Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Celiac Gene and NCGS


ktyler44

Recommended Posts

ktyler44 Contributor

Is it possible to have the celiac gene and be non-celiac gluten sensitive? Or if you are reacting to gluten and carry the gene, does that give an indication of celiac? My son's blood test came back negative, but the doctor wouldn't do an endo biopsy because she said he didn't have celiac. But if he carries the gene and had symptoms, wouldn't that be a red flag? Or could he carry the gene, have symptoms, and still just be NCGS?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



cyclinglady Grand Master
On 5/6/2018 at 7:16 AM, ktyler44 said:

Is it possible to have the celiac gene and be non-celiac gluten sensitive? Or if you are reacting to gluten and carry the gene, does that give an indication of celiac? My son's blood test came back negative, but the doctor wouldn't do an endo biopsy because she said he didn't have celiac. But if he carries the gene and had symptoms, wouldn't that be a red flag? Or could he carry the gene, have symptoms, and still just be NCGS?

Yes, he could have the gene and still be NCGS.  But did you know that some celiacs are seronegative?  Did you know that some celiacs never get a positive on the TTG (like me)?  Is he IgA deficient?

Ask for the full panel.  Then consider pushing for the endoscopy because something is wrong.  My niece had a celiac full blood panel and an endoscopy.  Turns out she has Crohn’s that was found by a pill camera.  

I do not know you full situation, but as a mother, we know when are kids are sick.  Push for answers!  Be nice and research like heck!  

chrissy-b Apprentice

My sister has the gene but tested negative for celiac. She was diagnosed as NCGS so it is possible. I'm not sure what you do in that situation as far as testing goes other than to ask them to continue testing for other things as well. 

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,438
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    rednecksurfer
    Newest Member
    rednecksurfer
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      In the U.S., most regular wheat breads are required to be enriched with certain B-vitamins and iron, but gluten-free breads are not required to be. Since many gluten-free products are not enriched, we usually encourage people with celiac disease to consider a multivitamin.  In the early 1900s, refined white flour replaced whole grains, and people began developing serious vitamin-deficiency diseases: Beriberi → caused by a lack of thiamin (vitamin B1) Pellagra → caused by a lack of niacin (vitamin B3) Anemia → linked to low iron and lack of folate By the 1930s–40s, these problems were common in the U.S., especially in poorer regions. Public-health officials responded by requiring wheat flour and the breads made from it to be “enriched” with thiamin, riboflavin, niacin, and iron. Folic acid was added later (1998) to prevent neural-tube birth defects. Why gluten-free bread isn’t required to be enriched? The U.S. enrichment standards were written specifically for wheat flour. Gluten-free breads use rice, tapioca, corn, sorghum, etc.—so they fall outside that rule—but they probably should be for the same reason wheat products are.
    • Scott Adams
      Keep in mind that there are drawbacks to a formal diagnosis, for example more expensive life and private health insurance, as well as possibly needing to disclose it on job applications. Normally I am in favor of the formal diagnosis process, but if you've already figured out that you can't tolerate gluten and will likely stay gluten-free anyway, I wanted to at least mention the possible negative sides of having a formal diagnosis. While I understand wanting a formal diagnosis, it sounds like she will likely remain gluten-free either way, even if she should test negative for celiac disease (Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If her symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet, it would likely signal NCGS).        
    • JoJo0611
    • deanna1ynne
      Thank you all so much for your advice and thoughts. We ended up having another scope and more bloodwork last week. All serological markers continue to increase, and the doc who did the scope said there villous atrophy visible on the scope — but we just got the biopsy pathology report back, and all it says is, “Duodenal mucosa with patchy increased intraepithelial lymphocytes, preserved villous architecture, and patchy foveolar metaplasia,” which we are told is still inconclusive…  We will have her go gluten free again anyway, but how soon would you all test again, if at all? How valuable is an official dx in a situation like this?
    • cristiana
      Thanks for this Russ, and good to see that it is fortified. I spend too much time looking for M&S gluten-free Iced Spiced Buns to have ever noticed this! That's interesting, Scott.  Have manufacturers ever said why that should be the case?  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.