Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Help With My Blood Test Results


Nizzy

Recommended Posts

Nizzy Newbie

My test results came in today and I'm a bit confused.

TTG Antibody, IgA: <1 Interpretation: Negative

TTG Antibody, IgG: 10.0 U/ml

I'm already scheduled for a biopsy because the nurse said it is a good sign of celiac, but could someone please explain what this means - the nurse didn't explain it very well?

I have read a few things that say some people don't produce the IgA antibody but could produce the IgG antibody instead.

Has anyone had similar results? If so, did you test positive in your biopsy?

Thanks!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



JoshB Apprentice

Unfortunately different labs use different methods and reporting ranges, so absolute numbers like that aren't very helpful. As I understand it "IgA" indicates gluten antibodies. These do not prove or disprove celiac trouble, they are just suggestive. You can have false positives for a number of reasons, and you can have a false negative if your immune system is doing strange things. "IgG" tracks gluten associated antibodies against the yourself. Generally a positive test here indicates celiac disease. A negative IgG doesn't necessarily mean anything as the test is not all that sensitive.

Hard to say without knowing the ranges on your test how "positive" your IgG was.

I rejected doing the biopsy as it seemed to me that they'd already tested positive in a way that was known to be accurate. I figure the biopsy is expensive, dangerous, time-consuming, and not very accurate at all, so what's the point? But... I had very high positives on all the blood work. If my blood work wasn't clear, I'd probably want a second way to test.

Ask your doctor for clarification. He should be able to tell you what your tests mean and why he wants to do the endoscopy. If he's not real clear I wouldn't be afraid to ask for a referral to a specialist.

Roda Rising Star

Some people have an IgA deficiency which will render any IgA based testing invalid. Did they do a total IgA?

Nizzy Newbie

Some people have an IgA deficiency which will render any IgA based testing invalid. Did they do a total IgA?

I am unsure if they did a total IgA. I'm pretty new to this and when I went into the doctor I barely knew what celiac disease was. I know they took a bunch of different blood tests - my thyroid, ect. And I was told by the nurse that everything looked normal minus the TTG IgG test.

Then I recieved a short note from my doctor in the mail that said exactly above and that I needed to schedule a f/u with him.

I should call and ask them to send my total blood work sent to me...Maybe it would look a little different?

pain*in*my*gut Apprentice

I am unsure if they did a total IgA. I'm pretty new to this and when I went into the doctor I barely knew what celiac disease was. I know they took a bunch of different blood tests - my thyroid, ect. And I was told by the nurse that everything looked normal minus the TTG IgG test.

Then I recieved a short note from my doctor in the mail that said exactly above and that I needed to schedule a f/u with him.

I should call and ask them to send my total blood work sent to me...Maybe it would look a little different?

You could request all of your test results (it's good to have all of the info). Regardless, you need to have further investigation (like a scope) to rule in/out celiac. You tested positive for an antibody to an enzyme that is being made in response to gluten that causes tissue damage to your small intestines (tTG). This test is sensitive, but it's not very specific, meaning that it can be positive due to other conditions like diabetes, heart failure, Crohn's disease and liver disease.

As far as antibody classes goes, there are 5 types that everybody has as part of their immune system: IgG, IgA, IgM, IgE, and IgD. Each class of antibodies is associated with different immune responses in the body. When testing for Celiac Disease, we are primarily looking for antibodies of the IgA class, because they are typically associated with the mucosa of the gastrointestinal tract. The problem with just testing tTG IgA class when doing a Celiac screen, is that IgA antibodies can be decreased in malabsorbtion disorders like Celiac! In which case the tTG (IgA) would be negative, and the Celiac disease diagnosis would be missed entirely. That is why we do a total IgA measurement, to make sure that the patient is not IgA deficient. If they are, then the IgG antibody class is tested against tTG. The IgG antibody is the most abundant class of antibodies in the body, and the patient would have to be severely malnourished to give a "false" negative IgG result for Celiac.

It looks like your doctor ordered the Celiac screen that tests for both IgG and IgA tTG antibodies. The lab my doc uses only does the IgA class, but then also does a total IgA to make sure there is no deficiency. It really depends on the lab and the doctor, as there really is no set standard for what exactly should be in a Celiac screen (unfortunately).

Sorry if this got WAY over the top! I am a med tech and I worked in an immunology lab for 9 years. ;) If anybody really wants to go crazy, here is a link about antibodies (scroll to the last part of the article, where it talks about the 5 types and what they are associated with). WARNING, your head may explode! :blink:

Open Original Shared Link

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      129,874
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    CSam
    Newest Member
    CSam
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.3k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • ehb
      @knitty kitty thank you I am exploring these options, I really appreciate all the suggestions and info. I am only slightly below the normal range for folate, zinc and copper. And in the low end of the normal range for B12, ferritin, and vitamin A. I’m good for carotene magnesium and iron, but I’ve been taking 400 mg magnesium daily 
    • Alibu
      I just had my endoscopy the other day and the doctor took 12 samples because he said if we're going to find something we're going to find it today LOL. But when he got down there, he said everything looked good. So I have it in my head again that it's going to be negative because everyone I've heard of who had a positive biopsy had their endoscopies where the doctor was like yep, I can see the damage. My tissues all look great apparently. So if they come back negative, I'm not sure where to go from here. Could it still be a non-celiac gluten sensitivity even with my blood work? I thought NCGS didn't show up on blood tests. Is it possible that the biopsy still comes back positive even if everything looked healthy on endoscope? I had it done at a big hospital in the state, so I would think they'd have the kind of equipment where they'd be able to see it well. I even have pictures in my report and they don't seem to have the damage that others have seen.
    • trents
      That's just it. When they are doing an EGD, even with biopsy, if they aren't thinking about celiac disease they may miss it. They should take several samples from both the duodenum and the duodenum bulb. Damage can be patchy and easily missed if sampling isn't through. And patch damage may explain lack of dramatic symptoms. Let me assure you that we frequently have posters on this forum who were silent celiacs for years and were diagnosed incidentally with celiac disease when their docs were checking for other things. They developed other medical problems such as anemia or vitamin and mineral deficiencies, neurological deficits, Hashimodo's thyroid, osteoporois, etc. - non GI symptoms - but their docs recognized those problems as often connected to celiac disease and had them checked for celiac disease, both blood antibody testing and biopsy, and found damage. A couple of years ago the Mayo Clinic did a large study involving over 300 people. They started with those officially diagnosed with celiac disease and also tested their first degree relatives. They found that almost 50% of  the first degree relatives tested positive for celiac disease and many or most were totally caught by surprise because they were largely asymptomatic. Their diagnosis was confirmed by biopsy. I really don't have anything more to say. You have some decisions to make.
    • knitty kitty
      Blood tests are affected by what you've had to eat in the previous day or two and any vitamin supplements you've taken in the past month or two.   If you have been taking vitamins before the time of the blood test, the vitamins supplements could mask a deficiency.  So get the tests before supplementing, or allow eight to twelve weeks for the supplements to wear off.    The thing with blood tests is that they measure what is in the blood, not what is stored inside organs and tissues where vitamins are actually utilized, and may miss subclinical deficiencies.  In times of shortages, the brain can order cells to release their stored vitamins into the blood stream in order to keep important organs like the brain and heart functioning.   Overall, getting blood tests for deficiencies is a good idea if it's available to you.  If you're deficient in any of the B vitamins, take a B Complex with all the B's in it.  The eight B vitamins work with one another like an orchestra.  Supplementing just one can throw the others off.  
    • Shining My Light
      Thank you @trents! This is all sound advice. In 2022 I did have a biopsy done with the EGD: SPECIMEN: (A) DUODENUM, BIOPSY (B) GASTRIC BIOPSY(C) GASTRIC POLYP, BIOPSY(D) ESOPHAGUS BIOPSY (E) ESOPHAGUS BIOPSY This would have been when the candida was found.  If I understand right it’s the duodenum they take a biopsy of. Nothing was mentioned about Villous atrophy however they were not looking for that particularly.    Something that stumps me is the correlation between symptoms and damage. One seems to equal the other. I have yet to see damage with “silent celiac”. Not saying it doesn’t exist.  Also super curious on other symptoms that would improve based on a gluten free diet. Obviously silent celiac wouldn’t have an improvement in GI symptoms but that is all I have read any data for. No one saying things like my anxiety went away or my headaches and joint pain are gone.    I see why it would be a “gluten challenge” since eating 4-6 slices of bread daily is a challenge to do. 😳 I would replace that with cake 🍰😉 
×
×
  • Create New...