Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Gut damage but blood test negative


beckism

Recommended Posts

beckism Newbie

Hi, I've suffered IBS symptoms and anaemia for a while, and the doctor has been referring me to lots of consultants to try and figure out what's wrong. Although I found wheat a big trigger for bloating, I'd never noticed a direct correlation with gluten, and a blood test at the start of this process tested negative for coeliac disease. Recently however, I had a gastroscopy, and was told my gut was very smooth with flattened mucosa in the duodenum, suggesting coeliacs. As far as I can tell from this forum, if there's damage to the villi then coeliacs is the cause. So, with a negative blood test, but with gut damage, does that mean I could still have celiac disease? 

Thanks for your help!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



cyclinglady Grand Master

Welcome!

Actually, many things can cause intestinal damage:

Open Original Shared Link

But did you have the complete celiac panel?  I ask because I test negative to the common celiac disease screening test -- the TTG.  The TTG is good but does not catch all celiacs.  The others include the DGP and EMA (both IGA and IGG versions).  

squirmingitch Veteran

Also, did they do biopsies when they were in your gut? That's what they should have done & the biopsies get sent to pathology to determine celiac disease or not.

beckism Newbie
On 12/15/2016 at 8:07 PM, cyclinglady said:

Welcome!

Actually, many things can cause intestinal damage:

Open Original Shared Link

But did you have the complete celiac panel?  I ask because I test negative to the common celiac disease screening test -- the TTG.  The TTG is good but does not catch all celiacs.  The others include the DGP and EMA (both IGA and IGG versions).  

Hi, thanks for link! Nope, didn't have the complete celiac panel, just the common screening test. I guess I'll wait for results from biopsies, and then request the full one depending upon what they show. I think, given my symptoms, that most of the other causes of gut damage don't apply to me, unless it could be some other kind of food allergy.  (at least, I hope I don't have tuberculosis..!)

The doctor doing the procedure seemed to think my gut looked fairly typical for gluten damage, but the nurse did say it could be possibly be lactose intolerance or similar.

20 hours ago, squirmingitch said:

Also, did they do biopsies when they were in your gut? That's what they should have done & the biopsies get sent to pathology to determine celiac disease or not.

Yup, they did biopsies. The only reason I posted now (as opposed to actually having results!) was that the gut was visibly damaged (smooth), so that the doctor instantly mentioned that it looked like I was suffering gluten intolerance. If it's visible to the eye, would the biopsies be expected to be positive too? Or, is it possible to have what looks like a damaged gut, but is somehow healthy?

I know I should wait for my results, but it'll be ages now it's christmas, and I'm impatient to self-diagnose myself ;)

squirmingitch Veteran

Uh YEH, if the doc could actually SEE that your gut was smooth through the scope that's big time!!! Shame on that nurse. Lactose intolerance doesn't cause villi damage. I would certainly imagine the biopsies will be positive with that extent of damage. 

cyclinglady Grand Master

Nothing is ever easy as you well know.  A celiac disease diagnosis can very elusive.  I am sorry that you have to wait.  At least you had a visual.  I had moderate to severe damage that was not visible on my endoscopy.  So, you just have to wait for the biopsy results.  

If negative keep in mind that the small intestine, if stretched-out,  is the size of a tennis court and it is easy to miss damaged areas.  I would ask for the complete celiac panel to help rule out or confirm celiac disease as an elevated TTG could be attributed to something like Crohn's before going gluten-free.   If it is celiac disease, it is nice to have the DGP as a ....ugh words escape me .... But like a starting point as the DGP is often best for dietary compliance.  

beckism Newbie
18 hours ago, squirmingitch said:

Uh YEH, if the doc could actually SEE that your gut was smooth through the scope that's big time!!! Shame on that nurse. Lactose intolerance doesn't cause villi damage. I would certainly imagine the biopsies will be positive with that extent of damage. 

I might be doing the nurse an injustice. It's possible she said other food allergies but my mind jumped to lactose intolerance. Anyway, even if it's not coeliacs, something is definitely damaging my gut :( 

5 hours ago, cyclinglady said:

Nothing is ever easy as you well know.  A celiac disease diagnosis can very elusive.  I am sorry that you have to wait.  At least you had a visual.  I had moderate to severe damage that was not visible on my endoscopy.  So, you just have to wait for the biopsy results.  

If negative keep in mind that the small intestine, if stretched-out,  is the size of a tennis court and it is easy to miss damaged areas.  I would ask for the complete celiac panel to help rule out or confirm celiac disease as an elevated TTG could be attributed to something like Crohn's before going gluten-free.   If it is celiac disease, it is nice to have the DGP as a ....ugh words escape me .... But like a starting point as the DGP is often best for dietary compliance.  

Thanks cyclinglady! I do find this whole process quite confusing, but I guess with visible damage, something is upsetting me, I just have to try and figure out what! 


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



SusanNash Rookie

Have they tested you for Iga defiency? 

Open Original Shared Link

I readon this site that can cause false negatives.

 

Quote

IgA deficiency, a condition associated with celiac disease that can cause a false negative tTG-IgA or EMA result.

 

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Rogol72 replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      8

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It

    2. - Scott Adams replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      8

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It

    3. - Scott Adams replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results

    4. - deanna1ynne replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,441
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Linda Boxdorfer
    Newest Member
    Linda Boxdorfer
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Rogol72
      @HAUS, I was at an event in the UK a few years back. I remember ringing the restaurant ahead to inquire about the gluten free options. All I wanted was a few gluten free sandwiches, which they provided and they were delicious. The gluten-free bread they used was Warbutons white bread and I remember mentioning it on this site before. No harm in trying it once. It's fortified with Calcium and Iron. https://www.warburtonsglutenfree.com/warbs_products/white-loaf/ The only other gluten-free bread that I've come across that is fortified is Schar with Iodized salt, nothing else.
    • Scott Adams
      In the U.S., most regular wheat breads are required to be enriched with certain B-vitamins and iron, but gluten-free breads are not required to be. Since many gluten-free products are not enriched, we usually encourage people with celiac disease to consider a multivitamin.  In the early 1900s, refined white flour replaced whole grains, and people began developing serious vitamin-deficiency diseases: Beriberi → caused by a lack of thiamin (vitamin B1) Pellagra → caused by a lack of niacin (vitamin B3) Anemia → linked to low iron and lack of folate By the 1930s–40s, these problems were common in the U.S., especially in poorer regions. Public-health officials responded by requiring wheat flour and the breads made from it to be “enriched” with thiamin, riboflavin, niacin, and iron. Folic acid was added later (1998) to prevent neural-tube birth defects. Why gluten-free bread isn’t required to be enriched? The U.S. enrichment standards were written specifically for wheat flour. Gluten-free breads use rice, tapioca, corn, sorghum, etc.—so they fall outside that rule—but they probably should be for the same reason wheat products are.
    • Scott Adams
      Keep in mind that there are drawbacks to a formal diagnosis, for example more expensive life and private health insurance, as well as possibly needing to disclose it on job applications. Normally I am in favor of the formal diagnosis process, but if you've already figured out that you can't tolerate gluten and will likely stay gluten-free anyway, I wanted to at least mention the possible negative sides of having a formal diagnosis. While I understand wanting a formal diagnosis, it sounds like she will likely remain gluten-free either way, even if she should test negative for celiac disease (Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If her symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet, it would likely signal NCGS).        
    • JoJo0611
    • deanna1ynne
      Thank you all so much for your advice and thoughts. We ended up having another scope and more bloodwork last week. All serological markers continue to increase, and the doc who did the scope said there villous atrophy visible on the scope — but we just got the biopsy pathology report back, and all it says is, “Duodenal mucosa with patchy increased intraepithelial lymphocytes, preserved villous architecture, and patchy foveolar metaplasia,” which we are told is still inconclusive…  We will have her go gluten free again anyway, but how soon would you all test again, if at all? How valuable is an official dx in a situation like this?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.