Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Please help us decide: does our 3 year old little need an endoscopy?


solarus
Go to solution Solved by trents,

Recommended Posts

solarus Newbie

Hoping to get some advice from this amazing community. Our 3 year old had not been growing well <10% for weight, less than 20% height even though we were both tall. He has also had eczema. Our GI ran a panel and we got the following results:

TTg IGA -18 (normal 0-3) - so 6x upper limit

EMA: positive

Tested homozygous for HLA DQB1*02, (which my understanding is the highest genetic risk config)

The doctor is suggesting an endoscopy next, but we are conflicted. It seems like if the endoscopy is positive, we'll do GFD. If the endoscopy is negative... with the positive blood work above, we'll still do GFD. So it looks GFD either way. Do we really need to put the poor thing through this? 

We are worried about traumatizing him further, as he is now very scared of going to the hospital particularly after the last blood draw :( We would be so very grateful for any thoughts or advice!

 


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



  • Solution
trents Grand Master

My understanding is that the EMA is the most specific antibody test for celiac disease but also the least sensitive. Which means, when that one is positive it's pretty definitive for celiac disease. If it were my kid, I wold skip the endoscopy and trial a gluten free diet. If he improves, you have your answer.

https://celiac.org/about-celiac-disease/screening-and-diagnosis/screening/:

"The EMA test has a specificity of almost 100%, making it the most specific test for celiac disease, although it is not as sensitive as the tTG-IgA test. About 5-10% of people with celiac disease do not have a positive EMA test. It is also very expensive in comparison to the tTG-IgA and requires the use of primate esophagus or human umbilical cord. It is usually reserved for difficult to diagnose patients."

RMJ Mentor

It sounds like you know what you plan to do.  Sometimes endoscopy results (if positive) can help to convince OTHER people that your child needs to be gluten free. But that may not be a good enough reason to put your child through it.

Scott Adams Grand Master

In Europe they routinely diagnose celiac disease without biopsy at 10x over a positive TtG level, but I agree with @trents and think you just have him go gluten-free, but be sure to discuss this with your doctor. The problem with a biopsy at that age is that it may be negative, and then you'll still not be sure about his diagnosis. 

trents Grand Master

Yes, agree with Scott. Young children with celiac disease often don't have damaged villi yet. There bodies are so resilient.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,201
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Elisa Stutsman
    Newest Member
    Elisa Stutsman
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • RMJ
      That means the normal range (i.e. not celiac disease) would be a result less than 14.99.  Your result is WAY above that. Some gastroenterologists would diagnose that as celiac disease even without a confirming biopsy because it is more than ten times the top of the normal range.
    • Redanafs
      Hi everyone. Back in 2022 I had blood work drawn for iga ext gliadin. Since then I’ve developed worse stomach issues and all other health issues. My doctor just said cut out gluten. He did no further testing. Please see my test results attached. I just need some direction cause I feel so ill and the stomach pain is becoming worse. Can this test show indications for other gastrointestinal diseases?
    • Fayeb23
      Thank you. These were the results TTG ABS NUMERICAL: > 250.0 U/mL [< 14.99]  Really don’t understand the results!
    • Scott Adams
      Clearly from what you've said the info on Dailymed is much more up to date than the other site, which hasn't been updated since 2017. The fact that some companies might be repackaging drugs does not mean the info on the ingredients is not correct.
    • RMJ
      To evaluate the TTG antibody result we’d need to know the normal range for that lab.  Labs don’t all use the same units.  However, based on any normal ranges that I’ve seen and the listed result being greater than a number rather than a specific number, I’d say yes, that is high! Higher than the range where the test can give a quantitative result. You got good advice not to change your diet yet.  If you went gluten free your intestines would start to heal, confusing any further testing,
×
×
  • Create New...