Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Enterolab Results - Comment?


Nevadan

Recommended Posts

Nevadan Contributor

I'm new to this gluten thing and would like a little bit of the experences of the other forum members re interpreting my Enterolab results.

Background: I'm male, 60 yrs old, very active and seemingly healthy but with a lifelong problem with intestinal bloat, gas, and constipation. I'm also diagnosed with osteoporosis. Base on the latter I saw an article linking osteo with celiac. I wasn't familiar with celiac at all, but after researching it a bit, I saw my other three symptoms as possibly indicating gluten sensitivity and/or celiac. Therefore I decided to try gluten-free. Within 48 hrs the b, g, and c were gone. I did 3 gluten challenges and each time within 48 hrs b, g, and c were back. Then I decided to submit samples to Enterolab after about 10 days of gluten-free diet. I got the results today:

Fecal Antigliadin IgA 22 units (normal <10)

Fecal Antitissue Transglutaminase IgA 17 units (normal <10)

Fecal Fat Score 84 (normal < 300)

Gene analysis: HLA-DQB1*0602,0602 (equal to DQ1 subtype DQ6, I think)

Their interpretation:

I don't have the genes likely to cause full blown celiac, but do have genes related to gluten sensitivity.

The IgA tests show present negative reaction to gluten.

The fecal fat score does not show any significant malabsorption.

I should avoid gluten lest it lead to real malabsorption in the future.

They recommend that I should stay gluten-free.

Any comments based on experience with gluten sensitivity and Enterolab testing would be appreciated. As usual I'm trying decide how serious my condition is.

Thanks for any comments.

I will be out of town from tomorrow until Sunday, so won't be able to respond to posts until then.

George


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Guest barbara3675

After staying off gluten and seeing positive results, that in itself should tell you that gluten isn't for you. Then with the results you have, you know that you are gluten sensitive, so why risk eating the stuff and take a chance on getting things wrong with you that you don't need to. I did the Enterolab thing and found I have the gene for celiac and am gluten sensitive with some numbers that are slightly higher than yours. I eat gluten-free and feel much better. They also said not to drink cow's milk. Now that I my tummy is all better with the gluten thing, I can take most all cow's milk products that are processed---except I use rice milk on my cereal and soy ice cream rather that regular. Once you get used to eating gluten-free, it really isn't so bad. I think of it as a challenge and something great that I am doing for myself. I sure wish I could do that in respect to my weight. Barbara

KaitiUSA Enthusiast

From those results and you feeling better off of gluten I would say definitely stay off of gluten. You may not have celiac, which causes the damage but you have a gluten intolerance that is causing symptoms.

If you eat gluten and then have symptoms it will pull your immunity down and you may experience other problems so it is in your best interest to stay gluten free.

Carriefaith Enthusiast

From your results, I would say that you have a gluten intolerance or maybe even celiac (Although it is hard to tell since you didn't have a celiac blood test or biopsy). Feeling better on the diet is also another postive result. The fact that you have osteoporosis may indicate malabsorption of Calcium and Vitamin D, If you have celiac this will get better with time. I'm assuming that you are taking supplements, but if not, maybe talk to your doctor about it.

skbird Contributor

I don't have either of the Celiac genes either, and my score was 9 for the IGA and 7 for the Antitissue Transglutaminase but I had been gluten free for 5 months at that point and Dr. Fine at EnteroLab recommended I stay off gluten anyway. I do have a very positive dietary response so that helps.

In fact, I am DQ1 - subtype 6 as well, and that is known to be related to gluten intolerance problems, also gluten ataxia (where gluten consumption affects your central nervous system). Since you are double DQ1 - 6, you are more apt to notice these effects. Some things associated with gluten ataxia are gait issues, peripheral neurapathy, mood disorders, and migraine.

My gastrointestinal symptoms were a lot like your's, though I was beginning to have several bouts a year of diarrhea that would last for a week or two. I have found the longer I'm off of gluten, the more pronounced my reaction to it is - that further reinforces my desire to avoid it.

I think it would be a good idea for you to avoid gluten. It sounds like it makes you feel better and you have test results to back you up. While you are unlikely to ever develop full Celiac (gene result, also you have no malabsorption), that doesn't mean you won't still develop other health issues as your body sees gluten as a poison.

Hope this helps.

Stephanie

Nevadan Contributor

Many thanks to those who replied. All help is appreciated.

I should have been more clear in my original post re my question. First I would not consider going back to gluten - it just feels too good without it. My real question was regarding the interpretation of the Enterolab results, particularly the gene testing in conjunction with the antibody and malabsorption test results. This was the first time I had encountered the "you don't have the specific genes for celiac, but you do have some genes related to gluten sensitivity" Special thanks to skbird for the comments on those genetic results. I've read Danna Korn's "Wheat Free, Worry Free" (which I found very helpful), but I'm still not clear on the differences between the use of the terms gluten alergy, gluten sensitivity, gluten intolerant, and celiac disease as they might relate to relative health risks. I know I should accept the "who cares what you call it, if it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck..." attitude, but I'm a scientist (physicist) by education so I am inclined to want to understand all the nitty-gritty in the results.

Thanks to all again.

George

gf4life Enthusiast

Dr. Fine is the only one who tests for the gluten intolerance genes as far as I know. The other labs only check for the 2 known Celiac genes (DQ2 & DQ8). In my signature you can see which ones my family has and my boys would have come back negative for the genes at any other lab. I am thankful that he is so far advanced in the genetic aspect of gluten intolerance. One of my sons specialists (who is very current on gene studies) say that the genetic study of Celiac Disease is no where near completion. There could be so many more genes responsible for causing a negative reaction to gluten. He is not willing to say my son is definitely NOT Celiac, since he has such an obvious reaction to gluten, and such a dramatic recovery from symptoms on the gluten-free diet...(as have all of the 4 of us in my family on the gluten-free diet)

God bless,

Mariann


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Scott Adams replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      7

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It

    2. - Scott Adams replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results

    3. - deanna1ynne replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results

    4. - cristiana replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      7

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,438
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    rednecksurfer
    Newest Member
    rednecksurfer
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      In the U.S., most regular wheat breads are required to be enriched with certain B-vitamins and iron, but gluten-free breads are not required to be. Since many gluten-free products are not enriched, we usually encourage people with celiac disease to consider a multivitamin.  In the early 1900s, refined white flour replaced whole grains, and people began developing serious vitamin-deficiency diseases: Beriberi → caused by a lack of thiamin (vitamin B1) Pellagra → caused by a lack of niacin (vitamin B3) Anemia → linked to low iron and lack of folate By the 1930s–40s, these problems were common in the U.S., especially in poorer regions. Public-health officials responded by requiring wheat flour and the breads made from it to be “enriched” with thiamin, riboflavin, niacin, and iron. Folic acid was added later (1998) to prevent neural-tube birth defects. Why gluten-free bread isn’t required to be enriched? The U.S. enrichment standards were written specifically for wheat flour. Gluten-free breads use rice, tapioca, corn, sorghum, etc.—so they fall outside that rule—but they probably should be for the same reason wheat products are.
    • Scott Adams
      Keep in mind that there are drawbacks to a formal diagnosis, for example more expensive life and private health insurance, as well as possibly needing to disclose it on job applications. Normally I am in favor of the formal diagnosis process, but if you've already figured out that you can't tolerate gluten and will likely stay gluten-free anyway, I wanted to at least mention the possible negative sides of having a formal diagnosis. While I understand wanting a formal diagnosis, it sounds like she will likely remain gluten-free either way, even if she should test negative for celiac disease (Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If her symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet, it would likely signal NCGS).        
    • JoJo0611
    • deanna1ynne
      Thank you all so much for your advice and thoughts. We ended up having another scope and more bloodwork last week. All serological markers continue to increase, and the doc who did the scope said there villous atrophy visible on the scope — but we just got the biopsy pathology report back, and all it says is, “Duodenal mucosa with patchy increased intraepithelial lymphocytes, preserved villous architecture, and patchy foveolar metaplasia,” which we are told is still inconclusive…  We will have her go gluten free again anyway, but how soon would you all test again, if at all? How valuable is an official dx in a situation like this?
    • cristiana
      Thanks for this Russ, and good to see that it is fortified. I spend too much time looking for M&S gluten-free Iced Spiced Buns to have ever noticed this! That's interesting, Scott.  Have manufacturers ever said why that should be the case?  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.