Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Gluten Free Sugar Substitute?


Wenmin

Recommended Posts

Wenmin Enthusiast

I am battling with pre-diabetes right now and would like to know what gluten free sugar substitute is best to use. I realize the holidays are right around the corner and would like to be prepared when the time comes to start baking. I do remember early in my diagnosis, trying a sugar sub at my mom's house and felt really bad after. Not real sure if it was the sugar substitute or something else that got me. I have access to many different kinds of substitutes, but not real sure which ones are gluten free. Please help!

Wenmin


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Juliebove Rising Star

I am battling with pre-diabetes right now and would like to know what gluten free sugar substitute is best to use. I realize the holidays are right around the corner and would like to be prepared when the time comes to start baking. I do remember early in my diagnosis, trying a sugar sub at my mom's house and felt really bad after. Not real sure if it was the sugar substitute or something else that got me. I have access to many different kinds of substitutes, but not real sure which ones are gluten free. Please help!

Wenmin

First off I don't know of any sugar substitutes that contain gluten. Yes there is glucose syrup that is sometimes made of wheat. But you wouldn't be using that if you are trying to cut the carbs.

Do beware of sugar alcohols such as mannitol, maltitol, sorbitol, xylitol, pretty much anything ending in "ol". They can have a laxative effect.

Also realize that a sugar substitute is going to alter the end ingredient. Splenda is the one generally used for baking because it can take high heat. But the best results would be a mix of 1/2 Splenda and 1/2 sugar. But if you're going to do that you are only slightly cutting back on the carbs. For most baked goods the flour you use is going to add so many carbs it may not be doable for you. Cheesecake is one thing I've been told does well with a sugar substitute and you can make it crustless or use a nut crust.

I have tried several times to make sugar free cranberry sauce. I just didn't like it. It came out as a strange pinkish color and didn't taste anything like the canned stuff I am used to.

I have diabetes. I don't eat a lot of sweets. I don't really like most of them. But if I am going to eat them, I just have one bite or a very small amount of the real thing. That to me is better than a whole serving of something made with a sugar substitute that just isn't good tasting.

My daughter has essentially what is pre-diabetes even though the Dr. didn't call it that. She has mostly given up sweets. She did get a couple of pre-made gluten-free cheesecakes that are a single serving. If she wants one of those she will cut back elsewhere in the meal on carbs. Or she will eat one as a snack before dance when she is going to be active and burn the carbs off. She will also eat candy by portioning out in very small amounts. Such as 10 Skittles per day.

RiceGuy Collaborator

I can only recommend Stevia, as it is completely natural, zero carbs, zero sugars, zero calories, and zero on the glycemic index. However, this would apply to only the pure extract. The Stevita brand has a pure extract called Simply-Stevia, which I use exclusively. This product has the highest purity of any Stevia extract I am aware of. It can take high heat, so it is good for cooking and baking.

However, because it is so intensely sweet, you must know how to use it, or you'll likely not get the kind of results you're hoping for. I do not have a sweet tooth, and I find that less than half a teaspoon is sweet enough for a recipe which traditionally would have about a cup of sugar. What this means is that you'll have to adjust the recipe to account for the reduced bulk. I don't find this to be a problem, but then I cook and bake entirely from scratch. I'm also not super-picky about the results, as long as it isn't distasteful, which rarely happens.

An example of how one might use Stevia in baking for the holidays would be pumpkin pie. What to use to make up the missing bulk? Well, it's pumpkin pie, ain't it? So why not extra pumpkin? You can also get creative and add some not-so-traditional ingredients. I find lots of things go well with pumpkin.

Another example is apple pie, and this is quite a bit easier since there isn't usually much added sugar to bulk up a traditional apple pie anyway. Depending on the variety of apple you use, you may find it only takes 1/4 tsp or less of Stevia to sweeten the entire pie.

Lastly, I find that a pinch of salt can go a long way in helping the taste when using Stevia as the only sweetener in a recipe. I'm not sure why this is, but I know many traditional sweet recipes have a little salt anyway, so perhaps it's nothing out of the ordinary. I just don't usually add salt unless I find it needs it.

The only sugar which I know is generally safer than sucrose (regular table sugar) for diabetics is fructose, but then that carries its own possible implications, especially if you use it often, or in high amounts. Not something I'd recommend using to any great degree, but since fructose is the primary sugar in most fruits, it cannot be pure evil. Though fresh fruits as found in nature tend to be better balanced in terms of nutrition than confectionery or a purified sugar product. Many fruits have fiber too, which I understand can slow the absorption of sugars, thus reduce the possible blood sugar spike. Agave is said to be relatively low glycemic, since it is primarily fructose. Granulated fructose is also available. But again, I do not recommend using fructose like the typical American uses sugar. That'll surely have health implications.

Jestgar Rising Star

This may sound odd, but this tea tastes very sweet to me:

Open Original Shared Link

and I've considered trying to use it in baked goods to see if it adds sweetness without the sugar.

Wenmin Enthusiast

Thanks for all ya'll help.

Wenmin

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Mmoc replied to Mmoc's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      2

      Blood tests low iGA 4 years later digestive issues

    2. - Aretaeus Cappadocia replied to Clear2me's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      6

      Gluten free nuts

    3. - trents replied to Larzipan's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      42

      Has anyone had terrible TMJ/ Jaw Pain from undiagnosed Celiac?

    4. - Scott Adams replied to Larzipan's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      42

      Has anyone had terrible TMJ/ Jaw Pain from undiagnosed Celiac?

    5. - Wheatwacked commented on Scott Adams's article in Latest Research
      6

      Study Estimates the Costs of Delayed Celiac Disease Diagnosis (+Video)


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,387
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    LizzieE
    Newest Member
    LizzieE
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Mmoc
      Thank you kindly for your response. I have since gotten the other type of bloods done and am awaiting results. 
    • Aretaeus Cappadocia
      I wanted to respond to your post as much for other people who read this later on (I'm not trying to contradict your experience or decisions) > Kirkland Signature Super Extra-Large Peanuts, 2.5 lbs, are labeled "gluten free" in the Calif Costcos I've been in. If they are selling non-gluten-free in your store, I suggest talking to customer service to see if they can get you the gluten-free version (they are tasty) > This past week I bought "Sliced Raw Almonds, Baking Nuts, 5 lbs Item 1495072 Best if used by Jun-10-26 W-261-6-L1A 12:47" at Costco. The package has the standard warning that it was made on machinery that <may> have processed wheat. Based on that alone, I would not eat these. However, I contacted customer service and asked them "are Costco's Sliced Almonds gluten free?" Within a day I got this response:  "This is [xyz] with the Costco Member Service Resolutions Team. I am happy to let you know we got a reply back from our Kirkland Signature team. Here is their response:  This item does not have a risk of cross contamination with gluten, barley or rye." Based on this, I will eat them. Based on experience, I believe they will be fine. Sometimes, for other products, the answer has been "they really do have cross-contamination risk" (eg, Kirkland Signature Dry Roasted Macadamia Nuts, Salted, 1.5 lbs Item 1195303). When they give me that answer I return them for cash. You might reasonably ask, "Why would Costco use that label if they actually are safe?" I can't speak for Costco but I've worked in Corporate America and I've seen this kind of thing first hand and up close. (1) This kind of regulatory label represents risk/cost to the company. What if they are mistaken? In one direction, the cost is loss of maybe 1% of sales (if celiacs don't buy when they would have). In the other direction, the risk is reputational damage and open-ended litigation (bad reviews and celiacs suing them). Expect them to play it safe. (2) There is a team tasked with getting each product out to market quickly and cheaply, and there is also a committee tasked with reviewing the packaging before it is released. If the team chooses the simplest, safest, pre-approved label, this becomes a quick check box. On the other hand, if they choose something else, it has to be carefully scrutinized through a long process. It's more efficient for the team to say there <could> be risk. (3) There is probably some plug and play in production. Some lots of the very same product could be made in a safe facility while others are made in an unsafe facility. Uniform packaging (saying there is risk) for all packages regardless of gluten risk is easier, cheaper, and safer (for Costco). Everything I wrote here is about my Costco experience, but the principles will be true at other vendors, particularly if they have extensive quality control infrastructure. The first hurdle of gluten-free diet is to remove/replace all the labeled gluten ingredients. The second, more difficult hurdle is to remove/replace all the hidden gluten. Each of us have to assess gray zones and make judgement calls knowing there is a penalty for being wrong. One penalty would be getting glutened but the other penalty could be eating an unnecessarily boring or malnourishing diet.
    • trents
      Thanks for the thoughtful reply and links, Wheatwacked. Definitely some food for thought. However, I would point out that your linked articles refer to gliadin in human breast milk, not cow's milk. And although it might seem reasonable to conclude it would work the same way in cows, that is not necessarily the case. Studies seem to indicate otherwise. Studies also indicate the amount of gliadin in human breast milk is miniscule and unlikely to cause reactions:  https://www.glutenfreewatchdog.org/news/gluten-peptides-in-human-breast-milk-implications-for-cows-milk/ I would also point out that Dr. Peter Osborne's doctorate is in chiropractic medicine, though he also has studied and, I believe, holds some sort of certifications in nutritional science. To put it plainly, he is considered by many qualified medical and nutritional professionals to be on the fringe of quackery. But he has a dedicated and rabid following, nonetheless.
    • Scott Adams
      I'd be very cautious about accepting these claims without robust evidence. The hypothesis requires a chain of biologically unlikely events: Gluten/gliadin survives the cow's rumen and entire digestive system intact. It is then absorbed whole into the cow's bloodstream. It bypasses the cow's immune system and liver. It is then secreted, still intact and immunogenic, into the milk. The cow's digestive system is designed to break down proteins, not transfer them whole into milk. This is not a recognized pathway in veterinary science. The provided backup shifts from cow's milk to human breastmilk, which is a classic bait-and-switch. While the transfer of food proteins in human breastmilk is a valid area of study, it doesn't validate the initial claim about commercial dairy. The use of a Dr. Osborne video is a major red flag. His entire platform is based on the idea that all grains are toxic, a view that far exceeds the established science on Celiac Disease and non-celiac gluten sensitivity. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence, and a YouTube video from a known ideological source is not that evidence."  
    • Wheatwacked
      Some backup to my statement about gluten and milk. Some background.  When my son was born in 1976 he was colicky from the beginning.  When he transitioned to formula it got really bad.  That's when we found the only pediactric gastroenterologist (in a population of 6 million that dealt with Celiac Disease (and he only had 14 patients with celiac disease), who dianosed by biopsy and started him on Nutramegen.  Recovery was quick. The portion of gluten that passes through to breastmilk is called gliadin. It is the component of gluten that causes celiac disease or gluten intolerance. What are the Effects of Gluten in Breastmilk? Gliaden, a component of gluten which is typically responsible for the intestinal reaction of gluten, DOES pass through breast milk.  This is because gliaden (as one of many food proteins) passes through the lining of your small intestine into your blood. Can gluten transmit through breast milk?  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.