Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

How long should I be eating gluten before first biopsy?


kmar27

Recommended Posts

kmar27 Newbie

Hi,

I'm a potential DH-er currently waiting for my referral appointment. My rash started in June and after seeing a clueless doctor multiple times (who had absolutely no idea what it was) he referred me to his awesome colleague who instantly suggested DH and gave me a dermatologist referral. I was warned that the referral could take a long time, so I gave up gluten immediately to try and slow down the rash symptoms temporarily. It had absolutely exploded from a few raised patches under my arms and on my forearms to my; feet, legs, butt (so so bad on my butt :( ) wrists, elbows and backs of knees. The itching was minimal and manageable everywhere apart from my feet which were insanely itchy, especially at night. Cutting out the gluten didn't get rid of the rash but it did stop the itching.

I finally got my referral appointment through, for the beginning of October, and the advice I found online was to make sure I was eating gluten for at least 6 weeks before the appointment, which I am currently doing (and enjoying everything delicious as my last gluteny hurrah :D ) However, I've also come across advice that says I need to be eating it for at least 2 months or I'll get a false negative. 

So my question is, is 6 weeks long enough for the antibodies to be present? Bear in mind I was eating gluten my whole life until June, then spent probably 3 weeks or so gluten free (enough to kill the itching) and now am eating it like normal again. 

Any advice would be very greatly appreciated! 

 

 


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



kareng Grand Master

i think to biopsy your DH, you just need  fresh lesion.  If you get that after 2 days... that would be enough.

 

 

Open Original Shared Link

 

Open Original Shared Link

squirmingitch Veteran

Ideally you should be eating gluten for 12 weeks just like anyone getting the celiac blood panel who has gone gluten free prior to testing.

 

Laoshi Rookie

I never got the test because I didn't want to deliberately  eat gluten....Until...on a mad whim I had decided to eat a bun after a year off gluten, and got so sick--and because a week after eating it I was still experiencing symptoms from the one bun, decided I would go get the test.  It was a tTg test and even though it was one full week after I had one hot dog bun, the test showed my gluten antibodies at 99. The normal range being under 10.  So I would say that you don't have to be continually eating gluten, but maybe everyone is different.  Maybe my body went into alarm mode after a year off gluten and eating a huge bun.

Laoshi Rookie

Also, I did get dh later.  It disappeared after I gave up dairy, which apparently is quite molecularly similar to gluten.

kareng Grand Master
2 hours ago, Laoshi said:

Also, I did get dh later.  It disappeared after I gave up dairy, which apparently is quite molecularly similar to gluten.

Unless you got it biopsies, it probably wasn't DH.  DH does not disappear when you stop dairy.  Unfortunately, There are lots of nasty rashes.

Victoria1234 Experienced
4 hours ago, Laoshi said:

Also, I did get dh later.  It disappeared after I gave up dairy, which apparently is quite molecularly similar to gluten.

My dh didn't go away for about a year or so off gluten if I recall. By that time I had reintroduced dairy as I was so depressed without it! I'm from Wisconsin and cheese is a way of life.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



kmar27 Newbie

Thanks guys, I guess there's a bunch of different advice and different experiences out there. I've done a bit more digging and the Coeliac.co.uk site recommends 6 weeks before the skin biopsy and over here at Celiac.com it's 12 weeks like @squirmingitch said. I imagine some doctors want you to be glutening for as long as possible to avoid the false negative? 

Thanks for all your advice, I'm so glad this site and others exist to help get info! The doctors I saw didn't explain anything about this, everything I've found has been on the internet. 

I don't really have any severe digestive symptoms (just the infernal rash :angry:) so I think I'm ok to keep it up until my appointment and hopefully I'll have cultivated enough little antibodies to get a positive!   

cyclinglady Grand Master
5 hours ago, Laoshi said:

I never got the test because I didn't want to deliberately  eat gluten....Until...on a mad whim I had decided to eat a bun after a year off gluten, and got so sick--and because a week after eating it I was still experiencing symptoms from the one bun, decided I would go get the test.  It was a tTg test and even though it was one full week after I had one hot dog bun, the test showed my gluten antibodies at 99. The normal range being under 10.  So I would say that you don't have to be continually eating gluten, but maybe everyone is different.  Maybe my body went into alarm mode after a year off gluten and eating a huge bun.

True.  Everyone is different.  It can take just a few days or it can take weeks for antibodies to ramp up.  I assume you have avoided buns like the plague now!  ?

cyclinglady Grand Master
5 hours ago, Laoshi said:

Also, I did get dh later.  It disappeared after I gave up dairy, which apparently is quite molecularly similar to gluten.

It might have just been a coincidence.  If you have celiac disease, you can also have a permant (not just due to celiac disease, but genetic) or temporary lactose intolerance.   I would imagine that consuming lactose or milk proteins (if you are  allergic), could contribute to inflammation and a heightened immune response.  I do not have DH, but I do have rosacea which flares when I am recovering for a celiac flare-up.  

Someday, researchers will really figure out "leaky gut".  

Glad your DH is in remission!  

 

squirmingitch Veteran
5 hours ago, kmar27 said:

Thanks guys, I guess there's a bunch of different advice and different experiences out there. I've done a bit more digging and the Coeliac.co.uk site recommends 6 weeks before the skin biopsy and over here at Celiac.com it's 12 weeks like @squirmingitch said. I imagine some doctors want you to be glutening for as long as possible to avoid the false negative? 

Thanks for all your advice, I'm so glad this site and others exist to help get info! The doctors I saw didn't explain anything about this, everything I've found has been on the internet. 

I don't really have any severe digestive symptoms (just the infernal rash :angry:) so I think I'm ok to keep it up until my appointment and hopefully I'll have cultivated enough little antibodies to get a positive!   

Those with dh tend not to have as severe GI symptoms or no GI symptoms at all as opposed to celiacs who do not have dh. Make SURE they take the dh biopsy form a CLEAR area ADJACENT to an active lesion. Anything else is not a dh biopsy.

 

kmar27 Newbie
3 hours ago, squirmingitch said:

Those with dh tend not to have as severe GI symptoms or no GI symptoms at all as opposed to celiacs who do not have dh. Make SURE they take the dh biopsy form a CLEAR area ADJACENT to an active lesion. Anything else is not a dh biopsy.

 

Thank you for the advice @squirmingitch, I will make sure they do! 

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Scott Adams replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      7

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It

    2. - Scott Adams replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results

    3. - deanna1ynne replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results

    4. - cristiana replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      7

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,440
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Lillian Steele
    Newest Member
    Lillian Steele
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      In the U.S., most regular wheat breads are required to be enriched with certain B-vitamins and iron, but gluten-free breads are not required to be. Since many gluten-free products are not enriched, we usually encourage people with celiac disease to consider a multivitamin.  In the early 1900s, refined white flour replaced whole grains, and people began developing serious vitamin-deficiency diseases: Beriberi → caused by a lack of thiamin (vitamin B1) Pellagra → caused by a lack of niacin (vitamin B3) Anemia → linked to low iron and lack of folate By the 1930s–40s, these problems were common in the U.S., especially in poorer regions. Public-health officials responded by requiring wheat flour and the breads made from it to be “enriched” with thiamin, riboflavin, niacin, and iron. Folic acid was added later (1998) to prevent neural-tube birth defects. Why gluten-free bread isn’t required to be enriched? The U.S. enrichment standards were written specifically for wheat flour. Gluten-free breads use rice, tapioca, corn, sorghum, etc.—so they fall outside that rule—but they probably should be for the same reason wheat products are.
    • Scott Adams
      Keep in mind that there are drawbacks to a formal diagnosis, for example more expensive life and private health insurance, as well as possibly needing to disclose it on job applications. Normally I am in favor of the formal diagnosis process, but if you've already figured out that you can't tolerate gluten and will likely stay gluten-free anyway, I wanted to at least mention the possible negative sides of having a formal diagnosis. While I understand wanting a formal diagnosis, it sounds like she will likely remain gluten-free either way, even if she should test negative for celiac disease (Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If her symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet, it would likely signal NCGS).        
    • JoJo0611
    • deanna1ynne
      Thank you all so much for your advice and thoughts. We ended up having another scope and more bloodwork last week. All serological markers continue to increase, and the doc who did the scope said there villous atrophy visible on the scope — but we just got the biopsy pathology report back, and all it says is, “Duodenal mucosa with patchy increased intraepithelial lymphocytes, preserved villous architecture, and patchy foveolar metaplasia,” which we are told is still inconclusive…  We will have her go gluten free again anyway, but how soon would you all test again, if at all? How valuable is an official dx in a situation like this?
    • cristiana
      Thanks for this Russ, and good to see that it is fortified. I spend too much time looking for M&S gluten-free Iced Spiced Buns to have ever noticed this! That's interesting, Scott.  Have manufacturers ever said why that should be the case?  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.