Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Reliability Of Blood Tests In Toddlers


covsooze

Recommended Posts

covsooze Enthusiast

DS was screened after I got my dx and his blood tests were negative. that was at the beginning of the year when he was coming up to 3. I know there's always an issue of false negatives, but I was wondering - is the chance of a false negative increased when kids are young? If he was tested again now (assuming he does have celiac disease) is it more likely to be positive? What concerns me is that, for the past 6-8 weeks, he's had very loose bms (not quite D) with undigested food in at times. He's also been complaining of stomach ache a lot. It's often after he drinks milk or eats something with gluten in. I'm thinking of doing the enterolab testing so that he doesn't have to have another blood test. How reliable is that in little kids?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



dahams04 Apprentice
DS was screened after I got my dx and his blood tests were negative. that was at the beginning of the year when he was coming up to 3. I know there's always an issue of false negatives, but I was wondering - is the chance of a false negative increased when kids are young? If he was tested again now (assuming he does have celiac disease) is it more likely to be positive? What concerns me is that, for the past 6-8 weeks, he's had very loose bms (not quite D) with undigested food in at times. He's also been complaining of stomach ache a lot. It's often after he drinks milk or eats something with gluten in. I'm thinking of doing the enterolab testing so that he doesn't have to have another blood test. How reliable is that in little kids?

I dont think they are reliable at all! My son (3) was biopsied first w/ positive results then had a blood test and it showed no Celiac! So now I question my other sons blood work. He is showing some syptoms now but his blood work came back normal... I say its not even worth it now! I have no faith in the labs at this point. GL to you though. I can tell you my neice (5) did show pos. blood tests a few weeks ago. So I'm not sure where they age is where it becomes more reliable. HTH!!

High-Tech Mom Rookie

The blood tests aren't reliable. My child, who had classic celiac symptoms, was tested around 3 and everything came back inconclusive, even the hailed Promethius genetics test came back negative. We re-tested at 5 and the blood tests indicated a severe reaction to gluten. Even the genetics blood test was re-ordered with a different lab and that came out positive.

From our experience, testing in the toddler years is inaccurate, and possibly testing at any age inaccurate. Celiac disease/gluten intolerance has to progress to significant damage before it can be detected with blood tests. We will be using EnteroLab for further testing. It's less invasive and claims to detect the disease earlier than the blood tests.

Good luck.

ravenwoodglass Mentor
From our experience, testing in the toddler years is inaccurate, and possibly testing at any age inaccurate. Celiac disease/gluten intolerance has to progress to significant damage before it can be detected with blood tests. We will be using EnteroLab for further testing. It's less invasive and claims to detect the disease earlier than the blood tests.

Good luck.

I have to agree with this. Relying on blood tests as a adult delayed my diagnosis by many years. No doctor ever told me anything about the diet other than I should be glad the tests were negative because I wouldn't be able to eat anything. :angry: The blood tests are horribly unreliable even for adults but for children it is even more of a 'crap shoot'. I would go either with enterolab or dietary exclusion.

covsooze Enthusiast

Thanks everyone. It's true - I had the blood test atfer my sister was diagnosed as I'd had stomach problems for a while. It was negative. I wish I'd known about this board at the time! 5 years later and I retested having become quite ill - the GI said no one could fail to diagnose me from either my bloods or the endo! I think I'll go with enterolab as it's not invasive. Just have to persude DH that we should shell out the money!

gerharts Newbie

Hi all, i'm a newbie..or at least I think I am! It never really occurred to me that a blood test could be unreliable. my daughter is 5 yrs old weighing 28 lbs 36". with not health issues to be concerned about other than the low weight/height. my primary dr. sent me to an endocronologist..who ran a battery of blood test with a positive for celiacs..while the norm range is 20 (or so i was told), her test came back with 40. We just came back from the gastro. Dr. and he drew more blood to do more detailed testing. Stefanie has no symptons other than the low weight/height..i have the endoscopy scheduled for 9/26..Oh, Yeah; i believe she was tested for celiacs at age 3 and that was negative..am still awaiting the results from the detailed testing..looking for advise as to whether i should put her through the torture of the endoscopy. I'm having difficulty believing she has celiacs as she does not have any GI issues. apologize for being long!

any insight would be appreciated.

liz

gerharts Newbie
The blood tests aren't reliable. My child, who had classic celiac symptoms, was tested around 3 and everything came back inconclusive, even the hailed Promethius genetics test came back negative. We re-tested at 5 and the blood tests indicated a severe reaction to gluten. Even the genetics blood test was re-ordered with a different lab and that came out positive.

From our experience, testing in the toddler years is inaccurate, and possibly testing at any age inaccurate. Celiac disease/gluten intolerance has to progress to significant damage before it can be detected with blood tests. We will be using EnteroLab for further testing. It's less invasive and claims to detect the disease earlier than the blood tests.

Good luck.

To High-Tech Mom

I'm new & I posted lasted night about the above issue. Would you mind taking a look at Posting #6?, could really use some feedback!

Regards,

Liz


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Guest nini
Hi all, i'm a newbie..or at least I think I am! It never really occurred to me that a blood test could be unreliable. my daughter is 5 yrs old weighing 28 lbs 36". with not health issues to be concerned about other than the low weight/height. my primary dr. sent me to an endocronologist..who ran a battery of blood test with a positive for celiacs..while the norm range is 20 (or so i was told), her test came back with 40. We just came back from the gastro. Dr. and he drew more blood to do more detailed testing. Stefanie has no symptons other than the low weight/height..i have the endoscopy scheduled for 9/26..Oh, Yeah; i believe she was tested for celiacs at age 3 and that was negative..am still awaiting the results from the detailed testing..looking for advise as to whether i should put her through the torture of the endoscopy. I'm having difficulty believing she has celiacs as she does not have any GI issues. apologize for being long!

any insight would be appreciated.

liz

many people with Celiac are completely asymptomatic and only find out they have celiac through screening because a first degree relative was dx'ed with it. Testing for gluten intolerance/Celiac is unreliable because of the high rate of false negatives, meaning that there are a lot of us who tested negative for years only to continue to get sicker and sicker until we finally accumulated enough damage for it to register on the tests. If the tests are positive then yes it's a done deal, but if the tests are negative, it only means they are "not positive"

my daughter was tested at three after my dx of celiac, and her tests were negative (or not positive) but after she continued to have tummy issues and diarrhea and vomiting as well as unexplained hives, I got her pediatrician to support us in a trial of the gluten-free diet. The response was miraculous and now at six she is a very healthy kid. So what that her "official" dx is gluten intolerance, I believe that by getting her gluten-free early we have prevented her from developing full blown celiac like her mother and therefore prevented her from suffering from the same kinds of illnesses I suffered with for years.

chrissy Collaborator

liz----an endoscopy is not torture for them, they don't remember a thing. but, if you are wary of it, you can always just try the diet and see if her growth improves.

High-Tech Mom Rookie
To High-Tech Mom

I'm new & I posted lasted night about the above issue. Would you mind taking a look at Posting #6?, could really use some feedback!

Regards,

Liz

Hello Liz,

Which of your daughter's blood tests came back positive? I agree with nini's feedback - positive results for gluten intolerance are positive, negatives can still be positive. Sound like your daughter has a severe enough gluten intolerance that it is showing up on the blood tests. I don't think that she can get an "official" diagnosis of celiac disease without a biopsy, but does have a diagnosis (at this point) of gluten intolerance (someone correct me if I'm wrong).

Either way, sounds like damage is occurring internally, and getting your daughter gluten-free will help improve her health and reduce her risk of getting other celiac-related diseases such as diabetes, osteoperosis, etc.

We are struggling ourselves as to how to proceed with our kids. My oldest child, now 5, has enough positive results with blood tests, genetic tests and symptoms that we don't feel a biopsy is necessary to diagnose celiac disease. Currently, the rest of the family is getting tested - blood tests, genetic tests and even EnteroLab tests. Properly diagnosing our 3 year old is more difficult. We don't want to uncecessarily put our 3-year old on the gluten-free diet, but we also don't want to just sit and wait for our child to have severe intestinal damage before taking action.

Read Dr. Fine's essay, he is pioneering research in this area and explains the pitfalls of the current methods of testing and diagnosis of celiac disease: Open Original Shared Link

I don't know what to tell you regarding whether to proceed with the biopsy or not. The biopsy is hit-or-miss. Your daughter could have an inconclusive biopsy - what will you do then? On the other hand, a biopsy might confirm celiac disease for you, and possibly uncover other co-existing conditions.

Good luck to you!

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,939
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Michelle C.
    Newest Member
    Michelle C.
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Wheatwacked
      Marsh 3b is the Gold Standard of diagnosis for Celiac Disease.  Until recently, regardless of antibody tests, positive or negative, you had to have Marsh 3 damage to be awarded the diagnosis of Celiac. As I understand you,  you were having constant symptoms..  Your symptoms improved on GFD, with occassional flare ups. Did your doctor say you do and you are questioning the diagnosis? Regarding your increasing severity when you get glutened it is "normal".  Gluten acts on the Opiod receptors to numb your body.  Some report withdrawal symptoms on GFD.  I was an alcoholic for 30 years, about 1/2 pint of voda a day. Each time I identified a trigger and dealt with it, a new trigger would pop up.  Even a 30 day rehab stint, with a low fat diet (severe pancreatis) during which I rarely had cravings.  Stopped at a Wendys on the way home and the next day I was drinking again.  20 years later, sick as a dog, bedridden on Thanksgiving, after months of reasearch, I realized that gluten free was my Hail Mary.  Back in 1976 my son was diagnosed at weaning by biopsy with Celiac Disease and his doctor suggested my wife and I should also be gluten free because it is genetic.  At 25 years old I felt no gastro problems and promised if I ever did I would try gluten free.  Well, I forgot that promise until I was 63 and my wife 10 years dead.  Three days of gluten and alcohol free, I could no longer tolerate alcohol. Eleven years gluten and alcohol free, with no regrets. Improvement was quick, but always two steps forward and one back.  Over time I found nineteen symptoms that I had been living with for my entire life, that doctors had said, "We don't know why, but that is normal for some people". Celiac Disease causes multiple vitamin and mineral deficiency.  It is an autoimmune disease, meaning your immune system B and T cells create antibodies against ttg(2) in the small intestine in Celiac Disease, and sometimes ttg(3) in skin in Dermatitis Herpetiformus.  'Why' is poorly understood.  In fact, it wasn't even known that wheat, barley and rye gluten was the cause.  Celiac Disease was also called Infantilism, because it was deadly, and believed to only be a childhood disease. So, as part of your recovery you must deal with those deficiencies.  Especially vitamin D because it contols your immune system.  Virtually all newly diagnosed Celiacs have vitamin D deficiency.  There are about 30 vitamin and minerals that are absorbed in the small intestine.  With Marsh 3 damage you may be eating the amount everyone else does, but you are not absorbing them into your system, so you will display symptoms of their deficiency.   As time passes and you replenish your deficiencies you may notice other symptoms improve, some you did not even know were symptoms. Our western diet has many deficiencies built into it.   That is the reason foods with gluten are fortified.  Gluten free processed food are not required to fortify.  Vitamin D, Iodine, choline.  The B vitamins, especially Thiamine (B1) run deficient quickly.  We only store enough thiamine for 2 weeks so the symptoms of Gastrointestinal BeriBeri can come and go quickly.  Magnesium, zinc, etc. each having its own symptoms affecting multiple systems.  High homocystene, an indicator of vascular inflamation can be cause by deficient Choline, folate, B6 and or B12.  Brain fog symptoms by deficient choline, iodine, thiamine B1. Dietary intake of choline and phosphatidylcholine and risk of type 2 diabetes in men: The Kuopio Ischaemic Heart Disease Risk Factor Study  
    • Rogol72
      I cut out the rice because it was affecting my stomach at the time ... not necessarily dermatitis herpetiformis. It was Tilda Basmati Rice, sometimes wholegrain rice. I was willing to do whatever it took to heal. Too much fiber also disagrees with me as I have UC.
    • trents
      But you didn't answer my question. When you consume gluten, is there an identifiable reaction within a short period of time, say a few hours?
    • Scott Adams
      You can still have celiac disease with negative blood test results, although it's not very common:  Clinical and genetic profile of patients with seronegative coeliac disease: the natural history and response to gluten-free diet: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5606118/  Seronegative Celiac Disease - A Challenging Case: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9441776/  Enteropathies with villous atrophy but negative coeliac serology in adults: current issues: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34764141/   
    • Scott Adams
      I am only wondering why you would need to cut out rice? I've never heard of rice being any issue in those with DH.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.