Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

New Test With Minimal Risk?


Georgia-guy

Recommended Posts

Georgia-guy Enthusiast

Do I came accross this article, and I know several people on here have had major issues with the gluten challenge to get tested. I am curious if anyone has seen any more information on this new test that does NOT require a gluten challenge??

Open Original Shared Link


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Georgia-guy Enthusiast

Disclaimer to those in the process of getting tested: this test from what I have read is still in the trial and experimental stages. It is not available to the public as a diagnostic tool...yet.

LauraTX Rising Star

I kind of have the attitude that I will buy into it once it is through the testing and approval pipeline.  However, if there were a way to diagnose without exposure to gluten, it would be really great for many people.

Georgia-guy Enthusiast

I agree with you Laura, I'm just curious if anyone has seen anything newer than this article from January. But from the study they reference, it looks pretty promising.

Georgia-guy Enthusiast

Just found a more detailed article, also from January, which lists the name of the test as "cytokine release' test"

Open Original Shared Link

BlessedMommy Rising Star

This would definitely be an improvement over current testing, but for some of us, 3 days of eating gluten would still be too long. With my prior history, I just couldn't take the chance of eating a gluten rich diet for 3 days. 

 

I can see the potential of a lot of people getting diagnosed with it, though, especially those who just feel really sick when they eat gluten, but don't have life threatening or potentially disabling complications. 

 

I suppose, though, those of us who won't risk eating gluten for any reason kind of have our answer anyway. My body hates gluten and no test result will change the way I live and eat anyhow.

kareng Grand Master

This appears to be a link to the blood test being developed.

This test does require a gluten challenge.   It is just 3 days of gluten instead of weeks.    Info/articles about this test have been linked to many times on here. 

 

She sums it up nicely:

 

https://www.celiac.com/gluten-free/blog/1038/entry-1994-hope-for-a-less-challenging-gluten-challenge/


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



hayley3 Contributor

That's good to know  I hope they get the test completed in my lifetime. 

  • 3 weeks later...
Georgia-guy Enthusiast

Karen, I probably should have mentioned that when I shared the link.

BlessedMommy, I recall seeing a post from you about your reaction. I don't blame you for not even being willing to do 3 days.

On the bright side though, if this test gets approved, it will be easier for those who don't get tested first to go get tested with less of a risk. It also gives hope that with more research maybe one day there will be a test with no gluten challenge.

BlessedMommy Rising Star

I have hope that in my lifetime they will come up with celiac tests that don't involve gluten consumption. You never know what possibilities could be out there.

hayley3 Contributor

I stopped eating gluten and all packaged products 7 years ago.  I also did a couple water fasts which supposedly would heal your intestines.  So then before the endoscopy I ate bread for 2 months occasionally.  After taking it out of your diet for so long, it's a hard habit to bring back in.  So I don't know if that was sufficient to get an accurate endoscopy.  That's why the allergist wanted the genetic test.  He told me it showed I have a 1 in 35 chance of having celiac, but I am still in limbo diagnosis-wise.  So this new test would be wonderful.  I also read an article that people should NOT go gluten free til they've been tested but I would've suffered for 7 years longer if I had waited on a doctor to test me.

 

Because of the similarilty between SIBO and Celiac, now they attribute the osteoporosis, the malabsorption, the autoimmune diseases, etc., to SIBO.  Yet celiacs also are more likely to have SIBO too.

nora-n Rookie

here is some more info on these T cells:

 

Open Original Shared Link  a pdf on the bottomof the page

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,113
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    J CARUCCI
    Newest Member
    J CARUCCI
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      If you were off gluten for two months that would have been long enough to invalidate the celiac blood antibody testing. Many people make the same mistake. They experiment with the gluten free diet before seeking formal testing. Once you remove gluten from the diet the antibodies stop being produced and those that are already in circulation begin to be removed and often drop below detectable levels. To pursue valid testing for celiac disease you would need to resume gluten consumption equivalent to the amount found in 4-6 slices of wheat bread daily for at least two weeks, preferably longer. These are the most recent guidelines for the "gluten challenge". Without formal testing there is no way to distinguish between celiac disease and gluten sensitivity since their symptoms overlap. However, celiac disease is an autoimmune disorder that damages the small bowel lining, not true of gluten sensitivity. There is no test available for gluten sensitivity so celiac disease must first be ruled out. By the way, elevated liver enzymes was what led to my celiac diagnosis almost 25 years ago.
    • trents
      Then it does not seem to me that a gluten-related disorder is at the heart of your problems, unless that is, you have refractory celiac disease. But you did not answer my question about how long you had been eating gluten free before you had the blood antibody test for celiac disease done.
    • Xravith
      My genetic test results have arrived - I’m homozygous for DQB1*02, meaning I have HLA-DQ2. I’ve read that this is one of the genes most strongly associated with celiac disease, and my symptoms are very clear. I’m relieved that the results finally arrived, as I was getting quite worried since my symptoms have been getting worse. Next step, blood test. What do these results imply? What should I tell my family? I’m concerned that this genetic predisposition might also affect other family members.
    • Roses8721
      Two months. In extreme situations like this where it’s clearly a smoking gun? I’m in LA so went to a very big hospital for pcp and gi and nutritionist 
    • rei.b
      So far 3 months in - worsening symptoms. I have had the worst constipation in my life and I am primarily eating naturally gluten-free foods like potatoes, eggs, salad with homemade dressing, corn tortillas, etc. I hate gluten-free bread and pasta so I don't eat it. Occasionally I eat gluten-free almond flour crackers. As stated in the post, I don't have any vitamin deficiency. I was already tested.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.