Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Receptionist Phone Ettiquette


CK1901

Recommended Posts

CK1901 Explorer

Just a quick phone ettiquette question - maybe someone else has experience with this?

 

I work in the Entertainment industry for a touring theatrical production company. Everyone once and awhile, I get a stray phone call from someone equesting contact information for former cast/crew members. I expect these are mostly debt collection offices or something of that nature. They almost never understand that our touring staff is under contract and are not permanent employees. Generally the callers are vague and refuse to disclose why they need the person's contact information. Therefore, I refuse to share it with them. I feel like saying "it's an important business matter" is not an adequate rationalization to issue personal information about our employees. We don't have  a real policy on this matter, so I usually just follow my instincts if I think it's a BS call. Even though the people we work with aren't exorbitantly famous or anything, I also worry about stalkers. Some of these people have been on broadway or are sort of famous within their circles. It's not that unreasonable to look out for their safety, right? Should I be taking messages and trying to reach out to our former cast members? This seems like a pain in the ass.

Sometimes I second guess myself because honestly, we get so many telemarketers, I almost automatically switch into kill mode if the call doesn't sound legit.

 

thoughts from any former or current admin professionals?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



kareng Grand Master

No where that I have ever worked - retail, hospital, restaurant, big business - would give out personal info to someone without a legitimate subpoena.    So I see no reason why you shouldn't say that you are not allowed to give that out.  "Sorry.  We aren't allowed to give out that information.  Have a nice day" Hang up before they an argue.

 

It isn't your job to take messages for these people, either.  Except maybe while they are working for you.  I don't think your boss pays you to waste time trying to find people and give them messages.

cyclinglady Grand Master

I agree with Karen. At the companies I worked at, you can never disclose anything about a current or past employee. That is a lawsuit just waiting to happen. Oh, that includes references!

By the way I was stalked. A security guard broke into the HR files and preceding to call me, mail me and even broke into my car and took just my CDs (though I could not prove that one). He was terminated and I had to move. I was creeped out for a long time.

bartfull Rising Star

When I get calls here at my business (or even at home), I always ask who is calling. If they just say, "Jeff", I will ask, "Jeff whom?". If they respond, "Jeff Smith", I will ask, "And you're representing?" If they don't answer with the name of the company, I just tell them straight out that if they don't identify themselves I refuse to talk to them.

CK1901 Explorer

Thanks all! Usually if it's an employment verification, i just forward it along to our PEO. I thought I was behaving accordingly, but it's just one of those things that no one has ever discussed at my job. Instances where I would consider it acceptable would include insurance calls related to worker's comp claims or something else legitimate where you can reference that it's OKAY. Phone solicitors are very pushy these days and it honestly gets to me and tests my ability to remain polite- especially when you hang up on them and they CALL BACK. Drives me crazy.

kareng Grand Master

T Instances where I would consider it acceptable would include insurance calls related to worker's comp claims or something else legitimate where you can reference that it's OKAY. 

 

 

Oh No!  Don't give them info either!  First, if the person actually filed worker's comp - they would have given them an address or phone number.  So its not likely it is really worker's comp on the phone. Second, if its a claim against your company in some way, a receptionist should not get involved in making those legal decisions.

notme Experienced

it was our company policy - we do not give out any personal info over the phone.   if you need something like a reference, then mail the request to me and i'll do that.  all the people who worked for us were truckers, therefore never present at the office (or very rarely) and anybody who wanted phone #s, addresses, etc i would take a message for the driver and relay it the next time i spoke with them.   something like an emergency, i would hunt them down and give them info (like if their wife couldn't reach them or kid was sick, etc)  but never did give info out to callers.  i told them i'm the information pirate:  i only *take* info, i never *give* info back lolz  :D


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



CK1901 Explorer

Oh No!  Don't give them info either!  First, if the person actually filed worker's comp - they would have given them an address or phone number.  So its not likely it is really worker's comp on the phone. Second, if its a claim against your company in some way, a receptionist should not get involved in making those legal decisions.

 

I'm not just a receptionist. I handle a variety of responsibilities within my office due to my manager's unwillingness to bring on additional staff. I also work with our insurance broker and manage all of our company's worker's comp claims within the office. As a result, I am able to verify the validity of insurance calls since I file and submit the paperwork and deal with the claims records. When employees fail to fill it out correctly or have illegible hand-writing, the insurance company usually calls and needs to speak with the employee. Since they are on the road, I have to connect them accordingly. This falls outside of the normal realm of receptionist phone protocol, but talking to insurance adjusters is sometimes a necessary part of that process.

CK1901 Explorer

Just to clarify, I'm versed on not issuing personal information willy-nilly. I was just wondering if I should be going above and beyond to contact former employees when people call for them. I hate to think that someone's credit report is getting hit because the collections agency has an old number on file. However, I think it's just too many people to keep track of and it's ultimately a time suck.

kareng Grand Master

I'm not just a receptionist. I handle a variety of responsibilities within my office due to my manager's unwillingness to bring on additional staff. I also work with our insurance broker and manage all of our company's worker's comp claims within the office. As a result, I am able to verify the validity of insurance calls since I file and submit the paperwork and deal with the claims records. When employees fail to fill it out correctly or have illegible hand-writing, the insurance company usually calls and needs to speak with the employee. Since they are on the road, I have to connect them accordingly. This falls outside of the normal realm of receptionist phone protocol, but talking to insurance adjusters is sometimes a necessary part of that process.

That is good to know.  If its part of your job, that is OK.

 

Just to clarify, I'm versed on not issuing personal information willy-nilly. I was just wondering if I should be going above and beyond to contact former employees when people call for them. I hate to think that someone's credit report is getting hit because the collections agency has an old number on file. However, I think it's just too many people to keep track of and it's ultimately a time suck.

  

 

"my manager's unwillingness to bring on additional staff"  Sounds like you don't have the time to be tracking people down who haven't paid their credit card bills!

CK1901 Explorer

That is good to know.  If its part of your job, that is OK.

 

  

 

"my manager's unwillingness to bring on additional staff"  Sounds like you don't have the time to be tracking people down who haven't paid their credit card bills!

 

haha probably true. I wish we had more concrete policies in place in my office. I think i will just create a list for the next person when I hopefully get a new job within the next year. Sometimes I have flashes of self-doubt over the dumbest things because I'm only relying on my common sense to make decisions.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Scott Adams replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      7

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It

    2. - Scott Adams replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results

    3. - deanna1ynne replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results

    4. - cristiana replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      7

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,440
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Lillian Steele
    Newest Member
    Lillian Steele
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      In the U.S., most regular wheat breads are required to be enriched with certain B-vitamins and iron, but gluten-free breads are not required to be. Since many gluten-free products are not enriched, we usually encourage people with celiac disease to consider a multivitamin.  In the early 1900s, refined white flour replaced whole grains, and people began developing serious vitamin-deficiency diseases: Beriberi → caused by a lack of thiamin (vitamin B1) Pellagra → caused by a lack of niacin (vitamin B3) Anemia → linked to low iron and lack of folate By the 1930s–40s, these problems were common in the U.S., especially in poorer regions. Public-health officials responded by requiring wheat flour and the breads made from it to be “enriched” with thiamin, riboflavin, niacin, and iron. Folic acid was added later (1998) to prevent neural-tube birth defects. Why gluten-free bread isn’t required to be enriched? The U.S. enrichment standards were written specifically for wheat flour. Gluten-free breads use rice, tapioca, corn, sorghum, etc.—so they fall outside that rule—but they probably should be for the same reason wheat products are.
    • Scott Adams
      Keep in mind that there are drawbacks to a formal diagnosis, for example more expensive life and private health insurance, as well as possibly needing to disclose it on job applications. Normally I am in favor of the formal diagnosis process, but if you've already figured out that you can't tolerate gluten and will likely stay gluten-free anyway, I wanted to at least mention the possible negative sides of having a formal diagnosis. While I understand wanting a formal diagnosis, it sounds like she will likely remain gluten-free either way, even if she should test negative for celiac disease (Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If her symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet, it would likely signal NCGS).        
    • JoJo0611
    • deanna1ynne
      Thank you all so much for your advice and thoughts. We ended up having another scope and more bloodwork last week. All serological markers continue to increase, and the doc who did the scope said there villous atrophy visible on the scope — but we just got the biopsy pathology report back, and all it says is, “Duodenal mucosa with patchy increased intraepithelial lymphocytes, preserved villous architecture, and patchy foveolar metaplasia,” which we are told is still inconclusive…  We will have her go gluten free again anyway, but how soon would you all test again, if at all? How valuable is an official dx in a situation like this?
    • cristiana
      Thanks for this Russ, and good to see that it is fortified. I spend too much time looking for M&S gluten-free Iced Spiced Buns to have ever noticed this! That's interesting, Scott.  Have manufacturers ever said why that should be the case?  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.