Jump to content

  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):

    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Importance Of Biopsys

Guest GITRDONE

By Guest GITRDONE
in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease

Recommended Posts

Guest GITRDONE
Guest GITRDONE
Posted

I have read under various topics that alot of you have choosen not to get a biopsy. So I'am wondering how do you know if your intestines are healing and/or do not have any permenant damage? And when should you go back to the doc for another endoscopy??

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


KaitiUSA Enthusiast
KaitiUSA
Posted

tTG and EMA blood tests are the specific ones for detecting damage. Doctors test usually after 6 months to see if the levels have gone down. Usually 3-6 months gluten free will heal damage.If you have not gotten a biopsy and had just positive blood tests then whatever tests were positive should be followed up on to see if levels of them went down. Blood tests are used to measure compliance of the diet.

ianm Apprentice
ianm
Posted

I have never had any of the celiac tests so I don't know for sure what is happening in my gut. What I do know is that I was extremely sick, tired and overweight. I stopped eating gluten and my life underwent a drastic transformation for the better. I don't want any of the tests because I can't afford to get that sick again. I have turned my life around and can't afford to mess it up again. Plus I am a single parent and my son needs me to be as healthy as I possibly can. The gluten free diet is all I can do any way so for me it just isn't worth it to get tested.

Guest nini
Guest nini
Posted

I only had blood tests. No biopsy. I too was very very ill prior to the blood tests definitively dx me with celiac. I don't need to know what's going on in my gut, my general health is so much better than it was. It's not worth it to me to go through a biopsy when I already know what is wrong with me and what fixes it. I personally don't feel that biopsies are necessary.

Carriefaith Enthusiast
Carriefaith
Posted

Every doctor seems to diagnose and deal with celiac disease differently. To diagnose, some just do blood tests, some do blood tests and a biopsy, and few still do the dietary challenge but it has been done.

In my opinon, I don't think that a follow up biopsy is necessay if you are following the diet and feeling better. Very rarely celiacs can get refactory celiac disease where the intestine doesn't heal, that's why I think follow up biopsies are important if you aren't feeling better on the diet.

frenchiemama Collaborator
frenchiemama
Posted

I was diagnosed through bloodwork. My doctor offered to set up a biopsy if I wanted it, but I decided not to. For one thing, the course of treatment doesn't change based on the results of the biopsy. So it would really be telling me only what I already knew, that I have celiac disease. We decided that if I wasn't feeling better in 3 months that I would have one, but I am feeling better and still don't really see the point.

lovegrov Collaborator
lovegrov
Posted

Biopsy diagnosis is still the gold standard and it can also be used to check for any other possible problems. But most doctors don't think a followup biopsy is necessary unless you continue to have problems.

richard

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


julie5914 Contributor
julie5914
Posted

I wanted a diagnosis, and I would have done it if my doctor wanted it for diagnosis. They diagnosed based on blood tests alone though since they were so high and since I had the EMA positive. I was happy because I felt like they were right, I didn't want to wait anymore to start the diet, and it saved me time and money to not have to do the procedure. They will be checking the blood levels in 3 months to check up on me, but I already feel a million times better.

Guest nini
Guest nini
Posted

Richard, according to the latest info I had read, the biopsy is NO LONGER THE GOLD STANDARD. The treatment is the same whether you are dx with blood tests alone, blood tests and biopsy, or dietary challenge...

Pegster Apprentice
Pegster
Posted

My GI Doc also said that the intestinal biopsy was the best diagnostic tool for celiac disease. When she told me this, I had already been gluten-free for six months after a positive biopsy for DH. I asked her why she felt another biopsy would be necessary since I was already on a gluten-free diet. She basically said it was so I could know I have celiac disease "for sure". I decided then that maybe she didn't know as much as the people on this site so I turned down the biopsy. Now I see that maybe I should have one just to check for healing or damage--even though I've been gluten-free for 15 months now. Any thoughts? :blink:

KaitiUSA Enthusiast
KaitiUSA
Posted

Biopsies have been considered the gold standard for diagnosis but that is changing. Blood tests are becoming more sophisticated. The tTG test will be taking place of biopsies in kids coming up in the near future.

Pegster-usually they will want to do a followup 6 months later to see if damage has healed if you had a biopsy to diagnose you.

Diagnosis from blood tests they will do the ones that showed up positive 6 months later to see if levels went down. This is how they test for compliance with the diet.

celiac3270 Collaborator
celiac3270
Posted

How is it not still the gold standard? The EMA isn't going to replace it anytime soon, and the tTG, though good, is not yet at a point where it can fully replace the biopsy.

KaitiUSA Enthusiast
KaitiUSA
Posted

It is still considered the gold standard but that will be changing in the near future.

My GI doctor said " biopsies are so last year" lol...he said that there are better ways for diagnosis without being invasive. I think this will be something that happens in the near future. In some cases biopsies are good when in question though. I am not downplaying biopsies because they can be very useful

Guest nini
Guest nini
Posted

I can't find it right now, but I read several medical journals recently that stated that Biopsies were no longer the gold standard because the diagnostic protocols are changing for celiac. People are presenting with symptoms that are NOT classic celiac symptoms and the biopsies are overlooking gluten intolerance and the genetic predisposition to celiac which leads to full blown celiac damage. In a lot of cases patients have no noticeable damage to the intestines YET, but the more specific blood tests are confirming EARLY Celiac. Why wait till damage is done or is so severe before dx a patient with celiac, when the blood tests clearly show the propensity for this? In children especially, most are too young for a biopsy to show any damage, and even if blood tests are inconclusive, when put on a gluten-free diet the patients respond "miraculously". The risks of an invasive procedure like a biopsy, although small, are still present, such as perforation of the intestinal wall or other such complications.

The medical community is making great strides in celiac research, however, there are so many Dr.s out there still unwilling to dx celiac if someone presents with symptoms other than the classic celiac symptoms. In my case, I was Overweight (despite not being able to keep food in me) and I was initially told it couldn't be Celiac because you ONLY LOSE weight with it. So also, Dr.s are still clinging to the outdated notion that biopsies are the only way to positively dx celiac.

When is a biopsy useful? When Celiac is suspected because of blood or fecal screenings, the diet has been implemented for at least 3 months and there is NO positive dietary response.

Guest GITRDONE
Guest GITRDONE
Posted

YOU ARE ALL AWESOME WHEN IT COMES TO INFORMATION & VALID OPINIONS. SORRY I HAVEN'T RESPONDED EARLIER. MY COMPUTER WAS BEING UNCOPORATIVE

OK, SO MAYBE NOT A BIOPSY, BUT WHAT ABOUT THE ENDYSCOPE??? I WAS MISDX FOR 15+ YEARS. WHEN THEY DID THE FIRST BIOPSY THEY SAID I HAD "COMPLETLY FLAT INTESTINES, WITH NO VISIBLE VILLIA". SO WITH THIS IN MIND, WILL A gluten-free DIET HEAL THE INTESTINES 100%???

:huh: SUSAN

Carriefaith Enthusiast
Carriefaith
Posted
I HAD "COMPLETLY FLAT INTESTINES, WITH NO VISIBLE VILLIA". SO WITH THIS IN MIND, WILL A gluten-free DIET HEAL THE INTESTINES 100%???
A very strict gluten free diet will result in healing of the villi in the small intestine. Only in very rare cases the villi cannot heal.
Guest nini
Guest nini
Posted

Susan, how are your symptoms when you are on the gluten-free diet? Are you feeling better? Is your health improving?

If it is, then that is a pretty good indicator that the villi are healing... If your health hasn't improved at all, and you are 100% gluten-free, then you may want to have another endoscope/biopsy to see what's going on. BUT... if you are feeling better I don't see a reason to do a follow up biopsy. And my Dr. said that a biopsy would only be necessary if I did not get better on the gluten-free diet.

Guest GITRDONE
Guest GITRDONE
Posted

Yes I do feel much better when on a gluten free diet. I have also noticed that when I am exposed that I experince all the symptoms that have mentioned under other topics (fog brain, vomiting, dizzy, the big D, etc). It also seems that the longer you are gluten-free, the harder it hits you when glutened.

Thanks for your comments. Its great to have you guys out there and to know you are not alone.

:) Susan

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):



    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):



  • Recent Activity

    1. trents
      - trents replied to Atl222's topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      1

      Increased intraepithelial lymphocytes after 10 yrs gluten-free

      Welcome to the celiac.com community, @Atl222! Yes, your increased lymphocytes could be in response to oats or it could possibly be cross contamination from gluten that is getting into your diet from some unexpected source but not enough to damage the villi. And I'm certain that increased lymphocytes can be caused by other things besides celiac disease...
    2. Scott Adams
      - Scott Adams replied to Aretaeus Cappadocia's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      1

      Brown Rice Vinegar (organic) from Eden Foods is likely gluten free

      This is a solid, well-reasoned approach. You’re right that “koji” by itself doesn’t indicate gluten status, and the risk really does come down to which grain is used to culture it. The fact that you directly contacted Eden Foods and received a clear statement that their koji is made from rice only, with no wheat or barley, is meaningful due diligence—especia...
    3. Scott Adams
      - Scott Adams replied to wellthatsfun's topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      1

      nothing has changed

      Seven months can still be early in celiac healing, especially if you were mostly asymptomatic to begin with—symptoms like low iron, vitamin D deficiency, nail changes, and hair issues often take much longer to improve because the gut needs time to recover before absorption normalizes. A tTG-IgA of 69 is not “low” in terms of immune activity, and it can t...
    4. Scott Adams
      - Scott Adams commented on knitty kitty's blog entry in Thiamine Thiamine Thiamine
      1

      About Celiac Remission

      This idea comes up often, but it’s important to separate theory from what’s actually supported by evidence. In celiac disease, the immune system does not “forget” gluten in a permanent or reliable way, even after long periods of avoidance, and the celiac genes do not turn off. While antibody levels (like tTG IgA) can normalize on a strict gluten-free diet an...
    5. Scott Adams
      - Scott Adams replied to TheDHhurts's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      2

      need help understanding testing result for Naked Nutrition Creatine please

      Gluten testing is normally reported in ppm (parts per million), which is equivalent to mg/kg, not micrograms by itself. A result of <0.025 mcg only becomes meaningful if you know the sample size tested (for example, mcg per gram or per kg). If that value represents <0.025 mcg per gram, that would equal <25 ppm, which is above the gluten-free threshold...
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):

  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      133,190
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748
    Atl222
    Newest Member
    Atl222
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.6k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):

  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Increased intraepithelial lymphocytes after 10 yrs gluten-free

      By trents · Posted

      Welcome to the celiac.com community, @Atl222! Yes, your increased lymphocytes could be in response to oats or it could possibly be cross contamination from gluten that is getting into your diet from some unexpected source but not enough to damage the villi. And I'm certain that increased lymphocytes can be caused by other things besides celiac disease or gluten/oats exposure. See attachment. But you might try eliminating oats to start with and possibly dairy for a few months and then seek another endoscopy/biopsy to see if there was a reduction in lymphocyte counts. 
    • Scott Adams
      Brown Rice Vinegar (organic) from Eden Foods is likely gluten free

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      This is a solid, well-reasoned approach. You’re right that “koji” by itself doesn’t indicate gluten status, and the risk really does come down to which grain is used to culture it. The fact that you directly contacted Eden Foods and received a clear statement that their koji is made from rice only, with no wheat or barley, is meaningful due diligence—especially since Eden has a long-standing reputation for transparency. While the lack of gluten labeling can understandably give pause, manufacturer confirmation like this is often what people rely on for traditionally fermented products. As always, trusting your body after trying it is reasonable, but based on the information you gathered, your conclusion makes sense.
    • Scott Adams
      nothing has changed

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      Seven months can still be early in celiac healing, especially if you were mostly asymptomatic to begin with—symptoms like low iron, vitamin D deficiency, nail changes, and hair issues often take much longer to improve because the gut needs time to recover before absorption normalizes. A tTG-IgA of 69 is not “low” in terms of immune activity, and it can take 12–24 months (sometimes longer) for antibodies and the intestinal lining to fully heal, particularly in teens and young adults. Eating gluten again to “test” things isn’t recommended and won’t give you clear answers—it’s far more likely to cause harm than clarity. Weight not changing is also very common in celiac and doesn’t rule anything out. Please know that your frustration and sadness matter; this adjustment is hard, and feeling stuck can really affect mental health. You deserve support, and if you can, reaching out to a GI dietitian or mental health professional familiar with chronic illness could really help you through this phase. This study indicates that a majority of celiacs don't recover until 5 years after diagnosis and starting a gluten-free diet: Mucosal recovery and mortality in adults with celiac disease after treatment with a gluten-free diet However, it's also possible that what the study really shows is the difficulty in maintaining a 100% gluten-free diet. I suspect that if you looked closely at the diets of those who did not recover within 2 years might be that their diets were not 100% gluten-free. Perhaps they ate out more often, or didn't understand all of the hidden ingredients where gluten can hide. Either way, it shows how difficult recovery from celiac disease can be for most people. According to this study: This article explores other causes of flattened villi:    
    • Scott Adams
      need help understanding testing result for Naked Nutrition Creatine please

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      Gluten testing is normally reported in ppm (parts per million), which is equivalent to mg/kg, not micrograms by itself. A result of <0.025 mcg only becomes meaningful if you know the sample size tested (for example, mcg per gram or per kg). If that value represents <0.025 mcg per gram, that would equal <25 ppm, which is above the gluten-free threshold; if it’s <0.025 mcg per kilogram, it would be extremely low and well within GF limits. Without the denominator, the result is incomplete. It’s reasonable to follow up with the company and ask them to confirm the result in ppm using a validated method (like ELISA R5)—that’s the standard used to assess gluten safety.
    • Scott Adams
      Medications

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      Medication sensitivity is very real for many people with celiac and other autoimmune conditions, and it’s frustrating when that’s brushed off. Even when a medication is technically gluten-free, fillers, dose changes, or how your nervous system reacts—especially with things like gabapentin—can cause paradoxical effects like feeling wired but exhausted. The fact that it helped bloating suggests it may be affecting gut–nerve signaling, which makes sense in the context of SIBO, but that doesn’t mean the side effects should be ignored. You’re carrying a heavy load right now with ongoing skin, eye, and neurological uncertainty, and living in that kind of limbo is exhausting on its own. It’s understandable to feel overwhelmed and discouraged when systems and providers don’t meet you where you are—your experience is valid, and continuing to advocate for yourself, even when it’s hard, really does matter. You can search this site for prescriptions medications, but will need to know the manufacturer/maker if there is more than one, especially if you use a generic version of the medication: To see the ingredients you will need to click on the correct version of the medication and maker in the results, then scroll down to "Ingredients and Appearance" and click it, and then look at "Inactive Ingredients," as any gluten ingredients would likely appear there, rather than in the Active Ingredients area. https://dailymed.nlm.nih.gov/dailymed/   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.