Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

How To "maximize" Testing My Kids


tri-gal

Recommended Posts

tri-gal Rookie

My situation is this: I am convinced I have celiac but undiagnosed as I went off gluten to help my nursing baby. I am concerned about my kids, but as I have no diagnosis, I have little "leverage" for testing.

My 1 year old is still off gluten, as am I, due to his gluten and other protein enteropathy symptoms (plus FPIES to several foods, for those interested in / familiar with FPIES).

(Unfortunately, I was not tested ahead of my gluten free status.)

My 5 year old is displaying potential symptoms, and I'd like to get her assessed but don't want to mess up what might be one chance ot do so.

Her symptoms follow this list of q's:

1) Do you think her symptoms warrant testing or would it be more severe if she had celiac disease?

2) when is the appropriate time and what is the appropriate path so we don't loose a precious opportunity for an accurate diagnosis?

3) if we blood test too early, the door may be shut on us permanently thereafter, so advice on whether and when to pursue:

blood panel now?

or pay for enterolab stool tests to see if we would likely have anything show up first, combined with gene test

 

Here are her symptoms:

vague but on and off bloating and tummy issues, seems to be gluten related but hard to measure

alternating days of fatty, pale stools, floating and bitty after a higher fat meal

stools that pack a punch

some days of constipation or feeling she needs to go, but does not

dental - enamel grooves and a couple of misshapen baby teeth

mood swings and frustration fits seem more related to gluten days, but hard to prove

she seemed never to grow vertically but always in the "normal" range on the charts... until the past year when our family reduced her gluten (because I was 100% gluten free)

 

Many thanks.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



cmc811 Apprentice

I'm in a similar situation except I did get tested and my results are being called inconclusive. Low positive ttg and Marsh I biospy isn't convincing enough apparently......grrr!

 

Anyway, my 5 year old is also having symptoms which is what really prompted me to get tested because I was getting resistance from the pediatrician when it came to testing him. Based on my positive blood test she ordered a total iga and ttg-iga for him. Both normal and so she has decided that she has ruled it out. Obviously, I don't think the 1 test is effective enough for a rule-out. So what I ended up doing is going around her. I have him scheduled with a pediatric GI in a week and I'm anxiously awaiting hearing his theory on my results and how that may change what testing needs to be on my son.

 

Moral of the story: find an experienced pedi GI and take her there. Explain everything and ask for a full panel. Make sure you let them know that you want to test while she's consuming gluten and since the house is gluten free you don't want to lose the window of opportunity. If they don't take you seriously call a different doctor. You have a valid point so continue to persue it!

tri-gal Rookie

Thanks so much for your feedback. Good for you for finding a GI specialist too. I'm motivated and inspired, so thanks!

When I was sorting through the maze of allergies and gluten issues last year, I decided to get a panel, by which point I had been gluten free for a couple of months. My doc initially said it would not matter....

Anyway, the results were deemed negative: I had a deamidated gliadin  IgG of 7.2 but lab says 10 and over is positive. Does this 7.2 result  suggest anything at all would people say? Meanwhile, my deamidated gliading IgA was 1.4 and translutaminase of 1.3 for IgA AB. My total IgA was 1.33, so I have no idea if this means I am on the low side of IgA generally speaking or how the other numbers relate to the total. I was left with no where to go for myself but "play around" with gluten, which I can't do whatsoever. I seem to have developed v active gluten reactions post partum with only  a few months of my gut deteriorating rapidly, so my theory is my gut started to heal relatively rapidly and no proof was left in my blood.

This entire chapter has been eating away at me, so to speak, with mounting anxiety of my children's health and no "diagnosis" to validate my concerns. Yet, I don't want my daughter to go entirely gluten free until I've figured it out.

GottaSki Mentor

While your DGP-IgG was not positive, I would run the Complete Celiac Antibody panel again to compare results -- while it will not be proof for official diagnosis -- if it has come down substantially it is yet another piece of the puzzle.  If it has gone up it will be an indication that gluten is sneaking in your diet and you need to review your diet, meds and supplements.

 

Since you remain in diagnostic limbo - yet your history, symptoms and reaction to gluten indicate NCGS (non-celiac gluten sensitivity) or celiac disease I would have the complete panel run annually -- I strongly believe more data is better :)

 

It's that or another challenge -- which you may have trouble physically completing.

cmc811 Apprentice

This entire chapter has been eating away at me, so to speak, with mounting anxiety of my children's health and no "diagnosis" to validate my concerns. Yet, I don't want my daughter to go entirely gluten free until I've figured it out.

I am in this exact situation. I have no problem going gluten free for myself because I think my test results provide enough of a case for it. It's my kids, mainly my symptomatic 5 year old, that severely stresses me out! The pediatrician hasn't thought it was Celiac from the beginning when I brought it up so the testing process has been difficult to get initiated for him. Now with a negative ttg, she has completely written off the possibility of Celiac. I specifically asked for DGP and basically was denied. She wouldn't order it, so I'm no help with that test.

 

Do you have the ranges for your results? All labs are a little different, so generally when you post a result you should also post the range the lab uses.

 

I'm sorry you're going through this, but trust me, you're not alone! I think many of us are in, or have gone through, diagnosis hell.

tri-gal Rookie

Thank you so much for your helpful response and suggestions. Very much appreciated and sound advice!

Best to you.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Scott Adams replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      7

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It

    2. - Scott Adams replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results

    3. - deanna1ynne replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results

    4. - cristiana replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      7

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,440
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Lillian Steele
    Newest Member
    Lillian Steele
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      In the U.S., most regular wheat breads are required to be enriched with certain B-vitamins and iron, but gluten-free breads are not required to be. Since many gluten-free products are not enriched, we usually encourage people with celiac disease to consider a multivitamin.  In the early 1900s, refined white flour replaced whole grains, and people began developing serious vitamin-deficiency diseases: Beriberi → caused by a lack of thiamin (vitamin B1) Pellagra → caused by a lack of niacin (vitamin B3) Anemia → linked to low iron and lack of folate By the 1930s–40s, these problems were common in the U.S., especially in poorer regions. Public-health officials responded by requiring wheat flour and the breads made from it to be “enriched” with thiamin, riboflavin, niacin, and iron. Folic acid was added later (1998) to prevent neural-tube birth defects. Why gluten-free bread isn’t required to be enriched? The U.S. enrichment standards were written specifically for wheat flour. Gluten-free breads use rice, tapioca, corn, sorghum, etc.—so they fall outside that rule—but they probably should be for the same reason wheat products are.
    • Scott Adams
      Keep in mind that there are drawbacks to a formal diagnosis, for example more expensive life and private health insurance, as well as possibly needing to disclose it on job applications. Normally I am in favor of the formal diagnosis process, but if you've already figured out that you can't tolerate gluten and will likely stay gluten-free anyway, I wanted to at least mention the possible negative sides of having a formal diagnosis. While I understand wanting a formal diagnosis, it sounds like she will likely remain gluten-free either way, even if she should test negative for celiac disease (Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If her symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet, it would likely signal NCGS).        
    • JoJo0611
    • deanna1ynne
      Thank you all so much for your advice and thoughts. We ended up having another scope and more bloodwork last week. All serological markers continue to increase, and the doc who did the scope said there villous atrophy visible on the scope — but we just got the biopsy pathology report back, and all it says is, “Duodenal mucosa with patchy increased intraepithelial lymphocytes, preserved villous architecture, and patchy foveolar metaplasia,” which we are told is still inconclusive…  We will have her go gluten free again anyway, but how soon would you all test again, if at all? How valuable is an official dx in a situation like this?
    • cristiana
      Thanks for this Russ, and good to see that it is fortified. I spend too much time looking for M&S gluten-free Iced Spiced Buns to have ever noticed this! That's interesting, Scott.  Have manufacturers ever said why that should be the case?  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.