Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Funny Cost For Celiac Blood Panel


cyclinglady

Recommended Posts

cyclinglady Grand Master

I was formally diagnosed a year ago.  My husband has not been formally diagnosed, but went gluten free 13 years ago at the advice of my allergist and his MD/GP.  Since my daughter was symptom free (I know….my only symptom was anemia), I waited until the "Affordable Care Act" was officially in place to have her tested for celiac disease.  We are self-employed and I was already "uninsurable" which meant that I was able to keep my old insurance but wasn't able to shop around for other insurance.  In my state, I could get new insurance but at an extra premium (we pay about $22K/year for three of us as it stands now).  My daughter has her own policy and I didn't want a "ding" on her record or any rejection.

 

Her results were negative.  Yeah!  

 

I received her bill from her insurance company yesterday.  The test was about $600.00.   Her insurance has set charges (negotiated rates), we had to pay the total lab costs of $68.00 since we have not met her deductible.    At first I just thought it was some kind of co-pay, but that was the full amount.  I cringe to think what folks without insurance must pay!  

 

Fortunately, my husband and I have a HMO policy that covers just about everything (and we pay through the nose for it).  

 

Yikes! 

 

I would have paid the $600 since health is everything to us, but still?  Why such a disparity in charges?  

 

 


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



1desperateladysaved Proficient

I have noticed extreme difference in charges.  If the doctor's believe I am denied coverage, than my bill goes down.  For example I recently got a thyroid full panel.  I heard from the insurance company which said the doctor had billed $528 dollars for the test.  Meanwhile, I got notice from the doctor's office that if the insurance company did not cover the price I would be billed the full cost of $128! 

 

I also had a MRI for my son once.  When the insurance company refused to pay the $1500, I was billed 400 dollars.  I believe big differences like this occur and sometimes I wonder if not having insurance would be cheaper. 

cahill Collaborator

This is how doctors/hops/labs/ect get more money from the insurance companys. They basicly over charge the insureace co. to get  more money from them .

 

When I was self pay( no insurance ) my docs would charge me a much lower rate than what they would have bill the insurance companys  .

powerofpositivethinking Community Regular

i consider myself pretty with it, but those insurance statements are so confusing to me :unsure:  I am very thankful to have really good insurance because it's outrageous to see the charges.  The Celiac Disease Comprehensive Panel from LabCorp I had done in December was $651, and the Vitamin D was $273.  The insurance paid $82.71, and my final cost was $5.  I have to get all of my lab work done through LabCorp or else I foot the entire bill.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Scott Adams replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      7

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It

    2. - Scott Adams replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results

    3. - deanna1ynne replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results

    4. - cristiana replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      7

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,438
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    rednecksurfer
    Newest Member
    rednecksurfer
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      In the U.S., most regular wheat breads are required to be enriched with certain B-vitamins and iron, but gluten-free breads are not required to be. Since many gluten-free products are not enriched, we usually encourage people with celiac disease to consider a multivitamin.  In the early 1900s, refined white flour replaced whole grains, and people began developing serious vitamin-deficiency diseases: Beriberi → caused by a lack of thiamin (vitamin B1) Pellagra → caused by a lack of niacin (vitamin B3) Anemia → linked to low iron and lack of folate By the 1930s–40s, these problems were common in the U.S., especially in poorer regions. Public-health officials responded by requiring wheat flour and the breads made from it to be “enriched” with thiamin, riboflavin, niacin, and iron. Folic acid was added later (1998) to prevent neural-tube birth defects. Why gluten-free bread isn’t required to be enriched? The U.S. enrichment standards were written specifically for wheat flour. Gluten-free breads use rice, tapioca, corn, sorghum, etc.—so they fall outside that rule—but they probably should be for the same reason wheat products are.
    • Scott Adams
      Keep in mind that there are drawbacks to a formal diagnosis, for example more expensive life and private health insurance, as well as possibly needing to disclose it on job applications. Normally I am in favor of the formal diagnosis process, but if you've already figured out that you can't tolerate gluten and will likely stay gluten-free anyway, I wanted to at least mention the possible negative sides of having a formal diagnosis. While I understand wanting a formal diagnosis, it sounds like she will likely remain gluten-free either way, even if she should test negative for celiac disease (Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If her symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet, it would likely signal NCGS).        
    • JoJo0611
    • deanna1ynne
      Thank you all so much for your advice and thoughts. We ended up having another scope and more bloodwork last week. All serological markers continue to increase, and the doc who did the scope said there villous atrophy visible on the scope — but we just got the biopsy pathology report back, and all it says is, “Duodenal mucosa with patchy increased intraepithelial lymphocytes, preserved villous architecture, and patchy foveolar metaplasia,” which we are told is still inconclusive…  We will have her go gluten free again anyway, but how soon would you all test again, if at all? How valuable is an official dx in a situation like this?
    • cristiana
      Thanks for this Russ, and good to see that it is fortified. I spend too much time looking for M&S gluten-free Iced Spiced Buns to have ever noticed this! That's interesting, Scott.  Have manufacturers ever said why that should be the case?  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.