Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

A bit confused about test results


festivus321

Recommended Posts

festivus321 Rookie

Hello,

Can someone give me (if possible) a simple explanation what the attached test results mean?  Result for (tTG) IgG is a "weak positive," but everything else was negative.  Given my circumstances, it  probably indicates Celiac's, and I guess the normal course of action is to get a biopsy or just stop eating gluten for a while/forever.  Just want to make sure I understand it all.

I am furiously Googling to figure this out since I haven't been able to talk to my Dr. yet about the results, but if anyone could help me out, I would really appreciate it.    

Thanks!!

Ed

 

 

 


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



cyclinglady Grand Master
On 2/28/2018 at 3:11 PM, festivus321 said:

Hello,

Can someone give me (if possible) a simple explanation what the attached test results mean?  Result for (tTG) IgG is a "weak positive," but everything else was negative.  Given my circumstances, it  probably indicates Celiac's, and I guess the normal course of action is to get a biopsy or just stop eating gluten for a while/forever.  Just want to make sure I understand it all.

I am furiously Googling to figure this out since I haven't been able to talk to my Dr. yet about the results, but if anyone could help me out, I would really appreciate it.    

Thanks!!

Ed

It only takes one positive on the panel to move forward.  I was positive only on the DGP IgA and yet I had some pretty severe small intestinal damage per my biopsies.  Even if I am exposed to gluten, only my DGP IgA is ever elevated.  Get a GI referral who is celiac-savvy.  Do not go gluten free until all testing is complete.  If everything is normal, then consider trialing the diet.  

Keep us posted!  

festivus321 Rookie
8 hours ago, cyclinglady said:

It only takes one positive on the panel to move forward.  I was positive only on the DGP IgA and yet I had some pretty severe small intestinal damage per my biopsies.  Even if I am exposed to gluten, only my DGP IgA is ever elevated.  Get a GI referral who is celiac-savvy.  Do not go gluten free until all testing is complete.  If everything is normal, then consider trialing the diet.  

Keep us posted!  

Thanks for the reply!   What you described for your results makes more sense to me, because what I read said that a positive for (TtG) IgA almost certainly indicates Celiac's.   What I'm a little confused about is my case, where the (tTG) IgA  in the normal range and no IgA deficiency, but the (tTG) IgG is positive.   I guess what I'm really asking:  Is there a rough estimate on the likelihood that I have Celiac's based on a "weak positive" (tTg) IgG and everything else is normal?

Thanks again,

Ed

cyclinglady Grand Master

No rough estimate.  The celiac tests are good, but not perfect.  It is why, even after some years of celiac experts debating, the biopsy is still the gold standard in diagnosing celiac disease.  I am sorry that your case does not follow the norm.  

festivus321 Rookie
7 minutes ago, cyclinglady said:

No rough estimate.  The celiac tests are good, but not perfect.  It is why, even after some years of celiac experts debating, the biopsy is still the gold standard in diagnosing celiac disease.  I am sorry that your case does not follow the norm.  

Interesting, thanks.  My doctor just messaged me a few minutes ago: "Your serum IgA levels were normal on this test. Because your tTG is weakly positive, it is unlikely that you have celiac disease."

Not real helpful.

So looks like a biopsy is in my near future... and maybe a new doctor. :)

Thanks for the help,

Ed

 

cyclinglady Grand Master

The odds are low, but you could still have celiac disease.  I am not a doctor, do not know your symptoms or other health issues you might have.  At least try to get a celiac-savvy to review your history.  

Open Original Shared Link

More from some members:

https://www.celiac.com/forums/topic/104880-thanks-for-sharing-your-thoughts-on-my-sons-test/

Did your doctor know that 10% of celiacs are seronegative?  

Open Original Shared Link

Open Original Shared Link

 So, you can not rule out celiac disease yet.  

Cara in Boston Enthusiast

A positive is a positive.  

My son was only positive on the IgG tests and negative on all IgA tests (even though he was not deficient).  I was the opposite.  He has extensive intestinal damage.  I had no damage at all.  He had zero GI symptoms, I had mostly GI symptoms.  We both have Celiac and our symptoms went away when we went gluten free.  It is different for everyone, which is why they give you a variety of tests.  

Even if your biopsy appears fine, that only means damage was not found (missed or not visible yet). It does not mean you don't have C.D.   

After all testing is done, try the diet.  Resolution of symptoms after going gluten free is, in itself, the final test.

I would find a better informed doctor also.

cara


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



festivus321 Rookie

Thanks for all the help/suggestions.   Sounds like the only "test" is to stop eating gluten for a few months.  No wonder people are confused about this topic.

 

Thanks,

Ed

festivus321 Rookie

Okay, so I've been avoiding gluten and milk for a week (which I know is not enough time,) but humor me.  Because I've been avoiding cow's milk,  I have replaced it with soy milk, which I eat with (gluten-free) cereal almost every morning.    Since my bowels seem to be getting worse, it occurred to me it might be soy to which I am intolerant.   Then I did some googling, and some claim that soy intolerance could cause a positive for tTG IgG.   So maybe it's soy intolerance, not Celiac.    I am probably way off base, but maybe???

Thanks,

Ed

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Scott Adams replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      7

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It

    2. - Scott Adams replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results

    3. - deanna1ynne replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results

    4. - cristiana replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      7

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,438
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    rednecksurfer
    Newest Member
    rednecksurfer
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      In the U.S., most regular wheat breads are required to be enriched with certain B-vitamins and iron, but gluten-free breads are not required to be. Since many gluten-free products are not enriched, we usually encourage people with celiac disease to consider a multivitamin.  In the early 1900s, refined white flour replaced whole grains, and people began developing serious vitamin-deficiency diseases: Beriberi → caused by a lack of thiamin (vitamin B1) Pellagra → caused by a lack of niacin (vitamin B3) Anemia → linked to low iron and lack of folate By the 1930s–40s, these problems were common in the U.S., especially in poorer regions. Public-health officials responded by requiring wheat flour and the breads made from it to be “enriched” with thiamin, riboflavin, niacin, and iron. Folic acid was added later (1998) to prevent neural-tube birth defects. Why gluten-free bread isn’t required to be enriched? The U.S. enrichment standards were written specifically for wheat flour. Gluten-free breads use rice, tapioca, corn, sorghum, etc.—so they fall outside that rule—but they probably should be for the same reason wheat products are.
    • Scott Adams
      Keep in mind that there are drawbacks to a formal diagnosis, for example more expensive life and private health insurance, as well as possibly needing to disclose it on job applications. Normally I am in favor of the formal diagnosis process, but if you've already figured out that you can't tolerate gluten and will likely stay gluten-free anyway, I wanted to at least mention the possible negative sides of having a formal diagnosis. While I understand wanting a formal diagnosis, it sounds like she will likely remain gluten-free either way, even if she should test negative for celiac disease (Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If her symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet, it would likely signal NCGS).        
    • JoJo0611
    • deanna1ynne
      Thank you all so much for your advice and thoughts. We ended up having another scope and more bloodwork last week. All serological markers continue to increase, and the doc who did the scope said there villous atrophy visible on the scope — but we just got the biopsy pathology report back, and all it says is, “Duodenal mucosa with patchy increased intraepithelial lymphocytes, preserved villous architecture, and patchy foveolar metaplasia,” which we are told is still inconclusive…  We will have her go gluten free again anyway, but how soon would you all test again, if at all? How valuable is an official dx in a situation like this?
    • cristiana
      Thanks for this Russ, and good to see that it is fortified. I spend too much time looking for M&S gluten-free Iced Spiced Buns to have ever noticed this! That's interesting, Scott.  Have manufacturers ever said why that should be the case?  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.