortunatly).

Alternatively:

Deposit funds into your flexible spending health account and that cost difference can be deducted from the account. You don't need to meet the 7.5% standard. Before you deposit funds into the flex spending account, confirm that they honor medically necessary diets such as a gluten free diet in their allowable expenses.

With either of these two options, you will need a letter from your doctor stating celiac and a medically necessary diet.

It's up to you if a serious gluten challenge is worth going through just for the tax deduction. You will probably need to itemize each pancake mix, cereal, and flour if you use the flex spending account. A deduction will be reimbursed at roughly 30% of the cost difference vs a tax credit which is reimbursed at 100%, but is not available to us.

Skylark Collaborator

I just wanted to clarify that while the assistance with the cost of food may be less here in the US, there is a tax deduction available for us. Save your grocery store receipts and then get a comparison of what it would have cost for the same gluten items. Subtract the difference. If that totals more than 7.5% of your income, it can be used as a tax deduction (not tax credit unfortunatly).

In reality, I don't think anyone would spend 7.5% of income on difference between gluten-free and normal foods. It's too much of your paycheck with low income, and too much food to eat with high income. I can see possibly qualifying for the deduction in a year where you had extensive health problems and a lot of other medical bills.

That's good to know about the flexible spending, although I don't have that as a benefit right now.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,685
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    tdouglas2901
    Newest Member
    tdouglas2901
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):




  • Who's Online (See full list)


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      I'd go with a vodka tonic, but that's just me😉
    • Rejoicephd
      That and my nutritionist also said that drinking cider is one of the worst drink choices for me, given that I have candida overgrowth.  She said the combination of the alcohol and sugar would be very likely to worsen my candida problem.  She suggested that if I drink, I go for clear vodka, either neat or with a splash of cranberry.   So in summary, I am giving ciders a rest.  Whether it's a gluten risk or sugars and yeast overgrowth, its just not worth it.
    • Inkie
      Thank you for the information ill will definitely bring it into practice .
    • Scott Adams
      While plain, pure tea leaves (black, green, or white) are naturally gluten-free, the issue often lies not with the tea itself but with other ingredients or processing. Many flavored teas use barley malt or other gluten-containing grains as a flavoring agent, which would be clearly listed on the ingredient label. Cross-contamination is another possibility, either in the facility where the tea is processed or, surprisingly, from the tea bag material itself—some tea bags are sealed with a wheat-based glue. Furthermore, it's important to consider that your reaction could be to other substances in tea, such as high levels of tannins, which can be hard on the stomach, or to natural histamines or other compounds that can cause a non-celiac immune response. The best way to investigate is to carefully read labels for hidden ingredients, try switching to a certified gluten-free tea brand that uses whole leaf or pyramid-style bags, and see if the reaction persists.
    • Scott Adams
      This is a challenging and confusing situation. The combination of a positive EMA—which is a highly specific marker rarely yielding false positives—alongside strongly elevated TTG on two separate occasions, years apart, is profoundly suggestive of celiac disease, even in the absence of biopsy damage. This pattern strongly aligns with what is known as "potential celiac disease," where the immune system is clearly activated, but intestinal damage has not yet become visible under the microscope. Your concern about the long-term risk of continued gluten consumption is valid, especially given your family's experience with the consequences of delayed diagnosis. Since your daughter is now at an age where her buy-in is essential for a gluten-free lifestyle, obtaining a definitive answer is crucial for her long-term adherence and health. Given that she is asymptomatic yet serologically positive, a third biopsy now, after a proper 12-week challenge, offers the best chance to capture any microscopic damage that may have developed, providing the concrete evidence needed to justify the dietary change. This isn't about wanting her to have celiac; it's about wanting to prevent the insidious damage that can occur while waiting for symptoms to appear, and ultimately giving her the unambiguous "why" she needs to accept and commit to the necessary treatment. This article might be helpful. It breaks down each type of test, and what a positive results means in terms of the probability that you might have celiac disease. One test that always needs to be done is the IgA Levels/Deficiency Test (often called "Total IGA") because some people are naturally IGA deficient, and if this is the case, then certain blood tests for celiac disease might be false-negative, and other types of tests need to be done to make an accurate diagnosis. The article includes the "Mayo Clinic Protocol," which is the best overall protocol for results to be ~98% accurate.    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.