Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

A Resume On All My Tests And Considerations


whitefairy30

Recommended Posts

whitefairy30 Rookie

Hi.

 

I done another stool test in another laboratory (not enterolab I'm outside US). 

 

That's the results:

 

- anti gliadin AK polyvalent: >200 (range 0-30)

- anti transglutaminase AK polyvalent: 50 (range 0-30)

- alpha 1 antitrypsin: normal

- calprotectin: normal

- lactoferrin: negative

- sekretorische iga: normal

 

The lab recommend a gluten free diet and a biopsy or a blood tests. 

The other tests rouled out inflammatory diseases like Crohn's or rcu. 

 

In february I had another stool test results at antigliadin iga at 51 (0-30). 

My genetic was DQB1*0201. 

My blood test in march about deamidated gliadin iga and igg it was negative. 

I also have positive anti asca igg in blodd in 2014, but I read a lot of celiacs get them. 

 

My symptoms are:

 

Meteorism since 20's, IBS (mostly costipated but sometimes diarrhea), low ferritin, borderline hemoglobin, thin and fragile hair, teeth with enamel defects since 20's, maybe SIBO but I don't have the breath test I think I can have it about my symptoms, brain fog, fatigue after meals, very low pressure (50/90). I had also gestational diabetes in 2005. Since 2010 I have some episodes of hypoglycemia after meals. I'm thin and underweight and doc suspected diabetes 1, but I don't show the auto antibodies in blood, so I don't have a diagnosis of diabetes but I got severe hypoglycemia (sometimes 2,7 nmol/L) after meals with a lots of sugar like chocolate.  

 

I know the standard goal for celiacs it's the positive biopsy, but with the anti gliadin in blood negative I think also my biopsy will be negative at this point. 

 

In 2013 I stopped eat grains and lactose. I eat only spelt bread and a little biscuits every day, so I have gluten but not so much as in past when I ate a lot of pastas, bread and biscuits.

 

I read much post here about Enterolab and results in stool, that appears positive before in stool test and after in blood, when the celiacs are at later stages.

 

With my HLA, my symptoms and stool tests I think I can have celiacs or gluten sensitivity for sure. Am I right ?? 

 

I cannot afford to return to eat pasta, bread and biscuits like in the past only for the gluten challenge.  

In 2013 I was so sick about diarrhea, pain, and high calprotectin (that means inflammations of intestines), that lasted a full year with a lot of pains. I don't really know if was the first stages of celiacs or maybe another inflammations. 

 

When I first tested in march 2015 at #1 lab and saw 51 I was just curious but when I had the positive gene HLA I done so many research about celiacs !! 

 

I started to cut off my bread at april 3 and not cheated on diet, so it's 15 days that I'm gluten-free, and I don't have cramps after meals !!  I'm severe bloated at evening after meals, but I have it since my teens. 

 

With all these info what do you think ? Can be real celiacs or gluten sensitive ? 

 

 

 

 

 


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



bartfull Rising Star

Stool testing is neither accurate nor recognized as valid.

 

Open Original Shared Link

cyclinglady Grand Master

We are not doctors. I know you are trying hard to get a diagnosis.

If you are not getting medical support, you can simply go gluten free for six months or so and gauge how you feel. It certainly will not harm you to eliminate all forms of wheat, barley and rye. If you decide to do this, you must be sure you are 100% gluten free.

I wish you well!

nvsmom Community Regular

As Bartfull said, those stool tests aren't widely recognized as a medically valid test for celiac disease, so you won't be able to get a celiac disease diagnosis with those tests.  BUT, it sounds like the results you got support your hypothesis that gluten is damaging your health. Perhaps you should go gluten-free, if you can't do the other blood tests or biopsy, and then reassess your health after 6 months?  keep a symptoms and food journal and that will help you keep track of the slow changes.  It can't hurt, right?

 

At this point, it could be either NCGS or celiac disease.  You would have to complete the celiac disease blood tests and endoscopy in order to get a clearer idea.... On the bright side, both are treated exactly the same way.  ;)

 

You said:

I know the standard goal for celiacs it's the positive biopsy, but with the anti gliadin in blood negative I think also my biopsy will be negative at this point. 

 

The tissue transglutaminase and endomysial antibodies (as a general rule) are thought by some to be a good predictor of the intestinal health. Open Original Shared Link

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Rogol72 replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      8

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It

    2. - Scott Adams replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      8

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It

    3. - Scott Adams replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results

    4. - deanna1ynne replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,441
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Linda Boxdorfer
    Newest Member
    Linda Boxdorfer
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Rogol72
      @HAUS, I was at an event in the UK a few years back. I remember ringing the restaurant ahead to inquire about the gluten free options. All I wanted was a few gluten free sandwiches, which they provided and they were delicious. The gluten-free bread they used was Warbutons white bread and I remember mentioning it on this site before. No harm in trying it once. It's fortified with Calcium and Iron. https://www.warburtonsglutenfree.com/warbs_products/white-loaf/ The only other gluten-free bread that I've come across that is fortified is Schar with Iodized salt, nothing else.
    • Scott Adams
      In the U.S., most regular wheat breads are required to be enriched with certain B-vitamins and iron, but gluten-free breads are not required to be. Since many gluten-free products are not enriched, we usually encourage people with celiac disease to consider a multivitamin.  In the early 1900s, refined white flour replaced whole grains, and people began developing serious vitamin-deficiency diseases: Beriberi → caused by a lack of thiamin (vitamin B1) Pellagra → caused by a lack of niacin (vitamin B3) Anemia → linked to low iron and lack of folate By the 1930s–40s, these problems were common in the U.S., especially in poorer regions. Public-health officials responded by requiring wheat flour and the breads made from it to be “enriched” with thiamin, riboflavin, niacin, and iron. Folic acid was added later (1998) to prevent neural-tube birth defects. Why gluten-free bread isn’t required to be enriched? The U.S. enrichment standards were written specifically for wheat flour. Gluten-free breads use rice, tapioca, corn, sorghum, etc.—so they fall outside that rule—but they probably should be for the same reason wheat products are.
    • Scott Adams
      Keep in mind that there are drawbacks to a formal diagnosis, for example more expensive life and private health insurance, as well as possibly needing to disclose it on job applications. Normally I am in favor of the formal diagnosis process, but if you've already figured out that you can't tolerate gluten and will likely stay gluten-free anyway, I wanted to at least mention the possible negative sides of having a formal diagnosis. While I understand wanting a formal diagnosis, it sounds like she will likely remain gluten-free either way, even if she should test negative for celiac disease (Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If her symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet, it would likely signal NCGS).        
    • JoJo0611
    • deanna1ynne
      Thank you all so much for your advice and thoughts. We ended up having another scope and more bloodwork last week. All serological markers continue to increase, and the doc who did the scope said there villous atrophy visible on the scope — but we just got the biopsy pathology report back, and all it says is, “Duodenal mucosa with patchy increased intraepithelial lymphocytes, preserved villous architecture, and patchy foveolar metaplasia,” which we are told is still inconclusive…  We will have her go gluten free again anyway, but how soon would you all test again, if at all? How valuable is an official dx in a situation like this?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.