Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

New Diagnosis


tlison2

Recommended Posts

tlison2 Newbie

Hi. Had endo and colonoscopy 2 wks ago for something else.  Showed Celiac on biopsies. Dr sent me for bloodwork and told me to start gluten-free now. 

Wondering if bloodwork comes in negative if things could change. Seeing her again Wednesday. Nurse said it’s not likely to change as biopsy says Celiac, and we will prioritize the Celiac then worry about the other stuff when I see doctor. 

Just curious. Thanks for any input.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Judy3 Contributor

I highly doubt that the diagnosis will changed based on the blood work.   They've already diagnosed with biopsy which is the 'gold standard'.   My blood work was negative as I was too sick to eat much but my genetic testing and the endo biopsy proved Celiac.    Gluten free 7 yrs here.   

Victoria1234 Experienced

It probably won't change either way the blood work goes. The endo is the gold standard of celiac dx. 

Do you have any symptoms? 

And welcome! We are a great group of people, albeit a bit slow on weekends. 

Feel free to ask away, and post your test results if you need help :)

Ennis-TX Grand Master

Welcome, you probably need to check out the newbie 101 section, there is a bit of a change, and clean out phase but pretty easy. It might seem a bit overwhelming at first but quickly becomes second nature to check labels, and stick to certain products. Few other limitations but you learn and adapt and just have to do some things differently. We do suggest a whole foods only diet at first to boost healing. We also suggest dropping dairy and oats for the first few months. So if you had any other symptoms we can help you out with. Many are nutrient deficiency related, some you might not even notice as they have been your "normal" for so long. But you will find a new life opening up as you heal.

Few helpful links
https://www.celiac.com/forums/topic/91878-newbie-info-101/
https://www.celiac.com/forums/topic/119661-gluten-free-food-alternative-list-2017/

cyclinglady Grand Master

Even if your complete blood panel (TTG, DGP and EMA) is negative, that does not mean that you do not have Celiac disease as some 10% of celiacs are seronegative.  Trialing the diet will help confirm a diagnosis.  Your doctor may order a genetic test.  There are other things that can cause villi damage: 

Open Original Shared Link

 

tlison2 Newbie

Thank you for replies. Most of our food is okay already, but I cleaned out flours, spice blends, etc, checked all labels. Restocked almost all of that. Loaded up my normal go to fruits/veggies and located gluten-free bread, breakfast, lunch, dinner, and snacks to help until I get the hang of different flours, bread and sauces. 

I do have diverticulosis, gastritis, reflux, possibly an ulcer to contend with. Some polyps and lipomas removed. Chronic complex migraine, hair loss, and osteoporosis. Might be better if I could sleep at night, but I sleep better during the day. I’m a hot mess right now. 

A few days in, and I do feel a little bit better. Not much pep yet but not in fetal position or running to bathroom either. 

Its a little overwhelming!

Thank you again!

 

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Scott Adams replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      7

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It

    2. - Scott Adams replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results

    3. - deanna1ynne replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results

    4. - cristiana replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      7

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,440
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Lillian Steele
    Newest Member
    Lillian Steele
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      In the U.S., most regular wheat breads are required to be enriched with certain B-vitamins and iron, but gluten-free breads are not required to be. Since many gluten-free products are not enriched, we usually encourage people with celiac disease to consider a multivitamin.  In the early 1900s, refined white flour replaced whole grains, and people began developing serious vitamin-deficiency diseases: Beriberi → caused by a lack of thiamin (vitamin B1) Pellagra → caused by a lack of niacin (vitamin B3) Anemia → linked to low iron and lack of folate By the 1930s–40s, these problems were common in the U.S., especially in poorer regions. Public-health officials responded by requiring wheat flour and the breads made from it to be “enriched” with thiamin, riboflavin, niacin, and iron. Folic acid was added later (1998) to prevent neural-tube birth defects. Why gluten-free bread isn’t required to be enriched? The U.S. enrichment standards were written specifically for wheat flour. Gluten-free breads use rice, tapioca, corn, sorghum, etc.—so they fall outside that rule—but they probably should be for the same reason wheat products are.
    • Scott Adams
      Keep in mind that there are drawbacks to a formal diagnosis, for example more expensive life and private health insurance, as well as possibly needing to disclose it on job applications. Normally I am in favor of the formal diagnosis process, but if you've already figured out that you can't tolerate gluten and will likely stay gluten-free anyway, I wanted to at least mention the possible negative sides of having a formal diagnosis. While I understand wanting a formal diagnosis, it sounds like she will likely remain gluten-free either way, even if she should test negative for celiac disease (Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If her symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet, it would likely signal NCGS).        
    • JoJo0611
    • deanna1ynne
      Thank you all so much for your advice and thoughts. We ended up having another scope and more bloodwork last week. All serological markers continue to increase, and the doc who did the scope said there villous atrophy visible on the scope — but we just got the biopsy pathology report back, and all it says is, “Duodenal mucosa with patchy increased intraepithelial lymphocytes, preserved villous architecture, and patchy foveolar metaplasia,” which we are told is still inconclusive…  We will have her go gluten free again anyway, but how soon would you all test again, if at all? How valuable is an official dx in a situation like this?
    • cristiana
      Thanks for this Russ, and good to see that it is fortified. I spend too much time looking for M&S gluten-free Iced Spiced Buns to have ever noticed this! That's interesting, Scott.  Have manufacturers ever said why that should be the case?  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.