Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

What do these mean?!


TWilson9608

Recommended Posts

TWilson9608 Newbie

Hello. My youngest daughter (8 y/o) was recently diagnosed with Celiac Disease, thorough labs and biopsies. It was suggested that our who family be tested and so I immediately began that process. My middle daughter (15 y/o) labs came in with a positive IGA of 13 but the transgluten was negative. What could this mean? My middle daughter is being referred to the pros GI specialist that my youngest goes to but her pediatric doctor is running a great deal more labs to look into other autoimmune disorders as well. I am being told, regardless of the negative portion that she does have Celiacs and obviously they'll need to confirm with biopsies, but both the labs and the pediatrician say its celiac...Can anyone clarify this more for me because I can't seem to find the correct search online to find the answers that I am looking for and my anxiety is through the roof right now! TIA


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



cyclinglady Grand Master
8 minutes ago, TWilson9608 said:

Hello. My youngest daughter (8 y/o) was recently diagnosed with Celiac Disease, thorough labs and biopsies. It was suggested that our who family be tested and so I immediately began that process. My middle daughter (15 y/o) labs came in with a positive IGA of 13 but the transgluten was negative. What could this mean? My middle daughter is being referred to the pros GI specialist that my youngest goes to but her pediatric doctor is running a great deal more labs to look into other autoimmune disorders as well. I am being told, regardless of the negative portion that she does have Celiacs and obviously they'll need to confirm with biopsies, but both the labs and the pediatrician say its celiac...Can anyone clarify this more for me because I can't seem to find the correct search online to find the answers that I am looking for and my anxiety is through the roof right now! TIA

Which IgA was it (and the lab range)?

  • Anti-tissue transglutaminase (tTG)
  • Anti-endomysium (EMA)
  • Anti-deamidated gliadin peptides (DGP)

It only takes one positive on any of these three tests to further investigate (e.g. biopsies via endoscopy).  

TWilson9608 Newbie
(edited)

Celiac IGA Gliadian Deamidatedb13

IGA Transglutamainase 0.3

Edited by TWilson9608
cyclinglady Grand Master

Okay, the information based on what you provided earlier (13 positive) seems to indicate that she needs to be elevated by a Gastroenterologist.  She has a positive on the DGP IgA, which is like me.  I have never had a positive on the EMA or the TTG even in follow up testing. The celiac tests are not perfect.  It is one reason why there are several.  Do not let your screening doctor (maybe your PED) tell you that she is not positive because she did not get a positive on the TTG.  

  It is a lot to take in, but knowing a diagnosis is so important.  Hang in there.  I get it.  I have a daughter too!  

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Scott Adams replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      7

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It

    2. - Scott Adams replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results

    3. - deanna1ynne replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results

    4. - cristiana replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      7

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,436
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Vivien Armstrong
    Newest Member
    Vivien Armstrong
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      In the U.S., most regular wheat breads are required to be enriched with certain B-vitamins and iron, but gluten-free breads are not required to be. Since many gluten-free products are not enriched, we usually encourage people with celiac disease to consider a multivitamin.  In the early 1900s, refined white flour replaced whole grains, and people began developing serious vitamin-deficiency diseases: Beriberi → caused by a lack of thiamin (vitamin B1) Pellagra → caused by a lack of niacin (vitamin B3) Anemia → linked to low iron and lack of folate By the 1930s–40s, these problems were common in the U.S., especially in poorer regions. Public-health officials responded by requiring wheat flour and the breads made from it to be “enriched” with thiamin, riboflavin, niacin, and iron. Folic acid was added later (1998) to prevent neural-tube birth defects. Why gluten-free bread isn’t required to be enriched? The U.S. enrichment standards were written specifically for wheat flour. Gluten-free breads use rice, tapioca, corn, sorghum, etc.—so they fall outside that rule—but they probably should be for the same reason wheat products are.
    • Scott Adams
      Keep in mind that there are drawbacks to a formal diagnosis, for example more expensive life and private health insurance, as well as possibly needing to disclose it on job applications. Normally I am in favor of the formal diagnosis process, but if you've already figured out that you can't tolerate gluten and will likely stay gluten-free anyway, I wanted to at least mention the possible negative sides of having a formal diagnosis. While I understand wanting a formal diagnosis, it sounds like she will likely remain gluten-free either way, even if she should test negative for celiac disease (Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If her symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet, it would likely signal NCGS).        
    • JoJo0611
    • deanna1ynne
      Thank you all so much for your advice and thoughts. We ended up having another scope and more bloodwork last week. All serological markers continue to increase, and the doc who did the scope said there villous atrophy visible on the scope — but we just got the biopsy pathology report back, and all it says is, “Duodenal mucosa with patchy increased intraepithelial lymphocytes, preserved villous architecture, and patchy foveolar metaplasia,” which we are told is still inconclusive…  We will have her go gluten free again anyway, but how soon would you all test again, if at all? How valuable is an official dx in a situation like this?
    • cristiana
      Thanks for this Russ, and good to see that it is fortified. I spend too much time looking for M&S gluten-free Iced Spiced Buns to have ever noticed this! That's interesting, Scott.  Have manufacturers ever said why that should be the case?  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.