Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Threshold Of Acceptability


October3

Recommended Posts

October3 Explorer

I called Crest and Colgate to inquire about whether their toothpastes are gluten-free, because I have seen gluten-free toothpaste advertised and hadn't previously considered that there could be gluten in toothpaste. Crest said their toothpaste has no gluten. Colgate said they don't add gluten to their products but can't guarentee they ingredients weren't exposed to gluten prior to their arrival at the factory. They said if something travels past a wheat field during transit it could be "exposed" and so they make no promises about things like that.

It seemed to be a very strict standard and one that on the surface seems to me to be unnecessary. I guess my thought is I'm willing to take that risk for the ease and savings of using something more mainstream. But maybe this is an issue for people??? Is it worth it to buy the labeled Gluten Free thing, or is it simply labeling tricks? I just don't see how anyone could guarantee that something has never passed by a wheat field.

On the other hand, I know Mela leuca products are tested for gluten and they have a list on their website of things that have tested gluten-free. (Toothpaste, btw, didn't make the list) So maybe that is important?

Can someone advise me as to how strict one should be starting out on things like this?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



GlutenFreeManna Rising Star

I called Crest and Colgate to inquire about whether their toothpastes are gluten-free, because I have seen gluten-free toothpaste advertised and hadn't previously considered that there could be gluten in toothpaste. Crest said their toothpaste has no gluten. Colgate said they don't add gluten to their products but can't guarentee they ingredients weren't exposed to gluten prior to their arrival at the factory. They said if something travels past a wheat field during transit it could be "exposed" and so they make no promises about things like that.

It seemed to be a very strict standard and one that on the surface seems to me to be unnecessary. I guess my thought is I'm willing to take that risk for the ease and savings of using something more mainstream. But maybe this is an issue for people??? Is it worth it to buy the labeled Gluten Free thing, or is it simply labeling tricks? I just don't see how anyone could guarantee that something has never passed by a wheat field.

On the other hand, I know Mela leuca products are tested for gluten and they have a list on their website of things that have tested gluten-free. (Toothpaste, btw, didn't make the list) So maybe that is important?

Can someone advise me as to how strict one should be starting out on things like this?

Those companies are just giving CYA statements. NO company can guarentee that anything is 100% gluten free. Although some things you can be more sure about than others, it is physically impossible to test for no gluten. The most sensitive test detects 5 PPM.

From an experience standpoint--I am very sensitive to cc and I have not had to worry wbout my toothpaste. I use Crest, Colgate and Aquafresh (whatever I can get free with a coupon).

sa1937 Community Regular

I totally agree with GlutenFreeManna. Not everything we use will have a gluten-free label slapped on it and the companies are being honest about not being able to guarantee gluten-free status of ingredients. So yes, CYA statements abound.

That said, I use Colgate toothpaste and have no problem with it.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,208
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Deeknip
    Newest Member
    Deeknip
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Fayeb23
      Thank you that’s really helpful, hopeful won’t have to have a biopsy.
    • RMJ
      That means the normal range (i.e. not celiac disease) would be a result less than 14.99.  Your result is WAY above that. Some gastroenterologists would diagnose that as celiac disease even without a confirming biopsy because it is more than ten times the top of the normal range.
    • Redanafs
      Hi everyone. Back in 2022 I had blood work drawn for iga ext gliadin. Since then I’ve developed worse stomach issues and all other health issues. My doctor just said cut out gluten. He did no further testing. Please see my test results attached. I just need some direction cause I feel so ill and the stomach pain is becoming worse. Can this test show indications for other gastrointestinal diseases?
    • Fayeb23
      Thank you. These were the results TTG ABS NUMERICAL: > 250.0 U/mL [< 14.99]  Really don’t understand the results!
    • Scott Adams
      Clearly from what you've said the info on Dailymed is much more up to date than the other site, which hasn't been updated since 2017. The fact that some companies might be repackaging drugs does not mean the info on the ingredients is not correct.
×
×
  • Create New...