Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Genetic Testing: Positive For Celiac ... Now What?


BrooklynFamily

Recommended Posts

BrooklynFamily Apprentice

Hi.

Not sure this is 100% the right board for this question, but i post here most often since I have a 3-year old son with Celiac Disease. Anyways, here is my question and I hope you can help me out....

My son was diagnosed with Celiac Disease a little over a year ago. He has been gluten-free since then and is doing amazingly on the new diet. At the time of his diagnosis, both my husband and I had the antibody test/Celiac panel done on us and the tests showed up negative. A year later, we finally got around to doing the genetic testing on ourselves and as it turns out, we both carry the gene for celiac disease.

So, what does that mean now? Since both of us carry the gene, does our 10-month old daughter have a higher risk of developing the disease than if only one of us was carrying the gene? How often should we do the antibody test? Once a year or every three years? And what about our parents and siblings? Should they now do the genetic testing or simply have the antibody test done more frequently?

I'm going to call my son's pediatric gi doc back and ask these questions as well, but just wondering what you all have learned from your experiences. Also, I've noticed that many posters know the actual results of their genetic tests (DQ2/DQ8, etc), should I find that stuff out as wellmor is it enough to just know that I tested positive? Does it make a difference or give me added information to know those specifics?

Thanks!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



lilu Rookie

Hi there.

I would definitely call your doctor back and ask that they send you a copy of both of your test result reports. Once you have the results in hand, you can post them here on the forum and get some help with interpretation.

Because both you and your husband each carry at least one high-risk gene, that does mean that your daughter is at increased risk as well. If each of you have only 1 risk gene (with a second gene that's low risk), then your daughter has a 25% chance of having no risk genes, a 75% chance of inheriting one or more risk genes. If either of you have two high risk genes, then your daughter 100% has at least 1 high risk gene. If only one of you had one high risk gene, then your daughter's likelihood of inheriting a high risk gene would be 50%, with a 50% chance of no high risk genes.

(Sorry if too much detail, I was a total anatomy and physiology geek in high school... ohhh so long ago).

Because both of you tested positive genetically and you have a child with active disease, this also means that you will want to notify both sides of the family and let them know that testing is recommended. Of course (as many here know all too well) it is then up to each family member to decide if they want testing.

Hope this helps at least end the confusion.

T.H. Community Regular

So, what does that mean now? ... How often should we do the antibody test? Once a year or every three years?

I think if I was in that situation, I would keep my daughter off of gluten until she was about 3 years old (unless you just want to keep it permanent until she's older). Three is the age that is recommended to introduce problem foods for children in families with severe food allergies, because at 3, they can usually verbalize better situations like 'my tummy hurts,' or 'I feel bad/weird, mommy.' I think celiac disease, while not an allergy, might have similar issues.

Before then, there can be problems that you won't be able to detect, the baby can't tell you, and tests are notoriously less effective for infants and toddlers because they get damage differently than adults.

Just personal preference, if after a gluten trial my child had no reaction, I'd probably test every year until puberty was over, and then suggest testing every 3 years or so.

I'd do the testing every year because the damage can be asymptomatic, but can make a big difference in a growing child. After puberty there is less of an issue, unless a woman is trying to conceive, and then I'd get tested right before then and potentially during the pregnancy, too, and right after, as the hormones can trigger the disease (it's believed. I don't believe it's been proven specifically).

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,741
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Kaz 1
    Newest Member
    Kaz 1
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Theresa2407
      Maybe you have a low  intolerance to Wheat.   Rye, Barley and Malt are the gluten in Celiac disease.  It has always been stated Wheat and Gluten, not just a Wheat intolerance.  Barley will keep me in bed for (2) weeks.  Gut, Migrains, Brain fog, Diahrea.  It is miserable.  And when I was a toddler the doctor would give me a malt medicine because I always had Anemia and did not grow.  Boy was he off.  But at that time the US didn't know anyone about Celiac.  This was the 1940s and 50s.  I had my first episode at 9 months and did not get a diagnosis until I was 50.  My immune system was so shot before being diagnoised, so now I live with the consequences of it. I was so upset when Manufacturers didn't want to label their products so they added barley to the product.  It was mostly the cereal industry.  3 of my favorite cereals were excluded because of this. Malt gives me a bad Gut reaction.
    • Gigi2025
      Thanks much Scott.  Well said, and heeded.   I don't have Celiac, which is fortunate.
    • Scott Adams
      Do you have the results of your endoscopy? Did you do a celiac disease blood panel before that?  Here is more info about how to do a gluten challenge for a celiac disease blood panel, or for an endoscopy: and this recent study recommends 4-6 slices of wheat bread per day:    
    • Scott Adams
      It is odd that your Tissue Transglutaminase (TTG) IgA level has bounced from the "inconclusive" range (7.9, 9.8) down to a negative level (5.3), only to climb back up near the positive threshold. This inconsistency, coupled with your ongoing symptoms of malabsorption and specific nutrient deficiencies, is a strong clinical indicator that warrants a more thorough investigation than a simple "satisfactory" sign-off. A negative blood test does not definitively rule out celiac disease, especially with such variable numbers and a classic symptomatic picture. You are absolutely right to seek a second opinion and push for a referral to a gastroenterologist. A biopsy remains the gold standard for a reason, and advocating for one is the most direct path to getting the answers you need to finally address the root cause of your suffering. Here is more info about how to do a gluten challenge for a celiac disease blood panel, or for an endoscopy: and this recent study recommends 4-6 slices of wheat bread per day:    
    • Scott Adams
      There is a distinction between gluten itself and the other chemicals and processing methods involved in modern food production. Your experience in Italy and Greece, contrasted with your reactions in the U.S., provides powerful anecdotal evidence that the problem, for some people, may not be the wheat, but the additives like potassium bromate and the industrial processing it undergoes here. The point about bromines displacing iodine and disrupting thyroid function is a significant one, explaining a potential biological mechanism for why such additives could cause systemic health issues that mimic gluten sensitivity. It's both alarming and insightful to consider that the very "watchdog" agencies meant to protect us are allowing practices banned in many other developed countries. Seeking out European flour and your caution about the high-carb, potentially diabeticgenic nature of many gluten-free products are excellent practical takeaways from your research, but I just want to mention--if you have celiac disease you need to avoid all wheat, including all wheat and gluten in Europe.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.