Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Biopsy Results


rebz

Recommended Posts

rebz Rookie

Here are my blood results.

total IgA - 4.38 g/L (0.8-2.8 normal range)

Endomysium IgA - negative

IgA gliadin - 35U/mL (15-30U/ml equivocal range)

IgG gliadin - 13 U.mL (15-30U/ml equivocal range)

IgA t-Transglutaminase 22 U/ml (normal range 0-15U/ml)

Biopsy results only showed ' subjective patchy increase in intraepithelial lymphocytes'

I am waiting for an appointment with GI doc to discuss results. Before the biopsy he said he thought it would be negative with these blood results.

I am totally confused - I think he will say that these results don't indicate celiac because there is no villous atrophy etc... I am thinking he will tell me I have IBS. Am I in denial about this do you think or are these results as borderline as I think they are...

Any comments are greatly appreciated

Rebecca


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



2kids4me Contributor

My daughter had borderline results in bloodwork too, GI said: " Her results are as low as they can get and still be called positive - I am doing the biopsy to rule out celiac as a cause for her intestinal symptoms plus we can get a better idea of what might be going on." [rather than saying - we are doing this to confirm celiac]

Biopsy confirmed celiac - subtotal villous flattening with lymphocytic infiltration.

Lymphocytes are the white blood cell that responds to antigens - be it viral, bacterial or gluten causing an immune response.

I read somewhere that dairy can cause villous blunting as well (if the person is intolerant), but not to the same degree at gluten.

IBS is not a diagnosis - its an adjective to describe inflammed bowel when they dont know the cause /havent found the cause. Many so called "IBS" patients respond very well to gluten free.

We had reduced gluten to one piece of bread or a serving of cereal in the weeks prior to biopsy, Kathryn hated eating that gluten! Even before the results were known, Kathryn decided she never wanted "that evil gluten" again.

Sandy

nikki-uk Enthusiast
Here are my blood results.

total IgA - 4.38 g/L (0.8-2.8 normal range)

Endomysium IgA - negative

IgA gliadin - 35U/mL (15-30U/ml equivocal range)

IgG gliadin - 13 U.mL (15-30U/ml equivocal range)

IgA t-Transglutaminase 22 U/ml (normal range 0-15U/ml)

Biopsy results only showed ' subjective patchy increase in intraepithelial lymphocytes'

I am waiting for an appointment with GI doc to discuss results. Before the biopsy he said he thought it would be negative with these blood results.

I am totally confused - I think he will say that these results don't indicate celiac because there is no villous atrophy etc... I am thinking he will tell me I have IBS. Am I in denial about this do you think or are these results as borderline as I think they are...

Any comments are greatly appreciated

Rebecca

It's possible that you've caught it before any real damage occured - or , damage can be patchy and maybe the biopsy sites missed it.

Something must have drove you to the docs in the first place symptom wise - so you've absolutely got nothing to lose by trying the gluten-free diet now you've had the biopsy :)

Nancym Enthusiast
Biopsy results only showed ' subjective patchy increase in intraepithelial lymphocytes'

I believe this is recognized as a pre-celiac changes I think Dr. Lewey, and others, write about this. You might want to google it up.

Here's one: Open Original Shared Link

rebz Rookie

thank you for your replies.

I shall wait and see what the GI says before making any decision on a gluten-free diet. I am reluctant to start without a definite diagnosis of celiac and these results are not convincing to me, though maybe others would think they are ?

aikiducky Apprentice

If you decide to not go gluten free at this point, in my opinion you certainly should get another biopsy some time in the future (a year or two). I think it's very likely that you're in the early stages of intestinal damage, and the most sensible thing would be to go gluten free now before any more damage has a chance to happen, but if you don't want to do that, you should have a follow up biopsy later to see if the damage has progressed.

Pauliina

ravenwoodglass Mentor
Here are my blood results.

IgA t-Transglutaminase 22 U/ml (normal range 0-15U/ml)

Biopsy results only showed ' subjective patchy increase in intraepithelial lymphocytes'

Any comments are greatly appreciated

Rebecca

Those were positive blood tests results. How many biopsies were done? 7 to 9 would be the optimum number but many doctors only take 1 to 3. You have 22 ft of small intestines, early in the disease the damage can be patchy and if the right spot is not biopsied you will not get an accurate result. If you need a good reason to stay gluten-free without a strong positive take a look at my signature. I do not show up in blood work and this delayed my diagnosis by many years. Without a positive blood test they never even thought to do an endo. I will never fully recover my brain function, after 5 years gluten-free what I live with is permanent. And I would not wish it on anyone. We do things backwards so often, doctors wait until damage is severe rather than 'inconvience' someone with a diagnosis that can prevent many other disease from ever showing up.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,162
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Jean Kemling
    Newest Member
    Jean Kemling
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      I am so sorry you're going through this. It's completely understandable to feel frustrated, stressed, and disregarded after such a long and difficult health journey. It's exhausting to constantly advocate for yourself, especially when you're dealing with so many symptoms and positive diagnoses like SIBO, while still feeling unwell. The fact that you have been diligently following the diet without relief is a clear sign that something else is going on, and your doctors should be investigating other causes or complications, not dismissing your very real suffering. 
    • Oldturdle
      It is just so sad that health care in the United States has come to this.  Health insurance should be available to everyone, not just the healthy or the rich.  My heart goes out to you.  I would not hesitate to have the test and pay for it myself.  My big concern would be how you could keep the results truly private.  I am sure that ultimately, you could not.  A.I. is getting more and more pervasive, and all data is available somewhere.  I don't know if you could give a fake name, or pay for your test with cash.  I certainly would not disclose any positive results on a private insurance application.  As I understand it, for an official diagnosis, an MD needs to review your labs and make the call.  If you end up in the ER, or some other situation, just request a gluten free diet, and say it is because you feel better when you don't eat gluten.      Hang in there, though.  Medicare is not that far away for you, and it will remove a lot of stress from your health care concerns.  You will even be able to "come out of the closet" about being Celiac!
    • plumbago
      Yes, I've posted a few times about two companies: Request a Test and Ulta Labs. Also, pretty much we can all request any test we want (with the possible exception of the N protein Covid test and I'm sure a couple of others) with Lab Corp (or Pixel by Lab Corp) and Quest. I much prefer Lab Corp for their professionalism, ease of service and having it together administratively, at least in DC. And just so you know, Request a Test uses Lab Corp and Quest anyway, while Ulta Labs uses only Quest. Ulta Labs is cheaper than Request a Test, but I am tired of dealing with Quest, so I don't use them so much.
    • Scott Adams
      PS - I think you meant this site, but I don't believe it has been updated in years: http://glutenfreedrugs.com/ so it is best to use: You can search this site for prescriptions medications, but will need to know the manufacturer/maker if there is more than one, especially if you use a generic version of the medication: To see the ingredients you will need to click on the correct version of the medication and maker in the results, then scroll down to "Ingredients and Appearance" and click it, and then look at "Inactive Ingredients," as any gluten ingredients would likely appear there, rather than in the Active Ingredients area. https://dailymed.nlm.nih.gov/dailymed/   
    • trents
      A lot to think about here. Does anyone have any recommendations for third party laboratories that will do full panel celiac screens private pay in the U.S.?
×
×
  • Create New...