Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Do I Or Don't I?


lpowmacback

Recommended Posts

lpowmacback Rookie

Hi guys - it's been a very long time since I've been here. While in the past I have been told I do not have celiac or a gluten sensitivity, I am back because I am now questioning what the doctors have told me- I've found some of you on here to be more knowledgeable about celiac & gluten issues  than some doctors - so I thought I'd throw you some information and you can tell me what you think. :)

 

Although I never seemed to have evident gluten sensitivity or celiac symptoms, in 2004 I was diagnosed with pretty bad  osteoporosis (I was 46, pre menopausal). Since I had no reason (other than I am 4'10.5") to have it, I went to an endocrinologist  who gave me a battery of tests. The only thing that came back questionable at the time was a

 

*  Gliandin AB IGG test:  22 (weak positive) 7/29/04

 

She suggested I might have a sensitivity to gluten and told me to go to NYC to see another endocrinologist for further testing. After that "weak positive," I put myself on a

 

*  started gluten free diet 8/25/04

 

I went to see Dr. Elizabeth Shane, an endocrinologist who gave me further testing and my initial tests came back negative 

 

*  Tissue Transglutam AB IGA- normal

   Gliadin AB (IGA) - normal

   Gliadin AB (IGG) - normal

   12/7/04 - on gluten free diet since 8/25/04

 

She then sent me for further testing:

 

*  Anti-Gliandin IgG ELISA (AGA IgG - normal

   Anti-Gliandin IgA ELISA (AGA IgA) - normal

   Anti-Human Tissue Transglutaminase IgA ELISA (TTG IgA) - normal

   Anti-Endomysial IgA IFA (EMA IgA): Negative

   Total Serum IgA by Nephelometry (TOTAL IgA) 114 mg - normal

   12/22/04 - on a gluten free diet since 8/25/04

 

From what I remember, I gave up a gluten free diet a month or so after those tests, since I was told I had no problem with it.

 

Recently, I had blood work done - revisiting the possibility of celiac or gluten sensitivity - and all was normal except for a:

 

* Immunoglobulin A, Qn, Serum - 83 (low)

* >1999 (High) B12 (I had been taking 1050 mcg a day)

7/24/14

 

My doctor has taken more blood since then to check for IGG - which I have not received results of yet.

 

Over the years, my osteoporosis has gotten worse - except the test (a year or so after) 4-5 months off of gluten (hmmmm... could that mean something?)

 

Thanks for any light you can shed!!

 

Lisa

 

 


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



SMRI Collaborator

If you were not eating gluten when you had your lab work done, the tests are not accurate.

lpowmacback Rookie

I was only not eating gluten when I had the tests in December - both came back negative. My only positives were weak - Gliandin AB IGG test:  22  (weak positive) 7/29/04 and very recently 7/24/14 and the most recent one which was only Immunoglobulin A, Qn, Serum - 83 (low).

LauraTX Rising Star

As said, any antibody test while you were gluten-free is invalid.  Also, because you have low IgA, any IgA associated test will show potential false negatives for you.  It will be interesting to see what the IgG one comes back as, let us know!  

lpowmacback Rookie

Why the heck did my doctor tell me that I did not have celiac then? Not that I definitely do - but to flat out say I didn't is kind of weird.She also said if the IgG test would just reveal that I would need to get some kind of monthly shot for my immune system... nothing about celiac.

SMRI Collaborator

You need to see a celiac specialist. Sounds like they were testing you for immune deficientcy not celiac.

cyclinglady Grand Master

Why the heck did my doctor tell me that I did not have celiac then? Not that I definitely do - but to flat out say I didn't is kind of weird.She also said if the IgG test would just reveal that I would need to get some kind of monthly shot for my immune system... nothing about celiac.

Some doctors can not get past the fact that some patients have symptoms that do not involve the intestinal tract! They just are not educated about celiac disease!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



LauraTX Rising Star

Honestly, an endocrinologist is likely not going to be up to date with diagnostic criteria of Celiac disease as it is out of their specialty.  With a low IgA, if your other immunoglobulins are low, that would be a separate issue all together (an immunodeficiency, which I myself have and am on the IV replacement med).  If she didn't test for the ttg IgG, that was a mistake, as the ttg IgA is result is unreliable.  At this point it is pertinent to get yourself to a GI doctor who specializes in the proper diagnosis of Celiac disease so you stop getting the runaround.

 

If your total IgG level comes back low, DO NOT let that endocrinologist put you on the replacement med until you are properly evaluated by an immunologist.  I say this from experience and seeing many others who were incompletely diagnosed, because there are many more facets than just having low immunoglobulins.  Having low IgA alone is not that big of an issue, however you may still want to see an immunologist to be properly screened, even if it is just bringing them your lab results and them telling you that you are A-Okay.  If you need help finding an immunologist you can start here: Open Original Shared Link or with your insurance company.

lpowmacback Rookie

Thank you so much for the info! I just found out my IgG came back within a normal range - I just put myself on a gluten free diet- because in 2004 I got a 22 (weak positive) in the Gliandin AB IGG test. The tests after that from Elizabeth Shane were taken when I'd been completely gluten free for at least 3 months.

 

LauraTX Rising Star

Good to hear the IgG came back normal.  If you want to stop messing with it and just go gluten-free now, that is probably a good idea.  Just know that if you ever want an official diagnosis from a specialist in the future, you will have to go back on gluten.  Keep a food diary so you can go back and figure out any irregularities.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,685
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    tdouglas2901
    Newest Member
    tdouglas2901
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      I'd go with a vodka tonic, but that's just me😉
    • Rejoicephd
      That and my nutritionist also said that drinking cider is one of the worst drink choices for me, given that I have candida overgrowth.  She said the combination of the alcohol and sugar would be very likely to worsen my candida problem.  She suggested that if I drink, I go for clear vodka, either neat or with a splash of cranberry.   So in summary, I am giving ciders a rest.  Whether it's a gluten risk or sugars and yeast overgrowth, its just not worth it.
    • Inkie
      Thank you for the information ill will definitely bring it into practice .
    • Scott Adams
      While plain, pure tea leaves (black, green, or white) are naturally gluten-free, the issue often lies not with the tea itself but with other ingredients or processing. Many flavored teas use barley malt or other gluten-containing grains as a flavoring agent, which would be clearly listed on the ingredient label. Cross-contamination is another possibility, either in the facility where the tea is processed or, surprisingly, from the tea bag material itself—some tea bags are sealed with a wheat-based glue. Furthermore, it's important to consider that your reaction could be to other substances in tea, such as high levels of tannins, which can be hard on the stomach, or to natural histamines or other compounds that can cause a non-celiac immune response. The best way to investigate is to carefully read labels for hidden ingredients, try switching to a certified gluten-free tea brand that uses whole leaf or pyramid-style bags, and see if the reaction persists.
    • Scott Adams
      This is a challenging and confusing situation. The combination of a positive EMA—which is a highly specific marker rarely yielding false positives—alongside strongly elevated TTG on two separate occasions, years apart, is profoundly suggestive of celiac disease, even in the absence of biopsy damage. This pattern strongly aligns with what is known as "potential celiac disease," where the immune system is clearly activated, but intestinal damage has not yet become visible under the microscope. Your concern about the long-term risk of continued gluten consumption is valid, especially given your family's experience with the consequences of delayed diagnosis. Since your daughter is now at an age where her buy-in is essential for a gluten-free lifestyle, obtaining a definitive answer is crucial for her long-term adherence and health. Given that she is asymptomatic yet serologically positive, a third biopsy now, after a proper 12-week challenge, offers the best chance to capture any microscopic damage that may have developed, providing the concrete evidence needed to justify the dietary change. This isn't about wanting her to have celiac; it's about wanting to prevent the insidious damage that can occur while waiting for symptoms to appear, and ultimately giving her the unambiguous "why" she needs to accept and commit to the necessary treatment. This article might be helpful. It breaks down each type of test, and what a positive results means in terms of the probability that you might have celiac disease. One test that always needs to be done is the IgA Levels/Deficiency Test (often called "Total IGA") because some people are naturally IGA deficient, and if this is the case, then certain blood tests for celiac disease might be false-negative, and other types of tests need to be done to make an accurate diagnosis. The article includes the "Mayo Clinic Protocol," which is the best overall protocol for results to be ~98% accurate.    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.