Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

What to do when test results are inconsistent?


Emilie

Recommended Posts

Emilie Newbie

My husband has had mild GI issues most of his adult life, heart burn and occasional bloating mainly. His heartburn has been under control for years through diet and the bloating is occasional and fairly mild. He is very healthy and active 39 year old with no other health issues. At a routine annual physical he mentioned the occasional bloating to his doc who threw the celiac Ttg-iga test into his routine blood panel. Well, to our surprise, his ttg number was 87, very high and as his doc put it “I think you have celiac disease.” We began to adjust to the idea, did our research, and schedule the biopsy to confirm. Also to it surprise the GI said his intestines looked great and the biopsy came back inconclusive. Ugh, so we aren’t sure what to do next. We will meet win the GI to discuss next steps but I have a feeling based on our brief conversation after the EGD that he’s either gonna day just go gluten free and see how you feel or you don’t need to go gluten free because I see no evidence of celiac. I don’t like either of these answers because from what I’ve read, there are pros and cons to both approaches. We have 4 kids and want to know definitively if he has it or not. We don’t want to go gluten free if it’s unnecessary and we certainly don’t want to keep ingesting gluten if he does have celiac. Has anyone been in a similar situation and if so, what happened? How did you confirm or rule out celiac?  I’m considering getting a second opinion from a celiac center but thought I would pose the question here first. 


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



cyclinglady Grand Master
1 hour ago, Emilie said:

My husband has had mild GI issues most of his adult life, heart burn and occasional bloating mainly. His heartburn has been under control for years through diet and the bloating is occasional and fairly mild. He is very healthy and active 39 year old with no other health issues. At a routine annual physical he mentioned the occasional bloating to his doc who threw the celiac Ttg-iga test into his routine blood panel. Well, to our surprise, his ttg number was 87, very high and as his doc put it “I think you have celiac disease.” We began to adjust to the idea, did our research, and schedule the biopsy to confirm. Also to it surprise the GI said his intestines looked great and the biopsy came back inconclusive. Ugh, so we aren’t sure what to do next. We will meet win the GI to discuss next steps but I have a feeling based on our brief conversation after the EGD that he’s either gonna day just go gluten free and see how you feel or you don’t need to go gluten free because I see no evidence of celiac. I don’t like either of these answers because from what I’ve read, there are pros and cons to both approaches. We have 4 kids and want to know definitively if he has it or not. We don’t want to go gluten free if it’s unnecessary and we certainly don’t want to keep ingesting gluten if he does have celiac. Has anyone been in a similar situation and if so, what happened? How did you confirm or rule out celiac?  I’m considering getting a second opinion from a celiac center but thought I would pose the question here first. 

I think you need to find out how many biopsies were taken and the location of them. Get the actual copy of the pathologist’s report and the doctor’s notes on the procedure and other lab results.  Consider asking for the rest of celiac panel which includes the EMA and DGP.  Some slight elevations on the TTG can be due to other things like IBD or other autoimmune issues, but his result is pretty high.  Did you know that the small bowel is the size of a tennis court?  Easy to miss damage areas.    Consider too a pill camera because that damage can be further down and away from the reach of the endoscopy.    Consider trialing the gluten-free diet.  If the TTG goes down, it can support a diagnosis.  Ask the GI how many celiac patients has he diagnosed.  Consider a second opinion and hand over the file (lab tests) to the consulting GI.  

You can see there are so many things that could have been missed or errors made.  

Keep advocating.  Something is wrong!  

RMJ Mentor

He could try going gluten free for six months and see if the antibody levels go down.  If so, it would indicate that gluten causes him to make auto antibodies (antibodies against oneself).

Emilie Newbie
50 minutes ago, cyclinglady said:

I think you need to find out how many biopsies were taken and the location of them. Get the actual copy of the pathologist’s report and the doctor’s notes on the procedure and other lab results.  Consider asking for the rest of celiac panel which includes the EMA and DGP.  Some slight elevations on the TTG can be due to other things like IBD or other autoimmune issues, but his result is pretty high.  Did you know that the small bowel is the size of a tennis court?  Easy to miss damage areas.    Consider too a pill camera because that damage can be further down and away from the reach of the endoscopy.    Consider trialing the gluten-free diet.  If the TTG goes down, it can support a diagnosis.  Ask the GI how many celiac patients has he diagnosed.  Consider a second opinion and hand over the file (lab tests) to the consulting GI.  

You can see there are so many things that could have been missed or errors made.  

Keep advocating.  Something is wrong!  

 

Emilie Newbie

What other questions would you recommend we ask if the GI doc at our appointment on Friday? I was pretty surprised after the EGD when the GI popped in to tell me all looked good like it was nothing and then when I asked why his TTG test was 87 he looked super surprised (The GP ordered the blood work, not him). It really made me wonder if he didn’t even realize why he was doing the biopsy and didn’t bother to test more than one location.  So I want to make sure I ask the right questions to help us narrow down what to do next. 

cyclinglady Grand Master

When I had my first endoscopy, my GI told me that visually everything looked good, but my biopsies revealed extensive villi damage.  I just had a repeat endoscopy.  This time the equipment was newer and visually my GI could see healthy villi on the scope (he gave me a photo).  No need to wait for biopsies.  We knew I had healed.  Maybe your GI has an older scope.  Let’s hope he did not make a major diagnostic  error by not properly obtaining biosies to confirm celiac disease.  If he goofed, consider that second opinion.  Who knows what else he missed if he did not even read the chart!  

Emilie Newbie

So curious what you all think our next steps should be.  I'm looking at his results and have summarized them below:

IgA Serum 195

tTG IgG 87.7

Deamidated Gliadin IgA Ab 14.7

The pathology report says duodenum, second and third part biopsies (but does not specify how many samples were taken other than "duodenum - second, third part are multiple fragments of tan soft tissues that are 1x0.3x0.2 cm in aggregate.  The specimen is entirely submitted in one cassette."  Results - minimal increased intraepithelial lymphocytes (32/100 enterocytes), normal villous architecture.  The GI also said visually everything looked good, no blunting, etc.

He did not appear to have the EMA test or genetic testing.  I'm wondering if these tests are our next steps?  Or maybe even to check for vitamin deficiencies because those weren't tested either?

Our general doc says he feels pretty strongly that he does have celiac and should go gluten free for a few months and test the tTG numbers again and assuming they are going down, that is enough.  Agree?  Should we get more tests done before removing gluten? 

Thoughts?

 


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,661
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    CarlaP
    Newest Member
    CarlaP
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Inkie
      Thank you for the information ill will definitely bring it into practice .
    • Scott Adams
      While plain, pure tea leaves (black, green, or white) are naturally gluten-free, the issue often lies not with the tea itself but with other ingredients or processing. Many flavored teas use barley malt or other gluten-containing grains as a flavoring agent, which would be clearly listed on the ingredient label. Cross-contamination is another possibility, either in the facility where the tea is processed or, surprisingly, from the tea bag material itself—some tea bags are sealed with a wheat-based glue. Furthermore, it's important to consider that your reaction could be to other substances in tea, such as high levels of tannins, which can be hard on the stomach, or to natural histamines or other compounds that can cause a non-celiac immune response. The best way to investigate is to carefully read labels for hidden ingredients, try switching to a certified gluten-free tea brand that uses whole leaf or pyramid-style bags, and see if the reaction persists.
    • Scott Adams
      This is a challenging and confusing situation. The combination of a positive EMA—which is a highly specific marker rarely yielding false positives—alongside strongly elevated TTG on two separate occasions, years apart, is profoundly suggestive of celiac disease, even in the absence of biopsy damage. This pattern strongly aligns with what is known as "potential celiac disease," where the immune system is clearly activated, but intestinal damage has not yet become visible under the microscope. Your concern about the long-term risk of continued gluten consumption is valid, especially given your family's experience with the consequences of delayed diagnosis. Since your daughter is now at an age where her buy-in is essential for a gluten-free lifestyle, obtaining a definitive answer is crucial for her long-term adherence and health. Given that she is asymptomatic yet serologically positive, a third biopsy now, after a proper 12-week challenge, offers the best chance to capture any microscopic damage that may have developed, providing the concrete evidence needed to justify the dietary change. This isn't about wanting her to have celiac; it's about wanting to prevent the insidious damage that can occur while waiting for symptoms to appear, and ultimately giving her the unambiguous "why" she needs to accept and commit to the necessary treatment. This article might be helpful. It breaks down each type of test, and what a positive results means in terms of the probability that you might have celiac disease. One test that always needs to be done is the IgA Levels/Deficiency Test (often called "Total IGA") because some people are naturally IGA deficient, and if this is the case, then certain blood tests for celiac disease might be false-negative, and other types of tests need to be done to make an accurate diagnosis. The article includes the "Mayo Clinic Protocol," which is the best overall protocol for results to be ~98% accurate.    
    • Scott Adams
      Welcome to the community! Generally, for a gluten challenge before celiac disease blood tests, Tylenol (acetaminophen) is considered safe and should not interfere with your antibody results. The medications you typically need to avoid are those like ibuprofen (Advil, Motrin) or naproxen (Aleve) that can cause intestinal irritation, which could potentially complicate the interpretation of an endoscopy if you were to have one. However, it is absolutely crucial that you confirm this with either your gastroenterologist or your surgeon before your procedure. They know the specifics of your case and can give you the definitive green light, ensuring your surgery is comfortable and your celiac testing remains accurate. Best of luck with your surgery tomorrow
    • Xravith
      Thank you for the advice. I’ve actually never checked for nutritional deficiencies, but for as long as I can remember, I’ve always taken vitamin and mineral supplements — otherwise my symptoms get worse. This week I stopped eating gluten to confirm whether my symptoms are really caused by it. Starting next week, I’ll reintroduce gluten — it’s sad to go back to how I was before — but at least I’ll be able to take the necessary tests properly. I think the diagnostic process will be long, but at least I’m happy that I finally decided to address this doubt I’ve had for years.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.