Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Confused about test results


kalbright

Recommended Posts

kalbright Newbie

I was wondering if someone could help interpret my blood test results. It appears to me to be a negative result, but in the notes my GI doc said, "Results are indicative of Celiac" so I am very confused. 

Tissue Transglutaminase Antibody, IGA <1

(<4 means no Antibody detected)

Immunoglobulin A: 215 

(Flag reference range: 81-463)

I would be most grateful for any help analyzing these results, if anyone feels moved to share their insight with me. Thanks so much!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



kareng Grand Master

I wonder if all the results are not posted?  Ask the GI why he says a negative test means Celiac?   What did he recommend as your next step?  Don't be afraid to ask questions.  Its your body and health!

 

cyclinglady Grand Master

The tests he gave you are typically the screening tests.  If negative (like yours) but if the doctor still suspects celiac disease, he may order the complete celiac panel or proceed to an endoscopy.  Results can be negative if you were on a gluten free diet (or gluten light).  You must be consuming gluten daily for 8 to 12 weeks prior to the blood draw.  

Follow Karen's advice.  We do not have the entire picture here.  

squirmingitch Veteran

Am I missing something here? It shows she's deficient in IgA which makes the tTG IgA of 215 pretty high even though it's "within normal range" -- that being normal range for those who are not IgA deficient. To have a result of 215 in a range of 81-463 when you're IgA deficient is a pretty big red flag I would think. The doctor realizes she has a false negative. Perhaps he wrote his notes the way he did, is to cover insurance requirements for further testing.

Karen & cyclinglady, am I on the right track?

For the OP:

 However, 3 percent of patients with celiac disease have IgA deficiency.

From:

Open Original Shared Link

 

Open Original Shared Link

 

Also see

Open Original Shared Link

especially the chart.

And see:

Open Original Shared Link

From the top of the chart you would go right as your IgA was less than 1 mg/dl

 

kareng Grand Master
8 minutes ago, squirmingitch said:

 

 

Am I missing something here? It shows she's deficient in IgA which makes the tTG IgA of 215 pretty high even though it's "within normal range" -- that being normal range for those who are not IgA deficient. To have a result of 215 in a range of 81-463 when you're IgA deficient is a pretty big red flag I would think. The doctor realizes she has a false negative. Perhaps he wrote his notes the way he did, is to cover insurance requirements for further testing.

Karen & cyclinglady, am I on the right track?

For the OP:

 However, 3 percent of patients with celiac disease have IgA deficiency.

From:

Open Original Shared Link

 

Open Original Shared Link

 

Also see

Open Original Shared Link

especially the chart.

And see:

Open Original Shared Link

From the top of the chart you would go right as your IgA was less than 1 mg/dl

 

I don't understand?  Looks like her total IGa is in the normal range?  Its 215?  Her TTG is less than 1.

And even if the total IGA had been lower than the range, the range is not for Celiac.  It needs to be less than 20 to be an issue for a Celiac ttg IGA test.

Edit to add Open Original Shared Link

cyclinglady Grand Master

No,  Kalbright is not IGA deficient.  Her initial screening was negative based on the information she posted.  I just pointed out that her doctor may continue to suspect celiac disease still (we do not know her symptoms).  She needs to talk to her doctor.  Maybe he can only order the TTG as a PCP or GP.  She might need a GI referral.  

BTW, I am not IGA deficient, yet my TTG IGA and IGG were negative (even on follow-up testing) but I had Marsh Stage IIIB (mod to severe) damage and only a positive DGP IGA.  I share that information because if my doctor had not ordered the entire celiac panel,  my celiac disease diagnosis would never had been caught.

squirmingitch Veteran

Oh sorry, my bad. I misread. 


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



cyclinglady Grand Master
48 minutes ago, squirmingitch said:

Oh sorry, my bad. I misread. 

No, continue to be vigilant!  I misread all the time.  I am usually in a hurry or feeling off/brain fog (should not respond at all but I like to help).  Luckily, we have other members who might be having a better day. 

Off topic.  Two bad things.  Went camping and missed a thyroid dose.  No wonder I needed a nap!  Duh!  Today we are working on taxes.  Need I say more?  

squirmingitch Veteran

I can only say I was rushing to get dinner on. No excuse. Should have waited until after dinner & come back to the subject.

Ugh! 2 hits in one day! Taxes are so stressful! I managed to get mine done early this year and it feels so good not to have that hanging over my head.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,905
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    klmgarland
    Newest Member
    klmgarland
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Xravith
      Yes, you are right. Indeed, I’ve been feeling anemic since the beginning of this week, and today I felt horrible during a lecture at the university, I was trembling a lot and felt all my body incredibly heavy, so I had to come back home. I’ll do a blood test tomorrow, but I’m just worried about the possibility of it coming back negative. I’ve been eating two cookies in the morning as my only source of gluten over the past two weeks—could that affect the final result?
    • trents
      Welcome to the forum, @Judy M! Yes, he definitely needs to continue eating gluten until the day of the endoscopy. Not sure why the GI doc advised otherwise but it was a bum steer.  Celiac disease has a genetic component but also an "epigenetic" component. Let me explain. There are two main genes that have been identified as providing the "potential" to develop "active" celiac disease. We know them as HLA-DQ 2.5 (aka, HLA-DQ 2) and HLA-DQ8. Without one or both of these genes it is highly unlikely that a person will develop celiac disease at some point in their life. About 40% of the general population carry one or both of these two genes but only about 1% of the population develops active celiac disease. Thus, possessing the genetic potential for celiac disease is far less than deterministic. Most who have the potential never develop the disease. In order for the potential to develop celiac disease to turn into active celiac disease, some triggering stress event or events must "turn on" the latent genes. This triggering stress event can be a viral infection, some other medical event, or even prolonged psychological/emotional trauma. This part of the equation is difficult to quantify but this is the epigenetic dimension of the disease. Epigenetics has to do with the influence that environmental factors and things not coded into the DNA itself have to do in "turning on" susceptible genes. And this is why celiac disease can develop at any stage of life. Celiac disease is an autoimmune condition (not a food allergy) that causes inflammation in the lining of the small bowel. The ingestion of gluten causes the body to attack the cells of this lining which, over time, damages and destroys them, impairing the body's ability to absorb nutrients since this is the part of the intestinal track responsible for nutrient absorption and also causing numerous other food sensitivities such as dairy/lactose intolerance. There is another gluten-related disorder known as NCGS (Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity or just, "gluten sensitivity") that is not autoimmune in nature and which does not damage the small bowel lining. However, NCGS shares many of the same symptoms with celiac disease such as gas, bloating, and diarrhea. It is also much more common than celiac disease. There is no test for NCGS so, because they share common symptoms, celiac disease must first be ruled out through formal testing for celiac disease. This is where your husband is right now. It should also be said that some experts believe NCGS can transition into celiac disease. I hope this helps.
    • Judy M
      My husband has had lactose intolerance for his entire life (he's 68 yo).  So, he's used to gastro issues. But for the past year he's been experiencing bouts of diarrhea that last for hours.  He finally went to his gastroenterologist ... several blood tests ruled out other maladies, but his celiac results are suspect.  He is scheduled for an endoscopy and colonoscopy in 2 weeks.  He was told to eat "gluten free" until the tests!!!  I, and he know nothing about this "diet" much less how to navigate his in daily life!! The more I read, the more my head is spinning.  So I guess I have 2 questions.  First, I read on this website that prior to testing, eat gluten so as not to compromise the testing!  Is that true? His primary care doctor told him to eat gluten free prior to testing!  I'm so confused.  Second, I read that celiac disease is genetic or caused by other ways such as surgery.  No family history but Gall bladder removal 7 years ago, maybe?  But how in God's name does something like this crop up and now is so awful he can't go a day without worrying.  He still works in Manhattan and considers himself lucky if he gets there without incident!  Advice from those who know would be appreciated!!!!!!!!!!!!
    • Scott Adams
      You've done an excellent job of meticulously tracking the rash's unpredictable behavior, from its symmetrical spread and stubborn scabbing to the potential triggers you've identified, like the asthma medication and dietary changes. It's particularly telling that the rash seems to flare with wheat consumption, even though your initial blood test was negative—as you've noted, being off wheat before a test can sometimes lead to a false negative, and your description of the other symptoms—joint pain, brain fog, stomach issues—is very compelling. The symmetry of the rash is a crucial detail that often points toward an internal cause, such as an autoimmune response or a systemic reaction, rather than just an external irritant like a plant or mites. I hope your doctor tomorrow takes the time to listen carefully to all of this evidence you've gathered and works with you to find some real answers and effective relief. Don't be discouraged if the rash fluctuates; your detailed history is the most valuable tool you have for getting an accurate diagnosis.
    • Scott Adams
      In this case the beer is excellent, but for those who are super sensitive it is likely better to go the full gluten-free beer route. Lakefront Brewery (another sponsor!) has good gluten-free beer made without any gluten ingredients.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.