Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Testing tomorrow - what exactly do I ask for?


ByeRye

Recommended Posts

cyclinglady Grand Master
9 hours ago, ByeRye said:

Finally...

Component Your Value Standard Range
TISSUE TRANSGLUTAMINASE IgG      0.37 Index     <=0.90 Index
Tissue transglutaminase IgA            0.30 Index <=0.90 Index

 

 

Negative (remember, I am not a doctor).  You can try for a GI consult and ask for the full panel, but on paper, you look good.  No documented autoimmune issues, not anemic at this time (I think you are taking iron supplements), you do not appear to be malnourished, no family history......hard to make a case.  Celiac disease symptoms are like so many other symptoms for many illnesses.   It also seems by your posting that you have been gluten light and that can impact tests.  Keep all labwork in your possession (e.g. Does your current doctor know your ferritin was a 2?) 

Risk factors:

Open Original Shared Link

Maybe your doctor will order a gene test based on the Mayo Clinic Algorithm:

Open Original Shared Link

You can also consider a gluten free diet for six months because there is no test for a gluten sensitivity.  

If you can get a GI consult, consider delaying it for three months and eat gluten 1 to 2 slices of bread a day) for three months (throw in some sourdough and donuts for me) and lay off all supplements prior to the test.  

I am sorry that you are in diagnostic limboland.  ☹️  

  • 2 weeks later...

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



ByeRye Apprentice

Cyclinglady, I wanted to thank you for all your helpful and informative comments. :)

Doc suggested I try the Low Fodmap diet. Haven't had gluten since the day of the blood test, and cut out lactose at the same time. No problem there. 

Already didn't eat quite a lot of the high fodmap foods anyway, but the ones I'm still struggling with losing are beans, onions, and garlic. I honestly don't even know how or what to cook without garlic or onion.  So that part of it has been quite difficult. When it comes to those three things I am just trying to cut back, since eliminating entirely was so overwhelming. 

There are definitely some changes I notice. I've been very tired. It's improved the last couple days. All last week I was practically comatose. Bloating is greatly improved. When I notice I am bloated it isn't painful. Which is a weird experience. Before bloating always equated pain and tremendous discomfort. No more stomach cramping. Basically all the pain is gone. It's also a new experience to eat and feel full, but it's a comfortable full, not a "omg I'm going to split open" full, even when eating the same volume of food. Before I'd eat until I was satisfied, but then after I was long finished eating my stomach would just feel fuller and fuller until it hurt. That isn't happening anymore.

So anyway! I'm still not entirely sure what to make of everything. I feel better than I had, but seems like I should feel better than I do. 

Jmg Mentor

Hello :)

I had a similar experience to you, a 'Eureka moment' a big improvement after removing gluten then a diagnostic journey that ended in an unexpected negative celiac test. After my scope I went gluten free for good and I'm never going back.

I saw you were going to do the same then this:  

On 6/13/2017 at 6:16 PM, ByeRye said:

Doc suggested I try the Low Fodmap diet. 

I think your Doctor seems smart, I've met a few who probably wouldn't know what Fodmaps are, but they're right that a recent study by Monash speculated that they were the likely cause for some IBS like symptoms in some patients that tested negative for celiac. So I can certainly see your Doc's reasoning and would be loath to seek to undermine it, even if some random bod on the web could do such a thing!

However...

I just wanted to relay my own experience. Resolution for me has come about through avoiding gluten. I know categorically that fodmaps aren't an issue, I eat a very high fodmaps diet, not deliberately just because I really like so many of the foods that are high on the list:

Open Original Shared Link

I also know that my problem isn't solely related to wheat, another suggestions sometimes offered for Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity. In my case I react to barley for instance as well. I'm just a little concerned that if you cut fodmaps and gluten at the same time you may draw a false correlation between symptom resolution and fodmap avoidance and wind up on a more restrictive diet than you need to! For me, thankfully, as long as I avoid gluten a big list of problems goes away and I get to keep enjoying as many onions, garlic, apples etc as I like. 

Best of luck :)

Matt

 

 

 

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Rogol72 replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      8

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It

    2. - Scott Adams replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      8

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It

    3. - Scott Adams replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results

    4. - deanna1ynne replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,441
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Linda Boxdorfer
    Newest Member
    Linda Boxdorfer
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Rogol72
      @HAUS, I was at an event in the UK a few years back. I remember ringing the restaurant ahead to inquire about the gluten free options. All I wanted was a few gluten free sandwiches, which they provided and they were delicious. The gluten-free bread they used was Warbutons white bread and I remember mentioning it on this site before. No harm in trying it once. It's fortified with Calcium and Iron. https://www.warburtonsglutenfree.com/warbs_products/white-loaf/ The only other gluten-free bread that I've come across that is fortified is Schar with Iodized salt, nothing else.
    • Scott Adams
      In the U.S., most regular wheat breads are required to be enriched with certain B-vitamins and iron, but gluten-free breads are not required to be. Since many gluten-free products are not enriched, we usually encourage people with celiac disease to consider a multivitamin.  In the early 1900s, refined white flour replaced whole grains, and people began developing serious vitamin-deficiency diseases: Beriberi → caused by a lack of thiamin (vitamin B1) Pellagra → caused by a lack of niacin (vitamin B3) Anemia → linked to low iron and lack of folate By the 1930s–40s, these problems were common in the U.S., especially in poorer regions. Public-health officials responded by requiring wheat flour and the breads made from it to be “enriched” with thiamin, riboflavin, niacin, and iron. Folic acid was added later (1998) to prevent neural-tube birth defects. Why gluten-free bread isn’t required to be enriched? The U.S. enrichment standards were written specifically for wheat flour. Gluten-free breads use rice, tapioca, corn, sorghum, etc.—so they fall outside that rule—but they probably should be for the same reason wheat products are.
    • Scott Adams
      Keep in mind that there are drawbacks to a formal diagnosis, for example more expensive life and private health insurance, as well as possibly needing to disclose it on job applications. Normally I am in favor of the formal diagnosis process, but if you've already figured out that you can't tolerate gluten and will likely stay gluten-free anyway, I wanted to at least mention the possible negative sides of having a formal diagnosis. While I understand wanting a formal diagnosis, it sounds like she will likely remain gluten-free either way, even if she should test negative for celiac disease (Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If her symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet, it would likely signal NCGS).        
    • JoJo0611
    • deanna1ynne
      Thank you all so much for your advice and thoughts. We ended up having another scope and more bloodwork last week. All serological markers continue to increase, and the doc who did the scope said there villous atrophy visible on the scope — but we just got the biopsy pathology report back, and all it says is, “Duodenal mucosa with patchy increased intraepithelial lymphocytes, preserved villous architecture, and patchy foveolar metaplasia,” which we are told is still inconclusive…  We will have her go gluten free again anyway, but how soon would you all test again, if at all? How valuable is an official dx in a situation like this?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.