Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

In shock and confused!


Alibu

Recommended Posts

Alibu Explorer

Hi all!

I can't even believe I am on this forum right now!  I asked my doctor to run a Celiac Disease Panel to rule it out after dealing with so many digestive and systemic issues for years now.  I never in my life expected it to come back positive, but the results are a little confusing and I keep finding conflicting info online.  Any help is appreciated!  

I do have hypothyroidism and have for about 10 years now.  My levels have been well controlled on medication for years and years.  My father has discoid lupus (it's lupus that affects only the skin, not the internal organs), so there is some autoimmune history in our family.

My lab tests are as follows:

F TISSUE TRANSGLUTAMINASE AB, IGA 11  H  (U/mL)
-
- Value Interpretation
- ----- --------------
- <4 No Antibody Detected
- > or = 4 Antibody Detected
F INTERPRETATION SEE NOTE  
-
- tTG IgA positive by ELISA is consistent with celiac
- disease, but not confirmed by EMA IFA.
-
- Recommend correlation with clinical, radiographic and
- endoscopic findings.

 

F IMMUNOGLOBULIN A 226 81-463 (mg/dL)

 

F ENDOMYSIAL ANTIBODY SCR (IGA) W/REFL TO TITER Negative  

 

I have a biopsy scheduled for this Thursday.  Given the fact that I have thyroid issues, and the EMA was negative, is it still likely that it's Celiac, or is it more likely that my autoimmune thyroid is throwing off the result?  Also, it's my understanding that a positive EMA is indicative of intestinal damage, so if mine is negative, does that mean that it's more likely to show a negative biopsy?

 

Thank you all so much for any insight, I feel so blindsided with this!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



cyclinglady Grand Master
1 minute ago, Alibu said:

Hi all!

I can't even believe I am on this forum right now!  I asked my doctor to run a Celiac Disease Panel to rule it out after dealing with so many digestive and systemic issues for years now.  I never in my life expected it to come back positive, but the results are a little confusing and I keep finding conflicting info online.  Any help is appreciated!  

I do have hypothyroidism and have for about 10 years now.  My levels have been well controlled on medication for years and years.  My father has discoid lupus (it's lupus that affects only the skin, not the internal organs), so there is some autoimmune history in our family.

My lab tests are as follows:

F TISSUE TRANSGLUTAMINASE AB, IGA 11  H  (U/mL)
-
- Value Interpretation
- ----- --------------
- <4 No Antibody Detected
- > or = 4 Antibody Detected
F INTERPRETATION SEE NOTE  
-
- tTG IgA positive by ELISA is consistent with celiac
- disease, but not confirmed by EMA IFA.
-
- Recommend correlation with clinical, radiographic and
- endoscopic findings.

 

F IMMUNOGLOBULIN A 226 81-463 (mg/dL)

 

F ENDOMYSIAL ANTIBODY SCR (IGA) W/REFL TO TITER Negative  

 

I have a biopsy scheduled for this Thursday.  Given the fact that I have thyroid issues, and the EMA was negative, is it still likely that it's Celiac, or is it more likely that my autoimmune thyroid is throwing off the result?  Also, it's my understanding that a positive EMA is indicative of intestinal damage, so if mine is negative, does that mean that it's more likely to show a negative biopsy?

 

Thank you all so much for any insight, I feel so blindsided with this!

Hard to say.  You have a positive TTG and you are not IgA deficient.  The TTG is pretty high, so I would say autoimmune thyroid is not tweaking your result, but I am NOT a doctor.   You only need one positive on the panel to move forward with the endoscopy.  Personally, I have Hashimoto’s Thyroiditis, only a positive on the DGP IgA (negative EMA and TTG tests) and my biopsies revealed moderate to severe patches of villi damage.  

You should be checked for lupus as you can have several autoimmune issues simultaneously.  

Keep us posted.  Keep eating gluten until all testing is done!

Alibu Explorer
1 hour ago, cyclinglady said:

Hard to say.  You have a positive TTG and you are not IgA deficient.  The TTG is pretty high, so I would say autoimmune thyroid is not tweaking your result, but I am NOT a doctor.   You only need one positive on the panel to move forward with the endoscopy.  Personally, I have Hashimoto’s Thyroiditis, only a positive on the DGP IgA (negative EMA and TTG tests) and my biopsies revealed moderate to severe patches of villi damage.  

You should be checked for lupus as you can have several autoimmune issues simultaneously.  

Keep us posted.  Keep eating gluten until all testing is done!

Thank you for your response!  I guess I'm trying to cling on to the hope that it's a false positive with the negative EMA, LOL.  

I have been checked for lupus a few times and it's always negative, so that's good.  I really didn't expect this to come back positive at all.

And yes, I'm eating ALL the gluten while I still can!!

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Scott Adams replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      7

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It

    2. - Scott Adams replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results

    3. - deanna1ynne replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results

    4. - cristiana replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      7

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,439
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Lillian Steele
    Newest Member
    Lillian Steele
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      In the U.S., most regular wheat breads are required to be enriched with certain B-vitamins and iron, but gluten-free breads are not required to be. Since many gluten-free products are not enriched, we usually encourage people with celiac disease to consider a multivitamin.  In the early 1900s, refined white flour replaced whole grains, and people began developing serious vitamin-deficiency diseases: Beriberi → caused by a lack of thiamin (vitamin B1) Pellagra → caused by a lack of niacin (vitamin B3) Anemia → linked to low iron and lack of folate By the 1930s–40s, these problems were common in the U.S., especially in poorer regions. Public-health officials responded by requiring wheat flour and the breads made from it to be “enriched” with thiamin, riboflavin, niacin, and iron. Folic acid was added later (1998) to prevent neural-tube birth defects. Why gluten-free bread isn’t required to be enriched? The U.S. enrichment standards were written specifically for wheat flour. Gluten-free breads use rice, tapioca, corn, sorghum, etc.—so they fall outside that rule—but they probably should be for the same reason wheat products are.
    • Scott Adams
      Keep in mind that there are drawbacks to a formal diagnosis, for example more expensive life and private health insurance, as well as possibly needing to disclose it on job applications. Normally I am in favor of the formal diagnosis process, but if you've already figured out that you can't tolerate gluten and will likely stay gluten-free anyway, I wanted to at least mention the possible negative sides of having a formal diagnosis. While I understand wanting a formal diagnosis, it sounds like she will likely remain gluten-free either way, even if she should test negative for celiac disease (Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If her symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet, it would likely signal NCGS).        
    • JoJo0611
    • deanna1ynne
      Thank you all so much for your advice and thoughts. We ended up having another scope and more bloodwork last week. All serological markers continue to increase, and the doc who did the scope said there villous atrophy visible on the scope — but we just got the biopsy pathology report back, and all it says is, “Duodenal mucosa with patchy increased intraepithelial lymphocytes, preserved villous architecture, and patchy foveolar metaplasia,” which we are told is still inconclusive…  We will have her go gluten free again anyway, but how soon would you all test again, if at all? How valuable is an official dx in a situation like this?
    • cristiana
      Thanks for this Russ, and good to see that it is fortified. I spend too much time looking for M&S gluten-free Iced Spiced Buns to have ever noticed this! That's interesting, Scott.  Have manufacturers ever said why that should be the case?  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.