Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Help!


gfreemom72

Recommended Posts

gfreemom72 Newbie

So this confuses me.....take a Gluten-Free product like Chex cereal.....some celiacs say they can eat with no problem, while others are more sensitive and have a problem after eating it.  If you aren't ultra sensitive and don't react after eating it, does that mean it's not affecting you internally?? I ask because my son has NO symptoms....we found celiac by accident....and this actually makes it harder.....I let him eat things that are labeled Gluten-Free, but often wonder if some celiacs get symptoms from such foods, couldn't they be damaging his intestines as well...even though he feels ok??

I feel like I'm not explaining this well...I hope someone understands my blabber! thanks!!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



kareng Grand Master

I eat Chex.  If they don't bother him and his follow-up Celiac panels are fine, he is probably not having any damage.  My antibodies are at a normal level when re-checked every year.

mushroom Proficient

There is also the possibility that when people say they "react" to something, that their reaction is to something else in the product and not to cross-contamination. 

GottaSki Mentor

I agree with Karen and Mushroom.

 

I can't eat chex because of other intolerances -- my celiac kids all eat rice, cinnamon and chocolate chex often.  We use half plain rice added to the other half flavored ones to decrease total sugar -- but all three are absolutely gluten-free.

gfreemom72 Newbie

thank u, everyone!

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      133,163
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Carolyn harkless
    Newest Member
    Carolyn harkless
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Let me hasten to add that if you will be undergoing an endoscopy/biopsy, it is critical that you do not begin efforts to reduce gluten beforehand. Doing so will render the results invalid as it will allow the small bowel lining to heal and, therefore, obscure the damage done by celiac disease which is what the biopsy is looking for.
    • Scott Adams
      This article, and the comments below it, may be helpful:    
    • Scott Adams
      That’s a really tough situation. A few key points: as mentioned, a gluten challenge does require daily gluten for several weeks to make blood tests meaningful, but negative tests after limited exposure aren’t reliable. Dermatitis herpetiformis can also be tricky to diagnose unless the biopsy is taken from normal-looking skin next to a lesion. Some people with celiac or DH don’t react every time they’re exposed, so lack of symptoms doesn’t rule it out. Given your history and family cancer risk, this is something I’d strongly discuss with a celiac-experienced gastroenterologist or dermatologist before attempting a challenge on your own, so risks and benefits are clearly weighed.
    • Greymo
      https://celiac.org/glutenexposuremarkers/    yes, two hours after accidents ingesting gluten I am vomiting and then diarrhea- then exhaustion and a headache. see the article above- There is research that shows our reactions.
    • trents
      Concerning the EMA positive result, the EMA was the original blood test developed to detect celiac disease and has largely been replaced by the tTG-IGA which has a similar reliability confidence but is much less expensive to run. Yes, a positive EMA is very strong evidence of celiac disease but not foolproof. In the UK, a tTG-IGA score that is 10x normal or greater will often result in foregoing the endoscopy/biopsy. Weaker positives on the tTG-IGA still trigger the endoscopy/biopsy. That protocol is being considered in the US but is not yet in place.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.