Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Blood work showing positive for celiac but Genetic test says negative


Jrod

Recommended Posts

Jrod Newbie

Hi,

Back in 2009 I was very sick and after seeing multiple doctors, one of them finally showed me the light. 
I no longer have the test but I remember that anit-body levels were high and it was suggested that I have celiac disease.
I was told to get an endoscopy but back then it cost $400 and as an 18, I did not have the money (I'm in Australia btw).

I went on gluten-free diet and within a few weeks started to feel better, my entire world changed! 
I did a follow up blood test and my levels had dropped but not completely. 
I later did a gluten challenge which was hard, but the test shows only inflammation in my stomach and no damage to the villi.

So for the last 7 years I have assumed I have celiac disease and have stuck to the diet really well.
However, I recently went and got the genetic test and the results showed that I do not carry the genes to develop celiac disease.

So what now? What am I meant to do? Does anyone have advice for me, I would prefer to be able to eat gluten.
If I cant develop celiac disease then why were my anti-bodies so high?

Thanks,


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



SLLRunner Enthusiast

There could be another reason for having high antibodies. You could also have a sensitivity to gluten which often has the same symptoms of celiac disease, just not the intestinal damage. 

What does your doctor say about all this?

I already know I am sensitive to gluten after eliminating gluten for about 3 weeks and feeling better, but I am currently doing a 4 week gluten challenge for celiac testing. Whether or not I have celiac disease, I will eat gluten free once all testing is done.

squirmingitch Veteran

There are something like 1-3% of celiacs who do not carry the "typical" genes so a gene test is not the all fired gospel. Yes, it's extremely rare for one not to have the typical genes associated with celiac disease but that does not mean it's impossible to have celiac without those genes.

SLLRunner Enthusiast

These links have interesting discussions on celiac genes

Open Original Shared Link

Open Original Shared Link

Here's a really cool illustration:  Open Original Shared Link

It is my understanding if you have no genes for celiac you will not get the disease. 

 

 

cyclinglady Grand Master

There is so much information missing that it is hard to speculate.  We do not know:

1.  Which celiac antibody tests were given, the results and lab ranges?

2.  How many biopsies were taken?  

3.  How long was the gluten challenge? 

4.  How long had you been gluten free before seeing your antibodies come down? (It can take a year or longer for them to hit the normal range)?

5.  Why the interest after seven years to go back on gluten knowing that your last challenge made you sick (or did it)? 

6.  What were your symptoms?  Anything off on regular blood work (e.g. Anemia, elevated liver enzymes?)

7.  Have you considered a wheat allergy?

8. Other autoimmune diseases ruled out?  (This can cause a false positive on the antibodies test which is why it is one of the reasons to get a full celiac panel)

9. Which lab performed the genetic test and does your doctor think they are reputable?  (There are cheaper versions to run but are not as accurate.)

You could be in the tiny percentage of those without the common celiac genes,  but that would be very rare. You could just be intolerant.  Only way to tell is to go back on gluten.  Lucky you if you have not been accidentally glutened in seven years.  I say this because my hubby went gluten-free 14 years ago per the poor advice of his doctor and my allergist.  He wishes for a definitive diagnosis (like me), but there is no way he will do a challenge.  He knows gluten makes him sick.  

I hope you figure it out.  

davenbacker Rookie

Do you have any more information on the genetic test you took? One from your doctor would probably be fairly accurate. But if you did a home test like 23andme.com or Enterolab, they tend to not give very good information for genes aside from the very most common. E.g., I know from experience that Enterolab says HLA DQ 2.2 does not predispose to Celiac disease, but several studies have shown it is just as prevalent as DQ8. And 23andme I think used to only report on DQ2.5. There are at least 4 haplotypes that are sufficient for Celiac disease, with different levels of risk. DQ2.5, DQ8, DQ2.2, and DQ7.5. I've heard DQ9 is another possibility. And it's possible but rare to have celiac disease without any of those.

ravenwoodglass Mentor

You had symptoms and blood tests showed high antibodies. You went gluten free and saw a resolution of symptoms and your antibodies went down.  You then did a gluten challenge which you say was hard. I take that to mean your body reacted.  You have your answer. What you need to do is to remain gluten free. As some folks have already stated it is possible to have celiac and not have one of the two most common genes. I know that from personal experience as I am one of the oddballs. I have  a double DQ9 and was firmly diagnosed celiac. We are learning more everyday about the genes that are associated with celiac and that there seem to be quite a few more than those two most common ones.

 


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



mommida Enthusiast

Genetic testing is not as accurate as whatever percentage you were told.

My daughter tested positive for both DQ2 and DQ8.  My genetic test taken through a different doctor's office was negative.  As the lab tech seemed so flustered about the blood draw and the inconvenience to day.  I had contacted Prometheus labs to question the results.. Like did my daughter's results and my results even show that we are biological mother and daughter?  Never got an answer to that, because I requested the test be done over.  I was promptly told that I must have been in the 2 percent of none miss results, genes mutate, and that EVERY blood test has at least 30 percent human error rate.  Not all Celiac genes are identified.  (if I had an official gold standard diagnoses they would have put my daughter and I into a further study to look for unidentified gene or gene mutation.

Like the other poster pointed out.  You lab test showed positive antibodies and the gluten free diet had an improvement to your health.  I would listen to your body as the true diagnostic tool.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - trents replied to JudyLou's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      1

      Seeking advice on potential gluten challenge

    2. - JudyLou posted a topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      1

      Seeking advice on potential gluten challenge

    3. - marzian commented on Scott Adams's article in Diagnosis, Testing & Treatment
      5

      A Future Beyond the Gluten-Free Diet? Scientists Test a New Cell Therapy for Celiac Disease (+Video)

    4. - Jmartes71 posted a topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      0

      Medications

    5. - Scott Adams replied to GlutenFreeChef's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      11

      Blood Test for Celiac wheat type matters?

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      133,136
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    GFTom
    Newest Member
    GFTom
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Welcome to the celiac.com community, @JudyLou! There are a couple of things you might consider to help you in your decision that would not require you to do a gluten challenge. The first, that is if you have not had this test run already, is to request a "total IGA" test to be run. One of the reasons that celiac blood antibody tests can be negative, apart from not having celiac disease, that is, is because of IGA deficiency. If a person is IGA deficient, they will not respond accurately to the celiac disease blood antibody tests (such as the commonly run TTG-IGA). The total IGA test is designed to check for IGA deficiency. The total IGA test is not a celiac antibody test so I wouldn't think that a gluten challenge is necessary. The second is to have genetic testing done to determine if you have the genetic potential to develop celiac disease. About 30-40% of  the general population have the genetic potential but only about 1% actually develop celiac disease. So, genetic testing cannot be used to diagnose celiac disease but it can be used to rule it out. Those who don't have the genetic potential but still have reaction to gluten would not be diagnosed with celiac disease but with NCGS (Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity).  Another possibility is that you do have celiac disease but are in remission. We do see this but often it doesn't last.
    • JudyLou
      Hi there, I’m debating whether to consider a gluten challenge and I’m hoping someone here can help with that decision (so far, none of the doctors have been helpful). I have a history of breaking out in a horrible, burning/itchy somewhat blistering rash about every 8 years. This started when I was in my early 30’s and at that point it started at the ankles and went about to my knees. Every time I had the rash it would cover more of my body, so my arms and part of my torso were impacted as well, and it was always symmetrical. First I was told it was an allergic reaction to a bug bite. Next I was told it was eczema (after a biopsy of the lesion - not the skin near the lesion) and given a steroid injection (didn’t help). I took myself off of gluten about 3 weeks before seeing an allergist, just to see if it would help (it didn’t in that time period). He thought the rash looked like dermatitis herpetiformis and told me to eat some bread the night before my blood tests, which I did, and the tests came back negative. I’ve since learned from this forum that I needed to be eating gluten daily for at least a month in order to get an accurate test result. I’m grateful to the allergist as he found that 5 mg of doxepin daily will eliminate the rash within about 10 days (previously it lasted for months whether I was eating gluten or not). I have been gluten free for about 25 years as a precaution and recommendation from my doctor, and the pattern of breaking out every 8 years or so remains the same except once I broke out after just one year (was not glutened as far as I know), and now it’s been over 9 years. What’s confusing to me, is that there have been 3 times in the past 2 years when I’ve accidentally eaten gluten, and I haven’t had any reaction at all. Once someone made pancakes (they said they were gluten-free, they were not) and I ate several. I need to decide whether to do a gluten challenge and get another blood test. If I do, are these tests really accurate? I’m also concerned that I could damage my gut in that process if I do have celiac disease. My brother and cousin both had lymphoma so that’s a concern regarding a challenge as well, though there is a lot of cancer in various forms in my family so there may be no gluten connection there. Sorry for the ramble, I’m just doubting the need to remain gluten free if I don’t have any reaction to eating it and haven’t had a positive test (other than testing positive for one of the genes, though it sounds like that’s pretty common). I’d appreciate any thoughts or advice! 
    • Jmartes71
      Hello, just popped in my head to ask this question about medications and celiac? I have always had refurse reaction to meds since I can remember  of what little meds my body is able to tolerate. I was taking gabapentin 300mg for a week,  in past I believe 150? Any ways it amps me up not able to sleep, though very tired.However I did notice it helped with my bloating sibo belly.I hate that my body is that sensitive and medical doesn't seem to take seriously. Im STILL healing with my skin, eye, and now ms or meningioma ( will know in April  which)and dealing with this limbo nightmare. I did write my name, address ect on the reclamation but im not tech savvy and not sure if went through properly. I called my city representative in Stanislaus County and asked if theres a physical paper i can sign for proclamation for celiac and she had no clue about what I was saying, so I just said I'll go back on website. 
    • Scott Adams
      I'm not saying that some celiacs won't need it, but it should be done under a doctor's supervision because it can cause lots of problems in some people.
    • Jmartes71
      I also noticed I get debilitating migraines when I smell gluten, wheat and its not taken seriously when it affects one in every way.Im still begging to properly be heard.I also noticed tolerance level is down the drain with age and life changes. I have been told by incompetent medical that im not celiac or that sensitive. Diagnosed in 1994 by gi biopsy gluten-free ever since along with other lovely food allergies. Prayers
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.