Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×

  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):

    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Please help us decide: does our 3 year old little need an endoscopy?

solarus
 Share
Go to solution Solved by trents,

Recommended Posts

solarus Newbie
solarus
Posted

Hoping to get some advice from this amazing community. Our 3 year old had not been growing well <10% for weight, less than 20% height even though we were both tall. He has also had eczema. Our GI ran a panel and we got the following results:

TTg IGA -18 (normal 0-3) - so 6x upper limit

EMA: positive

Tested homozygous for HLA DQB1*02, (which my understanding is the highest genetic risk config)

The doctor is suggesting an endoscopy next, but we are conflicted. It seems like if the endoscopy is positive, we'll do GFD. If the endoscopy is negative... with the positive blood work above, we'll still do GFD. So it looks GFD either way. Do we really need to put the poor thing through this? 

We are worried about traumatizing him further, as he is now very scared of going to the hospital particularly after the last blood draw :( We would be so very grateful for any thoughts or advice!

 

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


  • Solution
trents Grand Master
trents
Posted
  • Solution

My understanding is that the EMA is the most specific antibody test for celiac disease but also the least sensitive. Which means, when that one is positive it's pretty definitive for celiac disease. If it were my kid, I wold skip the endoscopy and trial a gluten free diet. If he improves, you have your answer.

https://celiac.org/about-celiac-disease/screening-and-diagnosis/screening/:

"The EMA test has a specificity of almost 100%, making it the most specific test for celiac disease, although it is not as sensitive as the tTG-IgA test. About 5-10% of people with celiac disease do not have a positive EMA test. It is also very expensive in comparison to the tTG-IgA and requires the use of primate esophagus or human umbilical cord. It is usually reserved for difficult to diagnose patients."

RMJ Mentor
RMJ
Posted

It sounds like you know what you plan to do.  Sometimes endoscopy results (if positive) can help to convince OTHER people that your child needs to be gluten free. But that may not be a good enough reason to put your child through it.

Scott Adams Grand Master
Scott Adams
Posted

In Europe they routinely diagnose celiac disease without biopsy at 10x over a positive TtG level, but I agree with @trents and think you just have him go gluten-free, but be sure to discuss this with your doctor. The problem with a biopsy at that age is that it may be negative, and then you'll still not be sure about his diagnosis. 

trents Grand Master
trents
Posted

Yes, agree with Scott. Young children with celiac disease often don't have damaged villi yet. There bodies are so resilient.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):


  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      130,002
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748
    Trish Haddock
    Newest Member
    Trish Haddock
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.3k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):


  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • wellthatsfun
      confirmed via biopsy, quite depressed

      By wellthatsfun · Posted

      i am australian. we do have plenty of substitutes, but most are very expensive compared to the originals. i believe i'll just stick to home cooked meals and not have many treats at all. it's sad but it's just so much easier. also, ive heard far too many horror stories of people ordering gluten free food from restaurants and cafés, explicitly telling servers and kitchen staff that cross contamination is a strict no go, and they still get very sick. until i find a reasonably priced fully gluten free kitchen somewhere, i am not eating out for my safety and sanity.
    • wellthatsfun
      confirmed via biopsy, quite depressed

      By wellthatsfun · Posted

      thank you all for the kind words and support. it truly means a lot. i know i will adapt, it really just is a grieving process right now though. looking forward to feeling healthier!
    • The Logician
      Gluten Sensitivity

      By The Logician · Posted

      To Trent’s, yes, from what i’ve read it is not uncommon for digestive systems to become less tolerant to gluten over time. Many types of sensitivity or allergies arise in older people who never had a problem. I don’t see why you are focusing on anything but the fact that after years of my sensitivity to gluten, for whatever reason , it has disappeared after a bout of antibiotics. What i’ve read is antibiotics can make gluten sensitivity worse. In any event, in my case, if I can still eat all the wheat products I want with no reaction after a month or more since my hospital stay this is something that should be investigated. Time will tell.
    • The Logician
      Gluten Sensitivity

      By The Logician · Posted

      I had a UTI, blood cultures are standard to insure that the infection does not get in the bloodstream which can lead to sepsis and death. In my case there was bacteria in my blood which necessitated 48 hours of antibiotic IV
    • Wends
      Finally got in to doctor to get my referral and I lucked out and got into Gastro the same day - question about different transglutaminase results

      By Wends · Posted

      Hi Cameo674. just read your post. Well wishes to a correct diagnosis so that you can get on track to healing and feeling better. Personally I know it’s good to have the eosinophilic disorder ruled out too, as this can show anti-ttg igA antibodies too. But usually without the anti-gliadin antibodies unless gliadin is an allergen for you. Thanks for posting the link to look up SNPs rs… numbers on another post. Was useful. Looking at your result, ”Celiac Associated HLD-DQ Typing: DQA1* Value: 05; DQA1*DQA11 Value: 05; DQB1* Value: 02; DQB1-DQB11 Value: 02; Celiac Gene Pairs Present Value: Yes; Celiac HLA Interpretation Value: These genes are permissive for celiac disease.  However, these genes can also be present in the normal population. Testing performed by SSOP.  So google failed me.  I think these results basically say I have genes, but everybody has these genes so this test was just to confirm that there is a vague possibility?  Maybe this test result explains why I do not have the horrible symptoms most individuals with celiac have?  I told the GI my assumption is that I am just gluten intolerant since I do not have the pain? So maybe this test explains why I have antibodies?” To me it reads.that you carry the high risk HLADQ2.5 haplotype.      
×
×
  • Create New...