Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Kind Of Shell Shocked


JenR

Recommended Posts

JenR Rookie

So I went gluten-free April 23 to see if it helped my rash. After 2 weeks I was discouraged as it didn't seem better. Sometime between 2 and 4 weeks a huge improvement happened... the rash has been in the same location for months, maybe even a year or more (outer ankles) so it's hard to believe it's coincidence.

What do you recommend for next steps? My derm directly biopsied my rash once a few years ago so obviously that didn't help (but it ruled out psoriasis.) Should I just go to a gastro? Is this enough info to diagnose without endoscopy or has everybody had endoscopy done even in the absence of GI symptoms? I'm already in the process of asking the local celiac email group if anyone can recommend a GI who understands about DH.

I realize I need to re-introduce gluten before testing is done; I had planned on that all along just to see if the rash came back, and will do so in a couple of weeks, probably.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



GlutenFreeManna Rising Star

So I went gluten-free April 23 to see if it helped my rash. After 2 weeks I was discouraged as it didn't seem better. Sometime between 2 and 4 weeks a huge improvement happened... the rash has been in the same location for months, maybe even a year or more (outer ankles) so it's hard to believe it's coincidence.

What do you recommend for next steps? My derm directly biopsied my rash once a few years ago so obviously that didn't help (but it ruled out psoriasis.) Should I just go to a gastro? Is this enough info to diagnose without endoscopy or has everybody had endoscopy done even in the absence of GI symptoms? I'm already in the process of asking the local celiac email group if anyone can recommend a GI who understands about DH.

I realize I need to re-introduce gluten before testing is done; I had planned on that all along just to see if the rash came back, and will do so in a couple of weeks, probably.

Wow you are really fornutate to see it gone in 5 weeks! My rash (I never had it tested so I don't know if it was DH) took several months to go away. I think you are goign to be hard pressed to find a GI dr that knows about DH unless they are a celiac disease specialist as well (maybe your celaic chapter person can help with that). Did you have any other symptoms besides the rash that lead you to go gluten free? If you did not have any GI symptoms you may find that you suddenly have them (or other neuro-based symptoms) once you add gluten back into your diet. Since you will have to add it in to see a dr for any future testing you could just try it again and see what happens. You will want to test by eating gluten for at least a week or until you have the rash return or other symptoms. Some people just have one piece of bread and they know right away. Some people have very delayed symptoms and must eat it for a week before they are sure.

JenR Rookie

Thanks for the ideas GFManna! No, I did not have any GI symptoms at all. I will be on the lookout for new symptoms when I re-introduce gluten (I didn't know that could happen!), and will be on it at least a week before I have any more testing.

GlutenFreeManna Rising Star

Thanks for the ideas GFManna! No, I did not have any GI symptoms at all. I will be on the lookout for new symptoms when I re-introduce gluten (I didn't know that could happen!), and will be on it at least a week before I have any more testing.

Just so you know, for blood test and endoscopy with biopsy testing they reccommend at least 3 months of eating the equivalent of 3-4 slices of bread a day. So for those tests you would need to eat it longer than a week. I was just suggesting a week to give it a fair chance to come back--some people thinkt hey are fine when they eat one piece of bread and the symptoms don't return. It can sometimes take a while for the antibodies to build up again. However, if your rash comes back in a short amount of time you can go to a different dermatologist and ask for a biopsy of the skin next ot the legions to test for DH. If you get diagnosed with DH then you have celiac disease--the skin form of it. You won't necessarily need any more testing.

JenR Rookie

ahhh thanks for clarifying!! good to know! hopefully the local group can give me tips on a derm and/or GI ... am thinking of just going to the guy who is the head of Dermatology at our area medical school; his main interest is bullous diseases (blistering) - and DH falls into that category.

your signature says you were diagnosed via an elimination diet - did you have any other tests to confirm other than the IgE test this month?

GlutenFreeManna Rising Star

ahhh thanks for clarifying!! good to know! hopefully the local group can give me tips on a derm and/or GI ... am thinking of just going to the guy who is the head of Dermatology at our area medical school; his main interest is bullous diseases (blistering) - and DH falls into that category.

your signature says you were diagnosed via an elimination diet - did you have any other tests to confirm other than the IgE test this month?

Unfortunately, no. My symptoms upon re-introducing gluten are so severe that I cannot eat it long enough for testing. I have unexplained seizures, fatigue, pain in my joints and muscles, muscle spasms, muscle weakness, shaking hands, brain fog, as well as the typical GI issues when I am on gluten. Prior to going gltuen free I did not have any bad GI issues, but I get them now if I have a little gluten by mistake.

The allergy testing is due a separate issue that came up--I started having anaphylactic reactions to milk. The allergist said might as well test all gluten grains since allergy testing does not require you to be eating something to get a positive test result. The wheat allergy makes sense since I also react to lotions with wheat-germ oil--I get hives if I use a product on my skin with wheat in it. Milk did not show up as an allergy but my dr advised me to avoid it since eatign it can put me in the hospital. Our bodies reactions can be more sensitive than the testing they use.

itchy Rookie

Everybody's situation is different. But here's my take.

I never needed to have an official diagnosis, once I was convinced it was DH. I have had various tests for celiac over the years, all of which just led the medical system away from celiac as a diagnosis when they turned up negative.

After two years I've had enough brushes with gluten to see the correlations between ingesting it, and the return of stinging rashes. Nothing short of having a gun put to my head would convince me to eat enough gluten to show up on a test. Besides, I enjoy the gluten free diet. Now if I could just avoid having my friends shower me with 'gluten free' substitutions when we eat together. ;-)


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



JenR Rookie

Our bodies reactions can be more sensitive than the testing they use.

Pretty amazing, huh?! I'm glad you were able to figure out your issues before you wound up irreversibly ill!

Itchy, LOL @ your friends.... you know they mean well!!

OK, another confusion/question - talking to a friend with celiac, she said that people with DH may have negative endoscopy but still have celiac & must be gluten-free. I thought endoscopy was the gold standard for diagnosis?? If I have a DH rash - i.e. got better with gluten elimination - and I re-introduce gluten after a short hiatus is it really likely to have a normal endoscopy?? Seems to me that if I have DH that responds to gluten/wheat ingestion - I have celiac and ultimately will have GI damage, even without symptoms. Is this right? Or is there a form of DH/celiac that is only manifested in the skin and not in the gut?

ravenwoodglass Mentor

Pretty amazing, huh?! I'm glad you were able to figure out your issues before you wound up irreversibly ill!

Itchy, LOL @ your friends.... you know they mean well!!

OK, another confusion/question - talking to a friend with celiac, she said that people with DH may have negative endoscopy but still have celiac & must be gluten-free. I thought endoscopy was the gold standard for diagnosis?? If I have a DH rash - i.e. got better with gluten elimination - and I re-introduce gluten after a short hiatus is it really likely to have a normal endoscopy?? Seems to me that if I have DH that responds to gluten/wheat ingestion - I have celiac and ultimately will have GI damage, even without symptoms. Is this right? Or is there a form of DH/celiac that is only manifested in the skin and not in the gut?

Your friend is right. You can have both negative blood tests and endoscopy with DH. However having DH is still a having a celiac diagnosis. You could do enough gluten to bring back the rash and then have a doctor familiar with DH do a biopsy. The biopsy needs to be done on intact skin next to the rash not on the rash itself and they need to be looking specifically for DH.

Just my opinion but since celiac can attack other organs like the brain and liver, for example, before you have significant gut damage I would just consider myself diagnosed if going back on gluten brings back the rash. That way you also avoid any 'preexisting condition' issues with insurance that you might have with an 'official' diagnosis.

You also should avoid iodine for a bit and be aware that it may take longer to clear the rash after you have reactived the antibodies on the gluten challenge.

JenR Rookie

Good info, thanks raven! The whole celiac/DH journey certainly does get curiouser & curiouser. I'm thinking I better get 2 different derm appointments close together so if one does the biopsy wrong, maybe the other will get it right. Yikes!!

ravenwoodglass Mentor

Good info, thanks raven! The whole celiac/DH journey certainly does get curiouser & curiouser. I'm thinking I better get 2 different derm appointments close together so if one does the biopsy wrong, maybe the other will get it right. Yikes!!

This may help a bit. Do be aware that there can be some false negatives in the biopsy like with all celiac testing and that although usually the lesions are bilateral they aren't always.

Open Original Shared Link

My lesions also resolved pretty quickly after I went gluten free and deleted iodine but it would take very little to bring them back for the first couple years. I also avoid gluten in all topicals. Now that the antibodies have left my skin when glutened I only get one or two little blisters whereas I used to be covered in lesions even on my scalp and face.

Korwyn Explorer

Hi Jen,

Also I didn't see if anyone mentioned this but you said the dermatologist directly biopsied the rash. That may be a reason for a false negative. If they aren't familiar with DH (as raven mentioned find one who is) then they may not have known that they should take the biopsy from the edge next to the lesion, not from within.

JenR Rookie

Also I didn't see if anyone mentioned this but you said the dermatologist directly biopsied the rash. That may be a reason for a false negative. If they aren't familiar with DH (as raven mentioned find one who is) then they may not have known that they should take the biopsy from the edge next to the lesion, not from within.

Yeah.... I know. At the time the lead candidate for the rash was psoriasis (I have chronic back/pelvic pain that seems to be an inflammatory condition called spondylitis - one form of spondylitis involves psoriasis.) So that is why he biopsied directly, and just had me do the anti-tTG blood test. He does know about DH and if I wind up going back to him I don't mind being blunt about where he needs to do the biopsy! But I think I will go to another derm who comes recommended by someone I met through the local celiac email group - she also presented only with DH, not GI symptoms, and this doc diagnosed her accurately. Thanks for the advice!

Korwyn Explorer

My Dad had life-long "psoriasis". It cleared up permanently within a couple months going gluten free after his diagnosis. I think now it was probably DH.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,074
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Amy1620
    Newest Member
    Amy1620
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Jmartes71
      EXACTLY! I was asked yesterday on my LAST video call with Standford and I stated exactly yes absolutely this is why I need the name! One, get proper care, two, not get worse.Im falling apart, stressed out, in pain and just opened email from Stanford stating I was rude ect.I want that video reviewed by higher ups and see if that women still has a job or not.Im saying this because I've been medically screwed and asking for help because bills don't pay itself. This could be malpratice siit but im not good at finding lawyers
    • AlwaysLearning
      We feel your pain. It took me 20+ years of regularly going to doctors desperate for answers only to be told there was nothing wrong with me … when I was 20 pounds underweight, suffering from severe nutritional deficiencies, and in a great deal of pain. I had to figure it out for myself. If you're in the U.S., not having an official diagnosis does mean you can't claim a tax deduction for the extra expense of gluten-free foods. But it can also be a good thing. Pre-existing conditions might be a reason why a health insurance company might reject your application or charge you more money. No official diagnosis means you don't have a pre-existing condition. I really hope you don't live in the U.S. and don't have these challenges. Do you need an official diagnosis for a specific reason? Else, I wouldn't worry about it. As long as you're diligent in remaining gluten free, your body should be healing as much as possible so there isn't much else you could do anyway. And there are plenty of us out here who never got that official diagnosis because we couldn't eat enough gluten to get tested. Now that the IL-2 test is available, I suppose I could take it, but I don't feel the need. Someone else not believing me really isn't my problem as long as I can stay in control of my own food.
    • AlwaysLearning
      If you're just starting out in being gluten free, I would expect it to take months before you learned enough about hidden sources of gluten before you stopped making major mistakes. Ice cream? Not safe unless they say it is gluten free. Spaghetti sauce? Not safe unless is says gluten-free. Natural ingredients? Who knows what's in there. You pretty much need to cook with whole ingredients yourself to avoid it completely. Most gluten-free products should be safe, but while you're in the hypersensitive phase right after going gluten free, you may notice that when something like a microwave meal seems to not be gluten-free … then you find out that it is produced in a shared facility where it can become contaminated. My reactions were much-more severe after going gluten free. The analogy that I use is that you had a whole army of soldiers waiting for some gluten to attack, and now that you took away their target, when the stragglers from the gluten army accidentally wander onto the battlefield, you still have your entire army going out and attacking them. Expect it to take two years before all of the training facilities that were producing your soldiers have fallen into disrepair and are no longer producing soldiers. But that is two years after you stop accidentally glutening yourself. Every time you do eat gluten, another training facility can be built and more soldiers will be waiting to attack. Good luck figuring things out.   
    • Russ H
      This treatment looks promising. Its aim is to provoke immune tolerance of gluten, possibly curing the disease. It passed the phase 2 trial with flying colours, and I came across a post on Reddit by one of the study volunteers. Apparently, the results were good enough that the company is applying for fast track approval.  Anokion Announces Positive Symptom Data from its Phase 2 Trial Evaluating KAN-101 for the Treatment of Celiac Disease https://www.reddit.com/r/Celiac/comments/1krx2wh/kan_101_trial_put_on_hold/
    • Scott Adams
      BTW, we've done other articles on this topic that I wanted to share here (not to condone smoking!):    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.