Jump to content

  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Called To Go For Endoscopy

maribeth

By maribeth
in Coping with Celiac Disease

Recommended Posts

maribeth Apprentice
maribeth
Posted

Well I had a message on my AM from the dr that's going to do the endoscopy and a colonastomy. It's been 2 months since I was told by my dr that she would make an appointment with a specialist. I have called my dr and the specialist several times to find out when I could get an appt. and never heard back til now. I've been gluten-free for about 6 weeks now. I'm not going back to eating gluten!!! I was unable to get back to the dr as they were gone for the day and won't be able to call till monday now. Probably won't get in til the end of the month or even the new year and want to go while I'm off for the holidays instead of having to miss work again. Will anything abnormal show after 2-3 months of being gluten-free. Should I perhaps not have the endoscopy? I know you're supposed to be on gluten to have the test but I'm definately not going back on gluten as I feel so good now. Have a great day. Beth

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


Guest nini
Guest nini
Posted

from what I understand if you are gluten free the endoscope won't show anything if there was damage to begin with. my personal opinion would be that you already have your answer and don't need to go through with the biopsy. I never had a biopsy and I do not doubt my dx one bit as I feel SOOOOOO much better off of gluten and I will never ever willingly go back to eating gluten again, especially not for any stupid test! You have your answer! Don't do it!

happygirl Collaborator
happygirl
Posted

If you want accurate tests, you must be eating gluten for an extended period of time.

I had positive bloodwork, and on the direction of my doctor, immediately went gluten free, had the biopsy five weeks later, and it was negative. I have since moved, and doctors look at my report and tell me I don't have Celiac...they dismiss me when I tell them the circumstances of the biopsy. They aren't interested.

Even if you go back on gluten now, it doesn't mean that damage will show up for them to diagnose.

Mary Contrary Rookie
Mary Contrary
Posted

Gee this sound just like me maribeth, I just made a thread in the wrong place..I put it in post diagnosis...but I am having my biopsy and a colonoscopy done on this Tuesday..I have however been off of wheat/gluten for 2 months now and I am finally starting to see a slowing down of my constant D...i am hoping something will still show up, surely if the villi of my small intestines is ruined it couldn't have healed up in 2 months, especially if i am still having D.

my regular Doc is awful..i made the appointment with the Gastro myself and was lucky enough to get in fairly soon...and he listened to me...i like the man alot..my regular Doc told me to go home and eat toast... :rolleyes:

oh by the way i did have blood work done and it was negative..but I am certain it is Celiacs..if you read my other post, I have had on going issues with wheat for along time...

daffadilly Apprentice
daffadilly
Posted

Everyone has to make their own decisions, I personally would skip it. Instead i would just get the Enterolab gene test... & maybe the fat absoption test, if that is clear then it really means that your villi are okay.

IMO biopsy is not necessary, if you want to a doctors permission to eat a healthy diet, then you will almost have to kill yourself first by eating gluten and then if you happen to have DQ1 genes you might not get the villi atrophy anyway - but you might get lots of other damage that they will not look for.

Even if you villi are damaged it can be spotty & if they do not take up to 15 biopsies they will surely miss it. Then there is the matter of the doctor "reading" the biopsy...

seems like a lot of trouble for nothing to me, but if you want an Official diagnosis then that is what you have to do, but you sound like you have your priorities all together already...

Helena Contributor
Helena
Posted
If you want accurate tests, you must be eating gluten for an extended period of time.

I had positive bloodwork, and on the direction of my doctor, immediately went gluten free, had the biopsy five weeks later, and it was negative. I have since moved, and doctors look at my report and tell me I don't have Celiac...they dismiss me when I tell them the circumstances of the biopsy. They aren't interested.

Even if you go back on gluten now, it doesn't mean that damage will show up for them to diagnose.

Happygirl,

I know you're seeing some specialists at well known research centres---are these the dr's who are telling you that you don't have celiac?!? I could see a GP who doesn't really know that much about celiac doing so . . . but I would expect people who are actively engaged in medical research to listen to what you have to say especially since you really know what you are talking about. Have you brought in journal articles to prove your point? How can they ignore what experts on celiac say on the matter?

Am feeling good about my decision not to go through with the biopsy at the moment (and I've been feeling ambivalent). . . . I might not have given the villi enough of a chance to get damaged and if I had gone through with it it could very well have been negative. But as is, the blood tests are strongly suggestive of celiac and my GI doc has recommended we skip the biopsy I hope that dr's I deal with in the future take that seriously.

Mary Contrary Rookie
Mary Contrary
Posted
Everyone has to make their own decisions, I personally would skip it. Instead i would just get the Enterolab gene test... & maybe the fat absoption test, if that is clear then it really means that your villi are okay.

IMO biopsy is not necessary, if you want to a doctors permission to eat a healthy diet, then you will almost have to kill yourself first by eating gluten and then if you happen to have DQ1 genes you might not get the villi atrophy anyway - but you might get lots of other damage that they will not look for.

Even if you villi are damaged it can be spotty & if they do not take up to 15 biopsies they will surely miss it. Then there is the matter of the doctor "reading" the biopsy...

seems like a lot of trouble for nothing to me, but if you want an Official diagnosis then that is what you have to do, but you sound like you have your priorities all together already...

I really appreciate your opinion, I have everything scheduled for tomorrow and am going to have it done, the colonoscopy is my main objective, I want the piece of mind that there isn't something else going on, even though I am quite sure there isn't.

And if the biopsys are negative, which it sounds like they will be, well so be it. If there is nothing else wrong with me, then that will be my answer regardless. I'll know for sure it is Celiacs, because I am already, after my two months off of gluten, starting to get. I don't need a test to verify it for me, I won't eat gluten again just for the sake of a positive test. Atleast with this disease you don't need anybody's permission or diagnosis to take care of yourself.

I'll just feel better, mentally atleast, after the colonoscopy, because there is always that nagging feeling that it could be something serious or life threatening. And as long as I'm there and prepared for it I'll, go ahead with the endoscopy as well.

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


happygirl Collaborator
happygirl
Posted
Happygirl,

I know you're seeing some specialists at well known research centres---are these the dr's who are telling you that you don't have celiac?!? I could see a GP who doesn't really know that much about celiac doing so . . . but I would expect people who are actively engaged in medical research to listen to what you have to say especially since you really know what you are talking about. Have you brought in journal articles to prove your point? How can they ignore what experts on celiac say on the matter?

Am feeling good about my decision not to go through with the biopsy at the moment (and I've been feeling ambivalent). . . . I might not have given the villi enough of a chance to get damaged and if I had gone through with it it could very well have been negative. But as is, the blood tests are strongly suggestive of celiac and my GI doc has recommended we skip the biopsy I hope that dr's I deal with in the future take that seriously.

Let's see....my doc at JH (that I love!) says that no matter what we want to call it, gluten is a problem for me (Celiac vs. gluten intolerance vs. sensitivity vs. allergy, he doesn't care).

my doc at NIH was kind of on the fence....he recognized that gluten bothered me, but didn't know about "intolerance."

a doc who used to be a leading armed forces doc (i'll leave it at that) told me basically it was all in my head

none of these are Celiac specialists...if you aren't a Celiac specialist/take a specific interest in Celiac...they don't care. I could tell you athe worst story about doc #3....it was not a pleasant app't.

And people wonder why I'm disillusioned sometimes :P

Helena Contributor
Helena
Posted

Gotta love those docs whose explanation for everything they don't know about is 'it's all in your head'! I think it is an ego thing----this way they have an explanation for everything. There's *nothing* they can't diagnose.

Well, at least the other docs believed that you shouldn't be eating gluten even if they aren't informed about diagnosing celiac.

I just thought that doctors who are at the top of their field would tend to realize that their understanding of everything that isn't in their particular research area is sketchy and that they'd look things up if they didn't know them off the top of their head. But I guess that's overly idealistic!

happygirl Collaborator
happygirl
Posted

girl, i would've thought so too.....but it is not the case for all of them, unfortunately!

hopefully, word will get out....

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):

  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      133,353
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748
    ace14219
    Newest Member
    ace14219
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.6k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):

  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Lkg5
      Unexpected gluten exposure risk from cultivated mushrooms

      By Lkg5 · Posted

      Thank’s for addressing the issue of mushrooms.  I was under the impression that only wild mushrooms were gluten-free.  Have been avoiding cultivated mushrooms for years. Also, the issue of smoked food was informative.  In France last year, where there is hardly any prepared take-out food that is gluten-free, I tried smoked chicken.  Major mistake!
    • catnapt
      results from 13 day gluten challenge - does this mean I can't have celiac?

      By catnapt · Posted

      my IGG is 815 IGA 203  but tTG-Iga is   <0.4!!!!!!!!!!!!!   oh my god- 13 days of agony and the test is negative?  I don't even know what to do next. There zero doubt in my mind that I have an issue with wheat and probably more so with gluten as symptoms are dramatically worse the more gluten a product has   I am going to write up the history of my issues for the past few years and start a food/symptom diary to bring with me to the GI doctor in March.   I googled like crazy to try to find out what other things might cause these symptoms and the only thing that truly fits besides celiac is NCGS   but I guess there are some other things I maybe should be tested for ...? like SIBO?   I will continue to eliminate any foods that cause me distress (as I have been doing for the past couple of years) and try to keep a record. Can anyone recommend an app or some form or something that would simplify this? I have a very full and busy life and taking the time to write out each symptom name in full would be tedious and time consuming- some sort of page with columns to check off would be ideal. I am not at all tech savvy so that's not something I can make myself ... I'm hoping there's some thing out there that I can just download and print out   do I give up on testing for celiac with such a low number? I am 70 yrs old I have been almost completely off gluten for the most part for about 2 yrs. I had a meal of vital wheat gluten vegan roast,  rolls and stuffing made from home baked bread and an apple pie- and had the worst pain and gas and bloating and odd rumblings in my gut etc - almost went to the ER it was so bad. I was thinking, since I'm spilling a lot of calcium in my urine, that perhaps this was a kidney stone (never had one before but there's always that first time, right?)    Saw my endo on Jan 20th and after hearing the story about the symptoms from eating that holiday meal, she suggested doing a gluten challenge. She said 2 weeks was fine- she said stopping it in the middle if symptoms got bad was fine- In the meantime I'd read that 2 weeks was not enough- called and argued with the nurse about this, but ultimately decided to stop the gluten on the 13th day and get the test done because I was in too much pain and almost suicidal and knew I could not continue.   so.............. that's where I am now I have had no bread since Sunday. I did have some rolled oats today and had some gas and bloating afterwards I did have some wheat germ in a smoothie on Tuesday and had a stomach ache later that night.   but overall I feel so much better! all the joint pain is gone! the nausea is gone. The stomach pain and gas and bloating are going away. Still a bit gassy but no more of that horrible odor. wow, that would clear a room if I was out in public!  I see a GI nurse March 4th  I hope she'll be able to help sort this out! can you think of what my next steps might be?
    • par18
      Is it gluten?

      By par18 · Posted

      Thanks for the reply. 
    • Scott Adams
      nothing has changed

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      What you’re describing is actually very common, and unfortunately the timing of the biopsy likely explains the confusion. Yes, it is absolutely possible for the small intestine to heal enough in three months on a strict gluten-free diet to produce a normal or near-normal biopsy, especially when damage was mild to begin with. In contrast, celiac antibodies can stay elevated for many months or even years after gluten removal, so persistently high antibody levels alongside the celiac genes and clear nutrient deficiencies strongly point to celiac disease, even if you don’t feel symptoms. Many people with celiac are asymptomatic but still develop iron and vitamin deficiencies and silent intestinal damage. The lack of immediate symptoms makes it harder emotionally, but it doesn’t mean gluten isn’t harming you. Most specialists would consider this a case of celiac disease with a false-negative biopsy due to early healing rather than “something else,” and staying consistently gluten-free is what protects you long-term—even when your body doesn’t protest right away.
    • Scott Adams
      Is it gluten?

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      Yes, I meant if you had celiac disease but went gluten-free before screening, your results would end up false-negative. As @trents mentioned, this can also happen when a total IGA test isn't done.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.