Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Genes !


DVjorge

Recommended Posts

DVjorge Apprentice

Hi community,

I am curious about what are the real genes implicated in Celiac ??

DQ-2 and DQ-8 ??

Because, Enterolab has another mind thinking that there are more genes, if they are correct, 90% of the poupulation have the genes.

Thank


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



ravenwoodglass Mentor

I know it sounds strange but what genes are considered celiac associated genes can vary from country to country. Many people have the associated genes but don't develop celiac and just having the genes is not diagnostic. We have much, much more to learn about the genetics involved with celiac and gluten intolerance.

nora-n Rookie

The DQ2 and DQ8 genes are said to respnosible for only about 40% of the risk for celiac, so other genes like myo9b and others carry more risk. The greatest risk is having a relative with celiac.

I have DQ5 and DH, and one does not need the celiac genes for DH

pricklypear1971 Community Regular

Where do you get testing for the other genes if u.S. Panels concentrate on 2, 8?

nora-n Rookie

Where do you get testing for the other genes if u.S. Panels concentrate on 2, 8?

i read on other forums that some phoned the labs and they actually had tested for the other genes, but not reported them to the doctor (I guess to not to confuse the doctors, too much information) and they got all the results, both alpha and beta chains.

So I suggest you try to find out if they tested alpha and beta chains.

They started doing that the last two-three years or so.

pricklypear1971 Community Regular

i read on other forums that some phoned the labs and they actually had tested for the other genes, but not reported them to the doctor (I guess to not to confuse the doctors, too much information) and they got all the results, both alpha and beta chains.

So I suggest you try to find out if they tested alpha and

beta chains.

They started doing that the last two-three years or so.

Mine tested alpha and beta, but the whole thing is confusing.

mushroom Proficient

Mine tested alpha and beta, but the whole thing is confusing.

Nora is very good at untangling all these confusing things. :D Try posting them and see what she says.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



ravenwoodglass Mentor

Where do you get testing for the other genes if u.S. Panels concentrate on 2, 8?

I had mine tested with Enterolab after my DD had doctors tell her that her biopsy and blood test were both a false positive because she didn't have DQ2 or DQ8.

pricklypear1971 Community Regular

I had mine tested with Enterolab after my DD had doctors tell her that her biopsy and blood test were both a false positive because she didn't have DQ2 or DQ8.

Well, I have a kit and need to send it in. Perhaps that will shed light further.

nora-n Rookie

Now we found articles that say the japanese celiacs have DQ9, simply because DQ9 is the main gene over there by number.

Now DQ 9 differs from DQ8 by one amino acid only , and it is capable of binding gliadin molecules in a 3D model.

(0303 is DQ9)

Now 6% of celiacs have half genes, and 2% have other genes, so why doctors can say for sure that a symptomatic patient cannot be celiac with a DQ 9 gene is beyond me. And the japanese celiacs are DQ9.

pricklypear1971 Community Regular

Can you refer me to the study about the % with half, whole genes?

DVjorge Apprentice

Thanks for the answers. But, I still don't know what are implicated genes ??

It looks like nobody knows the true. Enterolab says one thing, others say another, and so on !!

Is there an absolute list of genes necessary to develop Celiac ??

Or the genes theory is something no true ??

Thanks.

pricklypear1971 Community Regular

Thanks for the answers. But, I still don't know what are implicated genes ??

It looks like nobody knows the true. Enterolab says one thing, others say another, and so on !!

Is there an absolute list of genes necessary to develop Celiac ??

Or the genes theory is something no true ??

Thanks.

There are two main genes recognized in the western world -dq2 and dq8. There are another 13 implicated. I read a synopsis the other day that one is more specific to "activated" celiac than dq2, 8. There's constant research - and just because more have been identified doesn't necessarily mean more people carry the genes, it can also be more SPECIFIC identification.

mushroom Proficient

Thanks for the answers. But, I still don't know what are implicated genes ??

It looks like nobody knows the true. Enterolab says one thing, others say another, and so on !!

Is there an absolute list of genes necessary to develop Celiac ??

Or the genes theory is something no true ??

Thanks.

I would not regard the current genetic information available as anywhere near definitive.

nora-n Rookie

I have an old link somewhere that says several % have half genes,

here is one from pubmed about half genes:

Open Original Shared Link

and now just recently the dutch found something similar

nora-n Rookie

Here is something that says 9 out of 37 celiac children did not have DQ2 or DQ8

Open Original Shared Link

still it does not say what genes they had

I guess most had half genes and one or two had other genes, based on other articles of the same kind

domesticactivist Collaborator

Kimball Genetics division of Labcorp is who we used. They send just the summary to your dr, but if you call the genetic councilor they will give the full results.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,742
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    MistyMoon
    Newest Member
    MistyMoon
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):




  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Theresa2407
      Maybe you have a low  intolerance to Wheat.   Rye, Barley and Malt are the gluten in Celiac disease.  It has always been stated Wheat and Gluten, not just a Wheat intolerance.  Barley will keep me in bed for (2) weeks.  Gut, Migrains, Brain fog, Diahrea.  It is miserable.  And when I was a toddler the doctor would give me a malt medicine because I always had Anemia and did not grow.  Boy was he off.  But at that time the US didn't know anyone about Celiac.  This was the 1940s and 50s.  I had my first episode at 9 months and did not get a diagnosis until I was 50.  My immune system was so shot before being diagnoised, so now I live with the consequences of it. I was so upset when Manufacturers didn't want to label their products so they added barley to the product.  It was mostly the cereal industry.  3 of my favorite cereals were excluded because of this. Malt gives me a bad Gut reaction.
    • Gigi2025
      Thanks much Scott.  Well said, and heeded.   I don't have Celiac, which is fortunate.
    • Scott Adams
      Do you have the results of your endoscopy? Did you do a celiac disease blood panel before that?  Here is more info about how to do a gluten challenge for a celiac disease blood panel, or for an endoscopy: and this recent study recommends 4-6 slices of wheat bread per day:    
    • Scott Adams
      It is odd that your Tissue Transglutaminase (TTG) IgA level has bounced from the "inconclusive" range (7.9, 9.8) down to a negative level (5.3), only to climb back up near the positive threshold. This inconsistency, coupled with your ongoing symptoms of malabsorption and specific nutrient deficiencies, is a strong clinical indicator that warrants a more thorough investigation than a simple "satisfactory" sign-off. A negative blood test does not definitively rule out celiac disease, especially with such variable numbers and a classic symptomatic picture. You are absolutely right to seek a second opinion and push for a referral to a gastroenterologist. A biopsy remains the gold standard for a reason, and advocating for one is the most direct path to getting the answers you need to finally address the root cause of your suffering. Here is more info about how to do a gluten challenge for a celiac disease blood panel, or for an endoscopy: and this recent study recommends 4-6 slices of wheat bread per day:    
    • Scott Adams
      There is a distinction between gluten itself and the other chemicals and processing methods involved in modern food production. Your experience in Italy and Greece, contrasted with your reactions in the U.S., provides powerful anecdotal evidence that the problem, for some people, may not be the wheat, but the additives like potassium bromate and the industrial processing it undergoes here. The point about bromines displacing iodine and disrupting thyroid function is a significant one, explaining a potential biological mechanism for why such additives could cause systemic health issues that mimic gluten sensitivity. It's both alarming and insightful to consider that the very "watchdog" agencies meant to protect us are allowing practices banned in many other developed countries. Seeking out European flour and your caution about the high-carb, potentially diabeticgenic nature of many gluten-free products are excellent practical takeaways from your research, but I just want to mention--if you have celiac disease you need to avoid all wheat, including all wheat and gluten in Europe.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.