Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

This Nurse Was Full Of It, Right?


julandjo

Recommended Posts

julandjo Explorer

Background: I had my biopsy done a year ago. At the time I had been gluten free for 3 months already, and my life had improved immensely. Results were: villous blunting and atrophy. So then my GI told me to eat a ton of gluten for 2 weeks so I could do the blood test (if only I'd known what a farce 2 weeks was!). Of course it was negative, so the GI very reluctantly told me I "might" have celiac disease. It's irrelevant; gluten makes me want to die. ;)

The reason I got tested was for my kids - both have been extremely sensitive to gluten since birth, and even a single bite for my son, or CC for my daughter, results in extreme behavior changes, rash, screaming, snot, etc. etc. So they've effectively been gluten free their entire lives. Well my 4 year old is having a lot of tummy troubles, and had an endoscopy/colonoscopy to check for eosinophils. His pedi GI doctor requested the slides of MY biopsy so he could compare us and try to come up with an answer for why we both react to so many foods. This pleased me to no end, to have a doctor finally agree that whatever we have going on is genetic and to look at the whole picture.

Well. His nurse called with the results. The great news is neither of us had any eosinophils, and my son has no evidence of Celiac. I reminded her that he is gluten free, so of course he would have no evidence. She said that even if a Celiac is 100% gluten free, they will still have Celiac cells on biopsy. Huh?! Then she went over MY slides and said that there was villous damage, but not Celiac. Again, huh?! Aren't they one and the same? I told her that I had already been gluten-free for 3 months at the time, and she said it's possible I have gluten sensitivity, but not Celiac.

Someone, explain this for me! The end result is the same: the 3 of us cannot tolerate any gluten. But still, what she said flies in the face of everything I've understood about celiac disease!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



mushroom Proficient

The nurse is ignorant. The biopsy does not show "celiac cells"!! It shows damage caused by celiac disease. She does not know what she is talking about.

kareng Grand Master

Are you sure you were talking to a nurse, not the order taker at Dominos Pizza? :o

I would insist on speaking with the doctor. Call back and tell them you can be home between 1-5 or whatever for him to call you to discuss the results & what to do next. Some docs around here seem to have a set time they call back, usually 5-7 pm. My parents doc said his varies to as late as 9 if his daughter has a soccer game.

Skylark Collaborator

Huh? I would ask them to explain exactly what caused your villous blunting, damage, and severe gluten sensitivity if it's not celiac. You should get an interesting reply.

Of course your son has a normal biopsy if he's been gluten-free his entire life.

SAVANNAH21 Apprentice

Huh? I would ask them to explain exactly what caused your villous blunting, damage, and severe gluten sensitivity if it's not celiac. You should get an interesting reply.

Of course your son has a normal biopsy if he's been gluten-free his entire life.

Maybe I saw the same person as you. I actually thought I was seeing a GI doctor and when I went I saw a CNP. My biopsy(which was ordered by my family doc and performed by a general surgeon in my area) showed blunted villi but my blood work was negative so my family doc said I didn't have celiac because of the blood work. I requested a second opinion with a GI doc and that is where I saw the CNP. She said she didn't think I had Celiac but maybe a gluten intolerence. HUH!! What about my blunted villi, what causes it. I'm not sure at this point if I'll get another opinion now but I am on a gluten free diet and feeling absolutely wonderful.

Skylark Collaborator

"Cow's milk protein sensitive enteropathy (CMSE), viral or bacterial infections, medications (especially aspirin like arthritis medications e.g. ibuprofen etc), autoimmune enteropathy, Helicobacter pylori infection (the stomach ulcer bacteria), AIDs, common variable immunodeficiency, and lymphoma of the intestine are all possible causes of small intestine changes that may mimic celiac. However, if you have classic celiac type symptoms, a positive celiac specific antibody (anti-endomysial antibody or tissue transglutaminase antibody) and a positive response to a gluten free diet then celiac is the likely cause."

This is from an Ezine article by Dr. Scot Lewey that I apparently can't link to. It's article number 315570.

That's why I was saying julandjo should ask about the combination of villous blunting AND gluten intolerance. Villous blunting alone isn't always celiac.

mommida Enthusiast

A strict allergen free diet can work wonders. You should have seen my daughter's scope pictures when she was diagnosed with EE compared to her follow up. The doctor was amazed and said if he didn't know she was on the restricted diet he would have had to "undiagnose" her. This is one of the BEST doctors in the area. He now has a great respect for parents who follow allergen free diets and knows it is possible to avoid gluten like the plague.

Her esophagus and small intestine looked completely NORMAL her last scope in December 2009 so it looks like her EE is flared by airborn allergens that come with the dryness of late hot summer in the midwest.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



nora-n Rookie

Maybe ask her to show you "celiac cells" in a medical textbook??? There should be numerous images of them in textbooks! if they existed.

I wish there was something as simple as "celiac cells"!

If they would have bothered to order the IgG versions of the ttg or whatever tests they ordered, they might still have been positive. IgG type antibodies tend to hang around a lot longer. The blood draw should have had a note that the patient had been gluten free for three months.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      130,925
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Star4Celiactype1
    Newest Member
    Star4Celiactype1
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):




  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      TTG would refer to a blood antibody test. Not valid if you are already eating gluten free or mostly so. DQH would refer to a genetic test to see if you possess either or both of the two genes that have been connected most strongly to developing active celiac disease. The genetic test is more of a rule out measure than a diagnostic test as about 40% of the general population have one or both of those genes but only about 1% of the general population develops active celiac disease. If you don't have the genes but gluten causes you issues then the conclusion is NCGS (Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity) as opposed to celiac disease. So, the genetic testing helps with a differential diagnosis. I don't know about the 2P. 2 Pairs of genes?
    • Scott Adams
      Tell him to get me a case...just kidding! I wonder why they are not labelled gluten-free here in the USA? They don't have gluten ingredients.
    • Pamela Kay
      Glad this helped. There are lots of alternative breads out there, so someone has likely made some sort of paleo bread with no grain. And if you bake, experiment with some of the alternative flours to see what you can come up with. If you commit to the gluten-free diet 100%, you may want to do a bit of research on some of the tricker aspects of getting gluten out of your diet, such as cross contamination in the home kitchen (pots and pans, cutting boards, toaster, airborne flour). Don't feel you have to do everything at once, or let this overwhelm you. I've always said that going gluten free is a process, not a moment. The reason I mention this is that, if you think you are gluten-free, but still having symptoms, you may realize that even minute amounts of gluten cause a reaction for a while. Let me know if you have any questions.  Pam
    • Scott Adams
      The doctor was correct--if you are gluten-free the blood panel for celiac disease will not work, you would need to go on gluten challenge in order to be tested. Here is more info about how to do a gluten challenge for a celiac disease blood panel, or for an endoscopy: and this recent study recommends 4-6 slices of wheat bread per day:   This article might be helpful. It breaks down each type of test, and what a positive results means in terms of the probability that you might have celiac disease. One test that always needs to be done is the IgA Levels/Deficiency Test (often called "Total IGA") because some people are naturally IGA deficient, and if this is the case, then certain blood tests for celiac disease might be false-negative, and other types of tests need to be done to make an accurate diagnosis. The article includes the "Mayo Clinic Protocol," which is the best overall protocol for results to be ~98% accurate.    
    • Scott Adams
      It could, but it could also mean that gluten still not being fully eliminated. It's important to get a celiac disease blood panel to help figure this out. For people with celiac disease hidden gluten in their diets is the main cause of elevated Tissue Transglutaminase IgA Antibodies (tTG-IgA), but there are other conditions that can cause damaged villi:    
×
×
  • Create New...