Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):
  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

No Problems Drinking Many Beers...


Ksmith

Recommended Posts

Ksmith Contributor

Hey everyone,

So I know that we are not supposed to drink beer, but many beers don't seem to give me any problems (that I can detect)--most confidantly, Bud Light never bothers me. Many filtered pale ales don't give me problems either. The ones that do bother me are PBR *among other commercial beers), wheat beers, and unfiltered micros. Does anyone else on this forum have a similar situation? I know that I could be still have damage done without feeling it, blah, blah, blah...I was just wondering if anyone else can drink the lighter beers fairly easily...Thanks!!!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



CarlaB Enthusiast

Haven't tried it and won't. I'm waaayyyy to sensitive. As you know, you are getting the damage even if you don't have symptoms. My guess is that the beers you are drinking are not wheat beers, so the little bit of barley isnt' enough to make you feel discomfort even though it's still doing damage.

Ksmith Contributor

So everybody who has read this post does feel the effects of gluten when they drink beer? I am asking because I am confused about the severity of my GI. If anyone can shed some light, that would be awesome.

frenchiemama Collaborator
So everybody who has read this post does feel the effects of gluten when they drink beer? I am asking because I am confused about the severity of my GI. If anyone can shed some light, that would be awesome.

I wouldn't know. I never intentionally consume gluten just to see if it bothers me.

hez Enthusiast

I am sorry I am not of help. I do not drink beer. I happen to be one of the sensitive ones (I have reacted to a crumb). I can only imagine how I would feel after having a beer :(

Hez

Lymetoo Contributor

Sorry, I can't help either. I have 3 good reasons not to drink it. Lyme disease, yeast, and gluten intolerance. That's enough reasons for me to never try it.

teebs in WV Apprentice

I would bet that you won't find many people on this board that would drink a drop of regular beer. Drinking beer would be no different than eating a slice of bread or regular pasta, etc. Am I missing something here?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Matilda Enthusiast

...

Ksmith Contributor

After reading a scientific study (I think swedish study) that actually measured the amount of gluten in many popular beers, I started to take my chances--many of the beers were below the limit at which one would say the product contained gluten. I am not super sensitive, though and I do not react to cross contamination either. Drinking a beer most definately does not effect me like eating a slice of bread--it's not really all or nothing for me, I guess--because many beers contains very low levels of gluten and they don't bother me the same way eating a crouton would...except unfiltered beers--they kill me.

MistressIsis Apprentice

I recently tried Shiner Beer in Texas and didn't have any immediate reaction but I'll tell ya the next BM was definitly solid. There's something about the ingredients & distillation process my BF had checked it out before even mentioning it to me. Havign said that, I'm a Grey Goose kinda gal, never was a beer drinker

gfp Enthusiast
After reading a scientific study (I think swedish study) that actually measured the amount of gluten in many popular beers, I started to take my chances--many of the beers were below the limit at which one would say the product contained gluten. I am not super sensitive, though and I do not react to cross contamination either. Drinking a beer most definately does not effect me like eating a slice of bread--it's not really all or nothing for me, I guess--because many beers contains very low levels of gluten and they don't bother me the same way eating a crouton would...except unfiltered beers--they kill me.

The actual protein content of most beers is pretty low but I don't think that means there is a safe limit.

As you say you don't react to CC either I suspect that like most of us you react on split levels.....

Those of us that try 100% gluten-free... (including CC) for a reasonable period mainly all find that they had symptoms they didn't realise. Going gluten-free -lite can mean that some symptoms dissapear but that others we don't even recognise do not until we go 100% gluten-free.

In nearly all cases we didn't realise that we had those symptoms until they dissapeared. Hence lots of people might say they have no symptoms and truly believe it BUT most people who try discover they were wrong.

I am certainly in this group ..... it just took me a long time to admit it to myself.

On the other hand if I am glutened I react more than when I was constantly dripfeeding gluten

Guest nini

I don't drink at all anymore so I can't help you.

What is it in Europe, the codex standard or something, where certain ppm of gluten are considered acceptable on a gluten-free diet? I don't agree with this, but there are people that do. Maybe those particular beers fall under so many ppm (parts per million) of gluten.

gfp Enthusiast
I don't drink at all anymore so I can't help you.

What is it in Europe, the codex standard or something, where certain ppm of gluten are considered acceptable on a gluten-free diet? I don't agree with this, but there are people that do. Maybe those particular beers fall under so many ppm (parts per million) of gluten.

Yep and I think if people knew what the CODEX is then they would be less trusting ....

Its not a conspiracy, all the information is on the WHO website.... its just noone seems to bother to actually read it...

The Codex is written by the food industry so the standards in it are determined by the food industry which then seeks to justify them. The 200ppm limit was not based on health issues it was based on what could cheaply be screened ... and represented the lower limit of cheap non instrumentation testing...this isn't because more accurate testing wasn't available but that more accurate testing costs 10x to 100x more... so it was chosen as a purely practical limit for the food manufacturers to be able to abide by.

It was then up to the food industry to justify this limit was safe.... which they did by paying for studies that said it was safe. If the study suggested it wasn't they just don't use that study. If you think this is unlikely the tobacco industry did the same successfully for 50 yrs.

Open Original Shared Link

Endorsement of Methods of Analysis Provision in Codex Standards

A report of the ad hoc Working Group on endorsement of methods was presented by the Chair, Dr. Roger Wood (United Kingdom). The Committee endorsed the methods as proposed with amendments and comments. Much of the discussion on this agenda item focused on method to test for gluten in gluten free foods. The Committee agreed to endorse the R5 ELISA method for gluten as a Type I method.

Sterndogg Apprentice

I have no problems with Heineken or Amstel but avoid them anyway. Bud Light affects me. I do miss a good IPA.

Jestgar Rising Star

I used to drink the heavier beers so now I have none. I do know that a lot of the cheaper beers are supplemented with rice to make them lighter. So you may just not be sensitive enough to get a reaction from bud light.

KaitiUSA Enthusiast

You may not get symptoms from it but you are doing damage and thats for sure.

Ksmith Contributor

I understand that "I am doing damage" I tried to reinstate that again and again, and that wasn't really my question.

Rice Cakes Newbie

Before diagnosis, I drank Guinness Extra Stout constantly. I reacted with sneezing, but otherwise felt great for days afterward - it seemed really healthy stuff for me. Except for once or twice when the left side of my face melted... but I got better. Anyway, now I know why I sneezed and my face melted.

gfp Enthusiast
I understand that "I am doing damage" I tried to reinstate that again and again, and that wasn't really my question.

No but its hard to answer it without saying that.....

I can eat a whole pizza and be fine for a few hours.. sometimes till the next day.... OR I can get a crumb in CC and react in 1 hour.....

As I said earlier you need to define what you mean by symptoms..... (probably as much to yourself) ...

What I am trying to say is it may give you symptoms you just fail to recognose.... especially if you have not be gluten-free-gluten-free but more gluten-free-lite (i.e. you are still getting CC)

Guest cassidy

I'm jealous. I never used to drink a lot but there is something about a foamy cold beer that I really miss. I have tried the gluten-free beers but they aren't as carbonated and don't fill the craving.

I am very sensitive and would never give this a try because I do react to crumbs of cc and I promised myself I would never take risks because it sucks to feel that bad. I keep thinking about the drug they are testing that may let us eat cc amounts of gluten. I wonder if it would let you drink a light beer if some of them really don't have much gluten in them. That would be something to look forward to.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - asaT replied to wellthatsfun's topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      2

      nothing has changed

    2. - nanny marley replied to SilkieFairy's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      7

      IBS-D vs Celiac

    3. - asaT replied to Scott Adams's topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      45

      Supplements for those Diagnosed with Celiac Disease

    4. - par18 replied to Woodster991's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      9

      Is it gluten?

    5. - SilkieFairy replied to SilkieFairy's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      7

      IBS-D vs Celiac

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      133,342
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Muhammad
    Newest Member
    Muhammad
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.6k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • asaT
      Scott, I am mostly asymptomatic. I was diagnosed based on high antibodies, low ferritin (3) and low vitamin D (10). I wasn't able to get in for the biopsy until 3 months after the blood test came back. I was supposed to keep eating gluten during this time. Well why would I continue doing something that I know to be harmful for 3 more months to just get this test? So I did quit gluten and had the biopsy. It was negative for celiacs. I continued gluten free with iron supps and my ferritin came back up to a reasonable, but not great level of around 30-35.  Could there be something else going on? Is there any reason why my antibodies would be high (>80) with a negative biopsy? could me intestines have healed that quickly (3 months)?  I'm having a hard time staying gluten free because I am asymptomatic and i'm wondering about that biopsy. I do have the celiacs gene, and all of the antibody tests have always come back high. I recently had them tested again. Still very high. I am gluten free mostly, but not totally. I will occasionally eat something with gluten, but try to keep to a minimum. It's really hard when the immediate consequences are nil.  with high antibodies, the gene, but a negative biopsy (after 3 months strict gluten-free), do i really have celiacs? please say no. lol. i think i know the answer.  Asa
    • nanny marley
      I have had a long year of testing unfortunately still not diagnosed , although one thing they definitely agree I'm gluten intolerant, the thing for me I have severe back troubles they wouldnt perform the tests and I couldn't have a full MRI because I'm allergic to the solution , we tryed believe me  I tryed lol , another was to have another blood test after consuming gluten but it makes me so bad I tryed it for only a week, and because I have a trapped sciatic nerve when I get bad bowels it sets that off terribly so I just take it on myself now , I eat a gluten free diet , I'm the best I've ever been , and if I slip I know it so for me i have my own diagnosis  and I act accordingly, sometimes it's not so straight forward for some of us , for the first time in years I can plan to go out , and I have been absorbing my food better , running to the toilet has become occasionally now instead of all the time , i hope you find a solution 🤗
    • asaT
      I was undiagnosed for decades. My ferritin when checked in 2003 was 3. It never went above 10 in the next 20 years. I was just told to "take iron". I finally requested the TTgIgA test in 2023 when I was well and truly done with the chronic fatigue and feeling awful. My numbers were off the charts on the whole panel.  they offered me an endoscopic biopsy 3 months later, but that i would need to continue eating gluten for it to be accurate. so i quit eating gluten and my intestine had healed by the time i had the biopsy (i'm guessing??). Why else would my TTgIgA be so high if not celiacs? Anyway, your ferritin will rise as your intestine heals and take HEME iron (brand 4 arrows). I took 20mg of this with vitamin c and lactoferrin and my ferritin went up, now sits around 35.  you will feel dramatically better getting your ferritin up, and you can do it orally with the right supplements. I wouldn't get an infusion, you will get as good or better results taking heme iron/vc/lf.  
    • par18
      Scott, I agree with everything you said except the term "false negative". It should be a "true negative" just plain negative. I actually looked up true/false negative/positive as it pertains to testing. The term "false negative" would be correct if you are positive (have anti-bodies) and the test did not pick them up. That would be a problem with the "test" itself. If you were gluten-free and got tested, you more than likely would test "true" negative or just negative. This means that the gluten-free diet is working and no anti-bodies should be present. I know it sounds confusing and if you don't agree feel free to respond. 
    • SilkieFairy
      I realized it is actually important to get an official diagnosis because then insurance can cover bone density testing and other lab work to see if any further damage has been done because of it. Also, if hospitalized for whatever reason, I have the right to gluten-free food if I am officially celiac. I guess it gives me some legal protections. Plus, I have 4 kids, and I really want to know. If I really do have it then they may have increased risk. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.