Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):
  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Gluten Free Labeling


Lisa

Recommended Posts

Lisa Mentor

This was posted by the Administration, with other recent articles. I thought this was informative enough to stand on it's own:

https://www.celiac.com/articles/22804/1/What-You-Need-to-Know-About-False-Gluten-Free-Labeling-/Page1.html


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Skylark Collaborator

I was very upset by that article. The person who wrote it seems to think we have a labeling law in effect as of last September. :( I also found the article generally confusing.

Lisa Mentor

I was very upset by that article. The person who wrote it seems to think we have a labeling law in effect as of last September. :( I also found the article generally confusing.

Although somewhat non-specific (well okay, very non-specific), it does show how a variety of manufactures can be as uninformed as some of us as gluten free consumers, in purchasing products.

I will have to review it again. Not sure I picked up on the authors assumption that the FDA Laws were in place.

Skylark Collaborator

It's in the "What Does Gluten Free Mean?" section.

"According to the FDA, as of September 2011, gluten-free labeled products should (a) not include ingredients from gluten or gluten derivatives and (B ) maintain a status of less than 20ppm of gluten for all gluten-free labeled products."

Lisa Mentor

Additional information on the PROPOSED Legislation:

Open Original Shared Link

Lisa Mentor

It's in the "What Does Gluten Free Mean?" section.

"According to the FDA, as of September 2011, gluten-free labeled products should (a) not include ingredients from gluten or gluten derivatives and (B ) maintain a status of less than 20ppm of gluten for all gluten-free labeled products."

Yes, I noticed that the Proposed was omitted, in my review.

Skylark Collaborator

I'm not sure she understands how the proposed laws will work either.

"Example:

A barbecue sauce has gluten as an ingredient and states "gluten free*" on their product label. At the bottom of the label the product states: "*tested below 20ppm for gluten." Though the end product might test as non-detectable, the product still contains gluten and should not be labeled gluten free."

This would be legally labeled gluten-free under the proposed laws. It would be nice if such a food could not be labeled gluten-free but that's what we'll be dealing with if the 20 ppm proposal passes. Some people on the board can even tolerate foods like this. Rice Dream is an example.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Lisa Mentor

I prefer to read "no gluten ingredients", rather than "gluten free". I find it more informative.

It tells me I need to weight my options, rather than just automatically grab it off the shelf. B)

Skylark Collaborator

Personally, I love the GFCO mark. Nothing like independent certification to make me feel safe! :) After Tricia Thompson's study where she found all that gluten in soy flour I'm a little scared of "no gluten ingredients".

Unfortunately I'm not sure "naturally gluten-free" or "no gluten ingredients" was even legal under that old FDA proposal. Making it illegal to test and label anything but oats scares me half to death. I willingly pay extra for some of the Bob's Red Mill products like gluten-free xanthan gum and gluten-free cornstarch that have been tested and made in their dedicated facility.

kareng Grand Master

Sorry, Lisa, I have to disagree.

When I read it the first time, I didn't get past the part where she claims we have an actual law that went into effect in Sept. Even if it had been passed in Sept - which it was not- they would have to give companies a chance to implement it (change box labelling, etc). I don't know anything about her but I don't think she is very reliable. It is possible its a typo but, a reputable "expert" would have caught it when she re-read.

Lisa Mentor

Personally, I love the GFCO mark.

YES! The ultimate, at this time.

Lisa Mentor

Sorry, Lisa, I have to disagree.

When I read it the first time, I didn't get past the part where she claims we have an actual law that went into effect in Sept. Even if it had been passed in Sept - which it was not- they would have to give companies a chance to implement it (change box labelling, etc). I don't know anything about her but I don't think she is very reliable. It is possible its a typo but, a reputable "expert" would have caught it when she re-read.

There is nothing to disagree with. I know nothing of her credibility, but rather I found interesting the scenarios of possibilities, with unregulated "gluten free" criteria by producers or manufacturers.

mushroom Proficient

iI'm afraid I read the article and just went, "Huh??" :blink:

Lisa Mentor

iI'm afraid I read the article and just went, "Huh??" :blink:

Well then, pay it no mind. ;)

mushroom Proficient

Well then, pay it no mind. ;)

That's eggsactly what I'm doing. :P

psawyer Proficient

Canadian resident sticking his oar in the water. B)

There is a legal definition of gluten-free here. It (intentionally) does not address the possibility of contamination. But no product containing any ingredient derived from wheat, rye, barley or oats may be labeled or represented as "gluten-free."

An incremental improvement is coming shortly, when rye and barley will be added to the "priority allergens" that must be disclosed. Canada already includes sesame seeds and sulfites beyond the FDA/FALCPA list. Mustard seed is also being added.

The nature of cross-contamination is such that there can never be an iron-clad guarantee. Contamination can occur at any point along the supply line, not just at the final assembly plant. Even if the plant is ostensibly gluten-free, a person entering may carry crumbs into it. Not just employees enter--the UPS guy who brought that package came from the McDonalds drive-thru, eating a Big Mac. :o

mushroom Proficient

That is exactly the reason why I tend to ignore the subject (read, puts her head in the sand). It helps to have a gluten free label because it means someone is aware of the issue and is trying. You will find varying degrees of opinion on practically every product as to whether or not they have succeeded (in doing what, I am not quite sure :P ) So it all really comes down to trusting your own judgment. I frequently buy products that are not labelled gluten free after studying the ingredients. I have never had any problems with them. I have had problems with Amy's. Others have problems with Rice Dream....

Excuse me while I put my head back in the sand :blink:

FernW Rookie

I finally finished the article. Melanie Weir the author is part of my Celiac Support Group and I go to her store frequently. She is really nice and is quite knowledgeable but I admit this article was confusing and tooooo long. All I know is that I will continue on being careful real labled call mfg's and if I have any question come back here and ask, you people are great.

RiceGuy Collaborator

Personally, I love the GFCO mark. Nothing like independent certification to make me feel safe! :) After Tricia Thompson's study where she found all that gluten in soy flour I'm a little scared of "no gluten ingredients".

Unfortunately I'm not sure "naturally gluten-free" or "no gluten ingredients" was even legal under that old FDA proposal. Making it illegal to test and label anything but oats scares me half to death. I willingly pay extra for some of the Bob's Red Mill products like gluten-free xanthan gum and gluten-free cornstarch that have been tested and made in their dedicated facility.

Just so you know, Bob's Red Mill doesn't make the cornstarch they sell, nor the baking powder in which it is also included. I've never asked them about their xanthan gum, but I suspect they don't make that either.

What I'd like to see is the actual batch test results, printed on each package. This is not a big deal to implement at all, and it wouldn't be a burden to manufacturers. They already put dates and batch/lot numbers, so their systems are capable of batch-specific info being printed on the packages. It's just a matter of disclosure, which many companies do not want to do. Just as they don't want to label GMOs, because they feel it will "scare" consumers away.

Such batch-specific info would help identify particular facilities with and without CC issues, and when the company switches an ingredient source to one with a notably higher or lower level of CC. Yes, this would turn off those of us who need to be more careful (which we'll do anyway, but currently only after getting glutened and subsequently posting about it on the forum for the whole world to see), but it would also reward companies who manage things better. Again, they simply don't want to tell the consumer, hence all the runaround, doublespeak, and legalese when asked or when a law requires any such statements.

It's about as bad as the fact that companies are allowed to withhold ingredients entirely, such as in the case of the filling in Oreo cookies, or certain cola drinks. They call it a "secret formula".

And it would really be fantastic if grain producers would use dedicated equipment and facilities for each grain. This would not only be great for the gluten-free consumer, but for anyone with allergies to one grain but not another, be it a gluten grain or not. For example, someone with a corn allergy who can eat wheat, or a wheat allergy but can eat barley, and so forth.

psawyer Proficient

It's about as bad as the fact that companies are allowed to withhold ingredients entirely, such as in the case of the filling in Oreo cookies, or certain cola drinks. They call it a "secret formula".

Not true! Every ingredient in packaged food must be accounted for in the ingredient list. There are some vague terms permitted, such as "natural flavor," but wheat cannot be hidden in any of them.

Skylark Collaborator

Just so you know, Bob's Red Mill doesn't make the cornstarch they sell, nor the baking powder in which it is also included. I've never asked them about their xanthan gum, but I suspect they don't make that either.

Fooey. Their website is a little deceptive then. "All of our products marked with our gluten free symbol are produced in a dedicated facility and batch tested for gluten content."

I guess it would be common sense that they aren't making some of that stuff. Duh. I sure hope they're testing. <_< Otherwise I'm wasting money.

Scott Adams Grand Master

Or just read the part where it says:

"Though many companies try to follow the FDA's current gluten-free recommendation, mistakes are often made. "

as it clearly refers to it as "FDA's current gluten-free recommendation."

Take care,

Scott

RiceGuy Collaborator

Not true! Every ingredient in packaged food must be accounted for in the ingredient list. There are some vague terms permitted, such as "natural flavor," but wheat cannot be hidden in any of them.

Sorry, my bad. It's not called a secret formula, it's called a Trade Secret, and it IS permitted. Perhaps the top 8 allergens have to be declared, but the FDA does allow companies to withhold ingredients from product labels in certain cases.

Open Original Shared Link

Open Original Shared Link

RiceGuy Collaborator

Fooey. Their website is a little deceptive then. "All of our products marked with our gluten free symbol are produced in a dedicated facility and batch tested for gluten content."

I guess it would be common sense that they aren't making some of that stuff. Duh. I sure hope they're testing. <_< Otherwise I'm wasting money.

Well, the cornstarch and baking powder might be produced in a dedicated facility, and batch tested. Just not Bob's facilities, though I'd guess they repackage it in a dedicated gluten-free facility, and therefor subsequently test it.

psawyer Proficient

Sorry, my bad. It's not called a secret formula, it's called a Trade Secret, and it IS permitted. Perhaps the top 8 allergens have to be declared, but the FDA does allow companies to withhold ingredients from product labels in certain cases.

Open Original Shared Link

Open Original Shared Link

The ingredients are not "withheld." They are listed as "flavor." The exact makeup of the flavor is what is trade-secret. But there are limits on what can be labeled as "flavor."

Neither of those sites is provided by the FDA.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - knitty kitty replied to Jane02's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      9

      Desperately need a vitamin D supplement. I've reacted to most brands I've tried.

    2. - Jane02 replied to Jane02's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      9

      Desperately need a vitamin D supplement. I've reacted to most brands I've tried.

    3. - knitty kitty replied to Jane02's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      9

      Desperately need a vitamin D supplement. I've reacted to most brands I've tried.

    4. 0

      Penobscot Bay, Maine: Nurturing Gluten-Free Wellness Retreat with expert celiac dietitian, Melinda Dennis

    5. - Scott Adams replied to Jane02's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      9

      Desperately need a vitamin D supplement. I've reacted to most brands I've tried.

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      133,331
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Kristy2026
    Newest Member
    Kristy2026
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.6k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • knitty kitty
      @Jane02, I hear you about the kale and collard greens.  I don't do dairy and must eat green leafies, too, to get sufficient calcium.  I must be very careful because some calcium supplements are made from ground up crustacean shells.  When I was deficient in Vitamin D, I took high doses of Vitamin D to correct the deficiency quickly.  This is safe and nontoxic.  Vitamin D level should be above 70 nmol/L.  Lifeguards and indigenous Pacific Islanders typically have levels between 80-100 nmol/L.   Levels lower than this are based on amount needed to prevent disease like rickets and osteomalacia. We need more thiamine when we're physically ill, emotionally and mentally stressed, and if we exercise like an athlete or laborer.  We need more thiamine if we eat a diet high in simple carbohydrates.  For every 500 kcal of carbohydrates, we need 500-1000 mg more of thiamine to process the carbs into energy.  If there's insufficient thiamine the carbs get stored as fat.  Again, recommended levels set for thiamine are based on minimum amounts needed to prevent disease.  This is often not adequate for optimum health, nor sufficient for people with absorption problems such as Celiac disease.  Gluten free processed foods are not enriched with vitamins like their gluten containing counterparts.  Adding a B Complex and additional thiamine improves health for Celiacs.  Thiamine is safe and nontoxic even in high doses.  Thiamine helps the mitochondria in cells to function.  Thiamine interacts with each of the other B vitamins.  They are all water soluble and easily excreted if not needed. Interesting Reading: Clinical trial: B vitamins improve health in patients with coeliac disease living on a gluten-free diet https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19154566/ Safety and effectiveness of vitamin D mega-dose: A systematic review https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34857184/ High dose dietary vitamin D allocates surplus calories to muscle and growth instead of fat via modulation of myostatin and leptin signaling https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38766160/ Safety of High-Dose Vitamin D Supplementation: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31746327/ Vitamins and Celiac Disease: Beyond Vitamin D https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11857425/ Investigating the therapeutic potential of tryptophan and vitamin A in modulating immune responses in celiac disease: an experimental study https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40178602/ Investigating the Impact of Vitamin A and Amino Acids on Immune Responses in Celiac Disease Patients https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10814138/
    • Jane02
      Thank you so much @knitty kitty for this insightful information! I would have never considered fractionated coconut oil to be a potential source of GI upset. I will consider all the info you shared. Very interesting about the Thiamine deficiency.  I've tracked daily averages of my intake in a nutrition software. The only nutrient I can't consistently meet from my diet is vitamin D. Calcium is a hit and miss as I rely on vegetables, dark leafy greens as a major source, for my calcium intake. I'm able to meet it when I either eat or juice a bundle of kale or collard greens daily haha. My thiamine intake is roughly 120% of my needs, although I do recognize that I may not be absorbing all of these nutrients consistently with intermittent unintentional exposures to gluten.  My vitamin A intake is roughly 900% (~6400 mcg/d) of my needs as I eat a lot of sweet potato, although since it's plant-derived vitamin A (beta-carotene) apparently it's not likely to cause toxicity.  Thanks again! 
    • knitty kitty
      Hello, @Jane02,  I take Naturewise D 3.  It contains olive oil.   Some Vitamin D supplements, like D Drops, are made with fractionated coconut oil which can cause digestive upsets.  Fractionated coconut oil is not the same as coconut oil used for cooking.  Fractionated coconut oil has been treated for longer shelf life, so it won't go bad in the jar, and thus may be irritating to the digestive system. I avoid supplements made with soy because many people with Celiac Disease also react to soy.  Mixed tocopherols, an ingredient in Thornes Vitamin D, may be sourced from soy oil.  Kirkland's has soy on its ingredient list. I avoid things that might contain or be exposed to crustaceans, like Metagenics says on its label.  I have a crustacean/shellfish/fish allergy.  I like Life Extension Bioactive Complete B Complex.  I take additional Thiamine B 1 in the form Benfotiamine which helps the intestines heal, Life Extension MegaBenfotiamine. Thiamine is needed to activate Vitamin D.   Low thiamine can make one feel like they are getting glutened after a meal containing lots of simple carbohydrates like white rice, or processed gluten free foods like cookies and pasta.   It's rare to have a single vitamin deficiency.  The water soluble B Complex vitamins should be supplemented together with additional Thiamine in the form Benfotiamine and Thiamine TTFD (tetrahydrofurfuryl disulfide) to correct subclinical deficiencies that don't show up on blood tests.  These are subclinical deficiencies within organs and tissues.  Blood is a transportation system.  The body will deplete tissues and organs in order to keep a supply of thiamine in the bloodstream going to the brain and heart.   If you're low in Vitamin D, you may well be low in other fat soluble vitamins like Vitamin A and Vitamin K. Have you seen a dietician?
    • Scott Adams
      I do not know this, but since they are labelled gluten-free, and are not really a product that could easily be contaminated when making them (there would be not flour in the air of such a facility, for example), I don't really see contamination as something to be concerned about for this type of product. 
    • trents
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.