Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

All My Levels Are Okay?


hlm34

Recommended Posts

hlm34 Apprentice

question from a newbie - I was diagnosed with Celiac two weeks ago. My blood test and endoscopy both tested positive for it. I had relatively few symptoms - though my doctor suspected that the celiacs had been active for quite awhile and that "i had probably not been absorbing any nutrients for awhile now". At that time they did a bone density scan and blood work again at that time. My bone density scan shows i have Osteopina (sp?) - though i just got a phone call that my blood work shows that all my calcium levels, vitamin and mineral levels were in the normal range. Now at the time of the tests - i was NOT gluten free - i had pasta the night before! So my question is this - if I am pretty much asymptomatic, from what I understand, the real danger of celiac is that my body is not absorbing any nutrients or vitamins or minerals - but if my blood test shows that they were all in the normal range - what is the real danger here??? am i making any sense? I know that lots of people have very terrible symptoms associated with Celiac - luckily i do not - but i just cant understand why my blood tests came out normal! and how do i have normal levels of calcium but not normal bone density?? if I am absorbing vitamins and not having any other symptoms - then why would i continue on the gluten-free diet?? any guidance that someone could give me would be much appreciated - i am just trying to understand it all - i am sure i am missing something here.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



lovegrov Collaborator

The potential for developing certain cancers and other autoimmune diseases is higher in people who don't follow the diet. In addition, if you've tested positive in the biopsy, that means damage is definitely being done and if you continue eating gluten it will almost certainly catch up with you. I was pretty much feeling normal (and I bet my blood levels would have been pretty normal) until just shortly before I ended up in the hospital for 11 days and off work for 10 weeks because of undiagnosed celiac.

richard

mommida Enthusiast

Your bone density has been affected. Your body has been deficient enough in calcium, for it to start demineralization of your bones. That is why an "asymptomatic" symptom is bone pain. Your lucky the damage to your body can stop, before you even noticed symptoms.

I know it can seem overwhelming at first. You are changing your lifestyle, by changing your diet. I'm not sure of your age, but you are stronger than Celiac.

Laura

RiceGuy Collaborator

As noted by lovegrov, the danger is far worse than malnutrition, which in itself can and almost certainly will lead to all sorts of other diseases/problems. If you do not maintain a gluten-free diet, you'll end up with problems down the line. Being totally gluten-free is not something you can do just when it's convenient. The damage will continue, as it had with myself and so many others. Consider yourself one of the lucky few to have relatively little symptoms, but gluten intolerance means your immune system will destroy your gut if you keep eating gluten. It's just a matter of time. Then the malnutrition will progress until you do notice it readily, but by then you'll be far worse off for having ignored it.

To address the calcium level/bone density, remember that the ONLY place in the body which stores calcium is the bones. Your system will pull calcium from the bones as it needs it, so your levels can be normal, while your bones are being depleted. The malnutrition can prevent the body from obtaining the necessary amount of calcium, so over time you'd probably develope serious bone/teeth problems. It's like a car with an electrical problem that prevents the battery from recharging. Eventually the battery runs down, and...

So yes, eating the pasta was a bad idea. It doesn't matter if you don't notice the effects right now.

hlm34 Apprentice

thanks everyone. that helps. It has been two weeks since i found out that i had celiac and i have been gluten-free the whole time. No cheating - not once. It took two weeks for my blood tests to get here - and so as you can tell, i was confused by the results. I ate the pasta the night before i knew i had the disease. i guess it was a last hurrah if you will. But i definitely plan on sticking with the gluten-free diet. i just needed some clarification. Thanks a bunch. I feel better hearing things from "real" people - as opposed to just my doctor on the other end of the telephone!

RiceGuy Collaborator

Glad we could help.

Here's some additional info on calcium. As I have mentioned in other threads, consuming meat based proteins can lead to more calcium loss than plant based proteins. It is important to understand how calcium absorption works, especially when malabsorption is a factor. Open Original Shared Link

That site also has good info on obtaining other nutrients as well, including protein. The basic recommendation is a balanced diet, which doesn't mean you must drink milk for calcium or eat meat for protein. The beef and dairy industries have done a lot to convince the public to consume their products.

jenvan Collaborator

hey girl! everyone's bodies respond differently... i have had celiac for years...but aside for anemia, my vitamin levels were normal. (at least the ones i had tested). so, its not too out of the ordinary. and it doesn't mean you have a 'lesser' version of the disease. your dangers are the same as the rest of us--potential shorter life span (yes!), cancer (and intestinal lymphomas have a very low recovery/survival rate), other autoimmune diseases and eventually just generally not feeling well!

did your doc talk to you about options for treating your osteopenia? my mom had it. some docs may try and tell you to go on meds such as fosamax...but my rec is to not do so. since it is osteopenia and you are young, the drug will actually freeze your bone mass, so to speak, thereby freezing depletion, however it can also stop your chances of increasing your bone mass. instead of drugs initially, you can try other things to increase mass, limit alcohol and caffeine (which can deplete bones), start doing weight bearing exercises and begin taking a calcium supplement every day, if you aren't. docs wanted to put my mom on fosomax, she is in her 50s, and she refused. they told her she wouldn't reclaim any bone mass, esp. at her age...BUT she has been working out, lifting weights, taking a supplement, and has increased her bone mass, and is testing okay now. so, it can be done... there's my treatise on bones!! some info on osteopenia for you:

Open Original Shared Link

Open Original Shared Link


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



jenvan Collaborator

oh, and just saw this article too...https://www.celiac.com/st_prod.html?p_prodid=1262

neuropathy is also a possibility for untreated celiac.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      129,996
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Gma4anna
    Newest Member
    Gma4anna
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.3k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • The Logician
      To Trent’s, yes, from what i’ve read it is not uncommon for digestive systems to become less tolerant to gluten over time. Many types of sensitivity or allergies arise in older people who never had a problem. I don’t see why you are focusing on anything but the fact that after years of my sensitivity to gluten, for whatever reason , it has disappeared after a bout of antibiotics. What i’ve read is antibiotics can make gluten sensitivity worse. In any event, in my case, if I can still eat all the wheat products I want with no reaction after a month or more since my hospital stay this is something that should be investigated. Time will tell.
    • The Logician
      I had a UTI, blood cultures are standard to insure that the infection does not get in the bloodstream which can lead to sepsis and death. In my case there was bacteria in my blood which necessitated 48 hours of antibiotic IV
    • Wends
      Hi Cameo674. just read your post. Well wishes to a correct diagnosis so that you can get on track to healing and feeling better. Personally I know it’s good to have the eosinophilic disorder ruled out too, as this can show anti-ttg igA antibodies too. But usually without the anti-gliadin antibodies unless gliadin is an allergen for you. Thanks for posting the link to look up SNPs rs… numbers on another post. Was useful. Looking at your result, ”Celiac Associated HLD-DQ Typing: DQA1* Value: 05; DQA1*DQA11 Value: 05; DQB1* Value: 02; DQB1-DQB11 Value: 02; Celiac Gene Pairs Present Value: Yes; Celiac HLA Interpretation Value: These genes are permissive for celiac disease.  However, these genes can also be present in the normal population. Testing performed by SSOP.  So google failed me.  I think these results basically say I have genes, but everybody has these genes so this test was just to confirm that there is a vague possibility?  Maybe this test result explains why I do not have the horrible symptoms most individuals with celiac have?  I told the GI my assumption is that I am just gluten intolerant since I do not have the pain? So maybe this test explains why I have antibodies?” To me it reads.that you carry the high risk HLADQ2.5 haplotype.      
    • AnnaNZ
      Hello. Do you mind saying what symptoms led the doctors to test for bacteria in your blood?
    • trents
      So you you ate wheat products every single day for 50 years without a problem but then in the 90's you discovered that wheat was your problem. That's confusing to me. It seems contradictory. Did you have a problem or not?
×
×
  • Create New...