Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):
  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Do You Feel Better On A High/moderate Fat Or Low Fat Diet?


mle-ii

Do you feel better on a high/moderate fat or low fat diet?  

16 members have voted

You do not have permission to vote in this poll, or see the poll results. Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Recommended Posts

mle-ii Explorer

Do you feel better on a high/moderate fat or low fat diet?

By low fat I'm thinking something lower than 15-10% fat by calories and most likely high in carbohydrates.

By high/moderate fat I'm thinking something around 20%+ fat by calories and most likely low in carbohydrates.

By feeling better I mean you feel like you have more energy, better mood, no brain fog, less pain, etc.

I'm also thinking long term, like say being low fat or high/moderate fat for greater than say 2 weeks.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



eKatherine Apprentice

By the way, 10-15% of calories as fat would be considered an extremely low fat diet, while 20% is still considered unsustainably low.

mle-ii Explorer
By the way, 10-15% of calories as fat would be considered an extremely low fat diet, while 20% is still considered unsustainably low.

Agreed, but in the mindset of "fat is bad" it's not. ;)

I was trying to come up with some decent numbers that see about right for most folks, perhaps I'm off.

I just read something recently on gut health and so I was curious on how the real world of folks with damaged GIs would respond to this question. That and I'm trying ever so hard not to bias the poll.

Thanks,

Mike

Ursa Major Collaborator

I feel absolutely rotten if I don't get enough saturated fat. I cook with lard, and others will often not want to eat my 'greasy' food (I can't tolerate butter or coconut oil, which I'd prefer). I need to be on a high protein, high fat, low carbohydrate diet, or I lose all energy.

dlp252 Apprentice

I feel much better on a higher fat diet, with lower carbs. I have a lot more energy overall and feel full longer with a higher fat diet.

VydorScope Proficient

Agree, Higher (good) fat, Higher Protien, lower carb = best diet in my experence. :)

plantime Contributor

Low fat diet=depression and constipation for me.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



eKatherine Apprentice

I go crazy on a low fat diet. The cravings eventually consume me and I start eating things that are way off the scale as far as fat content is cncerned. Now that I can't eat dairy anymore, I'd better keep the fat in my diet up, no cheese or chocolate mousse in my future.

tarnalberry Community Regular
By low fat I'm thinking something lower than 15-10% fat by calories and most likely high in carbohydrates.

By high/moderate fat I'm thinking something around 20%+ fat by calories and most likely low in carbohydrates.

By feeling better I mean you feel like you have more energy, better mood, no brain fog, less pain, etc.

I'm also thinking long term, like say being low fat or high/moderate fat for greater than say 2 weeks.

Like the others, I also disagree with your definition, based on standard nutritional science (as much as there is a standard). Extrememly low fat is 10% of calories from fat. Low fat is less than 30%. High fat is over 70% calories from fat (yes, there are people who follow a high fat diet). moderate fat does not necessarily mean "low" carbohydrates. Additionally, there is reason to suggest that the body takes longer than 2 weeks to transition fully.

I tend towards hypoglycemic symptoms, so I CANNOT eat extremely low fat. I aim for about something like 25-30% fat, 20-30% protein, and 40-50% fat. Anything less than that is likely to leave me feeling low on energy and cranky, not to mention very 'brittle' when it comes to having controlled blood sugar. Also, on a very low fat diet, you're less likely to get enough of, or absorb enough of, the fat soluble vitamins that keep you healthy and keep your energy levels up. I really don't like 10% fat diets. My FIL is on one (Ornish) due to a heart attack, and it's working for him, and I support that it works for him, but generally don't like them for all the things they are missing. Veggies and fruit and grains and legumes are wonderful, but don't provide everything the human body and brain needs.

Sarah8793 Enthusiast

Me too. I feel best on a diet higher in fats and proteins and lower in carbs.

mle-ii Explorer
Like the others, I also disagree with your definition, based on standard nutritional science (as much as there is a standard). Extrememly low fat is 10% of calories from fat. Low fat is less than 30%. High fat is over 70% calories from fat (yes, there are people who follow a high fat diet). moderate fat does not necessarily mean "low" carbohydrates. Additionally, there is reason to suggest that the body takes longer than 2 weeks to transition fully.

I tend towards hypoglycemic symptoms, so I CANNOT eat extremely low fat. I aim for about something like 25-30% fat, 20-30% protein, and 40-50% fat. Anything less than that is likely to leave me feeling low on energy and cranky, not to mention very 'brittle' when it comes to having controlled blood sugar. Also, on a very low fat diet, you're less likely to get enough of, or absorb enough of, the fat soluble vitamins that keep you healthy and keep your energy levels up. I really don't like 10% fat diets. My FIL is on one (Ornish) due to a heart attack, and it's working for him, and I support that it works for him, but generally don't like them for all the things they are missing. Veggies and fruit and grains and legumes are wonderful, but don't provide everything the human body and brain needs.

I agree that my numbers were off now. Guess I'll have to rethink how to do the poll. I just wanted to make sure that folks that think fat is bad and cut a lot out don't think that 20% is high fat. Clearly I'm not a good poll taker. :P

I find for myself that somewhere around 33% from each is about right. Give or take. Though I don't use macros to determine how many grams from each. Usually I shoot for around 1 g per lean lb body mass, at least 100g carbs + more depending on activitiy and the rest fat.

Where I was going with this came from some studies (ok done on rats) that pointed towards gut growth (and I mean intestine/GI growth not belly growth) in rats that had part of their GI dammaged or removed.

I wondered if eating higher fat made us feel better because it helped grow/heal the GI. Thus the body takes in more vitamins, minerals and calories.

Perhaps I just misread the article, but it does make me wonder why some folks feel and do better on a higher fat diet and others do better on a higher carb diet.

Thanks,

Mike

VydorScope Proficient
I aim for about something like 25-30% fat, 20-30% protein, and 40-50% fat.

Shouldnt you have some carbs to? :P :P :P

mle-ii Explorer
Shouldnt you have some carbs to? :P :P :P

LOL I didn't even notice that. Who needs the stinkin carbs?!!?! ;)

covsooze Enthusiast

This is a difficult one for me. I need the fat for energy and to stave off depression, but fat also makes my stomach sore. I guess I need to be more careful about getting the 'right' fats....but even then, olive oil can irritate my stomach. :unsure:

jerseyangel Proficient

I definately feel better with a moderate amount of fat. I stick to olive oil, olives, palm oil (as shortening) almonds and meats as my sources of fat.

tarnalberry Community Regular
Shouldnt you have some carbs to? :P :P :P

lol :lol: I must have "fat" fingers. make that 25-30% fat, 20-30% protein, 40-55% carbs. (corrected my math as well. :P )

to the OP - and that's a loose estimate, unless I've been having blood sugar troubles, I'm not militant about it. if I've been having blood sugar difficulties, or in a situation where I expect I might (like the long hikes I'm doing) I'm somewhat militant about at *least* 25/25/50, at each meal/snack, or at least no more than 50% carbs.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Scott Adams commented on Scott Adams's article in Product Labeling Regulations
      2

      FDA Moves to Improve Gluten Labeling—What It Means for People With Celiac Disease

    2. - Scott Adams replied to wellthatsfun's topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      5

      nothing has changed

    3. - Scott Adams replied to Woodster991's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      11

      Is it gluten?

    4. - Seaperky replied to lizzie42's topic in Traveling with Celiac Disease
      2

      Trip to Anaheim/Disney

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      133,350
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Sarah S
    Newest Member
    Sarah S
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.6k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      What you’re describing is actually very common, and unfortunately the timing of the biopsy likely explains the confusion. Yes, it is absolutely possible for the small intestine to heal enough in three months on a strict gluten-free diet to produce a normal or near-normal biopsy, especially when damage was mild to begin with. In contrast, celiac antibodies can stay elevated for many months or even years after gluten removal, so persistently high antibody levels alongside the celiac genes and clear nutrient deficiencies strongly point to celiac disease, even if you don’t feel symptoms. Many people with celiac are asymptomatic but still develop iron and vitamin deficiencies and silent intestinal damage. The lack of immediate symptoms makes it harder emotionally, but it doesn’t mean gluten isn’t harming you. Most specialists would consider this a case of celiac disease with a false-negative biopsy due to early healing rather than “something else,” and staying consistently gluten-free is what protects you long-term—even when your body doesn’t protest right away.
    • Scott Adams
      Yes, I meant if you had celiac disease but went gluten-free before screening, your results would end up false-negative. As @trents mentioned, this can also happen when a total IGA test isn't done.
    • Seaperky
      I found at Disney springs and Disney they have specialist that when told about dietary restrictions they come and talk to you ,explain cross contamination measures tsken and work with you on choices. Its the one place I dont worry once I've explained I have celiac disease.  Thier gluten free options are awesome.
    • Churley
      Have you tried Pure Encapsulations supplements? This is a brand my doctor recommends for me. I have no issues with this brand.
    • asaT
      plant sources of calcium, such as spinach, have calcium bound to oxalates, which is not good. best source of calcium is unfortunately dairy, do you tolerate dairy? fermented dairy like kefir is good and or a little hard cheese. i do eat dairy, i can only take so much dietary restriction and gluten is hard enough! but i guess some people do have bad reactions to it, so different for everyone.  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.