Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):
  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Grant To Develop Wheat Free Of Harmful Gluten Proteins


ENF

Recommended Posts

ENF Enthusiast

April 24, 2008

Washington State University researcher receives NIH grant to develop wheat free of harmful gluten proteins

PULLMAN, WA - Washington State University researcher Diter von Wettstein has been awarded a four-year, $837,000 grant from the National Institutes of Health to further his work on developing wheat varieties safe to eat for people who have Celiac disease.

Rest of article here:

Open Original Shared Link


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



home-based-mom Contributor
April 24, 2008

Washington State University researcher receives NIH grant to develop wheat free of harmful gluten proteins

PULLMAN, WA - Washington State University researcher Diter von Wettstein has been awarded a four-year, $837,000 grant from the National Institutes of Health to further his work on developing wheat varieties safe to eat for people who have Celiac disease.

Rest of article here:

Open Original Shared Link

I don't know about the rest of you, but I think I can hear The Hallelujah Chorus! This is great, not only for us, but for others because maybe they will never develop this condition and never have to be as sick as some of you have been. B)

celiac-mommy Collaborator

Couldn't be a more perfect place (because that's where I went ;) ) Ironic... the school is surrounded by miles and miles of wheat fields!!

Aleshia Contributor
Couldn't be a more perfect place (because that's where I went ;) ) Ironic... the school is surrounded by miles and miles of wheat fields!!

you said you went to washington state university... can I ask you who you went to ? I'm in washington trying to find a doctor who is knowledgeable about celiac disease and won't just say "you don't have it cause you don't have diarhea and you aren't losing weight"....

Aleshia Contributor
Couldn't be a more perfect place (because that's where I went ;) ) Ironic... the school is surrounded by miles and miles of wheat fields!!

you said you went to washington state university... can I ask you who you went to ? I'm in washington trying to find a doctor who is knowledgeable about celiac disease and won't just say "you don't have it cause you don't have diarhea and you aren't losing weight"....

celiac-mommy Collaborator
you said you went to washington state university... can I ask you who you went to ? I'm in washington trying to find a doctor who is knowledgeable about celiac disease and won't just say "you don't have it cause you don't have diarhea and you aren't losing weight"....

Sorry, I meant I went to college there (and I met my dh there on the 2nd day of school!) The dr I see is Char Glenn in Portland OR. She specializes in Celiac dz and nutrition. She's WONDERFUL.

RiceGuy Collaborator

The thing is, even if they do develop it, there's still the problem of producing it commercially. All attempts to grow the original varieties of wheat on a commercial scale failed because of pollen drifting in from other fields growing the modern hybrids. Seems to me they'll have the same trouble here. Getting all the current wheat fields to grow the "safe" variety in a given area, without any of the stuff being grown now lingering around to mess up the genetics of the new one will be quite a task.

Anyway, I'm not so sure I'd even try eating it though. Seems like every time man plays around with genetics, there are unpredictable consequences.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Guhlia Rising Star

I would have to say I agree whole heartedly with RiceGuy. I would be terrified to even try the stuff. I may be in the minority, but I'm perfectly happy with my gluten free replacement products. They may be pricey, but they taste better to me and my family than the gluteny version did.

ravenwoodglass Mentor

I agree with Guhlia and Riceguy. This is something I just don't see as being of any real value. For one thing man has spent quite a while increasing the level of gluten in wheat to give it more of the qualities that make wheat, wheat. Even ancient forms of wheat like spelt are not tolerated by us and I am not even really sure that it is just the gluten in the wheat the we react to. Doctor after doctor will tell us that wheat germ oil is fine and so is wheat derived alcohol and vinagers. Many of us can heartily say that this is not so. I am perfectly happy without this toxin and think we would be better served by them creating other nongluten additives so they can get it out of food that it is not meant to be in in the first place. We shouldn't have to check stuff like orange juice for example.

home-based-mom Contributor

To RiceGuy, Guhlia, and ravenwoodglass: Points well taken.

However *IF* the new variety became the norm (note the big *IF*) then perhaps others in the future would not ever become as sick as you have been. It may be too late for you but perhaps, hopefully, not for others. The issue here (as I see it) is not how tasty your food is, not how well you have adjusted to the gluten-free lifestyle, but how sick your great grandchildren will never get. :)

Takala Enthusiast

Color me skeptical that the end result would be positive.

It would require the entire world using this variety, which apparently would be genetically engineered. (I looked at the site, which is a sort of information clearinghouse for many bio engineering type companies) This is when you take genes from one plant (or animal) and insert them into another plant.

It would take at least a generation (30 years) to see what the actual results of humans eating this variety of wheat would experience. (how do "normal" people react long term to the modified wheat, anyway? ) And what about farm animals ? They eat wheat byproducts, too.

As the other poster(s) have said, the problem with genetically engineered grains is that they cannot control the pollen in the fields, it then cross contaminates everything.

There have been cases where these biotech companies do this deliberately with other grains, plant next to other fields, and then actually have sued the neighboring farmers for trying to save the seed they grew to replant, instead of purchasing the seed from the company, because of patent protection.

Other times, it just destroys the genetic uniqueness of heirloom crops, either way, it decreases the amount of actual diversity, which is not a good thing.

At least with the alternatives right now such as rice and corn, one can tell they ARE rice and corn, not wheat, and it makes it easier to determine just what does and does not have gluten.

I don't see them doing this out of medical concern so much as for the ability to patent more grains and control the patent rights thru farmers having to pay royalties. There is still no real reason whatsoever to be using anonymous grain byproducts in almost all manufactured foods other than to make them cheaper to manufacture, not healthier to eat.

See the problem: grain, more expensive to grow, being used as fill in food to make it cheaper to manufacture but to sell for more because it would be "special" food.

There are a lot of companies right now wanting to tinker with grain genetics, they want to develop varieties of rice which is needing less fertilizer, for instance, by inserting barley genes into it, then have it be raised in China, which would then pay the farmers to grow it by getting carbon - cap payments for using less petroleum fuels and fertilizer, at least that is the theory.

You can now see why I am not going to embrace this idea of a Brave New Grain World without wanting some oversight.

All we need right now to be healthy is :

earlier diagnoses and information awareness of gluten intolerance and the health problems

foods accurately labeled

foods not accidently cross contaminated

foods not full of wierd things (why is wheat in any ice cream? etc )

medications not full of hidden gluten and unknown sourced products

And what do we have ? Society is still not providing these things.

gfjayhawk Rookie

I'm skeptical about this as well. The problems of cross-pollination and contamination with gluten-containing wheat will be very hard to solve. Also, wheat has been bred to develop high levels of gluten because of gluten's special characteristics. Cooking with gluten free wheat would be an entirely different experience, and I'm not sure that people who don't have a pressing medical need to go gluten free will be happy about that.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Wheatwacked replied to Heatherisle's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      34

      Blood results

    2. - Known1 replied to xxnonamexx's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      6

      FDA looking for input on Celiac Gluten sensitivity labeling PLEASE READ and submit your suggestions

    3. - Wheatwacked replied to catnapt's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      31

      results from 13 day gluten challenge - does this mean I can't have celiac?

    4. - Wheatwacked replied to catnapt's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      31

      results from 13 day gluten challenge - does this mean I can't have celiac?

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      133,414
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    EBeloved
    Newest Member
    EBeloved
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.6k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Wheatwacked
    • Wheatwacked
      Celiac Disease causes more vitamin D deficiency than the general population because of limited UV sunlight in the winter and the little available from food is not absorbed well in the damaged small intestine.  Taking 10,000 IU a day (250 mcg) a day broke my depression. Taking it for eleven years.  Doctor recently said to not stop.  My 25(OH)D is around 200 nmol/L (80 ng/ml) but it took about six years to get there.  Increasing vitamin D also increases absorption of Calcium. A good start is 100-gram (3.5-ounce) serving of salmon,  vitamin D from 7.5 to 25 mcg (300 to 1,000 IU) but it is going to take additional vitamin D supplement to be effective.  More importantly salmon has an omega-6 to omega-3 ratio 1:10 anti-inflammatory compared to the 15:1 infammatory ratio of the typical Western diet. Vitamin D and Depression: Where is all the Sunshine?
    • Known1
      Thank you for sharing your thoughts.  I respectfully disagree.  You cherry picked a small section from the page.  I will do the same below: The agency is seeking information on adverse reactions due to “ingredients of interest” (i.e., non-wheat gluten containing grains (GCGs) which are rye and barley, and oats due to cross-contact with GCGs) and on labeling issues or concerns with identifying these “ingredients of interest” on packaged food products in the U.S. “People with celiac disease or gluten sensitives have had to tiptoe around food, and are often forced to guess about their food options,” said FDA Commissioner Marty Makary, M.D., M.P.H. “We encourage all stakeholders to share their experiences and data to help us develop policies that will better protect Americans and support healthy food choices.” --- end quote Anyone with celiac disease is clearly a stakeholder.  The FDA is encouraging us to share our experiences along with any data to help develop future "policies that will better protect Americans and support healthy food choices".  I see this as our chance to speak up or forever hold our peace.  Like those that do not participate in elections, they are not allowed to complain.  The way I see it, if we do not participate in this request for public comment/feedback, then we should also not complain when we get ill from something labeled gluten-free. Have a blessed day ahead, Known1
    • Wheatwacked
      Here is a link to the spreadsheet I kept to track my nutrition intakes.  Maybe it will give you ideas. It is not https so browsers may flag a security warning. There is nothing to send or receive. http://doodlesnotes.net/index3.html I tracked everything I ate, used the National Nutrition Database https://www.foodrisk.org/resources/display/41 to add up my daily intake and supplemented appropriately.  It tracks about 30 nutrients at once.
    • Wheatwacked
      Hello @catnapt, That's so true.  Every person with Celiac Disease has different symptoms.  There are over 200 that it mimics.  Too many still believe that it is only a childhood disease you outgrow.  Or it's psychosomatic or simply a fad.  Idiots.  It's easy to get angry at all of them.   You just have to pick at the answers until you find the ones that work for you.  I too suffer from not being able to take the drugs that work for "everyone else".  SSRIs make me twitch ane feel like toothpicks are holding my eye open, ARBs cripple me.  Statins cause me intestinal Psuedo Obstruction.  Espresso puts me to sleep.  I counted 19 different symptoms that improved from GFD and dealing with my nutritional defecits.  I couldn't breath through my mouth until I started GFD at 64 years old.   My son was born with celiac disease, biopsy diagnosed at weaning.   So why are we the one-percenters.  Why, after being silent for so long, does it suddenly flare? There is the possibility that you have both Celiac Disease and Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity.  NCGS was not established as a diagnosis until 1980.  NCGS is diagnost by first elimating Celiac Disease as the cause, and showing improvement on GFD.  Nothing says you can't have symptoms from both.  Wheatbelly: Total Nutrition by Dr. Davis was helpful to me. We come to the forum to share what we've learned in dealing with our own symptoms.  Maybe this will help someone. Speaking of which if you don't mind; what is your 25(OH)D vitamin D blood level?  You mentioned a mysterious Calcium issue. Vitamin D, Calcium and Iodine are closely interactive. It is not uncommon for postmenopausal women to have insufficient intake of Iodine.   (RDA): Average daily level of intake sufficient to meet the nutrient requirements of nearly all (97%–98%) healthy individuals; often used to plan nutritionally adequate diets for individuals You are a one-percenter.  You may need higher intake of some essential nutrient supplements to speed up repairing the damages.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.