Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

How Bad Is Sugar?


Steph1

Recommended Posts

Steph1 Apprentice

Ok, so I have come to terms with the fact that for now, at least, gluten-free grains are like gluten Jr, no alcohol, and either no soy, no msg or both.  Oh yeah no chocolate :(   Plain sugary stuff seems to be ok, though.  Like hard candy, or Talenti Sorbet (omg so good).  Is it likely that even if I don't feel sick or have issues that I notice, that it is still not good for me at the moment?  I don't eat it all the time, but I definitely have been on a candy kick.

 

Eta:  oh milk is out too, though I think a little cheese is ok.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



kareng Grand Master

I know this "no added sugar diet" is all the rage right now.  I am sure there are lots of places to get info on it.  Maybe Katie Couric's TV shoe website has info on it.

 

I saw Katie Couric was doing it.  She still seemed to be eating a lot of sugar - more fruits, etc than usual.  But I guess the point of it is no added sugar?

 

You already seem so restricted, why take on a fad diet?  If you don't have a problem with a hard candy or some sorbet - why eliminate more foods?

BlessedMommy Rising Star

I got sick constantly, had back to back bouts of bronchitis, and was sick with various forms of allergies all the time. 

 

Cutting out sugar for a period of time really helped me a lot. My health is improved, my allergies are much better and I can enjoy the spring weather without feeling miserable all the time.

 

I now use some sweeteners very, very sparingly. I can usually tell when I've had too much.

 

If you're not sick and feel fine, though, you may not have to cut it out altogether. I think that low sugar is a good idea for everyone, but using no sweeteners of any kind is difficult.

FruitEnthusiast Enthusiast

Sugar isn't good for anyone, especially anyone with immune issues. It causes inflammation and inhibits your immune system. I was over doing sugar and didn't think it was hurting anything until I saw the delayed effect it had on my digestive system. I've completely removed sugar from my diet.

 

Cutting back on sugar isn't a new idea. There have been many books written, over the years, that talk about how damaging sugar is to the body. Everyone has to decide for themselves, but keeping sugar to a minimum can only help you, especially while you're healing.

GF Lover Rising Star

Sugar isn't good for anyone, especially anyone with immune issues. It causes inflammation and inhibits your immune system. I was over doing sugar and didn't think it was hurting anything until I saw the delayed effect it had on my digestive system. I've completely removed sugar from my diet.

 

Cutting back on sugar isn't a new idea. There have been many books written, over the years, that talk about how damaging sugar is to the body. Everyone has to decide for themselves, but keeping sugar to a minimum can only help you, especially while you're healing.

 

Hi FruitE,

 

Do you have research information on sugar and inflammation/immune system or is this your personal opinion?

 

Colleen

BlessedMommy Rising Star

I use the American Heart Association recommendations as my baseline. I try to keep my daily intake of all added sugars (honey, maple syrup, etc. count as added sugar) to around their recommendation--which works out to about 6-9 tsp per day. It's easy to get over that amount without thinking about it, so as a rule of thumb I try to avoid most things with sweeteners, unless it's something that I really enjoy. For example, spaghetti sauce doesn't need sugar, nor does seasonings, etc. I try to stick with buying unsweetened non-dairy milks, etc. 

 

So basically I save my daily allotment of sugar for certain condiments that I really like (such as vegenaise, stir fry sauces, etc.), granola, an occasional treat, etc.

Steph1 Apprentice

I don't want to cut it out, I really don't.  Today I have pain in my ear, pressure in my eyes and head, C, joint pain and vertigo.  I just want to feel better.  I had potato salad over the weekend, other than that everything was normal.  Oh I had a few pieces of cheese. I feel like practically everything makes me sick.  I guess it wouldn't kill me to give up excessive sugar for a week. :unsure:


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



BlessedMommy Rising Star

I found that once I cut out sugar, my cravings went way down. Now, lots of sugary things seem too sweet to me. I do use some sweeteners in moderation now and it's fairly easy to stop when I need to. I think that going without sugar for a period of time reprogrammed my taste buds.

Steph1 Apprentice

Ruth - do you still eat a few servings of fruit each day?  

BlessedMommy Rising Star

Yes, we love fresh fruit and typically consume at least the recommended 2-4 servings, if not more. :) We've eaten a lot of fresh berries and melons lately. Yum!

chocominties Rookie

I've read that sugar can upset your digestive system because certain bacteria feed off of it and then flourish (in a bad way). 

 

All I know is that I rapidly gain weight if I so much as *look* at sugar.  One Vitamin Water 3x in a week was enough to make me gain 5 pounds in said week with no other dietary changes.  I now try to limit my sugar intake.  YMMV.

FruitEnthusiast Enthusiast

Hi FruitE,

 

Do you have research information on sugar and inflammation/immune system or is this your personal opinion?

 

Colleen

 

Hi Colleen, you asked to see some research…

 

From the CNN Health website:

 

(CNN) March 2014 -- The World Health Organization wants you to stop eating so much sugar. Seriously. The WHO is encouraging people to consume less than 5% of their total daily calories from sugars. Most Americans still consume much more. For an adult at a normal body mass index, or BMI, eating 5% would be around 25 grams of sugar -- or six teaspoons. That's less than is typically found in a single can of regular soda, which contains about 40 grams of sugar.

 

From Dr Weil's website:

 

"It is becoming increasingly clear that chronic inflammation is the root cause of many serious illnesses - including heart disease, many cancers, and Alzheimer's disease. Inflammation is the body's way of getting more nourishment and more immune activity into an area that needs to fend off infection or heal. But when inflammation persists or serves no purpose, it damages the body and causes illness, which we see when the immune system mistakenly targets the body's own tissues in (autoimmune) diseases".

 

"Learning how specific foods influence the inflammatory process is the best strategy for containing it and reducing long-term disease risks. As part of an Anti-Inflammatory Diet, reduce your consumption of foods made with wheat flour and sugar".

GF Lover Rising Star

Hi Colleen, you asked to see some research…

 

From the CNN Health website:

 

(CNN) March 2014 -- The World Health Organization wants you to stop eating so much sugar. Seriously. The WHO is encouraging people to consume less than 5% of their total daily calories from sugars. Most Americans still consume much more. For an adult at a normal body mass index, or BMI, eating 5% would be around 25 grams of sugar -- or six teaspoons. That's less than is typically found in a single can of regular soda, which contains about 40 grams of sugar.

 

From Dr Weil's website:

 

"It is becoming increasingly clear that chronic inflammation is the root cause of many serious illnesses - including heart disease, many cancers, and Alzheimer's disease. Inflammation is the body's way of getting more nourishment and more immune activity into an area that needs to fend off infection or heal. But when inflammation persists or serves no purpose, it damages the body and causes illness, which we see when the immune system mistakenly targets the body's own tissues in (autoimmune) diseases".

 

"Learning how specific foods influence the inflammatory process is the best strategy for containing it and reducing long-term disease risks. As part of an Anti-Inflammatory Diet, reduce your consumption of foods made with wheat flour and sugar".

 

Hi FruitE,

 

Like Dr. Weil's site, most of what I read when researching the subject is opinion and the ol' "research shows" line without providing sources for the information.  In the time I spent looking I could not find any peer reviewed studies or legit research on the good/bad effects of consumption of sugar.  All that I read was about how over consumption of highly refined carbs (sugars) lead to obesity to diabetes and heart disease and they were talking about excessive amount of refined sugar added to processed foods and blood sugar levels.

 

I think with all the "recommendations" on appropriate sugar consumption and how "bad" it is for you drives many people to cut sugar out all together, which "they" say is not good for you either as the body does need some sugars to function (I read that in my search but don't have the source at hand but I think it was Webmd.)  I also read some info from a couple of Pediatricians that newborns will choose a sweet taste over other tastes.

 

I would imagine that the natural sugars in fruits is plenty to sustain us.   I also believe that moderation is the key to everything.  As for myself, I try to maintain a "low" sugar diet per my Oncologist but that is deceiving because "low" is really just the recommended amounts.  

 

I guess in the end it all boils down to not cutting out all sugars but choosing natural ones over processed and limiting "sweets" to a reasonable level.  That said, I do make brownies on occasion, have some ice cream here and there, enjoy a candy bar once in awhile and I am a sucker for Cherry 7Up.  I don't over indulge in sweets, I think of them as "something special" to have.  

 

Colleen

BlessedMommy Rising Star

I agree with us needing natural sugars! I joined a Candida support board and I didn't feel like I fit in there, because the folks there tended to be militant about cutting even natural sugars like fruit or stuff like potatoes. They considered stuff like eating fruit to be "playing with fire." :wacko:

GF Lover Rising Star

I agree with us needing natural sugars! I joined a Candida support board and I didn't feel like I fit in there, because the folks there tended to be militant about cutting even natural sugars like fruit or stuff like potatoes. They considered stuff like eating fruit to be "playing with fire." :wacko:

 

Yikes!  Now that is "Extreme".  

 

Colleen

FruitEnthusiast Enthusiast
I think with all the "recommendations" on appropriate sugar consumption and how "bad" it is for you drives many people to cut sugar out all together, which "they" say is not good for you either as the body does need some sugars to function (I read that in my search but don't have the source at hand but I think it was Webmd.) 

 

I would imagine that the natural sugars in fruits is plenty to sustain us.   I also believe that moderation is the key to everything. 

 

I guess in the end it all boils down to not cutting out all sugars but choosing natural ones over processed and limiting "sweets" to a reasonable level.  I don't over indulge in sweets, I think of them as "something special" to have.  

 

Colleen

 

Exactly. You have said it here better than I did. I read the same thing on WebMD about how we need to have the natural sugar in fruits in our diet. I don't want to give anyone the idea that I suggest removing fresh fruit, it's good for you.

 

I was talking about having refined sugar in moderation, or any concentrated sugar. Sometimes it seems to make sense that if fresh whole fruits are good, then unsweetened fruit juice is just as good, but it actually has the same amount of sugar per oz as soda. One source for that info is from the Harvard School of Public Health website.

 

Like you say sweets are meant to be a treat, something special. I believe also that moderation is the key to everything.

JamieRmusic Explorer

Sugar feeds the wrong kinds of bacteria in the gut which is a bad thing. So if you are serious about healing then the professionals suggest that you get off sugar completely until properly healed, but dark honey seems to be ok in moderate amounts.

GF Lover Rising Star

Please explain who the "Professions" are.  If you read some research you will learn that the body NEEDS some sugar to function properly.

 

Colleen

cyclinglady Grand Master

I disagree, Colleen. Yes, your body needs some sugar, but it will convert even protein into glucose. How else did the Eskimos survive? Let's face it. The typical Western diet contains too much added sugar. We are up to 160 pounds per person in the U.S. That seems pretty excessive. Check out this lecture from UC San Francisco.

Open Original Shared Link

It is just "food for thought".......

JamieRmusic Explorer

I agree with cyclinglady on this one. Your body will produce everything except the 11 amino acids that it cannot produce. This is why meats are such a great source of protein, but we don't need to eat as much as most people do. Oviously we can get it from specific plants and other foods like quinoa and so forth (lysine is an example that quinoa is rich off of, which is hard to get outside of meat). All I'm saying that a well balanced meal is required to fill the spectrum, and meat can make it easier. Myself have debated going vegan once I am fully healed due to the fact I can't stand the way our food is being treated. We are so disconnected, and it feels like the stuff just comes out of nowhere. Poor animals...

I believe everything that is "not-so-good-for-you" In moderation is "ok", but if you are in a healing process from celiacs then it is suggested not to. The body will manage to get rid of most toxics and has an amazing ability to filter stuff. Except when your GI tract is broken and you get everything into your bloodstream.

Check out Gluten Summit which is hosted by the wonderful Dr. Tom'o Bryan who has a good grasp of A.I (auto immune) diseases. Thyroid Sessions has a lot of good information too. SCD Lifestyle is run by two who have celiacs and have struggled most of their lives. After figuring out what it was and gotten a grasp on it they became physicians and are now on the road to help more people. 

I suggest checking Gluten Summit as they have a list of all the doctors and practitioner they have interviewed. Over 40 who specialise in their own unique part of the body, but all related to A.I or celiacs.

BlessedMommy Rising Star

^Being celiac and vegetarian is totally doable. I'm vegetarian and still find that I have a ton of gluten free food options. :)

FruitEnthusiast Enthusiast

SCD Lifestyle is run by two who have celiacs and have struggled most of their lives. After figuring out what it was and gotten a grasp on it they became physicians and are now on the road to help more people.

 

It's a very helpful and informative site. They explain why they recommend removing grains, starches, and all added sweeteners, except honey for a time to heal, then certain foods can be added back in gradually. It is an extreme approach, which is what it sometimes takes to get well.

 

This diet is recommended by Dr. Pimentel who heads the GI Motility Program at Cedars Sinai in Los Angeles, CA. There main objective is to control the excess bacteria in the gut. Sugars are what the bacteria feed on. I have a friend who is a patient of his and she's doing much better following the SCD diet.

 

I don't technically follow the diet myself, but I have had to remove all the foods they do anyway because I can't tolerate them, including refined and concentrated sugars. So my diet is basically the same diet.

 

I was vegetarian for the first year and a half after going gluten-free. Eventually I found I didn't feel well and added chicken back into my diet. Some people do better than others on a vegetarian diet.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,900
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    tessycork47
    Newest Member
    tessycork47
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Welcome to the forum, @Judy M! Yes, he definitely needs to continue eating gluten until the day of the endoscopy. Not sure why the GI doc advised otherwise but it was a bum steer.  Celiac disease has a genetic component but also an "epigenetic" component. Let me explain. There are two main genes that have been identified as providing the "potential" to develop "active" celiac disease. We know them as HLA-DQ 2.5 (aka, HLA-DQ 2) and HLA-DQ8. Without one or both of these genes it is highly unlikely that a person will develop celiac disease at some point in their life. About 40% of the general population carry one or both of these two genes but only about 1% of the population develops active celiac disease. Thus, possessing the genetic potential for celiac disease is far less than deterministic. Most who have the potential never develop the disease. In order for the potential to develop celiac disease to turn into active celiac disease, some triggering stress event or events must "turn on" the latent genes. This triggering stress event can be a viral infection, some other medical event, or even prolonged psychological/emotional trauma. This part of the equation is difficult to quantify but this is the epigenetic dimension of the disease. Epigenetics has to do with the influence that environmental factors and things not coded into the DNA itself have to do in "turning on" susceptible genes. And this is why celiac disease can develop at any stage of life. Celiac disease is an autoimmune condition (not a food allergy) that causes inflammation in the lining of the small bowel. The ingestion of gluten causes the body to attack the cells of this lining which, over time, damages and destroys them, impairing the body's ability to absorb nutrients since this is the part of the intestinal track responsible for nutrient absorption and also causing numerous other food sensitivities such as dairy/lactose intolerance. There is another gluten-related disorder known as NCGS (Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity or just, "gluten sensitivity") that is not autoimmune in nature and which does not damage the small bowel lining. However, NCGS shares many of the same symptoms with celiac disease such as gas, bloating, and diarrhea. It is also much more common than celiac disease. There is no test for NCGS so, because they share common symptoms, celiac disease must first be ruled out through formal testing for celiac disease. This is where your husband is right now. It should also be said that some experts believe NCGS can transition into celiac disease. I hope this helps.
    • Judy M
      My husband has had lactose intolerance for his entire life (he's 68 yo).  So, he's used to gastro issues. But for the past year he's been experiencing bouts of diarrhea that last for hours.  He finally went to his gastroenterologist ... several blood tests ruled out other maladies, but his celiac results are suspect.  He is scheduled for an endoscopy and colonoscopy in 2 weeks.  He was told to eat "gluten free" until the tests!!!  I, and he know nothing about this "diet" much less how to navigate his in daily life!! The more I read, the more my head is spinning.  So I guess I have 2 questions.  First, I read on this website that prior to testing, eat gluten so as not to compromise the testing!  Is that true? His primary care doctor told him to eat gluten free prior to testing!  I'm so confused.  Second, I read that celiac disease is genetic or caused by other ways such as surgery.  No family history but Gall bladder removal 7 years ago, maybe?  But how in God's name does something like this crop up and now is so awful he can't go a day without worrying.  He still works in Manhattan and considers himself lucky if he gets there without incident!  Advice from those who know would be appreciated!!!!!!!!!!!!
    • Scott Adams
      You've done an excellent job of meticulously tracking the rash's unpredictable behavior, from its symmetrical spread and stubborn scabbing to the potential triggers you've identified, like the asthma medication and dietary changes. It's particularly telling that the rash seems to flare with wheat consumption, even though your initial blood test was negative—as you've noted, being off wheat before a test can sometimes lead to a false negative, and your description of the other symptoms—joint pain, brain fog, stomach issues—is very compelling. The symmetry of the rash is a crucial detail that often points toward an internal cause, such as an autoimmune response or a systemic reaction, rather than just an external irritant like a plant or mites. I hope your doctor tomorrow takes the time to listen carefully to all of this evidence you've gathered and works with you to find some real answers and effective relief. Don't be discouraged if the rash fluctuates; your detailed history is the most valuable tool you have for getting an accurate diagnosis.
    • Scott Adams
      In this case the beer is excellent, but for those who are super sensitive it is likely better to go the full gluten-free beer route. Lakefront Brewery (another sponsor!) has good gluten-free beer made without any gluten ingredients.
    • trents
      Welcome to the forum, @catsrlife! Celiac disease can be diagnosed without committing to a full-blown "gluten challenge" if you get a skin biopsy done during an active outbreak of dermatitis herpetiformis, assuming that is what is causing the rash. There is no other known cause for dermatitis herpetiformis so it is definitive for celiac disease. You would need to find a dermatologist who is familiar with doing the biopsy correctly, however. The samples need to be taken next to the pustules, not on them . . . a mistake many dermatologists make when biopsying for dermatitis herpetiformis. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.