Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Dr's Advice Feels Fishy


Abthiede

Recommended Posts

Abthiede Newbie

Hello! I finally made it to a GI doc in my area. Based on my weak positive blood test results and symptoms, he does suspect celiac but prescribed an upper GI series and told me to eliminate gluten (which I have already). After reviewing the results he will order an endoscopy. Based on the knowledge I've gained from reading these posts, I asked him if eliminating gluten now would ensure a negative result on the endoscopy, but he said I wouldn't heal that fast. Can that be right? Additionally, I also have a mild dairy allergy and he "prescribed" Activia yogurt for probiotics. I asked if it was okay to eat yogurt with a dairy allergy and he said it's been processed enough it wouldn't bother me. Any one with a dairy allergy find Acitiva problematic?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Rucko Apprentice

Hello. Do you know how long until you get the endoscopy? 

Abthiede Newbie

Hello. Do you know how long until you get the endoscopy?

Thanks for your response, Rucko. It depends on the results of the upper GI series, which I haven't yet scheduled. I haven't read anything on any celiac sites that mentions an upper GI series as a viable test for celiac so I'm a bit mired in doubt. I'm not sure the exposure to radiation, the dye milkshake, etc. are all worth it, especially if once I get an endoscopy my villi have already healed from eliminating gluten (provided they're damaged in the first place). This disease is such a psychological mind trick. I know I feel better without gluten, so it makes sense to avoid it. But somehow the diagnosis means so much. The only *real* reason I can think of pursuing a diagnosis is for the sake of my daughters who may end up in the same boat, and to make my husband stop rolling his eyes when I turn down pizza and beer.

GottaSki Mentor

You should not remove gluten before all celiac testing is complete - which includes endoscopy.

 

How long have you been gluten-free?

 

Do you know if you had a complete celiac antibody panel?  Any nutrient testing?

 

An endoscopy is usually the next step after positive (even weak) antibody test.

cyclinglady Grand Master

Here's some information about testing at UC San Diego's Celiac Center:

 

Open Original Shared Link

 

It mentions that you must be eating gluten until ALL diagnostic tests are completed!  My doctor told me to continue to eat gluten after my "weak" positive blood test until my biospy/endoscopy seven weeks later (which showed moderate to severe damage -- Marsh Stage IIIB).     

 

I've been allergic to whey and casein (milk proteins) for years.  I can not eat yogurt from a cow!  But, if you have a lactose intolerance (milk sugar) which many celiac disease patients often have due to villi damage,  you may be able to tolerate yogurt as the lactose is broken down.  If you're allergic, take a non-dairy/milk probiotic.  There are many of these supplements available.  

 

Why the upper GI series?  Does he suspect something else?  It won't confirm celiac disease.  

 

Good Luck.  Keep researching and be informed!  

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Scott Adams replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      7

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It

    2. - Scott Adams replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results

    3. - deanna1ynne replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results

    4. - cristiana replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      7

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,438
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    rednecksurfer
    Newest Member
    rednecksurfer
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      In the U.S., most regular wheat breads are required to be enriched with certain B-vitamins and iron, but gluten-free breads are not required to be. Since many gluten-free products are not enriched, we usually encourage people with celiac disease to consider a multivitamin.  In the early 1900s, refined white flour replaced whole grains, and people began developing serious vitamin-deficiency diseases: Beriberi → caused by a lack of thiamin (vitamin B1) Pellagra → caused by a lack of niacin (vitamin B3) Anemia → linked to low iron and lack of folate By the 1930s–40s, these problems were common in the U.S., especially in poorer regions. Public-health officials responded by requiring wheat flour and the breads made from it to be “enriched” with thiamin, riboflavin, niacin, and iron. Folic acid was added later (1998) to prevent neural-tube birth defects. Why gluten-free bread isn’t required to be enriched? The U.S. enrichment standards were written specifically for wheat flour. Gluten-free breads use rice, tapioca, corn, sorghum, etc.—so they fall outside that rule—but they probably should be for the same reason wheat products are.
    • Scott Adams
      Keep in mind that there are drawbacks to a formal diagnosis, for example more expensive life and private health insurance, as well as possibly needing to disclose it on job applications. Normally I am in favor of the formal diagnosis process, but if you've already figured out that you can't tolerate gluten and will likely stay gluten-free anyway, I wanted to at least mention the possible negative sides of having a formal diagnosis. While I understand wanting a formal diagnosis, it sounds like she will likely remain gluten-free either way, even if she should test negative for celiac disease (Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If her symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet, it would likely signal NCGS).        
    • JoJo0611
    • deanna1ynne
      Thank you all so much for your advice and thoughts. We ended up having another scope and more bloodwork last week. All serological markers continue to increase, and the doc who did the scope said there villous atrophy visible on the scope — but we just got the biopsy pathology report back, and all it says is, “Duodenal mucosa with patchy increased intraepithelial lymphocytes, preserved villous architecture, and patchy foveolar metaplasia,” which we are told is still inconclusive…  We will have her go gluten free again anyway, but how soon would you all test again, if at all? How valuable is an official dx in a situation like this?
    • cristiana
      Thanks for this Russ, and good to see that it is fortified. I spend too much time looking for M&S gluten-free Iced Spiced Buns to have ever noticed this! That's interesting, Scott.  Have manufacturers ever said why that should be the case?  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.