Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Is It Celiacs?


mmcc54

Recommended Posts

mmcc54 Contributor

So at a year old our daughter was marked failure to thrive for not gaining since 6 months old. They did some blood work her IIg came back positive at 16 a month later we did the biopsy which came back negative. Her GI said to try gluten free so her and I (nursing still) have been gluten free for alittle over 4 months. I have seen some inprovment as far as the number of BMs decrease and her fuzziness has diminished. But she still hasn't gained much weight. She eats all day high fatty foods and has only gained 2lbs since 6 months very VERY slowly at only 18lbs now she still hasn't doubled her birth weight. Over the last week or so she has had a new symptom of lime green BMS very loose def doesn't look normal her Dr said it could be a virus but shes acting fine....im so frustrated. Her pedi is convinced that she has celiacs and all of these poor growth and other symptoms is related but he GI doesn't think it is...thought?? Shes meeting all milestones and seems healthy just not growing!?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



mmcc54 Contributor

I meany her IgG came back positive...and I should add she is already 16 months and hasn't gained so it is a long stretch for a child her age to not be gaining weight!!!!

w8in4dave Community Regular

Are you sure she is 100% gluten free? Sometimes some slips in there. I would maby try to find a child safe probiotic, and get her some vitamins. Maby her Ped. can recommend a child safe probiotic.... or look it up on line.

cyclinglady Grand Master

What about her other measurements?  Head and body length.  Are they on target?  Have they changed?  

 

I'm a little confused.  Is she 16 months old and weighs 18 pounds?  

 

I think I probably mentioned this before, but my daughter weighed 6.5 pounds at birth.  At one year she was 17 and it took her until she was 24 months to hit 20 pounds.  Doctor was concerned but I pointed out that her head and body length were growing during that period.    She did not have celiac disease or any issues at all.  I'm just pointing out that kids all grow at a different rate and that people are being coming accustomed to seeing big babies and big people!  It took her until she was four to finally get of out of 5% weight bracket and hit 25%.  At 12 she's now near 50%.  

 

This last bout with diarrhea may just be viral like the doctor said.  

 

I hope this helps.  

tommysmommy Newbie

I dont like the word virus.... i heard that for 2 months as my little guy got sicker & sicker - our babies shouldnt be struggling if the fix is food. First, if the blood test was positive I wouldnt worry too much about the negative biopsy - it just means her intestines hadnt suffered damage yet - I'd consider her celiac. Are you sure you are comoletely gluten-free - have u eliminated all sources of cross contamination (like toasters, pans & spatulas). Have you considered other food intolerances/allergies? It is common for dairy to be a problem for those with celiac (and its not always permanent but hard for celiacs digest), soy, corn & oats are other common sensitivities. Its easy to try eliminating these individually for a few days & observe her reaction. good luck!

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Scott Adams replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      7

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It

    2. - Scott Adams replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results

    3. - deanna1ynne replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results

    4. - cristiana replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      7

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,438
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    rednecksurfer
    Newest Member
    rednecksurfer
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      In the U.S., most regular wheat breads are required to be enriched with certain B-vitamins and iron, but gluten-free breads are not required to be. Since many gluten-free products are not enriched, we usually encourage people with celiac disease to consider a multivitamin.  In the early 1900s, refined white flour replaced whole grains, and people began developing serious vitamin-deficiency diseases: Beriberi → caused by a lack of thiamin (vitamin B1) Pellagra → caused by a lack of niacin (vitamin B3) Anemia → linked to low iron and lack of folate By the 1930s–40s, these problems were common in the U.S., especially in poorer regions. Public-health officials responded by requiring wheat flour and the breads made from it to be “enriched” with thiamin, riboflavin, niacin, and iron. Folic acid was added later (1998) to prevent neural-tube birth defects. Why gluten-free bread isn’t required to be enriched? The U.S. enrichment standards were written specifically for wheat flour. Gluten-free breads use rice, tapioca, corn, sorghum, etc.—so they fall outside that rule—but they probably should be for the same reason wheat products are.
    • Scott Adams
      Keep in mind that there are drawbacks to a formal diagnosis, for example more expensive life and private health insurance, as well as possibly needing to disclose it on job applications. Normally I am in favor of the formal diagnosis process, but if you've already figured out that you can't tolerate gluten and will likely stay gluten-free anyway, I wanted to at least mention the possible negative sides of having a formal diagnosis. While I understand wanting a formal diagnosis, it sounds like she will likely remain gluten-free either way, even if she should test negative for celiac disease (Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If her symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet, it would likely signal NCGS).        
    • JoJo0611
    • deanna1ynne
      Thank you all so much for your advice and thoughts. We ended up having another scope and more bloodwork last week. All serological markers continue to increase, and the doc who did the scope said there villous atrophy visible on the scope — but we just got the biopsy pathology report back, and all it says is, “Duodenal mucosa with patchy increased intraepithelial lymphocytes, preserved villous architecture, and patchy foveolar metaplasia,” which we are told is still inconclusive…  We will have her go gluten free again anyway, but how soon would you all test again, if at all? How valuable is an official dx in a situation like this?
    • cristiana
      Thanks for this Russ, and good to see that it is fortified. I spend too much time looking for M&S gluten-free Iced Spiced Buns to have ever noticed this! That's interesting, Scott.  Have manufacturers ever said why that should be the case?  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.