Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×

  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):

    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Enterolab Vs Blood Test/biopsy

Ottonegirl

Recommended Posts

Ottonegirl Rookie
Ottonegirl
Posted

I'm so new to all this & have read tons of posts & am still not sure what I'm looking at here. Entereloab tests for the gluten gene - right? Do they test for antibodies? The blood tests look for anti-bodies. But, if you haven't been back on gluten long enough then you might not get a + because you won't have anti-bodies. Is this correct?

Does everyone with the gene actually have symptoms/the disease?

Thanks again,

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


Nancym Enthusiast
Nancym
Posted

On the Enterolab web site there's an FAQ and an essay you should read.

If you get the entire celiac panel done it tests for antibodies in the stool as well as genes. The blood tests are not as sensitive and often return negative results for people who later adopt a gluten-free diet and find themselves responding to it. But on the other hand, MD's don't really trust Enterolab's results for the most part. He finds a LOT more gluten sensitive people than mainstream medicine.

Personally, I think there's little value to having an official diagnosis since it all comes down to following a gluten-free diet and you don't need a doctor to do that. The only reason I had Enterolab test me was curiosity and I thought maybe with genetics and diagnosis in hand I could convince my siblings to look for this in themselves. But they were uninterested.

CarlaB Enthusiast
CarlaB
Posted

If it were me, if I were off gluten, I'd go for Enterolab. If I were still eating gluten, I would go for a blood test, keeping in mind there are a lot of false negatives. If it were negative, I'd try Enterolab and see what my dietary response was.

I would not to a gluten challenge as they are too long and can do too much damage. None of us are guaranteed to heal completely, so deliberately eating gluten when you know you are sensitive to it is a bad idea.

Not everyone with the gene develops the active disease.

Enterolab tests both for the genes and for the antibodies. Their antibody test is more sensitive than the blood test, so they will pick up and intolerace before it gets into your blood ... it will also pick up non-celiac gluten intolerance, whereas the blood test usually will not.

Nevadan Contributor
Nevadan
Posted
On the Enterolab web site there's an FAQ and an essay you should read.

If you get the entire celiac panel done it tests for antibodies in the stool as well as genes. The blood tests are not as sensitive and often return negative results for people who later adopt a gluten-free diet and find themselves responding to it. But on the other hand, MD's don't really trust Enterolab's results for the most part. He finds a LOT more gluten sensitive people than mainstream medicine.

Personally, I think there's little value to having an official diagnosis since it all comes down to following a gluten-free diet and you don't need a doctor to do that. The only reason I had Enterolab test me was curiosity and I thought maybe with genetics and diagnosis in hand I could convince my siblings to look for this in themselves. But they were uninterested.

I think Nancym's last paragraph is an excellent recommendation. I also followed her same path for the same reasons and unfortunately encountered the same lack of interest from other family members - pretty common I hear.

AndreaB Contributor
AndreaB
Posted

If you are still eating gluten (doesn't sound like you are), then definately get a blood test. If you are gluten free and want some more definative answers get enterolab's full panel for $369.

I got my whole family tested and we tested on the low side (I had been gluten lite and the rest of the family had just been finishing up things we still had in the house). My husband has 2 celiac genes but not the active sensitivity. He's also gluten free though.

I like enterolab because they can catch gluten sensitivity before a lot of damage is done, or for those that don't have the celiac gene, they can tell you whether you have a sensitivity. I also like the gene test and will be checking into getting that with my last child since he won't be eating gluten. He started us on our quest for answers and was intolerant just by his reactions.

Ottonegirl Rookie
Ottonegirl
Posted
  • Author

Thanks everyone - I'm beginning to get a handle on this. I'm thinking going Entero lab sounds like the best for my family. My daughter has been biopsied & got a negative result - she'd only been back on gluten for 5 weeks when she had the biopsy. I know her GI doc won't run the blood tests & therefore, her pediatrician won't either. I've already been diagnosed with Irritible Bowel & have been on & off gluten so much over the past 6 years that I'm not sure the bloodwork would show anything. I do know that I'm allergic to wheat & milk... just need to find out about all gluten. It would definitely be worth it. Then based on what we find, we'll decide whether to test the rest of the family. I'm pretty certain that everyone is having issues just not as severe as my daughter's & mine.

Thanks again for the info & encouragement.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):


  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,345
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748
    Louise Sullivan
    Newest Member
    Louise Sullivan
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):


  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Gluten exposure when trying to conceive

      By trents · Posted

      My reaction to a gluten bolus exposure is similar to yours, with 2-3 hours of severe abdominal cramps and intractable emesis followed by several hours of diarrhea. I don't necessarily equate that one large exposure to gluten with significant intestinal lining damage, however. I think it's just a violent reaction to a what the body perceives to be a somewhat toxic substance that I am no longer tolerant of because I have quit exposing myself to it regularly. It's just the body purging itself of it rather than an expression of significant damage. Before diagnosis, when I was consuming gluten daily, I had little to no GI distress. I was, for the most part, a "silent celiac". The damage to my small bowel lining didn't happen all at once but was slow and insidious, accumulating over a period of years. The last time I got a big shot of gluten was about three years ago when I got my wife's wheat biscuits mixed up with my gluten-free ones. There was this acute reaction after about two hours of ingestion as I described above. I felt washed out for a few days and fully recovered within a week or so.  Now, I'm a 74-year-old male. So, I'm not worried about being pregnant. And I don't want to contradict your physicians advice. But I just don't think you have done significant damage to your small bowel lining by one episode of significant gluten ingestion. I just don't think it works that way.
    • Skydawg
      Gluten exposure when trying to conceive

      By Skydawg · Posted

      Wondering about some thoughts on how long to wait to try to get pregnant after a gluten exposure?  I have been diagnosed for 10 years and have followed the diet strictly. I have been cross contaminated before, but have never had a full on gluten exposure. I went to a restaurant recently, and the waiter messed up and gave me regular bread and told me it was gluten free. 2 hours later I was throwing up for the whole evening. I have never had that kind of reaction before as I have never had such a big exposure. My husband and I were planning to start trying to get pregnant this month. My dr did blood work to check for electrolytes and white blood cells, but did not do a full nutritional panel. Most of my GI symptoms have resolved in the past 2 weeks, but I am definitely still dealing with brain fog, fatigue and headaches. My dr has recommended I wait 3 months before I start to try to get pregnant.   I have read else where about how long it can take for the intestine to fully heal, and the impacts gluten exposure can have on pregnancy. I guess I am really wondering if anyone has had a similar experience? How long does it take to heal after 1 exposure like that, after following the diet so well for 10 years? Is 3 months an okay amount of time to wait? Is there anything I can do in the meantime to reduce my symptoms? 
    • ShadowLoom
      Gluten Free Cannabis Edibles

      By ShadowLoom · Posted

      I’ve used tinctures and made my own edibles with gluten-free ingredients to stay safe. Dispensary staff don’t always know about gluten, so I double-check labels or just make my own.
    • Scott Adams
      Damage after 13 years gluten free

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      It's great to hear that there are some good doctors out there, and this is an example of why having a formal diagnosis can definitely be helpful.
    • RMJ
      Damage after 13 years gluten free

      By RMJ · Posted

      Update: I have a wonderful new gastroenterologist. She wants to be sure there’s nothing more serious, like refractory celiac, going on. She ordered various tests including some micronutrient tests that no one has ever ordered before.  I’m deficient in folate and zinc and starting supplements for both. I’m so glad I decided to go to a new GI!
×
×
  • Create New...