Jump to content

  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):

    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Positive Biopsy Followed By Negative Blood Work

JodyM75

Recommended Posts

JodyM75 Apprentice
JodyM75
Posted

My GI diagnosed me with celiac after my EGD the beginning of April, which showed "mild celiac" in a biopsy.  (Yes, I know you either have it or you don't, but those are the words they used when they told me - I'm assuming that means "mild damage").

 

Blood work just came back today as normal.  This is what they told me when I called:

 

IGG:  3  (she said anything under 20 was considered normal)

IGA:  7  (same as above, under 20 was normal)

IGM: antibodies not detected

 

-How common are false negatives?

-I was gluten free for about 4 weeks prior to the blood being drawn.  When I asked my GI, he said no, don't start eating gluten again before the test.  Thoughts?

-What are my next steps?

 

Any other thoughts would be helpful.  Also, I don't present with the obvious and debilitating symptoms many of you have so I can't really tell if a gluten-free diet is helping.  The most I can say is my pressing fatigue has cleared up.

 

Thank you all so much!

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


cyclinglady Grand Master
cyclinglady
Posted

My initial blood work was barely positive and my only symptom was anemia (went to GI for routine colonoscopy and he suspected celiac disease) but my biopsy showed Marsh Stage IIIB moderate to severe-damage. I have not gone back for another blood test since I was barely positive on it, I am no longer anemic, and my husband is gluten-free, so I am very sure I am diet compliant. Also, I should say that anemia was my only symptom, but between my blood test and biopsy (7 weeks), I consumed enough bread that brought intestinal symptoms (e.g. Rock feeling in stomach, etc.) and I get those symptoms when i get glutened eating out.

Why no blood test prior to the endoscopy? I would think insurance would require it.

Looks like you were just at the beginning stages of celiac disease and four weeks of the diet brought your antibodies down. Good job!

Let's see what the others have to say.

CajunChic Explorer
CajunChic
Posted

Look at your pathology report and read what type of damage was seen, (increased IELs, villi blunting, scalloping, was the structure normal, crypt ratios, etc.)

Mine was only increased IELs (Marsh 1) and negative bloodwork, still got a celiac dx.

False negatives happen all the time, especially if you're catching the disease in the beginning. That's what my GI told me about having negative bloodwork. He said I had seronegative celiac.

Everyone has different symptoms, keep going gluten-free and see how you feel a couple months from now. Some people don't have any symptoms but are damaging their bodies.

Good luck!

JodyM75 Apprentice
JodyM75
Posted
  • Author

Cycle:  It was a fluke.  I have a hiatal hernia and just switched GIs in January after I found out my previous GI diagnosed me with Barretts on sight only, no biopsy.  I had been researching wheat and it's relationship with thyroid problems (which run in the family) and stumbled on some things that related celiac to gastroparesis, which my new GI also diagnosed me with in January.  So I was sitting on the gurney waiting to go in for my EGD in April and asked the doc if he was going to do a biopsy for celiac in addition to the Barretts.  He initially said no because I didn't have a medical history, but then saw the gastroparesis DX and said he would do it.  We both said afterward: SO glad we did that! 

 

LMC: I don't have it with me, but it did say something about villi blunting that corresponds with celiac. And I don't have Barretts (yay!). I'll have to take another look to see the exact wording.

 

I have a gut feeling (haha) that I was lucky and caught this early.  Very, very lucky. 

thepeach80 Rookie
thepeach80
Posted

See a new GI. I'm in the process now of getting a second opinion on my scope from last year. I was told there was damage but it was inconclusive. tTG of 4 in January and 5 in June. 

JodyM75 Apprentice
JodyM75
Posted
  • Author

This was my second opinion, with a much better GI than I had before who just looked around and gave me erroneous DXs.  The biopsy showed villious atrophy, the blood tests (apparently) show nothing.  Not sure why I need a second third opinon.  So far, everything he's said and done has been dead on. 

CajunChic Explorer
CajunChic
Posted

Lol!!! I feel the same way! I thank God I found it before I suffered what other celiacs have suffered without the correct dx. Now on to better days : )

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


nvsmom Community Regular
nvsmom
Posted

Blood work just came back today as normal.  This is what they told me when I called:

 

IGG:  3  (she said anything under 20 was considered normal)

IGA:  7  (same as above, under 20 was normal)

IGM: antibodies not detected

 

-How common are false negatives?

-I was gluten free for about 4 weeks prior to the blood being drawn.  When I asked my GI, he said no, don't start eating gluten again before the test.  Thoughts?

-What are my next steps?

 

Those may not be  celiac tests that you have listed there. The Immunoglobulin A, G, and M (IgA, IgG, IgM) are just measurements of the immune response in different area of the body. The IgA is made in the mucosal linings of the body (mouth, intestines, etc) and is deficient in 1/20 celiacs. IgG is the most common immunoglobulin found in all bodily fluids; it fights viruses and bacteria. The IgM is in the lymphatic system and is a first line of defense against infection.

 

Celiac tests are:

tTG IgA and tTG IgG

DGP IgA and DGP IgG (newest tests)

EMA IgA

AGA IgA and AGA IgG (older and less accurate tests)

 

Your tests could be a tTG based tests as they often have reference ranges of 0-20, but I have never ever seen a tTG IgM test before - you might want to double check with the doctor that the correct tests were done.

 

If you need to re-test, you will need 8-12 weeks of 1-2 slices of bread per day to be accurate if you have gluten-free for quite a while.  If you have only been gluten-free for a month, you may not need the full gluten challenge, but there is no way to know for sure. Your GI was wrong, you should have been eating gluten for testing.  :(

 

You could always try testing ASAP. Sometimes autoantibodies linger for months before dropping - the tTG tests are the worst for that. Try testing now, and then again after a gluten challenge if you wish.

 

This report discusses the validity of the tests; page 12 has an easy to read chart: Open Original Shared Link

 

I'm glad that you were not feeling too poorly, but an improvement of any sort would point to celiac disease.  I hope you continue to feel better on the gluten-free diet!  :)

JodyM75 Apprentice
JodyM75
Posted
  • Author

I called them back and they said they run the anti-gliadin, tTG, and anti-endomysial tests.  All my numbers were within normal ranges.

 

I'm still going to go with the biopsy results and just assume at this point that I caught it early.  I may do a gluten challenge at some point in the future to see what happens, but not any time soon. 

nvsmom Community Regular
nvsmom
Posted

I called them back and they said they run the anti-gliadin, tTG, and anti-endomysial tests.  All my numbers were within normal ranges.

 

I'm still going to go with the biopsy results and just assume at this point that I caught it early.  I may do a gluten challenge at some point in the future to see what happens, but not any time soon. 

 

That's definitely the safe, and smart, way to go. Good luck with the diet!  :)

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):


  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,685
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748
    tdouglas2901
    Newest Member
    tdouglas2901
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):



  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):


  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      Draft gluten-free ciders… can they be trusted ?

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      I'd go with a vodka tonic, but that's just me😉
    • Rejoicephd
      Draft gluten-free ciders… can they be trusted ?

      By Rejoicephd · Posted

      That and my nutritionist also said that drinking cider is one of the worst drink choices for me, given that I have candida overgrowth.  She said the combination of the alcohol and sugar would be very likely to worsen my candida problem.  She suggested that if I drink, I go for clear vodka, either neat or with a splash of cranberry.   So in summary, I am giving ciders a rest.  Whether it's a gluten risk or sugars and yeast overgrowth, its just not worth it.
    • Inkie
      Tea Bags and Gluten

      By Inkie · Posted

      Thank you for the information ill will definitely bring it into practice .
    • Scott Adams
      Tea Bags and Gluten

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      While plain, pure tea leaves (black, green, or white) are naturally gluten-free, the issue often lies not with the tea itself but with other ingredients or processing. Many flavored teas use barley malt or other gluten-containing grains as a flavoring agent, which would be clearly listed on the ingredient label. Cross-contamination is another possibility, either in the facility where the tea is processed or, surprisingly, from the tea bag material itself—some tea bags are sealed with a wheat-based glue. Furthermore, it's important to consider that your reaction could be to other substances in tea, such as high levels of tannins, which can be hard on the stomach, or to natural histamines or other compounds that can cause a non-celiac immune response. The best way to investigate is to carefully read labels for hidden ingredients, try switching to a certified gluten-free tea brand that uses whole leaf or pyramid-style bags, and see if the reaction persists.
    • Scott Adams
      Inconclusive results

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      This is a challenging and confusing situation. The combination of a positive EMA—which is a highly specific marker rarely yielding false positives—alongside strongly elevated TTG on two separate occasions, years apart, is profoundly suggestive of celiac disease, even in the absence of biopsy damage. This pattern strongly aligns with what is known as "potential celiac disease," where the immune system is clearly activated, but intestinal damage has not yet become visible under the microscope. Your concern about the long-term risk of continued gluten consumption is valid, especially given your family's experience with the consequences of delayed diagnosis. Since your daughter is now at an age where her buy-in is essential for a gluten-free lifestyle, obtaining a definitive answer is crucial for her long-term adherence and health. Given that she is asymptomatic yet serologically positive, a third biopsy now, after a proper 12-week challenge, offers the best chance to capture any microscopic damage that may have developed, providing the concrete evidence needed to justify the dietary change. This isn't about wanting her to have celiac; it's about wanting to prevent the insidious damage that can occur while waiting for symptoms to appear, and ultimately giving her the unambiguous "why" she needs to accept and commit to the necessary treatment. This article might be helpful. It breaks down each type of test, and what a positive results means in terms of the probability that you might have celiac disease. One test that always needs to be done is the IgA Levels/Deficiency Test (often called "Total IGA") because some people are naturally IGA deficient, and if this is the case, then certain blood tests for celiac disease might be false-negative, and other types of tests need to be done to make an accurate diagnosis. The article includes the "Mayo Clinic Protocol," which is the best overall protocol for results to be ~98% accurate.    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.