Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Various Tests Done So Is Biopsy A Must?


GlutenFreeBuddy

Recommended Posts

GlutenFreeBuddy Newbie

Hello everyone,

 

I found out I have celiac disease completely by accident. I had a lifetime of digestive issues but never put it together. My doctor initially ran blood work labs and my celiac antibodies were very elevated. I then went to a specialist who ran more blood work and found that I am low on various vitamins. I also had the genetic testing done and this returned positive. I've been gluten free for 6 weeks and feel better this way. My doctor is still pushing that I do the endoscopy to complete the biopsy. My gut (no pun intended!) is telling me that this test is not worth the stress it will be on my body and especially not worth going back on gluten...especially if there are so many false negatives with it. I don't see the benefits of putting myself through it as I already have so many indicators that this in fact is Celiac. Please share your opinions/thoughts!

 

Thank you!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



bartfull Rising Star

Some people feel they need the biopsy (the "gold standard" for diagnosing celiac) in order to comply fully with the diet. Others need it so they can get a doctor's note for school or airline trips or so they can bring their own food to places that don't allow outside food.

 

If you don't feel you need any of those things, by all means go gluten-free and don't look back. The only thing that might make a difference on would be if you are hospitalized or in a nursing home at some time in the future.

cyclinglady Grand Master

Everything Bart said!

I personally needed the biopsy. I wanted a benchmark for damage plus, I needed the firm diagnosis in order for me to be dietary compliant. I could not believe that both my husband and I needed to be gluten free. He has been gluten-free for 14 years now, so I knew exactly what it meant! My daughter's doctor did not hesitate to test her despite that she was symptom free. My doctor ordered labs and bone scans because of my diagnosis.

It would be nice to see if your doctor would be willing to give you a celiac disease diagnosis in your chart. Some doctors do refuse.

It is your choice! I wish you well!

nvsmom Community Regular

I'm one who skipped the biopsy.  I had undeniably positive tTG IgA and EMA IgA, and my symptoms and family history supported a celiac disease diagnosis.  My doctor said I could pursue the endoscopy but he was comfortable diagnosing celiac disease.  

 

If you are happy to go gluten-free now, and your doctor is willing to diagnose celiac disease based on your blood tests, I would say you may as well go gluten-free now.  If he won't give you a diagnosis of celiac disease without the biopsy, I would consider doing it if you foresee the need for dietary accommodations in the future (at a college dorm, or in a hospital).  You could always doctor shop for one who is willing to diagnose it based on your blood tests.

 

The gluten challenge is usually 2-4 weeks, of 1/2 to 4 slices of bread per day (1 slice is the norm), for the endoscopic biopsy.  If you do get it done, ensure at least 6 samples are taken.

 

Best wishes in whatever you decide to do.

jbeilfuss Newbie

I suppose this is a personal decision more than anything.  I am new here and am still in the process of getting diagnosed and I have my biopsy this Thursday.  I suppose mostly I wanted to just know for sure in spite of getting two positive blood tests (not terribly high on the tTG IGA, but over the limit for sure; my DGP was just over three times the upper "normal" limit.

 

I stopped eating gluten just less than two weeks prior to getting the blood draw, so my GI doctor wanted me to eat gluten containing foods for 8 weeks before the biopsy and I have definitely had some rough days in there.  But it's almost here now and I will be glad to know if they see any damage down there. 

nvsmom Community Regular

...I stopped eating gluten just less than two weeks prior to getting the blood draw, so my GI doctor wanted me to eat gluten containing foods for 8 weeks before the biopsy and I have definitely had some rough days in there.  But it's almost here now and I will be glad to know if they see any damage down there. 

 

Eight weeks is a long gluten challenge for the biopsy.  Most doctors go with two to four weeks, with a few going with six.  Because yours is so long, you can probably eat the minimum amounts of gluten needed - don't overdo it and make yourself sicker than needed.

 

Most doctors ask for 1/2 to 4 slices of bread (or equivalent) be eaten per day.  I think you could probably go with the 1/2 to 1 slice per day, but if you are worried about getting a false negative, and since you are close to the procedure date, you may want to stay the course.  Just make sure they take at least 6 samples when they are in there - false negatives happen more often when 4 or fewer samples are taken.

 

Hang in there.  :)

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - deanna1ynne replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      5

      Inconclusive results

    2. - Wends replied to Heatherisle's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      30

      Blood results

    3. - Wends replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      5

      Inconclusive results

    4. - cristiana replied to Leeloff's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      63

      How Come Gluten Didnt Bother Me In Italy


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,700
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    RelievedP
    Newest Member
    RelievedP
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • deanna1ynne
      The first negative biopsy in 2021 just said "no pathological change" for all the samples, and the second one in 2022 said "Duodenal mucosa with mild reactive change (focal foveolar metaplasia) and preserved villous architecture." So I think Marsh score 0 in both cases, though it's not actually written in the pathology reports. I'm really hoping to get a clear positive result this time, just for her sake.  
    • Wends
      Hopefully the biopsy gives a conclusive and correct diagnosis for your daughter. Im in the UK and have been in the situation a few years ago of trying to rule celiac in or out after inconclusive results. Many symptoms pointing to it including the classic symptoms and weight loss and folate and iron deficiency. You have to play a waiting game. I also had the label of IBS and likely food allergy. Genetic test showed low risk for celiac but not no risk. It sounds like the Gastroenterologist is on it and hopefully will diagnose what it is correctly. Food hypersensitivity (allergy) can also cause similar symptoms and inflammation as well as mimicking IBS. Milk / dairy and wheat (cereal grains) being the biggest culprits. The “oesophagitis” and “gastritis” you mentioned can be caused by another gastrointestinal disorder called “eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorders”. These are named depending on which part of the gastrointestinal tract is affected. For example eosinophilic oesophagitis, eosinophilic gastritis, eosinophilic gastroenteritis, and more rare eosinophilic colitis. They are antigen (allergen) driven. When the blood test measuring anti-ttg antibodies is positive in absence of a positive ema test - which is more specific to celiac, this can also suggest food hypersensitivity (allergy). Usually delayed type allergy similar to celiac but not autoimmune if that makes sense. In this case the ttg antibodies are transient. Which happens. I’ve first hand experience. For info, evidence of villous atrophy too can be caused by food hypersensitivity. Not just by celiac disease. In Egid disorders the six food elimination diet, under a dietitian and gastroenterologist care, is the dietary protocol to figure out the culprit or culprits. Sometimes only two food elimination diet is used at first. The number one culprit is milk protein / dairy. Followed by wheat, eggs, soy, fish and seafood, and nuts. Most are only reactive to one food group or two. Most are only reactive to milk. Hope this is a helpful reply.
    • Bennyboy1998
      Yes gene HLADQ2 was positive 
    • Wends
      Wow, the system is crazy isn’t it? Maybe switch Doctors if you can. It’s surprising from what you’ve written it seems obvious it’s celiac disease. The “potential” diagnosis means celiac is developing and it basically just hasn’t done enough gut damage to be captured on the biopsy yet, and meet that “criteria” to satisfy the current system! Given the overwhelming evidence already - family history, positive ttg and ema. And your own experience and intuition which counts far more. And the labs being reproduced after gluten elimination and reintroduction- elimination and reintroduction diet is the gold standard too. Shame on the Doc and the system. What was the Marsh score? I’m guessing not 0 if it’s potential celiac. Meaning the autoimmune process has been triggered and started. Your daughter is obviously very healthy and her immune system is putting up a good fight. It can take years for the gut damage to build to a point where there’s overt symptoms and then a conclusive diagnosis, hence why many celiacs receive diagnosis later in life. You can prevent it. See the positive and the gift in that. Hopefully the gluten challenge confirms it, but if it doesn’t maybe get a second opinion?
    • cristiana
      @Gigi2025  Thank you for your interesting post.  Some of what you say chimes with something my gastroenterologist tells me - that he has clients who travel to France and find the same as you  - they will eat normal wheat baguette there without issue, for example.  His theory was he thought it might be to do with the locally sourced wheat being different to our own in the UK? But I have to say my own experience has been quite different. I have been to France twice since my diagnosis, and have been quite ill due to what was then (pre-2019)  poor labelling and cross-contamination issues.  My TTG test following my last visit was elevated - 'proof of the pudding', as we say in the UK!  It was not just a case of eating something like, say, shellfish, that disagreed with me - gluten was clearly an issue. I've also been to Italy to visit family a couple of times since my diagnosis.  I did not want to take any chances so kept to my gluten free diet, but whilst there what I did notice is that coeliacs are very well catered for in Italy, and many brands with the same ingredients in the UK are clearly marked on the front of their packaging that they are 'senza glutine'.  In the UK, you would have to find that information in the small print - or it puts people off buying it, so I am told!  So it seems to me the Italians are very coeliac aware - in fact, all children are, I believe, screened for coeliac disease at the age of 6.  That must mean, I guess, that many Italian coeliacs are actively avoiding gluten because, presumably, if they don't, they will fall ill?        
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.