Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Very Very sensitive Celiac flying American Airlines (business class!)


smoaky

Recommended Posts

smoaky Newbie

I am a very sensitive celiac (we all are, I just tend to have clear reactions for a long time!). Don't eat at restaurants unless they are 100% gluten free. Long ago gave up eating airline food; since I've only ever flown in coach I don't really care to try the purportedly gluten-free options. 

However, I have a trip coming up this week on American Airlines. With miles I was able to snag a cheap business class fare. I'm thrilled to get to sit in a premium seat etc. But the food is also meant to be a highlight of business or first class. American lists an option which is called "gluten-intolerant." Now, obviously, that immediately raises red flags. I am not gluten intolerant, I have Celiac, and react to the smallest amount of gluten - a spec of beer on the rim of a wine glass, and other forms of cross contamination. 

Though I might seem like a weirdo onboard, I would prefer to turn down any meal that even has the possibility of glutening me. What better way to *ruin* my first and maybe only business class flight by getting glutened and then sick the next day (it takes me 48 hours to get back to normal). 

Does anyone know much about American Airline's "gluten-intolerant" food? I suppose I can eat anything that is pre-packaged and certified, but the whole point of First and Business is you get real food cooked for you. Which, lol, is a big no usually!

Welcome any thoughts here. I'm leaning towards not eating anything they give me, but open to advice. I'm also contacting the airline but not sure they'll get CC etc.

Thanks!!!!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



tessa25 Rising Star
52 minutes ago, smoaky said:

I suppose I can eat anything that is pre-packaged and certified, but the whole point of First and Business is you get real food cooked for you.

The food in first is no longer worth eating these days anyway. I would pack a nice sandwich, some chips and a cupcake and let everyone drool at my yummy meal.

cyclinglady Grand Master

Good luck!  Even if I order gluten-free meals (e.g. international flights), there is a 50% chance that The gluten-free meal will make it on the plane even when I have called several times to confirm.  I bring my own food.    Cold items are placed in a collapsible cooler with a bag of ice.  The ice is discarded in the trash when going through TSA.  Then I ask a restaurant to refill my ziplock bags with fresh ice once I am in the terminal.  

My food is always better than what 1st class gets.  Come on....it is still airplane food!  Load up in free drinks if you want to indulge!  

Happy travels!  ✈️

smoaky Newbie

I will consult with American Airlines but not hopeful. Looks like preparing a meal is my best bet -- or just bringing snacks as usual. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Scott Adams replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      7

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It

    2. - Scott Adams replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results

    3. - deanna1ynne replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results

    4. - cristiana replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      7

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,436
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Blozo
    Newest Member
    Blozo
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      In the U.S., most regular wheat breads are required to be enriched with certain B-vitamins and iron, but gluten-free breads are not required to be. Since many gluten-free products are not enriched, we usually encourage people with celiac disease to consider a multivitamin.  In the early 1900s, refined white flour replaced whole grains, and people began developing serious vitamin-deficiency diseases: Beriberi → caused by a lack of thiamin (vitamin B1) Pellagra → caused by a lack of niacin (vitamin B3) Anemia → linked to low iron and lack of folate By the 1930s–40s, these problems were common in the U.S., especially in poorer regions. Public-health officials responded by requiring wheat flour and the breads made from it to be “enriched” with thiamin, riboflavin, niacin, and iron. Folic acid was added later (1998) to prevent neural-tube birth defects. Why gluten-free bread isn’t required to be enriched? The U.S. enrichment standards were written specifically for wheat flour. Gluten-free breads use rice, tapioca, corn, sorghum, etc.—so they fall outside that rule—but they probably should be for the same reason wheat products are.
    • Scott Adams
      Keep in mind that there are drawbacks to a formal diagnosis, for example more expensive life and private health insurance, as well as possibly needing to disclose it on job applications. Normally I am in favor of the formal diagnosis process, but if you've already figured out that you can't tolerate gluten and will likely stay gluten-free anyway, I wanted to at least mention the possible negative sides of having a formal diagnosis. While I understand wanting a formal diagnosis, it sounds like she will likely remain gluten-free either way, even if she should test negative for celiac disease (Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If her symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet, it would likely signal NCGS).        
    • JoJo0611
    • deanna1ynne
      Thank you all so much for your advice and thoughts. We ended up having another scope and more bloodwork last week. All serological markers continue to increase, and the doc who did the scope said there villous atrophy visible on the scope — but we just got the biopsy pathology report back, and all it says is, “Duodenal mucosa with patchy increased intraepithelial lymphocytes, preserved villous architecture, and patchy foveolar metaplasia,” which we are told is still inconclusive…  We will have her go gluten free again anyway, but how soon would you all test again, if at all? How valuable is an official dx in a situation like this?
    • cristiana
      Thanks for this Russ, and good to see that it is fortified. I spend too much time looking for M&S gluten-free Iced Spiced Buns to have ever noticed this! That's interesting, Scott.  Have manufacturers ever said why that should be the case?  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.