Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Igg, Ttg Normal After Going gluten-free? Huh?


chgomom

Recommended Posts

chgomom Enthusiast

Doc says now, per the most recent labs, my IGG went from 24, about 4 months ago, to 7 just a few days ago. She said this can happen when you go gluten free. She saif my TTG went back to normal. And I showed no genotyping for it now. Weird? Can this really happen once you go gluten-free? SHe said as far as labs are concerned there is no celiac indicators in my blood anymore.

She said though I still obviously have the Osteo and deficiencies in the following:

A

D

Zinc

B12

She said we're just going to maintain the vigilant gluten-free diet, and keep vigilant on the supplements because the blood work shows good things. She also said no biopsy is needed with that kind of response.

really????

I'm confused...


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



chgomom Enthusiast

Any ideas,,,,,?? Suggestions....or ever had this happen??

Lisa Mentor

I can't help you with your numbers, but I too have similar defficiences.

LKelly8 Rookie

You've removed the trigger - gluten - and now your antibody levels have returned to normal. Congrats! Your immune system is no longer attacking your small intestine! :lol: Keep up the gluten-free diet and your vitamin/mineral deficiancies should improve as well.

chgomom Enthusiast

She was saying I might not actually have celiac.....because it usually doesn't improve that quickly.

But from everything I have seen here.....You go gluten free and if you are strict, the levels....can improve not over night but in a reasonable amount og time.

The PA and doc both said though, this is such a common phenomenon in the celiac community...which she said is good for me....means I don't need a biopsy because he labs (the positive ones were from another doc) don't show the antibodies....she said our task now is to stay strict....fix the deficiencies...and re check in a couple of weeks...and then every couple of months.

happygirl Collaborator

Hey girl,

Ok heres the deal. What is happening to you is good news and is what is supposed to happen!

When you are a Celiac and are ingesting gluten, your numbers are elevated. They are elevated because you are ingesting the trigger (gluten) and your body increases the antibodies, as a result of an autoimmune response that occurs in Celiacs WHEN THEY EAT GLUTEN.

When you are not eating gluten, the antibodies stop being produced. Your numbers *should* return to numbers. In his book, Dr. Green says that blood tests at 6 months can (and, potentially, should) be back to normal......so in four months, for someone who has been vigilant and the right circumstances (this does not apply to those who have other issues and "difficult" Celiac!)---they could certainly return in four months. I'm surprised that your doctor told you this, honestly. From everything I have read and know, your doctor is misguided on the Celiac part.

The goal is to be back to "normal." We will always have Celiac, but as long as the gluten is out, we don't have quote "active, raging" Celiac---in terms of the antibodies. Every blood test I have had post gluten free has had negative bloodwork---that is a sign that you are doing WELL! You should be congratulated and feel so good. It does NOT mean that you don't have Celiac!!!!!

And, you don't need your numbers checked every few months unless you are having complications. I highly, highly, highly recommend Dr. Peter Green's book, "Celiac Disease: A Hidden Epidemic". It will answer all your questions and will be a good guide for you to use with your doctor. If you have more questions, let me know and I'd be happy to look it up in this book. He is a leading Celiac expert at Columbia.

I hope this helps clear up the confusion. CONGRATULATIONS!

par18 Apprentice
Doc says now, per the most recent labs, my IGG went from 24, about 4 months ago, to 7 just a few days ago. She said this can happen when you go gluten free. She saif my TTG went back to normal. And I showed no genotyping for it now. Weird? Can this really happen once you go gluten-free? SHe said as far as labs are concerned there is no celiac indicators in my blood anymore.

She said though I still obviously have the Osteo and deficiencies in the following:

A

D

Zinc

B12

She said we're just going to maintain the vigilant gluten-free diet, and keep vigilant on the supplements because the blood work shows good things. She also said no biopsy is needed with that kind of response.

really????

I'm confused...

Doc says now, per the most recent labs, my IGG went from 24, about 4 months ago, to 7 just a few days ago. She said this can happen when you go gluten free. She saif my TTG went back to normal. And I showed no genotyping for it now. Weird? Can this really happen once you go gluten-free? SHe said as far as labs are concerned there is no celiac indicators in my blood anymore.

She said though I still obviously have the Osteo and deficiencies in the following:

A

D

Zinc

B12

She said we're just going to maintain the vigilant gluten-free diet, and keep vigilant on the supplements because the blood work shows good things. She also said no biopsy is needed with that kind of response.

really????

I'm confused...

I'm not confused. This is exactly what I would expect from someone who is gluten intolerant/Celiac. I did not have blood tests done before I was Dx'd via biopsy in May 05. I have no doubt the levels were elevated though as I was pretty sick. I did however get a follow-up blood test 1 year into the diet. "All" my blood test results were normal. Actually the value for each of the five tests in the panel were 1's. Since I have felt perfectly healthy since going gluten free this was no surprise to me. If someone were to look at my bloodwork without any background they could not diagnose me as being Celiac. I know that I am and will continue to stay on the gluten-free diet. Be thankful you do not need a biopsy. Sounds like your doctor is right on.

Tom


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



happygirl Collaborator

Just wanted to add---Tom made a good point. The blood tests measure the production of antibodies, which is how the medical community operationalizes the reaction to gluten. The goal is to stop the eaction, which would decrease the antibodies. We still have Celiac, but we are not setting off the autoimmune reaction, which is the goal!

:)

chgomom Enthusiast

Yeah...her exact words were

"You don't show any celiac now because you don't have positive antibodies or the gene"

So they are only going to treat it as vitamin deficiency...and they aren't going to code it celiac as I alter found out today.

Makes no sense. POsitive blood work across the baord, went gluten free, now negative blood work, minus severe deficiencies and osteo. Sounds text book to me...

And the office said we know it happens all the time....so why would they not code it as such...because I'm not having the biopsy?? Soooooooooooo confused......

I mean positive blood work, and dietary response with proof in my teeth, deficiencies and osteo.....to me....if it walks like a ducks...and talks like a duck....it is a duck...

tarnalberry Community Regular

you show the appropriate improvement on your blood tests and the doc thinks that's weird? I think her response is weird!

Lisa Mentor

Sounds like you have a "duck", and welcome. :)

happygirl Collaborator

lol...so they did the gene testing and you came back negative for DQ2 and DQ8? (Just trying to clarify from previous posts)

(By the way-----I am one of those people who say I don't care how you were diagnosed or if you have a diagnosis at all......but if gluten free makes it better, embrace it! So I'm not questioning you :D )

As Lisa said, welcome to the club, duck.

mouse Enthusiast

Tom, I have a question. I have been gluten free for over 2 1/2 years and have asked for the complete panel to be done. Which I had done the week before last. I am having more neuro problems and want to check if I am being complacient or what. I will know the numbers next week. Since you had 1's on each of the tests after one year, does this mean that mine should also be in the single digit after 2 1/2 years? Thanking you in advance for your response.

chgomom Enthusiast

Right all my blood work in June, was positive HIGHLY>

Then I had a subsequent series of tests...those were not as high but positive (different doc these times)

Then she runs labs the 12th....and says what she said about not having celiac...because they were negative.

Mind you I have been gluten-free since June 27th. She I don't have it.

But I have soft tooth enamel...my periods have come back being gluten free....I am deficient in all sorts of things....I have the osteo....porosis and penia....What more could there be???

And yes...the genotyping that was done were those...

bremac Apprentice

It sound like you have celiac disease to me. I don't know about the genotyping thing though. But about tTG, if it was "only" 24 to begin with, I don't think it's unreasonable that it would drop down to normal that fast. Mine was over 80 when I was diagnosed and still only took about 2 months for it to become normal. If your antibodies are low though, that means you're doing well keeping gluten free. :)

Guest nini

what your Dr. says makes no sense... of course your numbers are returning to normal, that is what is supposed to happen when you remove the offending trigger (gluten)... so she's saying because you got better on the gluten-free diet YOU DON'T HAVE CELIAC????? That's just insane. Of course you have Celiac, YOU GOT BETTER on the gluten-free diet! That is what is supposed to happen. It is only rare cases of refractory sprue where someone's numbers don't go down and they don't improve despite being on a gluten-free diet. Now, from an insurance standpoint, you almost DON'T want them to code it as celiac because you can be denied health insurance in the future because of that dx (yes it happened to me) But for them to be so clueless to think that if you get better on the gluten-free diet that must mean you don't have celiac? That's silly! Unless they meant that they expect Celiacs to get better on the gluten-free diet, which is how it should be...

sounds like a duck, walks like a duck, it's a duck...

Quack Quack!

Gamecreature Rookie

Okay, I'll say it. Find another doctor. You health is too important to rely on the treatment of someone who chooses to remain misinformed on diagnoses and treatment.

chgomom Enthusiast

Yeah she said you don't have the geen and your blood work is negative so you don't have it.

Positive blood work, and then my levels returning to normal mean enough to me....

I don't barf or hav D anymore....outside of the odd occasion where what I ate.....just doesn't agree with me...and when they did the challange...I was in the hospital within 4 or 5 days

par18 Apprentice
Tom, I have a question. I have been gluten free for over 2 1/2 years and have asked for the complete panel to be done. Which I had done the week before last. I am having more neuro problems and want to check if I am being complacient or what. I will know the numbers next week. Since you had 1's on each of the tests after one year, does this mean that mine should also be in the single digit after 2 1/2 years? Thanking you in advance for your response.

Hi,

Just saw your question. As far as I know the only way one can probably tell how well they are avoiding gluten would be a blood test or biopsy. Because I felt so fine I almost did not do the follow-up blood test this past August. It was good that I now have a reference of the anti-body counts to go by. Are neuro issues the only problems you are having? Were they the reason you went gluten free in the beginning? I quess what I am asking is whether you have noticed improvements since going on the gluten free diet 2 1/2 years ago. In my case the issues were all gastro and they have completely gone since being on the diet. I also feel very healthy and that is the main indicator for me. As far as the single digit question I don't know how much difference it makes but my lab work was done by Lab Corp in Burlington N.C.

Tom

mouse Enthusiast

Thanks Tom for taking the time to answer. I had become the classic Celiac by the time of diagnosis - 53 pound weight loss, D, bedridden, dehydrated. I had had some neuro problems that came and went for about 8 years before the Celiac diagnosis. But, when I saw a doctor for those problems they rolled their eyes. They did diagnose me with familial tremors during that time. Then this past Jan. I was diagnosed with Glutin Ataxia and I got the impression that if I remained gluten free that they should not get any worse. Then a few months ago, the neuro problems started again and even added some new neuro symptoms and that is why I asked for the blood panel to be done again. I just want to make sure that I have not become jaded and am letting gluten into my body. But, when I asked on this forum before, no one really gave me a range on where the numbers should be. By the way I am 64 years old. And I am in AZ and we use a different lab here.

chgomom Enthusiast

Shes actually a leading researcher inthe field and concentrates her practivce on Celiac disease, thats her entire clinic.

I called the office and left a message and said I need an explanation as to why they would say that when I have been gluten-free since June. Because that would change the labs, thats what you want to happen and if its not noted properly then when I move, or have other problems, I won't be treated properly.

Soooooooooooo frustrated.

I know what it is I know prior to going gluten-free all my blood work was positive,...so why ....uggghhh

mouse Enthusiast

Maybe it is just a miscommunication. It is good that you have called and asked for an explanation. But, you might make another appt. with her to get some face to face clarification.

DingoGirl Enthusiast
Makes no sense. POsitive blood work across the baord, went gluten free, now negative blood work, minus severe deficiencies and osteo. Sounds text book to me...

And the office said we know it happens all the time....so why would they not code it as such...because I'm not having the biopsy?? Soooooooooooo confused......

I mean positive blood work, and dietary response with proof in my teeth, deficiencies and osteo.....to me....if it walks like a ducks...and talks like a duck....it is a duck...

ARE THEY COMPLETE IDIOTS??? grrrrrrrrrrr......this is insane. of COURSE the levels go down with strict removal of gluten...DUH! My TGA was GREATER THAN 100 at time of diagnosis (and they stop measuring at 100). AT the four-month mark is was down to 17. I"ll have another checkup in a couple of months....and BTW my periods were almost non-events before.....very short and anemic. Within a couple of months they came back VERY strongly, and anemia is reversing - at time of dx my ferritin was 2, was up to 6 (still low but improving).

I would stay off gluten if I were you....

chgomom Enthusiast

I think maybe she forgot that I had that lab work in my file....that I had the all postive levels....

that my periods were non existent now clock work,....levels are down to "normal", no D.....but now we're left managing the deficiecies and osteo....

Someone suggested if I get noting with that message.....to go to a naturopath....I dunno about that though

I have celiac. Everyhting else is benign.....that blood work was sky high prior to going gluten free.....and now I have soooo many issues with vitamins and etc....ughhhhh

Gamecreature Rookie
I think maybe she forgot that I had that lab work in my file....that I had the all postive levels....

that my periods were non existent now clock work,....levels are down to "normal", no D.....but now we're left managing the deficiecies and osteo....

That's possible. My GI has been very good so far and seems to really understand Celiac, but I have to keep reminding him that I no longer have a gall bladder.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,137
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Kristen Wolf
    Newest Member
    Kristen Wolf
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Jenny (AZ via TX)
    • Bev in Milw
      Reading labels at dailymed.com is simpler if you’re familiar w/ gluten-free list of inert ingredients (aka ‘excipients’  allowed by FDA.      www.gluten-free.com has that list & I’ve included It’s below…. Tricky ones for me are the “4 D’s“ because names are similar. These 2 are gluten-free by ‘legal’ definition— •Dextrans - Partially hydrolyzed corn or potato starch. •Dextrose - Powdered corn starch. Other 2 need to be questioned. (Maybe ok for isolated 7-10 day Rx,   antibiotic?,  but gluten-free status needs to be verified for long term / daily use for chronic condition, like thyroid or BP meds.)   These are : •Dextrates - Mix of sugars resulting from the controlled enzymatic hydrolysis of starch. •Dextrins - Result from the hydrolysis of starch by heat or hydrochloric acid (from corn).  It can also be obtained from wheat, rice or tapioca.  (Maltodextrin on US labels MUST be corn so gluten-free.) Technically, ‘Starch’ on USDA ‘food’ labels in US must be from corn, & if not, the source must be identified.   In drugs,‘ Pregelatinized starch’ & ‘Sodium starch glycolate’ can also be from potato, rice, OR wheat.  Wheat is more likely to be found in products made outside of US (Europe) where corn is not the major(readily available & least costly) crop.     Hope this helps even though  learning sources of some gluten-free ones may make them less appealing. (And while the “Read every label, every time” for gluten is a pain, I’ve learned there are worse things than celiac dx—Allergy to corn would be at top on my list!)          Bev in Milwaukee From www.gluten-free.com EXCIPIENT INGREDIENTS IN MEDICATIONS  Aspartame - An artificial sweetening agent derived from aspartic acid. Aspartic Acid - A crystalline amino acid found naturally in sugar beets and sugar cane.  Benzyl alcohol - Made synthetically from benzyl chloride which is derived from toluene (a tar oil). Cellulose - (ethylcellulose, methylcellulose, hydroxymethylcellulose, hydroxypropyl, microcrystalline) – Obtained from fibrous plant material (woody pulp or chemical cotton). Cetyl alcohol - Derived from a fat source (spermaceti, which is a waxy substance from the head of the sperm whale). Croscarmellose sodium - An internally cross-linked sodium carboxymethylcellulose for use as a disintegrant in pharmaceutical formulations.  Comes from wood pulp or cotton fibers to form carboxymethylcellulose.  It contains no sugar or starch. Dextrans - Partially hydrolyzed corn or potato starch. Dextrates - Mix of sugars resulting from the controlled enzymatic hydrolysis of starch. Dextrins - Result from the hydrolysis of starch by heat or hydrochloric acid (from corn).  It can also be obtained from wheat, rice or tapioca. Dextrose - Powdered corn starch. Fructose - Obtained naturally from fruits or honey; hydrolyzed cane or beet sugar. Gelatin - Obtained from the skin, white connective and bones of animals (by boiling skin, tendons, ligaments, bones, etc with water). Glycerin - Historically, glycerin (also known as glycerol), was made the following ways: -  Saponification (a type of chemical process) of fats and oils in the manufacturing of soaps -  Hydrolysis of fats and oils through pressure and superheated steam -  Fermentation of beet sugar molasses in the presence of large amounts of sodium sulfite   Today its is made mostly from propylene (a petroleum product) Glycerols - Obtained from fats and oils as byproducts in the manufacture of soaps and fatty acids (may also be listed as mono-glycerides or di-glycerides). Glycols - Products of ethylene oxide gas. Hypromellose – A brand of hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (see cellulose). Iron oxide (rust) - Used as a coloring agent. Kaolin - A clay-like substance. Lactilol - Lactose derivative; a sugar alcohol. Lactose - Also known as milk sugar, is used in the pharmaceutical industry as a filler or binder for the manufacture of coated pills and tablets.   Commercially produced from cow's milk. Maltodextrins - A starch hydrolysate that is obtained from corn in the United States but can also be extracted from wheat, potato or rice. Mannitol - Derived from monosaccharides (glucose or mannose). Methyl Paraben – Comes from the combination of denatured wood alcohol and benzoic acid (benzoic acid occurs naturally in cherry bark, raspberries, tea, anise and cassia bark).  Polysorbates - Chemically altered sorbitol (a sugar alcohol). Polyvinyl alcohol – A water soluble synthetic alcohol (synthesized by hydrolysis of polyvinyl acetate). Povidone (crospovidone, copovidone) - synthetic polymers  Pregelatinized starch - A starch that has been chemically or mechanically processed.  The starch can come from corn, wheat, potato or tapioca. Shellac - A natural wax product used in tablet or capsule coating. Sodium lauryl sulfate – A derivative of the fatty acids of coconut oil. Sodium starch glycolate - Sodium salt of carboxymethyl ether of starch. Usually from potato but can be from corn, wheat or rice. Stearates (calcium, magnesium) - Derived from stearic acid (a fat; occurs as a glyceride in tallow and other animal fats and oils, as well as some vegetables; prepared synthetically by hydrogenation of cottonseed and other vegetable oils). Sucrose - Sugar also known as refined sugar, beet sugar or cane sugar. Titanium dioxide - Chemical not derived from any starch source used as a white pigment.  Triacetin – A derivative of glycerin (acetylation of glycerol). Silcon dioxide – A dispersing agent made from silicon.  
    • NoriTori
      @Scott Adams  Sure, Any and all information is welcome. Also the only was to convince my family to get tested is to get tested myself and conclusive answers. Very stubborn lot.  
    • trents
      Understood. It's very anxiety-provoking when you don't know what you are dealing with and don't know if you are attacking it correctly.
    • Heatherisle
      I have heard of NCGS, but everything is just so confusing!!! Just unsure of things as her EMA test was negative but TTG was positive @19u/ml(lab range 0.0-7.0).Apparently she also has occasional bubble like blisters in between her fingers, don’t know if that’s significant. She is triallling gluten free as suggested by the gastroenterologist after her endoscopy. Keep getting different answers when typing in her symptoms etc. Some sites say it can be possible to have coeliac, even with a negative EMA . It’s so frustrating and her anxiety levels are through the roof. I know she’s hoping it’s coeliac which is weird I know!!! But if it’s not it just means more tests. Sorry to ramble on!!!
×
×
  • Create New...