Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):
  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Positive Ttg Negative Biopsy


Hells Bells

Recommended Posts

Hells Bells Apprentice

I had a positive Ttg blood test 45 normal<20 I then had to wait seven weeks for my biopsy which came back negative. I had been gluten free except for a 5 day gluten challenge before my blood test for 4 months , my GI doc said to stay gluten free until 3 days before my boipsy. Both times i ate the gluten I got severe stomach pain, felt like I was drugged and diarrhoea. I am 41 and always had tummy trouble.

I keep reading that the biopsy is the gold standard, so I think I am celaic but my blood screening was only the Ttg and the biopsy negative. I am concerned to get an officail diagnosis as it frightens me that f I get hospitalised or later in life put in an institution they will give me gluten.

Any thoughts?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



CarlaB Enthusiast

Welcome to the board.

You should not have been gluten-free before your biopsy because it can give a false negative. The biopsy is the "gold standard"; however, it can only rule in celiac, it cannot rule it out because of the chance of a false negative.

I do not have an official diagnosis although I had elevated levels in a stool test. My biopsy had been negative as well, but I too had been gluten-free. My doc says that my dietary response is proof enough.

Be glad you don't have an official diagnosis, you will never have it be a pre-existing condition for insurance! As far as years later if you are in an old folks home, hospital, or anything, I'm sure no one will ask for proof if you claim you have celiac disease.

psawyer Proficient

Welcome to the forum!

There is no such thing as a negative biopsy, only one which is not positive.

Okay, that probably needs an explanation. A biopsy which finds damage to the villi conclusively proves celiac disease. But a biopsy which does not find damage does not mean that there is not some damage in a different place that was not sampled. It is also possible that the disease is in an early enough stage that detectable damage has not yet occurred. Or, in your case, three days of gluten was not enough to create detectable damage. Most experts say you need to eat gluten in quantity (equivalent to 3 slices of ordinary bread per day) for a number of WEEKS prior to a biopsy to get meaningful results.

I would say that the tTg is enough to give you your answer. That test is, as I understand it, very specific to celiac disease, and there is nothing ambiguous about a result more than twice the normal limit.

Guest nini

positive dietary response is the best indicator, if you responded well to the diet then reacted badly when reintroducing gluten then obviously gluten is a problem. It's irrelevent if it is Celiac or gluten intolerance because the treatment is identical, lifetime adherance to the gluten-free diet. As was stated before the biopsy can only confirm the dx, it can never ever completely rule it out if it's "negative"

oceangirl Collaborator
positive dietary response is the best indicator, if you responded well to the diet then reacted badly when reintroducing gluten then obviously gluten is a problem. It's irrelevent if it is Celiac or gluten intolerance because the treatment is identical, lifetime adherance to the gluten-free diet. As was stated before the biopsy can only confirm the dx, it can never ever completely rule it out if it's "negative"

I had a similar story- 4 months gluten-free before biopsy and it was negative. But I had a positive tTg test before that. I did a VERY brief gluten challenge before the biopsy (three days) and almost went to the hospital the pain was so bad! Then I tested through Enterolab to find I have two genes for gluten intolerance. That's all I needed to know to be gluten-free. Call it what you will, my body doesn't do well with gluten and it seems yours doesn't either. I hope you stick with the diet- there are ups and downs but you should see lots of improvement. Good luck!

lisa

Mayflowers Contributor

I received my stool test kit and I'm sending it back tomorrow so I'll know once and for all. It also includes the free cows milk test which I'm interested in because I was allergic to milk as an infant but grew out of it.

I've been gluten free for about 3 weeks now and I noticed less bloating and much less indigestion. I was getting pressure, and gas pain in my sternum a few hours after eating wheat. I've also been unable to lose weight. I hope this makes a difference. I knew a guy who said he gave up wheat and lost 25 pounds just by doing that. I hope it works for me too. :)

I won't have a biopsy. I really don't want to be diagnosed as gluten intolerant. I won't be able to get insurance in the future. I just hope I can stay out of a nursing home as long as possible! :huh:

Hells Bells Apprentice

Thanks every one for the help, I am beginning to realise what a big thing this is. I will never go back onto gluten as I was so ill on it. I think I was in denial a bit and finding it hard to say I am celiac.

I had recently met someone in a rest home in Canada who as they did not have an official diagnosis were finding it hard to get gluten free and was served unsuitable food. They gave her breaded fish, regular oats and just took the noodles out of the soup.

I think that there needs to be a whole lot more education out there for what gluten free realy means.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Ursa Major Collaborator

You appear to have a VERY ignorant GI doctor. Of course your biopsy was negative, your villi had enough time to heal sufficiently for a negative biopsy. And villi won't get damaged enough in five days to produce enough damage for a positive biopsy.

It can take six months to a year on a high gluten diet for enough damage to reoccur to test positive.

Anyway, your high Ttg and getting severe stomach trouble when you eat gluten is enough evidence anyway. Just go back to being gluten-free and get well!

eKatherine Apprentice

Considering how so many doctors consider the biopsy to be the gold standard, it's amazing they don't even bother to do it right so as to get reliable results.

ekdumas19 Apprentice

I agree. Once I finally went to a GI doc, he immediately wanted to run a biopsy once i told him i had been diagonsed only through a blood test. I told him I had been gluten free for 4 years-but we still did the biopsy and of course found nothing! Good thing I didnt listen to him and didnt start chowing down on bread-or else i probably would have been even sicker than I was before I went to see him! Definitly not going back to that guy ever again. Also, when i had the biopsy-and i came to after being under for awhile-the nurse asked me if i wanted a muffin! A muffin! I was so drained and def. needed something to eat after fasting for practically a whole day-good thing i thought ahead and brought my gluten free roll! I was living in Cape Cod at the time-and I am so glad I now in Boston, where they have a lot more specialist here who hopefully wouldnt ever try to give me a muffin! Yikes!

jerseyangel Proficient
Considering how so many doctors consider the biopsy to be the gold standard, it's amazing they don't even bother to do it right so as to get reliable results.

I couldn't agree more with this!

Hells Bells Apprentice

I think the problem with GI docs is a lot of them are primarily surgeons and arn't always as knowledgable about celiac as they should be. He was only able to give very limited dietry advice too, I got more info reading this site.

Mayflowers Contributor

Sorry to say but a lot of Medicine is a money making business. If they do a biopsy they make money. I had a cardiologist try to con me into having a cardiac catheterization because of a "shadow" on my stress test that turned out to be just that. A shadow from my breast making it look like my artery was clogged. I had another opinion and the other doc said it wasn't a clogged artery. I refused the test. It's very risky. You could bleed to death.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      133,353
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    ace14219
    Newest Member
    ace14219
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.6k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Lkg5
      Thank’s for addressing the issue of mushrooms.  I was under the impression that only wild mushrooms were gluten-free.  Have been avoiding cultivated mushrooms for years. Also, the issue of smoked food was informative.  In France last year, where there is hardly any prepared take-out food that is gluten-free, I tried smoked chicken.  Major mistake!
    • catnapt
      my IGG is 815 IGA 203  but tTG-Iga is   <0.4!!!!!!!!!!!!!   oh my god- 13 days of agony and the test is negative?  I don't even know what to do next. There zero doubt in my mind that I have an issue with wheat and probably more so with gluten as symptoms are dramatically worse the more gluten a product has   I am going to write up the history of my issues for the past few years and start a food/symptom diary to bring with me to the GI doctor in March.   I googled like crazy to try to find out what other things might cause these symptoms and the only thing that truly fits besides celiac is NCGS   but I guess there are some other things I maybe should be tested for ...? like SIBO?   I will continue to eliminate any foods that cause me distress (as I have been doing for the past couple of years) and try to keep a record. Can anyone recommend an app or some form or something that would simplify this? I have a very full and busy life and taking the time to write out each symptom name in full would be tedious and time consuming- some sort of page with columns to check off would be ideal. I am not at all tech savvy so that's not something I can make myself ... I'm hoping there's some thing out there that I can just download and print out   do I give up on testing for celiac with such a low number? I am 70 yrs old I have been almost completely off gluten for the most part for about 2 yrs. I had a meal of vital wheat gluten vegan roast,  rolls and stuffing made from home baked bread and an apple pie- and had the worst pain and gas and bloating and odd rumblings in my gut etc - almost went to the ER it was so bad. I was thinking, since I'm spilling a lot of calcium in my urine, that perhaps this was a kidney stone (never had one before but there's always that first time, right?)    Saw my endo on Jan 20th and after hearing the story about the symptoms from eating that holiday meal, she suggested doing a gluten challenge. She said 2 weeks was fine- she said stopping it in the middle if symptoms got bad was fine- In the meantime I'd read that 2 weeks was not enough- called and argued with the nurse about this, but ultimately decided to stop the gluten on the 13th day and get the test done because I was in too much pain and almost suicidal and knew I could not continue.   so.............. that's where I am now I have had no bread since Sunday. I did have some rolled oats today and had some gas and bloating afterwards I did have some wheat germ in a smoothie on Tuesday and had a stomach ache later that night.   but overall I feel so much better! all the joint pain is gone! the nausea is gone. The stomach pain and gas and bloating are going away. Still a bit gassy but no more of that horrible odor. wow, that would clear a room if I was out in public!  I see a GI nurse March 4th  I hope she'll be able to help sort this out! can you think of what my next steps might be?
    • par18
      Thanks for the reply. 
    • Scott Adams
      What you’re describing is actually very common, and unfortunately the timing of the biopsy likely explains the confusion. Yes, it is absolutely possible for the small intestine to heal enough in three months on a strict gluten-free diet to produce a normal or near-normal biopsy, especially when damage was mild to begin with. In contrast, celiac antibodies can stay elevated for many months or even years after gluten removal, so persistently high antibody levels alongside the celiac genes and clear nutrient deficiencies strongly point to celiac disease, even if you don’t feel symptoms. Many people with celiac are asymptomatic but still develop iron and vitamin deficiencies and silent intestinal damage. The lack of immediate symptoms makes it harder emotionally, but it doesn’t mean gluten isn’t harming you. Most specialists would consider this a case of celiac disease with a false-negative biopsy due to early healing rather than “something else,” and staying consistently gluten-free is what protects you long-term—even when your body doesn’t protest right away.
    • Scott Adams
      Yes, I meant if you had celiac disease but went gluten-free before screening, your results would end up false-negative. As @trents mentioned, this can also happen when a total IGA test isn't done.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.